Forward: A Quick Start Guide to Jumpstarting (or Starting) Your Men’s Ministry (8 minute read)
Introduction: The Men's Ministry I Know -- A History of the Modern Men's Ministry Movement in America and How my Involvement in it Led Me to Start New Commandment Men's Ministries (72 minute read)
Part 1: The Men's Ministry I Didn't Know -- Fine-Tuning Your Entire Church for Natural and "Stealthy" Men's Ministry (20 minute read)
Part 2: A Men's Ministry Men Want to Know - Fine-Tuning Your Dedicated Local Church Men's Ministry to Reach and Disciple Men to Do Good Works (82 minute read)
Appendix
The Forward section of this article on men's ministry gives brief instructions on how any layman can begin a men's ministry in his church. The Introduction provides a history of the modern men's ministry movement in America and how, through this movement, the Lord led Herb Reese to begin a men's ministry that uses teams of men to serve the widowed and single parents. Part I focuses on how churches can reach and utilize all of the men in their congregations at every level of ministry. Part II focuses on how a dedicated men's ministry can train men of God to be equipped to do all of God's good works.
Photo courtesy vtengr4047
Is your church’s men’s ministry sputtering, or maybe even nonexistent? Maybe it's time for a jumpstart.
We all know the feeling: your men’s ministry is more like a zombie convention than a recruitment center for top gun aviators. You are just going through the motions and no one really knows why you are meeting. Even worse, your men have a room temperature median age.
If you are a men’s ministry leader and I have just described your men’s ministry, here is what I suggest you do to jumpstart it:
And how are your relationships? Does your wife think she’s won the lottery because she’s married to you? Do your kids jump for joy when you get home from work? Do you pray with your family regularly?
And your neighbors, are they glad they live next door to you? Do they see the reality of Christ in your life? Maybe, for them at least, it’s just the fact that you keep your lawn mowed. Do they know you are a Christian? Are you loving them as yourself?
Fill yourself up with the power of the Holy Spirit, the knowledge of God our Father, the love of Jesus Christ and his love for the people around you. Then you will have plenty to share when it is time to minister to the men in your church.
By jumper cable, I mean relationships with other men. You can’t jumpstart a men’s ministry unless you have solid and continuous connections with other men in your church.
You don't have those kinds of relationships with men in your church? Here is a way to develop them.
Stop right now and text, email, or call a man in your church whom you respect and invite him to get together with you for lunch or coffee.
There, I did it myself. I just texted someone from church for a coffee appointment. Easy peasy.
When you get together with your friend, discuss the state of your church’s men’s ministry, if you have one. Or get his feedback on starting one. But mainly, use this time to get to know him better and to build your relationship with him.
Do this once a week with a different man each week for ten weeks. Then evaluate both the feedback you have received about your church’s men’s ministry as well as the relationships you have developed.
Turn on your ignition. Not their ignition, your ignition. Take the initiative yourself and review the initial ideas for your church’s men’s ministry that you have gleaned from your meetups with other men. Then share them with your pastor or appropriate staff person. Sound the bugle. Lead the charge.
After you have acquired permission from your church leadership to begin, ask the Lord to show you which of the men you have been talking to about men’s ministry would make good leadership team members. Maybe all of them will. Or perhaps just a few of them will. And yes, you need a team.
Now comes the hard work. Ask these men to join with you in praying and studying the Word and researching men’s ministry. Don’t assume that just because you are men and Christians, that therefore you are experts on men’s ministry. Take this process slow, invest some time and effort, and devote several months to it (but not an eternity!).
Meet regularly and discuss what you are learning with each other. Don’t approach this task with your own preconceived ideas. Listen to your men with a goal of finding unity and direction.
Men’s ministry is basically discipleship, and that means we need to know what Jesus expects of us. Check out this post: What are Your Ten Year Goals for Your Church’s Men’s Ministry?
We also don’t need to reinvent the wheel. There are a multitude of great men’s ministry resources available. Here are five men’s ministries I recommend, and here are another five.
Get out of your car, walk over to your men’s cars, get in, turn on their ignitions and step on their gas pedals.
Rev up their engines and get their batteries fully charged by first summarizing and clarifying the vision of what your small leadership group believes God wants to do with your men’s ministry, and then by listing the concrete actions steps you need to take to accomplish it.
Note that jumpstarting cars is an invisible process. There they are, two cars just sitting there connected to each other with a jumper cable. But inside that jumper cable are unseen electrons coursing through it from one charged battery to the other, uncharged battery, until both batteries share the same level of charge.
Something similar is happening during this step in your men’s ministry. Your men are sitting around discussing what they have learned over the past few months about men’s ministry.
You are distilling the wisdom you have gleaned from praying, studying, reading and talking with other men’s ministry leaders. It looks like nothing is happening during this process. But slowly, invisibly, the Spirit of God molds your minds into one unified vision and passion for reaching men.
This slow and purposeful time of prayer and discussion is critical for disseminating a unified and committed spirit among your leaders. Without it your men’s ministry will be crippled from the start.
All effective men’s ministry is a caravan: a group of Christian men heading in the same direction toward the same destination.
I have chosen the term “caravan” carefully because it expresses the concept of men moving together, of men going somewhere with each other for a purpose.
Note that the first written history of the Christian church isn’t called “The Meetings of the Apostles,” but “The Acts of the Apostles.” The Book of Acts is a history of what the Apostles did; how they, by the power of the Spirit, traveled throughout the known world, proclaimed the gospel, made disciples of Christ who did good works, and in the process, overturned their world order.
In other words, you don’t jumpstart other men’s cars so they can just sit in their cars with their engine idling and read the owner’s manual that they have pulled out of the glove compartment.
The owner’s manual is an important document, of course, and must be kept in mind while driving. But your men's cars do not exist simply so your men can read and enjoy the owner’s manual. Their cars exists so they can go somewhere. The owner’s manual just shows them how to do it.
In the same way, your men’s ministry does not exist simply so your men can study the Bible and socialize with each other. Yes, the Bible is our owners' manual, and our owner is God. It is God's manual for us.
Your men’s ministry exists so your men can obey the Bible – obey how it applies to them in their own personal lives and how it applies to others through their obedience.
Of course, they have to learn the Bible well – and learn to love the God who inspired it, along with his Son, Jesus Christ, as the Holy Spirit opens their understanding – in order to experience it. Both individual and group Bible study is essential to do this. But the goal of your men’s ministry – your caravan – is to practice, to do, the Bible, not just know it.
The interesting thing about jumpstarting a car is that sometimes, once you finally get it started, you discover the real problem the car has. Is it billowing blue smoke? The engine probably needs a ring job. Do you hear a rapid clicking sound? The rocker arms in the engine may need adjusting. Does the car make an ear-piercing squealing noise when you rev up the engine? Could be the serpentine belt or the fan belt.
The same thing is true when you jumpstart men — that is when they get saved or when they begin to take their walk with the Lord seriously. Before they can go anywhere on a “caravan trip” with you – i.e., before they can minister to others – they need to deal with besetting sin in their lives, heal their broken relationships, and become consistent in their walk with the Lord.
An effective men’s ministry is first of all a ministry that deals with the real issues your men are struggling with. Often, that is pornography addiction or other addictions, marital issues, financial issues, and self image issues. I give a picture of how a ministry can accomplish this in the lives of its men in my post, The First Men’s Breakfast.
Notice that the first verb in Christ’s Great Commission to us is “Go.”
“Go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey all that I have commanded you.” Matthew 28:19-20
Think for a moment of all the places your men will be going to after they have “fixed their cars” and go out from your men’s ministry: their home, the gas station, their work, their neighborhood, their local grocery store. They may travel somewhere on business or vacation. They may even move away. Wherever they go, the purpose of your men’s ministry is to make sure that they are radiating the reality and presence of the Lord Jesus Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit.
If you look at your men this way, you will realize that there is no such thing as a “small” men’s ministry. Even just three men meeting together will leave that meeting and go to dozens of destinations throughout the week. Ten men would impact hundreds of destinations in the same time frame. Fifty men would impact thousands of destinations.
You are a Christian today because the first disciples went somewhere and preached the gospel and obeyed all Jesus Christ commanded them to do, and then their disciples went somewhere else and did the same.
Think for a moment of the dozens, if not hundreds, of people each man in your men’s ministry meets during the week: their wife, their children, their extended family members, their neighbors, their fellow workers, people on the street, people in stores. Each one of those people will have the opportunity to observe firsthand the presence and power of the love of Christ in the lives of your men.
“The goal of our instruction is the love that comes from a pure heart, a clear conscience, and a sincere faith,” Paul writes to Timothy in 1 Timothy 1:5.
If there is one thing your men’s ministry should be doing, it is teaching your men how to deeply love people with the love of Christ. The love of Christ is unique to Christians, Jesus tells us. It is so unique that when we practice it, people automatically recognize us as Christ-followers (John 13:34-35).
This deep, profound, and unconditional love of Christ is a critical need that all people have, both unbelievers and believers. This is why we are commanded to love our fellow believers as Christ loves us, and unbelievers as we love ourselves.
A successful men’s ministry teaches men how to love the people around them, and how to surround themselves with people who love them.
Now comes the good part. And I mean quite literally the “good” part.
The Bible tells us over and over again that the reason God saves men is to do good. (Matthew 5:16; Ephesians 2:10; James 2:14-17; Titus 2:14; 3:14, etc.)
If unsaved men have a habit of leaving behind them a trail of death and destruction – toxic maleness that results in alcohol and drug abuse, pornography addiction, abuse of women, broken marriages, abandoned children, crime, gangs, incarceration, suicide, and on and on – then it stands to reason that saved men should be known for leaving behind them a trail of people overwhelmingly blessed by their good works.
Do a Bible study on good works and then show your men from the Bible what these good works look like in their families, in your church, and in your community.
Your men’s ministry should be one of the most meaningful and fulfilling spiritual experiences your men have ever had. By nurturing your own spiritual life, by making the connections with other men in your church that you need to make, by together investing time and effort into studying the Word, seeking the leading of the Spirit, and availing yourself of other men’s ministry resources, and by executing your ministry to men well, you have every reason to expect that it will be.
Okay, so we’ve learned how to jump-start a men's ministry. Now, let’s get into the nuts and bolts of men’s ministry.
I'm calling this introduction "The Men's Ministry I Know" because I have been an active participant in men's ministry for many years, beginning when I was a young teen in my church in Los Angeles in the 1960's.
This rather long introduction is a summary of my experiences with men's ministry, both on the receiving end as a youth and young adult, and on the giving end as an adult. It is also a summary of the lessons I have learned about men's ministry as a result of those experiences.
My hope is that reading this introduction will help you understand the perspective I'm coming from when I discuss what a comprehensive church-wide men's ministry can look like ("The Men's Ministry I didn't Know") in Part 1, as well as what a comprehensive dedicated local church men's ministry can look like ("A Men's Ministry Men will Want to Know") in Part 2.
But before I discuss men's ministry itself, we first have to understand the cultural context we are doing men's ministry in.
The modern American men's ministry movement that started in earnest in the 1980's arose in response to massive social changes that rocked American culture beginning in the 1960's and continuing to this day. The results of those social changes had direct adverse effects on men. I summarize these adverse effects on men by what I call "The Men's Hall of Shame."
The current abysmal state of American men originated in the 1960's when our society experienced dramatic - some might even say revolutionary - socio economic convulsions. Prior to that time, the Judeo-Christian worldview with its concomitant ethical standards dominated American culture.
Briefly stated, the Judeo-Christian worldview understood the universe to be created and governed by a personal and holy God who communicated to us in history through the Bible and his son, Jesus Christ. Viewed from this perspective, morals were considered absolute in the sense that they were given to us by God and were based on his holy character, not relative in the sense that we make morals up ourselves pragmatically as we go.
Consequently, men and women had specific social roles to fulfill that required duty and sacrifice, with men filling the roles of breadwinner and head of the home, and women filling the roles of wife and homemaker. Divorce happened rarely and extramarital sex was considered sinful and shameful. As a result, the vast majority of children in all social classes grew up in stable, two parent homes.
But starting in the 60's, the dominant sway of the Judeo-Christian worldview in American culture began to wane. In its place, a materialistic, godless, and secular worldview became the reigning social paradigm.
As a result, morality came to be seen as relative, not absolute. That is, anyone could do as they pleased, so long as they didn't hurt anyone else. Predefined social roles for men and women that required duty and sacrifice were now viewed as repressive and antiquated. Instead, self-fulfillment and equality became the modern, "liberating" ethic.
A big part of this new so-called liberation involved sex. The sexual revolution that accompanied this tectonic change in worldviews eschewed the Judeo-Christian sex ethic along with the God who authored it. Rather than limiting sex to the bedrooms of married couples, the new materialistic view of reality meant that any consenting adult could have sex with any other consenting adult any time they wanted, regardless of whether or not they were married.
We are, after all, just glorified animals and nothing more, are we not? Our culture increasingly arrived at that conclusion as a result of its new materialistic outlook. Consequently, sexual identity and sexual fulfillment became one of the key, if not the key, defining elements of what it means to be human because it is the most pleasurable and fulfilling physical experience any person can have.
At first blush, both men and women saw some clear benefits to the disintegration of static morality and social roles in American society.
Freed from the confines of their homes, children, and domineering husbands, suddenly, vast career opportunities began opening up for women that formerly had been the sole domain of men.
With the promise of increased income and financial independence at hand, women no longer felt tethered to their husbands should their marriages sour and fall apart.
Men, too, welcomed the sexual revolution with open arms. Without having to wait until marriage to fulfill their sexual desires, or at least appear to wait until marriage, men increasingly indulged their sexual lusts with abandon.
Even children, it was thought, could benefit from the new morality. With the option of divorce now more readily available and socially acceptable, dysfunctional couples could avoid torturing their children with their ceaseless marital conflicts by simply ending their marriages with the newly passed no-fault divorce laws.
But half a century later, the dark underbelly of America's intellectual and social paroxysms that began in the 1960's has become manifestly obvious.
In today's newly liberated America, marriage has been trashed and children are being increasingly abandoned by their mothers and/or fathers, albeit by their fathers at much higher rates. Men especially began spiraling downward.
Let's first look at the disintegration of marriage by considering this statement from the US Census Bureau:
"Among those ages 18-24, cohabitation is now more prevalent than living with a spouse: 9 percent live with an unmarried partner in 2018, compared to 7 percent who live with a spouse. Fifty years ago, in 1968, living with an unmarried partner was rare. Only 0.1 percent of 18- to 24-year-olds... lived with an unmarried partner, according to the Current Population Survey. In contrast to the rising rates of cohabitation, the proportion of young adults who are married has declined over time. Today, 30 percent of young adults ages 18-34 are married, but 40 years ago, in 1978, 59 percent of young adults were married." (Emphasis mine.)[note]"Living with an Unmarried Partner Now Common for Young Adults" United States Census Bureau, Benjamin Gurrentz, November 15, 2018[/note]
Now look at the impact that - according to statistics provided by the US Census Bureau - America's disdain for marriage is having on our children:
Notice that if you add the statistics together for mother only households (21%) and no parent at all households (4%), you get 25% of all children living without their father or an adult male in the home, or 1 out of 4. What that means is that American men are not only abandoning marriage, they are abandoning their own children as well.
(For an authoritative article on the biological impact fatherless homes have on children, see the the American Academy of Pediatrics study, Father Loss and Child Telomere Length: It concludes that "At 9 years of age, children with father loss have significantly shorter telomeres (14% reduction).... Telomeres are the protective end caps of chromosomes. They shorten with age and are like a biological clock. Chronic stress is associated with accelerated telomere shortening, adverse health outcomes, and possibly more rapid biological aging.")
It would be bad enough if the rejection of Judeo-Christian family values was the only male maladaptive behavior brought about by the acceptance of a godless, materialistic worldview. But unfortunately it is just one of a multitude of self-destructive and anti-social behaviors that men have adopted.
Consider the percent of people populating the following groups who are men:
It is tempting to look at these statistics on men in a clinical and emotionally detached way. But each one of them represents thousands upon thousands of adults and children whose lives have been upended by the godlessness and moral rootlessness that infects modern American culture in general and especially modern American men.
The saddest part about modern men's mass maladaptive behaviors is not only that sociologists do not know how to ameliorate them, along with the resulting cascading problems such behaviors create in the lives of those who interact with men, but that they don't even have the categories to understand them.
The reason is because sociologists and others who try to address these issues are so post-Christian in their assumptions that it is inconceivable to them that the real solutions for these culture-destroying behaviors might actually lie in the spiritual and moral realms.
Such were the circumstances that gave rise to the modern men's ministry movement.
Over the past sixty years of my adult life I have been exposed to dozens and dozens of parachurch men’s ministries. The first two that I learned about as a young man exemplify two important lessons for anyone involved in men’s ministry.
“We must pay the most careful attention, therefore, to what we have heard, so that we do not drift away…how shall we escape if we ignore so great a salvation?” Hebrews 2:1,3
I’m starting this brief and by no means complete history of men’s ministry with YMCA because, technically, it is one of the most successful parachurch “men’s ministries” ever. But I put men’s ministry in quotes here because it really is no longer a men’s ministry in the strict sense of the term.
I joke that the Young Men’s Christian Association should be called the Association – or the “A” – because it is no longer just for young men and it is no longer Christian. Instead, YMCA has become a cautionary tale that all men’s ministries should take to heart.
As originally conceived by George Williams, who founded YMCA in 1844, YMCA “combined preaching in the streets and the distribution of religious tracts with a social ministry. Philanthropists saw them as places for wholesome recreation that would preserve youth from the temptations of alcohol, gambling, and prostitution and that would promote good citizenship.”[8]
YMCA soon caught on and by 1851 had spread to 9 countries around the world. Today, YMCA is in 120 countries and boasts 64 million members, a truly remarkable achievement.
But YMCA’s success came at a cost: having gained the whole world, it lost its soul. For instance, I do not know of any YMCA today that conducts prayer and Bible reading groups the way George Williams did when he first founded the organization. And I would be very pleasantly surprised to see gospel tracts being handed out at the front desk of a local YMCA.
I personally worked in the YMCA across from McArthur Park in downtown Los Angeles when I was attending college. I knew at the time that God was calling me into ministry. When my vocational plans became known at the Y, some of my fellow staff members took me aside on more than one occasion and strenuously tried to convince me that entering the ministry would be a waste of my life!
The evolution of YMCA from a conservative, Bible believing and preaching “young men’s Christian association” into an organization that ignores orthodox Christian beliefs and even opposes them parallels the heterodoxy that has come to characterize many mainline churches, denominations, seminaries and so-called Christian colleges.
The end result is that these organizations bear primary responsibility for destroying the foundations of Western civilization and now actually promote the ensuing moral relativism and cultural disintegration I have previously described.
So much for the A.
But if YMCA and its liberal Christian cohorts failed to stem the tide of male moral declension in America, what will?
I believe the answer is clear: what transforms men is the proclamation of the gospel of Jesus Christ within the context of Christians practicing sacrifice for the benefit of fellow believers, that is, good works.
The Bible teaches that it is Christians practicing sacrifice for the benefit of others, especially others in their church, that adorns the gospel and paves the way for its broad acceptance in any culture. I offer up two men as beautiful examples of this principle.
“This is how we know what love is: Jesus Christ laid down his life for us. And we ought to lay down our lives for our brothers and sisters.” 1 John 3:16
The late Lt Col Scott Huddleson served in the Air Force’s Space Command for over twenty years before it became a separate branch of the military. Scott and I were good friends in high school. I got to know him just after his girl friend, whom he would later marry, took him to a Billy Graham Crusade, where he made a profession of faith. After we graduated high school, Scott headed to the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs while I entered UCLA. Over the years, we kept in touch.
While a cadet at the Air Force Academy, Scott became involved with The Navigators, a college and military men’s ministry known for its focus on evangelism and discipleship through Bible study and scripture memory. Soon Scott began rapidly growing in his faith.
One day I received a cassette tape (I’m dating myself!) from Scott in the mail. He had just learned about the founder of the Navigators, Dawson Trotman. Scott was so impressed by his testimony that he made an audio recording about it and sent it to me.
On the tape, Scott recounted with solemnity how Dawson sacrificed his life for a young girl who fell out of a boat they were in. Dawson jumped into the water and kept her afloat until she could be rescued. But Dawson drowned in the process.
As I listened to Scott’s earnestness on that tape, I realized that this story meant so much to Scott because he himself was expected as a member of the armed forces to be willing to sacrifice his life in service for our country. Dawson Trotman was a Christian man who had sacrificed his life in service for another human being. No wonder Dawson had such an impact on Scott.
And no wonder The Navigators has had such an impact on the Air Force Academy, a place that drills into its cadets that it is better to die with honor than to live with shame. Dawson’s selfless act perfectly illustrates this ethic. As a result, Dawson’s continuing impact has been so great among the cadets at the Academy over the past several decades that The Navigators has been sued for supposedly violating the establishment of religion clause in the Constitution! 3
Scott’s deep awe and respect for Dawson Trotman because of his sacrifice illustrates a critical principle for reaching men: men respect men who sacrifice for the benefit of others.
We see this principle lived out in real life time and again.
When a police officer dies in the line of duty, fellow officers line up by the hundreds to salute him as his body is driven away from the scene.
When a fireman dies saving the life of someone in a fire, his fellow firemen do the same thing.
When a war hero is buried, his fellow soldiers give him a twenty-one gun salute. Indeed, our entire country honors its war dead on Memorial Day once a year.
This is a universal practice: when a man gives his life for the benefit of another, other men stop in awe and pay their respects. Because of this truth about men, when Christians practice sacrifice, they “adorn the gospel.” Christian sacrifice pries open tightly closed and well-guarded spiritual, emotional, and moral doors that lead directly into the hearts of men.
In doing so, when men observe Christian sacrifice in action, it becomes natural for them to accept the One who sacrificed his life for them.
A classic biblical example of this truth is Saul, who, while standing at the scene of the martyrdom of Stephen, saw and heard his bold testimony as he was being stoned to death. That example of Christian sacrifice, along with the many other examples that Saul would soon witness later, lodged in Saul’s mind as a powerful goad until he couldn’t stand it any more.
“We all fell to the ground, and I heard a voice saying to me in Aramaic, ‘Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me? It is hard for you to kick against the goads.’” (Acts 26:14)
That is what Christian sacrifice does. It starts an internal dissonance in the soul of the unbeliever that cannot be resolved until he surrenders and believes.
But there is more to Dawson’s story and it expands on this principle: men not only respect men who sacrifice for the benefit of others, but they are also inspired by them to do the same.
Dawson Trotman’s example of self-sacrifice is well known. But what is not as well known is that when he sacrificed his life for that little girl, he was most likely inspired to do so by his own brother who had done the same thing.
That is correct. Before Dawson Trotman gave his life for a girl, his brother Roland had given his life to save the life of a different girl.
Here is how Dawson told the story about his brother’s heroic sacrifice just months before he made his own heroic sacrifice:
“When I first came to know the Lord, I talked to my brother about the Savior. He laughed at me and said, “I’m not interested. Don’t talk to me any more.” I do not talk to a man when he tells me not to, but I talk to the Lord. Three years later I said, “Roland, could I talk to you for a moment about Christ?” He said yes, and smiled a bit. The Lord had just brought him to Himself. He had seen some things that had touched his heart. Three weeks later headlines in the Los Angeles Examiner read, “Hero Gives Life To Save Girl.” How do you think I felt when I found out that my own brother was gone? What if I had not spoken to him about Christ?” 4
Think about it. Roland Trotman was a hero before his brother Dawson was. It seems that Dawson Trotman had his brother Roland’s example on his mind when he jumped out of the boat and into the water to save the life of that girl, even though he knew he couldn’t swim and might drown.
So let me say this again, men who see another man sacrifice for someone not only respect that man, but are inspired to do the same.
This is true of soldiers. When soldiers sacrifice for others, they inspire other soldiers to do the same.
This is true of police officers. When police officers sacrifice for others, they inspire other police officers to do the same.
This is true of firemen. When firemen sacrifice for others, they inspire other firemen to do the same.
And this is also true of Christians. When Christians sacrifice for others, they inspire other Christians to do the same.
“By this we perceive the love of Christ, that he laid down his life for us. And we ought also to lay down our lives for our brothers and sisters.” (1 John 3:16)
The principle of sacrifice is central to Christianity and critical to men’s ministry
The principle of sacrifice is central to Christianity and critical to men’s ministry. Until we learn how to practice sacrifice the way Christ modeled for us, we will never be effective in reaching the millions of men who need to be reached in order to make an impact on our culture.
The problem, however, is that the Navigators failed failed to communicate the importance of Dawson Trotman's example of sacrifice to the greater men's ministry community.
Dawson Trotman's Headstone
The headquarters for the Navigators is located a few miles northwest of Colorado Springs, Colorado. It lies tucked away in an idyllic and secluded valley called Glen Eyrie that marks the beginning of the Rocky Mountains.
One can find Dawson Trotman’s grave on top of a hill next to the glen on its north side. The gravesite looks down on the narrow valley and Glen Eyrie Castle.
Hiking up to the grave takes some effort, but visiting Dawson Trotman’s final resting place is a great way to honor the man who founded The Navigators and then sacrificed his life to save a young girl.
In a way, The Navigators’ physical isolation in that picturesque glen serves as a metaphor for The Navigators ministry itself: it’s a great men’s ministry, but they keep to themselves.
In my many years working alongside dozens of national men’s ministries, I never saw The Navigators make any attempt to participate in the broader men’s ministry movement, even at the height of Promise Keepers’ stadium events.
Wanting to build some bridges with The Navigators, National Coalition of Ministries to Men (NCMM) held its annual convention at Glen Eyrie some years back and I attended. NCMM even invited the President of the Navigators to be a keynote speaker. But as far as The Navigators joining with us in advancing a common men’s ministry agenda, nothing came of it.
The result is that while Roland and Dawson Trotman’s sacrifices should be held up to all Christian men and to all men’s ministries as shining examples of the kind of sacrifices Christian men should be willing to make, it still requires some effort just to learn about them.
Once we grow in Christ and become the kind of men that we are supposed to be, what are we supposed to do?
These two beautiful examples of sacrifice that The Navigators had to give to the early men’s ministry movement are the answer to an important question haunting all of men’s ministry: Once we grow in Christ and become the kind of men that we are supposed to be, what are we supposed to do? The answer that the Trotman brothers exemplify: because we have been saved by Christ’s sacrifice, in love we are to be willing to sacrifice our lives for each other.
Again, for the third time, 1 John 3:16 is worth another read.
“This is how we know what love is: Jesus Christ laid down his life for us. And we ought to lay down our lives for our brothers and sisters.” 1 John 3:16
The Navigators are a renowned men’s ministry, highly regarded in conservative Christianity. It could easily have promoted this ethic of sacrifice as exemplified by their founder and his brother to other men’s ministries. But it failed to do so at a critical time in the nascent men’s ministry movement. That failure would eventually hobble a movement that otherwise had a promising future.
Having no clear answer to the question of what Christian men are supposed to do, the early men’s ministry movement focused instead on what Christian men are supposed to be. Two trailblazing men’s ministry authors exemplify this important but limited focus.
Dr. Gene Getz
Cultures do not descend into moral depravity overnight. Mercifully, it takes time for sin to become acceptable; or, as Dr. Francis Schaeffer once put it, for “the unthinkable to become the thinkable.” But without the counterbalance of a substantial Christian response, cultures do eventually begin spiraling faster and faster downward.
“Evildoers and impostors will go from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived.” 2 Timothy 3:13
Imagine if you could travel back in time to the 1960’s, at the beginning of America’s cultural shift away from a Christian worldview to a materialistic worldview, and tell people that in just a few decades young men would, on a regular basis, begin randomly shooting people to death in schools, shopping malls, and even churches. That one of the leading causes of death among men would be drug overdose. That a quarter of all married men would abandon their children. That marriage itself would begin to disappear. That something called the Internet would play a key role in enslaving men to pornography. And that a third of all working-age men would refuse to work.
The people listening to you would have thought you were a crazy lunatic, on the level of a homeless person holding up a cardboard sign with “The End is Near!” scribbled on it.
What has now become a massive avalanche of male moral chaos was by 1974 — the year Dr. Gene Getz published his groundbreaking book, The Measure of a Man — a relatively harmless ball of snow slowly rolling down the hill. America had yet to see the culmination of sin and vileness that men are capable of.
The Measure of a Man is based on a simple idea: use the lists of qualifications for elders found in 1 Timothy 3:1-7 and Titus 1:5-9 as the standard, or “measure,” for what a mature Christian man looks like; what a Christian man is supposed to be.
That clear biblical concept took off. Since Gene Getz wrote The Measure of a Man almost fifty years ago, over 1 million copies have been sold worldwide, it has been translated into dozens of languages, and it has never gone out of print. (Here is my review of The Measure of a Man and here is my interview with Gene Getz.)
The simplicity of The Measure of a Man reflects the simpler times it was written in. For example, there is no hall of shame section in Getz’s book, the kind of section that I wrote at the beginning of this article and that also often appears in more recent men’s ministry books.
Neither is there any reference in The Measure of a Man to men’s ministry specifically. Dedicated men’s ministries in local churches were still almost completely nonexistent. Rather, the book addresses Christian men as part of their larger local church.
And finally, there is no rousing call in The Measure of a Man for Christian men to rise up against the increasingly secularized culture around them and do something. It just hadn’t dawned on anyone yet how bad things would get.
By 1982, the year Ed Cole published Maximized Manhood, that snowball of male dysfunction had gotten much larger and was rolling ever faster downhill.
Just eight years after Gene Getz published The Measure of a Man, it was becoming increasing clear that our materialistic and secular culture, and the sexual revolution it had spawned, were taking a wrecking ball to the American family.
The natural response on the part of Christians was to prioritize the importance of family (hence the rise of Focus on the Family) and the role Christian men needed to play in restoring the family institution to a healthy state.
Enter Edwin Louis Cole, often referred to as the founder of modern men’s ministry, and his book, Maximized Manhood: A Guide to Family Survival.
The thesis of Cole’s book is that the ultimate purpose of a Christian man in an increasingly godless culture is to establish a healthy marriage and produce Christian children by being a “maximized man,” i.e. the kind of husband and father God wants a man to be. (Here is my review of Maximized Manhood.)
Biblically speaking, it is undeniably true that Christian men ought to be good family men. Gene Getz was right when he applied the qualifications for elders (and, I might add, deacons as well) to all Christian men. And Ed Cole was right to emphasize the same family values in his book. Being a good family man plays a central role in all three lists of elder and deacon qualifications.
[An elder must be] faithful to his wife….He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him, and he must do so in a manner worthy of full respect. (If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God’s church?) 1 Timothy 3:2, 3-5
A deacon must be faithful to his wife and must manage his children and his household well. 1 Timothy 3:12
An elder must be blameless, faithful to his wife, a man whose children believe and are not open to the charge of being wild and disobedient. Titus 1:6
But there is one problem.
But the problem with both Gene Getz’s and Ed Cole’s approach is that there is a difference between being qualified to do something as opposed to doing it. If one focuses only on attaining the qualifications to do something, then the thing that one is qualified to do will never get done.
For example, we can think of the qualifications necessary to be a fighter jet pilot: patriotic, fearless, quick learner, fast decision maker, able to fly a fighter jet, and a willingness to sacrifice one’s life, are some of the possible qualifications that come to mind.
Now these are all great qualities. It would be fantastic to personally have all of these qualities in and of themselves.
But qualifying to fly a fighter jet as opposed to actually getting in and flying the fighter jet in a war are two very different things.
Qualifying to fly a fighter jet is what the pilot is. But flying the fighter jet and helping to win the war against a terrible enemy is what the pilot does. If qualifying men to be fighter jet pilots is the only function of an air force, it will lose the war.
In the same way, the qualifications for church leaders in 1 Timothy 2 and Titus 1 are not goals, but means for achieving the goal: that of mature Christian men joining with other believers in fighting the battle against Satan himself and accomplishing the amazing good God saved them to do. If qualifying men for church leadership is the only function of men’s ministry, it will lose the spiritual war.
Unfortunately, the modern men’s ministry movement has been losing the spiritual war in America for the last fifty years because it has failed to make this distinction: we keep focusing on what men are supposed to be as opposed to what we are supposed to do.
Just a few days ago I came across the following men’s ministry page on a church’s website and it perfectly exemplifies the current men’s ministry focus on what Christian men are supposed to be as opposed to what Christian men are supposed to do:
You’re invited to join North Valley Men in a journey exploring biblical masculinity. Men will get the chance to meet and get to know other men and receive some excellent practical teaching.
This is a great opportunity to help fathers and husbands lead their families. It will also help single men to mature in their manhood, and young boys will learn what it means to be a man! Don’t miss the journey.
Volume 1 – A MAN AND HIS DESIGN (Completed Sept 2020 – Oct 2020)
Volume 2 – A MAN AND HIS STORY (Completed – Feb 2021 – March 2021)
Volume 3 – A MAN AND HIS TRAPS (Completed – Aug 2021 – Sept 2021)
Volume 4 – A MAN AND HIS WORK (Completed Feb 2022 – April 2022)
Volume 5 – A MAN AND HIS MARRIAGE (Coming soon – Aug 2022 – Sept 2022)
Volume 6 – A MAN AND HIS FATHERHOOD
Just by looking at the volume titles on the above website page, it is obvious that 33 The Series considers marriage and fatherhood to be the culmination of a Christian man’s purpose, the ultimate reason he has been saved, or, as Ed Cole put it, his “maximized manhood.”
But being a good husband and father, as wonderful and critical as these things may be, are mere qualifications for doing something far greater: that of leading the church into battle by being willing to sacrifice one’s life in the fight against Satan, in propagating the gospel, and in accomplishing massive good.
We’ve seen how modern men’s ministry is making the mistake of not distinguishing between what Christian men are supposed to be as opposed to what Christian men are supposed to do. So what? What’s the big deal?
The big deal is that the entire future of Christianity in America depends on men’s ministry getting this right, that’s the big deal.
I’m going to give you an example of what happened when just one pastor made this mistake of confusing being with doing. Then I’m going to give you another example of how a major men’s ministry made this same mistake, even though it knew better, but this time it had national repercussions. I’ll start with the pastor first.
I am that pastor.
Dan was a funny guy. He was an civil engineer and he had an engineer’s personality: shy and difficult to talk to. He hardly ever said a word. After I officiated his wedding to Teresa, Dan developed a peculiar habit. Every Sunday evening following church, he would wait until everyone had left. Then, without saying a word, he would silently walk around the church with me while I locked up. When I finished, he would smile and say “Goodnight Pastor,” and leave.
That was it, Sunday evening after Sunday evening. It was as if the Spirit of God was telling me, “Take note of this man. I don’t want you to forget him. I’m going to use Dan to teach you something.”
Then God did something with Dan that was totally unexpected. Shocking even. After several months of that Sunday evening ritual, Dan was diagnosed with terminal metastatic bone cancer and died a few weeks later. He and Teresa had been married barely one year.
Teresa was paralyzed with grief.
As her pastor, I did everything I could to comfort her, but nothing I said or did helped.
Of course, pastors see a lot of death. And eventually I got used to that. But witnessing happily married women like Teresa become widows, sometimes without any warning whatsoever, gutted me. Every. Single. Time.
Maybe I was sick the day this topic was covered, but in my four years of seminary I do not remember any professor giving a lecture on how to minister to widows. And I majored in pastoral ministries! (This is what I wish I had learned in seminary about ministering to widows.)
Each time a woman in my congregation crossed that deep, dark emotional abys into widowhood, I would tell myself, “This time I will do better by her. This time I will be more empathetic. This time I will be more committed. This time I will visit her more often. This time I will spend more time in prayer for her. This time….”
But pastors are busy people. I certainly was. I would visit the grieving widow once, maybe twice. But eventually other ministry pressures would force me to move on, with one more guilt-brick for my pathetic effort loaded into to my emotional backpack.
Our church wasn’t large enough to have a paid congregational pastor, so I tried assigning widows to our deacons, the way many smaller churches often do. After all, serving widows is why the office of deacon was instituted in the first place. My deacons were responsible to call their widows and check on them once a quarter. But I knew the calls were stilted and perfunctory, something to check off their to-do list before an upcoming deacon meeting.
In the meantime, I had only a limited awareness of the spiritual battle that Teresa was fighting; indeed, the spiritual battle that all Christian widows fight. It would be years later, after talking with widows around the country about their experiences, that I gained a deeper understanding of what Christian widows go through when they lose their husbands.
If I were to sum up in one word how Christian widows feel about becoming a widow in their church it would be the word abandoned. I hear it again and again. Believing widows who have faithfully served in their churches, often for their entire adult lives, feel abandon by their fellow believers.
There are several reasons why this is true.
First of all, churches are geared towards families. Why? Because families are the future of the church, aren’t they? Believing this is true, churches organize their budgets, staff, and programs accordingly.
But when a wife looses her husband, she presents at church as just a single person, not as part of a family. Her children are grown and gone. Her husband is gone. It’s just her. Suddenly, everything that seemed relevant to her as a wife seems irrelevant to her as a widow.
Then there is the problem of time that I previously mentioned. Pastors and pastoral staff are busy. So they treat widows as a short term, burdensome problem.
But, as any widow will tell you, widowhood is not a short term problem. The emotional, spiritual, social, physical, and financial issues they face after losing their husbands are long term, often lasting years and even decades. Churches are not set up to address such long term needs.
Another problem is cultural. American culture does not facilitate spontaneous interaction between unrelated individuals on a daily basis. Instead, we socialize, especially in suburban America, in isolated “bubbles.” There is our home bubble, our neighborhood bubble, our work bubble, our church bubble, our hobby bubble, etc.
Because we normally socialize only in our bubbles, we frequently do not learn what is going on in the other bubbles a widow is involved in. We just see her at church in our church bubble and assume she is fine.
Sadly, there is widespread ignorance among Christians, even among pastors, about the importance the Word of God gives to ministering to widows. I could easily give you forty biblical passages, some of them extensive, that teach about the importance of meeting the needs of widows.
The office of deacon was instituted specifically to minister to widows. James writes that the highest expression of our faith is to visit widows and orphans in their distress. Paul gives extensive instructions in 1 Timothy 5 about which widows should be put on the church’s support list. I could go on.
But even worse, there is also willful disobedience to the Word of God on the part of the church when it comes to how it treats its widows. For example, how many churches do you know that actually have a “widows list” as described in 1 Timothy 5?
These failures on the part of the church are not inconsequential for widows. Rather, they are extremely detrimental to them because they contradict the practice of love of Christ, and that at their greatest time of need.
All of these issues surrounding widows came crashing down on me when I made my second follow-up visit to Teresa’s home a few months after Dan died.
I parked in Teresa’s driveway, walked up to her house, and knocked on the door. Teresa opened the door and greeted me with a forced smile tacked onto an ashen face. I walked into her barely lit living room and sat down. The one lamp fighting the darkness was the only light turned on in the entire house.
As I sat and talked with Teresa, I learned something tragic. Every night since Dan died she had cried herself to sleep on the hardwood floor in that living room. She couldn’t bring herself to sleep in her bedroom because it reminded her too much of Dan. She had been doing this for several weeks.
Suddenly, deep conviction pierced my heart. Our church was supposed to be this great bastion of love, the very love of Christ in fact, and yet our paltry practice of this love had no relevance at all to this desperate young widow sitting in front of me contorted with grief.
I managed to blurt out a few more shallow words of comfort, closed with a quick prayer, and then fled to my car in the driveway. There I pounded the steering wheel and wept. I had failed Teresa and I had failed Dan. One more abandoned widow. “Lord, show me how to minister to this woman!” I cried out.
I didn’t know it at the time, but I was struggling with the being but not doing problem. Our church leadership was completely focused on being the kind of men we were supposed to be, but not on doing the kind of things we were supposed to do.
I met the biblical qualifications for an elder and my deacons met the biblical qualifications for deacons. In fact, there were many men in our church that met all the qualifications for both deacons and elders.
But we were ignoring the things we were supposed to do. For example, we were excelling at being good family men, but failing to do what we were supposed to do for our widows, not to mention our single moms, and our fatherless children.
Or, to use the analogy I used in my previous post, we were qualifying our leadership to be fighter jet pilots, but we were not getting into our fighter jets and risking our lives for a greater purpose.
And what were we supposed to do for these dear people in our church? The Bible says we were supposed to guarantee their wellbeing by laying down our lives for them.
Here is a fourth reading of 1 John 3:16, but with expanded context:
We know love by this, that He laid down His life for us; and we ought to lay down our lives for the brothers and sisters. But whoever has worldly goods and sees his brother or sister in need, and closes his heart against him, how does the love of God remain in him? Little children, let’s not love with word or with tongue, but in deed and truth. (1 John 3:16-18)
By focusing only on marriage and family in our church – on what we were supposed to be as good husbands and fathers – our men were marginalizing those not in a family at all, even though they were a part of the family of God. We were loving them in word only, but not in deed. How cruel.
But how could we change? Little did I know the answer would be found at a Promise Keeper’s stadium event.
And that brings me to my second example; the major men’s ministry that confused what Christian men are supposed to be with what Christian men are supposed to do, even though it knew better.
Coach Bill McCartney
Late last year, on the morning of December 30, 2021, an unseasonably hot, 90 mile an hour windstorm tore out of Eldorado Canyon, where the Rockies meet the high plains just a few miles south of Boulder, Colorado, and a few miles north of my home.
That hurricane force windstorm caught a spark, fanned it into flames, and then dragged them east across the crispy dry shortgrass on the southern edge of Boulder County until they reached the densely populated Denver suburbs of Superior and Lewisville.
I watched my TV in horror as Jeff Todd, my friend, neighbor and a reporter for Denver’s local CBS affiliate, CBS4, reported on what would be one of the defining stories of his career: the destruction by fire of over 1,000 homes in less than twelve hours.
The exact cause of the Marshall Fire, as it is called, hasn’t been determined yet. But one leading theory is that an unseen subterranean coal seam fire in the area, one that started in a coal mine almost 140 years ago and has been smoldering underground ever since, made its way to the surface and became the source of that inferno.
The Marshal Fire was not the first fire of enormous consequence to race out of Boulder County, Colorado and gain national attention. Another inferno, this one spiritual in nature, was sparked thirty years earlier by Bill McCartney, a CU Boulder Buffs football coach. (Read my interview with Bill McCartney.)
That spark burst into flame and exploded almost overnight into a nationwide movement of the Spirit of God among hundreds of thousands of Christian men who, like that smoldering coal seem, had themselves been smoldering for decades with holy discontent just beneath everyone’s radar.
For many conservative Christian men in the early 90’s, the modern godless American culture growing around them like kudzu had become unrecognizable. It felt at the time like our spiritual lives were being strangled to death, creating a siege mentality in our ranks. All that was needed was someone with spiritual passion and vision who could tap into this massive discontent and give it expression. Bill McCartney was God’s man to do just that.
Bill McCartney rose to fame, not as a spiritual leader, but as a college football coach who turned the so-so CU Buffs football program into a football powerhouse that went all the way to the national championship in 1990. But that was just one of Coach McCartney’s many accomplishments as CU’s head football coach.
To quote from CU’s Athletic Hall of Fame, “Bill McCartney first set foot on the University of Colorado campus in Boulder in June 1982; little did he know at the time that almost 13 years later he would retire as the winningest coach in CU football history. “Mac” was 93-55-5 in 13 seasons at the reins of the Buffaloes, guiding the program to its first national championship in football in 1990 and to more bowl games, nine, than any before him. He coached Colorado to three Big Eight titles, 10 consecutive winning seasons in league competition and a 58-29-4 mark in conference play, all of which remain school bests.” 4
However, Bill McCartney was not just a football coach, he was a Christian football coach who proclaimed his faith on and off the field every chance he got. Having just won the national college football championship in 1990, “Coach” sensed that he could use his growing fame and influence to further the cause of Christ on a national scale.
During a fateful car ride from Boulder to Colorado Springs, while Coach talked with Dave Wardell, a gymnastics coach at CU Boulder, along with two other men, they came across the idea of holding Christian men’s rallies in football stadiums that would focus on men keeping their promises, their promises to their wives, their children, to God, and to their church.
As the four men talked about the possibilities of utilizing the increasingly popular form of contemporary worship being implemented in churches, along with testimonies from leading Christians, and compelling preaching from well-known pastors, they sensed the Spirit of God leading them to start a new men’s ministry organization, Promise Keepers.
Thus, on December 3, 1990, Promise Keepers was officially founded. The first stadium event, held at CU Boulder’s event center in 1991, drew 4,200 men. Promise Keepers continued to host stadium events in Colorado each year until 1994, when it held 7 stadium events in 7 cities around the country and drew 278,000 men.
By 1995 PK stadium events had spread to 13 cities and was consistently garnering national headlines. 5 By 1996, PK held events in 20 stadiums, and in 1997, besides its stadium events, Promise Keepers hosted “Stand in the Gap: A Sacred Assembly of Men” at the National Mall in Washington, D.C. Attendance estimates at Stand in the Gap range from 600,000 to over one million men.
All in all, an estimated total of 7 million men attended PK stadium events and the national mall event during the 90s. At its height, PK’s annual budget was over 100 million dollars and it boasted a full time staff of more than 300. 6
One of those 7 million attendees was myself.
At the time all of this was happening with Promise Keepers, I was serving as the pastor of my church in Quincy, Illinois, the same church that Dan and Teresa attended. Having heard reports of the success Promise Keepers was having around the country, I began taking vans of men from my church to the conferences, starting in 1995 with PK’s Indianapolis stadium event at the RCA Dome.
If you combined a raucous NFL football game with a Billy Graham crusade, along with a rock concert, a 50,000 voice all male choir singing at the top of their lungs, throw in a half-time locker room style exhortation from Coach Bill McCartney himself, then add some of the greatest preaching in America, along with testimonies from major Christian athletes, all of this encapsulated in 17 hours over two days, you get an idea of what Promise Keepers stadium evets were like.
PK stadium events were like nothing any of us Christian men had ever experienced anywhere else; they were like being in heaven itself. I personally witnessed thousands of men come to Christ at the four stadium events my men and I attended from 1995 to 1998. I also saw thousands of Christian men rededicate their lives to Christ.
It felt like, finally, something was happening, some huge work of the Spirit was responding to the tsunami that was secular American culture.
Unfortunately, that feeling would prove to be transient in nature. The reason is because Promise Keepers did not adequately answer this question: what now?
To illustrate what the being but not doing problem was for Promise Keepers, I am going to quote 2 Timothy 3:16-18, an important biblical passage that relates to men’s ministry and to what Promise Keepers was attempting to do. But I am going to leave something out. Read the quote and then guess what it is that I left out.
From infancy you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness.
Did you guess what it was that I left out?
What I left out is the ending: …so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.
Promise Keepers was great at making men “wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.” It was great at “teaching” all of the “God-breathed Scripture.” It was great at “rebuking” us for our unrepented sin. It was great at “correcting” us in our relationships, It was great at “training us in righteousness,” such as how to maintain sexual purity through accountability groups. But 1 Timothy 3:16-18 teaches that all of this is “so that” we will be “equipped for every good work.”
But at no time do I ever recall any emphasis on being thoroughly equipped for every good work. What are these good works that we are supposed to do?
There was nothing at all at any PK event that I attended about good works. Nothing. It was all about being, but nothing about doing.
“What do we do now?” That was the question on everyone’s mind in our church van as we drove home to Quincy from our first PK event. As we talked about what we had just experienced, someone had a suggestion.
“Pastor, we need to start a men’s ministry at our church.” I agreed. But then I thought, “How in the world do I do men’s ministry and how do I find time to do it? Just what I need, one more responsibility.”
The next year I made another trip with my men to PK’s second conference at Indianapolis’ RCA Dome. We still hadn’t gotten a men’s ministry off the ground at our church and I knew my men were going to get all fired up at the conference again and want to start one. So I decided that during a break I would browse the conference book center PK had set up down on the football field.
As I browsed the various items Promise Keepers was selling, I came across a booklet entitled, “Focusing Your Men’s Ministry.” I bought it, shoved it into my conference tote bag, and promptly forgot about it until a few weeks after the conference.
Little did I know the impact something in that booklet would have on me, on Teresa, and on thousands of men, widows, single moms, and fatherless children for decades to come.
As we drove home after that second PK event, sure enough, one of my men asked me again if we could start a men’s ministry.
“Yes. This time we will do something. I promise.”
A team with their care receiver
"Treat younger men as brothers, older women as mothers, and younger women as sisters, with absolute purity." 1 Timothy 5:1-2
I wish I could say that after years of studying and preaching the Bible, I eventually gained enough insight into the importance of ministering to widows and others with long term needs that I came up with the idea of using teams of men to serve them.
But that is not how it happened. Men's team ministry to widows (and single moms and fatherless children) was not my original idea. Rather, I got the idea from Promise Keepers, where men's team ministry was described in the back of one of their booklets; the one entitled "Focusing Your Men's Ministry" that I purchased at their Indianapolis stadium event and then stuffed into my tote bag and forgot about.
It wasn't until weeks later, when I recalled my promise to my men that I would help them start a men's ministry at our church, that I remembered that booklet. I got my conference tote bag, poured out the contents on my desk, and found what I was looking for.
It was lunchtime and I decided I would take the booklet with me to Sprouts Inn, a restaurant down the street from my church. As I sat there eating lunch, I read through "Sharpening Your Men's Ministry" and came to the appendix entitled "Examples of Successful Men's Ministries."
As I read the descriptions of the men's ministries the booklet listed, the following example jumped off the page at me. I quote parts of it here so you can read it yourself.
"Grace Community Church, Lincoln, NE
Size: 220 (70 men), Average Age: 30
PHILOSOPHY OF MINISTRY
Grace Community Church has the atmosphere of a small-town country church in the heart of the city. Their men's ministry is eight years old.
Their men's ministry is developed, organized and orchestrated to fit within their philosophy of ministry: to reach out and win others to Jesus Christ, to disciple them to Christian maturity and service, to come together to worship the living God and glorify Him, and to build strong families and homes, and therefore a strong church. Because one-fourth of the women in the church are widowed, divorced, single, or abandoned, a major thrust of the men's ministry is to support these male-less environments. (Emphasis mine.)
STRUCTURE
The structure of the men's ministry uses small groups (2 to 5 men) within a large group setting...
Each team is responsible for three to five of the women (widowed, divorced, abandoned, or single) mentioned before. They provide home and car repair services, do yard work, and offer the kind of moral support that is missing in the women's homes. Twice a year the women are invited into the homes of the group's members where they are treated to expressions of love and concern in a family atmosphere around the dinner table. The women know they can count on these men in times of need.
EFFECTIVENESS
GCC has seven small groups that range from 2-5 men in a group, a total of 55 men. They are nearing 100% involvement for the men in their church!
The church has seen five or six men come to Christ through their men's ministry. One of the biggest blessings is seeing men who had been lukewarm for years now on fire."
As I read the above men's ministry description, I almost jumped out of my seat. "This is exactly what Teresa needs!" I thought.[note]Over the years I have learned that the newly widowed also need emotional support in the form of various counseling resources. I discuss what these are in my article, "A Comprehensive Church-Based Widows Ministry."[/note]
There were several things that impressed me about this particular men's ministry.
As I read through this description of Grace Community Church's men's ministry, I could see that all of these men's ministry elements had immediate positive implications for Teresa and others in our church with long term needs. I was so excited about the possibilities for our men and for Teresa and others in need that I began contacting men in my church immediately to see if they were interested in starting a men's team ministry like this. In all, sixteen men volunteered.
I began by dividing us into four teams of four men each and then I identified four potential care receivers in our church: the newly widowed Teresa, a single dad who was disabled with epilepsy, a single mom who was disabled with Crones, and another single mother of three children who was on welfare.
We committed to serving in the homes of our care receivers for two hours every other Saturday morning and began the ministry with high expectations.[note]In my next pastorate I changed the service model to one Saturday morning a month.[/note]
After just a few months I observed several things. First of all, for the first time I noticed Teresa coming to church with a genuine smile on her face. She had her own team of men who were faithfully taking care of her. I could almost physically feel my guilt-brick for failing Teresa that I had in my emotional backpack fall out. The other three care receivers were also extremely blessed by their teams.
Then there were the men. Just like the men of Grace Community Church in the Promise Keepers booklet, our men became very passionate about the ministry. In fact, the team assigned to the single mother of three children who was on welfare got her qualified for a Habitat for Humanity home, recruited and organized additional volunteers, and then built her a home!
One of their teams faithfully served their care receiver until she passed away. At the funeral, her team members volunteered to be her pall bearers. As they carried her coffin out of the church, someone took their picture and it appeared on the front page of Quincy's newspaper, along with a story about their service to her. What a beautiful witness to the love of Christ!
And finally, there was the impact our men's team ministry had on me personally.
The next two years were a spiritual renaissance for me. As I studied the Word, I kept seeing things relating to our men's team ministry that I hadn't noticed before. It was as if Jesus was walking and conversing with me on my own "road to Emmaus."
It was during this time that I realized how important and pervasive the topic of ministry to widows is in scripture. It wasn't just by accident that the early church focused so many of its resources on widows, but by design, and in fulfillment of both Old Testament teaching and Jesus' teaching.
I also learned to see the practical implications of the church as the ultimate family, the eternal family of God, and that we really are to treat fellow believers as actual family members.
I discovered how loving like Jesus Christ involves a set of practices that includes identifying with someone, committing to them, and sacrificing for them.
Also during this time, the concept of hesed love in the Old Testament took on new meaning for me as I learned about how important our New Covenant relationship is as a church.
The whole men's team ministry experience was a wonderful culmination to my ten years of ministry in Quincy. In 1999 I received a call to pastor a church in Broomfield, Colorado, a suburb of both Denver and Boulder. Our family wound up living just a few miles from CU Boulder.
Little did I know how significant it was that the Lord had moved me and my family almost next door to the birthplace of Promise Keepers...and next door to the ashes of its demise.
The Marshal fire — that fire in December of 2021 that destroyed over 1,000 homes in Boulder, Lafayette, and Superior, Colorado — left block after block with homes flattened down to their cement basement foundations, with only the occasional charred chimney still standing.
Driving around and surveying the devastation, one can easily remember the vibrant communities that once lived there. But all that is left now are just memories.
Like the burned over subdivisions destroyed by the Marshal fire, it is a sad commentary on Christian revivals that the areas where revivals have occurred are sometimes referred to as “burned over districts.” This was certainly the case for western New York in the early nineteenth century. There religious revivals broke out so often that it eventually became difficult for evangelists to hold any more. This is what the evangelist Charles Finney observed about western New York:
“I found that region of country what, in the western phrase, would be called, a ‘burnt district.’ There had been, a few years previously, a wild excitement passing through that region, which they called a revival of religion, but which turned out to be spurious.” … “It was reported as having been a very extravagant excitement; and resulted in a reaction so extensive and profound, as to leave the impression on many minds that religion was a mere delusion. A great many men seemed to be settled in that conviction. Taking what they had seen as a specimen of a revival of religion, they felt justified in opposing anything looking toward the promoting of a revival.”3
In a sense, the Denver/Boulder metro area in 1999, the year I moved there to pastor a church, could be described as a burned over district. The national Christian men’s revival that was Promise Keepers had pretty much run its course. While Promise Keepers was still drawing 300,000 to its stadium events nationally in 1999, that number was way down from it previous highs in the mid 1990’s. Suffering massive financial problems and seeing the writing on the wall, PK cancelled its planned millennial march that year. The march was supposed to take place at 50 state capitals on New Year’s Eve. By 1999, PK had even been banned by CU Boulder from using its stadium for future events.
As a result, I arrived in the Denver/Boulder region to find it filled with thousands of men who had attended a Boulder Promise Keepers stadium event and who had experienced “a very extravagant excitement,” but now were left with only memories, along with a question: What do we do now? In addition, there were the hundreds of men who had quit their jobs and careers to work for Promise Keepers at its headquarters in Denver, only to be laid off two or three years later and who were now burned out.
Was Promise Keepers all “a mere delusion”?
No, it was not. Here are several reasons why.
First of all, there were thousands upon thousands of men who came to faith in Christ through Promise Keepers. PK stadium events were possibly the most effective means of evangelizing men in American history.
Promise Keepers also raised the awareness of the need for dedicated men’s ministries in local churches. Whereas men’s ministries in churches were almost unheard of prior to Promise Keepers, following PK they became quite common.
Additionally, Promise Keepers fostered the birth of dozens of national and regional parachurch men’s ministries that exist to this day. My ministry, New Commandment Men’s Ministries, is one example.
And finally, Promise Keepers proved to the world that there are millions of Christian men in America “who have not yet bowed the knee to Baal;” that is, they have not bought into the prevailing materialistic worldview.
But if this is so, then why the decline of Promise Keepers?
The fact of the matter is, in spite of all of its success and blessings — in spite of all its “promise,” so to speak — in 1997 Promise Keepers went into a very steep nosedive from which it never recovered. Here are some of the reasons why.
Putting together a staff of hundreds in just three or four years and getting it to work in unison proved to be difficult. One staff member told me that it seemed like everyone came on board with their own hidden agendas.
Bill McCartney was first and foremost a very successful and famous college football coach who knew how to motivate men to levels of performance they had never dreamed of before. But he had not been trained in ministry or in nonprofit administration. His spiritual depth and influence were wonderful. But some of his ministry decisions seemed impulsive and counterproductive and his board either couldn’t or wouldn’t stand up to him and tell him when they thought he was wrong.
By holding its national Washington DC conference, called Stand in the Gap and attended by over 600,00 men, in October, 1997, Promise Keepers forced men to choose between attending it and attending the regional stadium events that were also being held that year. In essence, Promise Keepers was competing against itself. The result was less attendance at stadium events and a loss of momentum.
At the same time, Promise Keepers stopped charging for its stadium events, this while also incurring huge costs from Stand in the Gap, creating a severe cash shortage that forced it to lay off hundreds of staff.
Then in 1999, Promise Keepers had to cancel its Millennial March — the march on all fifty state capitals on New Years day, increasing the perception that it was on the ropes.
But the final death knell happened in 2003 when Promise Keepers took a ham-handed approach to racial reconciliation at a stadium event for pastors that resulted in the alienation of thousands of pastors. Losing the trust of its pastors would be the final nail in the PK coffin. (My next chapter will focus on this topic.)
Finally, PK never answered the question, “What do we do now?” satisfactorily for its men. Unfortunately, while PK had the answer to this question hidden away in its own literature, it did not take it seriously enough to promote it. Consequently, time and again, men leaving the stadium events knew what kind of men they were supposed to be, but they didn’t know what kinds of things they were supposed to do.
Everything about Promise Keepers was calibrated to impress: the massive stadiums, the huge crowds, the incredible music, and the eloquent speakers. It all added up to an exhilarating experience. This desire to wow people, to overwhelm them with the reality of, not just tens of thousands of Christian men, but hundreds of thousands of Christian men worshipping together in unison, was especially true of Stand in the Gap, the culmination of PK’s stadium events at the National Mall in Washington, DC.
In some ways, Stand in the Gap resembled Jesus’ triumphal entry in the gospels.
When he drew near to Bethphage and Bethany, at the mount that is called Olivet, he sent two of the disciples, saying, “Go into the village in front of you, where on entering you will find a colt tied, on which no one has ever yet sat. Untie it and bring it here. If anyone asks you, ‘Why are you untying it?’ you shall say this: ‘The Lord has need of it.’” So those who were sent went away and found it just as he had told them. And as they were untying the colt, its owners said to them, “Why are you untying the colt?” And they said, “The Lord has need of it.” And they brought it to Jesus, and throwing their cloaks on the colt, they set Jesus on it. And as he rode along, they spread their cloaks on the road. As he was drawing near—already on the way down the Mount of Olives—the whole multitude of his disciples began to rejoice and praise God with a loud voice for all the mighty works that they had seen, saying, “Blessed is the King who comes in the name of the Lord! Peace in heaven and glory in the highest!” And some of the Pharisees in the crowd said to him, “Teacher, rebuke your disciples.” He answered, “I tell you, if these were silent, the very stones would cry out.” (Luke 19:29-40)
Here we see several similarities between Stand in the Gap and the triumphal entry. Both Stand in the Gap and the the triumphal entry were the culminations of years of previous grass roots ministry in the countryside of their respective nations. Both drew huge crowds. Both came victoriously to their capital seats of national power. Both were highly emotional, joyous events. Both glorified God. And both got the attention of everyone in their capitals, especially the attention of their political and religious leaders. (But even the triumphal entry wasn’t broadcast live in its entirety by CSPAN to the entire US!)
There are other parallels as well. Both Stand in the Gap and the the triumphal entry preceded periods of rapid decline in the respective ministries involved. I’ve already noted what happened to Promise Keepers after Stand in the Gap. So, too, within a week of Jesus’ triumphal entry, almost all of his disciples abandoned him and even the dozen that remained wound up arguing among themselves. Even worse, one of his disciples betrayed Jesus, resulting in his crucifixion. After the triumphal entry, Jerusalem, like Western New York and Boulder/Denver, soon became a “burned over district” filled with discouraged and disappointed disciples.
But they were wrong because they had an inadequate understanding of God’s entire agenda; they had no idea of God’s plan to redeem believers through the death of his Son and to form a church that was made up of those believers.
Of course, the crowd at the triumphal entry did understand some parts of God’s agenda correctly: Jesus was indeed the predicted messiah and the future king of Israel who would rule the world, and Jesus was fulfilling prophecy when he entered Jerusalem riding on a donkey. In this sense the crowd rejoicing at Jesus’ triumphal entry was absolutely expressing the right response. But otherwise, they were clueless to the rest of God’s plan.
In the same way, like the disciples at the Triumphal Entry, the attendees at Stand in the Gap had an inadequate agenda. What they were doing was fantastic, but it was also incomplete. The difference, however, is that the crowd at the triumphal entry didn’t fully know God’s agenda because it hadn’t been told to them yet. They had no answer to the question, what do we do now? But the men and their leaders at Stand in the Gap should have known God’s full agenda because it has been clearly given to the church.
So what is the agenda that God has given the church? Here it is, in all of its majestic simplicity:
“Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and love one another.” 1 John 3:23
This summary of God’s agenda for Christians that John gives us in 1 John 3:23 is in two parts. The first part covers our relationship with God while the second part covers our relationship with our fellow believers.
Another way of looking at these two parts is the first part covers our spirituality — our salvation and current walk with God through faith in his son, while the second part covers our practice — what we are to do as a result of our salvation and walk with God.
We can summarize Promise Keepers’ understanding of the church’s agenda this way:
“Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and love each other by being a good Christian family man, and by being racially reconciled.”
At its stadium events and at Stand in the Gap, Promise Keepers fulfilled the first half of this agenda brilliantly. Thousands of men came to saving faith in Jesus Christ because of Promise Keepers. In addition, we were exhorted in our spiritual disciplines like prayer, Bible study, and fellowship. We were also encouraged to deal with any ongoing sin in our lives that breaks our fellowship with God.
But with respect to the second half of the church’s agenda, Promise Keepers fell short. PK, like so many men’s ministries, placed a strong emphasis on marriage and family. And following Bill McCartney’s lead, PK also emphasized racial reconciliation. But it ignored a critical part of what it means for believers to love each other.
As a result, we are going to see that, while family relations and race relations are laudable areas to focus on, they represent an inadequate understanding of God’s full agenda for the church, putting the attendees at Promise Keepers events in a similar position to the crowd at the triumphal entry: that of not having an adequate answer to the question, “What do we do now?”
“Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and start loving each other by first doing whatever it takes to meet the pressing needs of your fellow believers — especially the pressing needs of your widows — with additional applications of what it means to love each other to follow.”
It is true that very early in its history the church had to deal with the thorny issue of race relations. And eventually the church also had much to say about a Christian view of marriage and family. But these, and other “additional applications,” such as the well known “one anothers” in the epistles, were not the first and most important priorities of the church.
Rather, contrary to the way Promise Keepers understood the church’s agenda, the early church’s very first priority was doing whatever it took to make sure every believer had their “pressing needs” met (Titus 3:14) so that it could proudly say to the watching world, “There is no needy person among us.”
“God’s grace was so powerfully at work in them all that there were no needy persons among them. For from time to time those who owned land or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales and put it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to anyone who had need.” Acts 4:33-354
We see the early church reasserting this priority of meeting the pressing needs of its impoverished members, especially its widows, again and again throughout the Book of Acts (Acts 2:42-47; 4:32-37; 6:1-7; 20:32-35) and, indeed, throughout the rest of the New Testament (Galatians 2:10; James 1:27; 1 Timothy 5:3-16; 1 John 3:16-18; 1 Timothy 6:17-19; Titus 3:14, etc.). It did so because it was inconceivable to them that they could love each other the way they were commanded to while at the same time ignore some of their members who were living in extremis.
In addition, the early church had the example of Jesus on the cross entrusting his mother Mary, herself a widow and single mother, into the care of John. The importance of this act cannot be overstated, for it provided a beautiful example of how Jesus expected the church to care for all of its widows and single moms.
Thus, following Pentecost, the early church had a clear answer to the question, “What do we do now?”
“What we do now,” they realized, “is do whatever it takes to meet the needs of our widows, single moms, fatherless children, and others with long term pressing needs.”
One of the things that separates the triumphal entry (and Stand in the Gap) from Pentecost is that at Pentecost, both God and God’s people had complete and aligning agendas. That is, God’s people knew what God was doing and what God wanted them to do, and then they did it.
This is why we talk about the meetings of the Promise Keepers, but we talk about the acts of the apostles and their disciples. It is also why the triumphal entry and Stand in the Gap burned out, but Pentecost never did.
And the irony of it all, an irony that Promise Keepers never picked up on, is that solving its impoverished believers problem eventually also helped the early church move towards racial reconciliation.
From its beginning, Promise Keepers put a huge emphasis on racial reconciliation. And heaven knows that Americans, and White Christian Americans in particular, need to be reminded on a regular basis that racism is a blight on our country and contrary to everything Christianity stands for.
Without having to say a word, Promise Keepers showed by example the blessings that come when the love of Christ reigns in the hearts of people of different races.
The first and most prominent way PK promoted racial reconciliation was with its programming. At stadium events, minority — especially Black — worship leaders, musicians, MC’s, and preachers were well represented.
The second way PK promoted racial reconciliation was with its staffing practices. As the organization grew, it consistently sought out leading minority talent from around the country, with the result that 27% of PK’s staff was minority. A prime example is Dr. Raleigh Washington, who eventually became the President of Promise Keepers.
As magnificent as Promise Keepers was in exemplifying racial reconciliation in practice, there was one event where PK stumbled badly, and that was the pastors conference in Phoenix in February, 2003. This was the second pastors conference PK hosted. The first was in Atlanta in 1996.
The Atlanta conference had 36,000 pastors in attendance, and while there was an emphasis on racial reconciliation at that conference, the primary focus was on edifying and building up the pastors in attendance in their spiritual walk.
I did not attend the pastors conference in Atlanta, but the pastor who went with me to the Phoenix pastors conference had attended the one in Atlanta and talked glowingly about it. But he soon realized that something about the Phoenix conference was very different.
The theme for the Phoenix conference had been announced as “Come Near to Me,” a theme that suggested to him and to me that this conference, like the previous pastors conference, would be about deepening our spiritual walk with the Lord; that the theme, “Come Near to Me,” was describing God speaking to us and and inviting us to “come near” to him.
As it turned out, we were greatly mistaken. Instead of the conference being about having a greater spiritual depth to our relationship with the Lord, the conference was actually all about racial reconciliation. The “Come Near to Me” theme was intended to refer to minorities inviting whites to “come near” to them. This, in spite of the fact that there had been nothing in the promotion of the event mentioning racial reconciliation.
Over the course of the weekend, there was a Black presentation on racial reconciliation, then a Hispanic presentation on racial reconciliation, then an Asian presentation on racial reconciliation, then an American Indian presentation on racial reconciliation. There was even a Hebrew/Christian presentation on racial reconciliation. That was the entire conference!
And on top of it all, we were left with the same old “being without doing” problem every PK conference had: we were told to go find a Black (or Hispanic, or Asian, or Native American Indian, or Hebrew Christian) pastor and befriend him. That was it.
I remember my pastor friend telling me after the conference that he had been so encouraged as a pastor at the Atlanta conference, but now he just felt depressed. In reality, we had been the victims of a bait and switch.
And we were not alone.
As it turned out, the individual responsible for overseeing surveying the pastors as they exited the Phoenix conference later joined my non profit’s board. He said the response in Phoenix was really bad. The pastors attending felt betrayed and angry, like they had been tricked. Promise Keepers never again regained the trust of those pastors. It was another unforced error on PK’s part, and another bullet to its foot.
The moral: you cannot force racial reconciliation.
Therefore if you have any encouragement from being united with Christ, if any comfort from his love, if any common sharing in the Spirit, if any tenderness and compassion, then make my joy complete by being like-minded, having the same love, being one in spirit and of one mind. Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves, not looking to your own interests but each of you to the interests of the others. In your relationships with one another, have the same mindset as Christ Jesus.
Of course, cultures and races have clashed since the beginning of time. Discrimination, prejudice and bigotry seem endemic to the human condition.
But there was one group of people who succeeded, for the most part, in overcoming vast differences in cultural practices and racial preferences during a time of increasing diversity and rapid change. That group of people comprised the early church.
The first Christians knew one thing: Christ had died a horrible death for their sins in order to reconcile them to God, and now the risen Christ intended for them to be reconciled to each other the same way; that is, by sacrificing for each other. “In your relationships with one another, have the same mindset as Christ Jesus.”
Thus, when it came to the concept of reconciliation, the early believers had two things going for them: they had a clear picture of what reconciliation looks like, and they knew specifically what to do in order to accomplish it.
From the very first days of the church, believers enjoyed a high sense of reconciliation with each other. “They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and sincere hearts,” we read in Acts 2:46. Again, in Acts 4:32, Luke tells us, “All the believers were one in heart and mind.” In other words, these believers just liked being around each other.
Later, Paul would write an even more vivid description of what reconciliation is like: “Therefore if you have any encouragement from being united with Christ, if any comfort from his love, if any common sharing in the Spirit, if any tenderness and compassion, then make my joy complete by being like-minded, having the same love, being one in spirit and of one mind. Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit,” Philippians 2:1-4.
Notice the nouns Paul uses here:
What Paul is describing here is a healthy community of human beings who are completely reconciled to each other and who feel utter joy while being around each other. They are this way because of their shared faith in Jesus Christ.
But how? How did these believers achieve and maintain this amazing state of unity?
The first believers were determined to achieve one thing in particular: that there be no needy person among them. They accomplished this task by voluntarily liquidating their personal property to meet pressing needs as they became apparent (Acts 4:34-5:4), by sharing their food and possessions with each other (Acts 4:32), by stressing the importance of work (Ephesians 4:28), and even by taking on second jobs (Acts 20:32-35).
Paul summarized these attitudes and practices of the early believers beautifully when he wrote in Philippians 2:3-4, “Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves, not looking to your own interests but each of you to the interests of the others.“
But soon a problem arose. The apostles began discriminating against the Hellenistic Jewish widows when they distributed food and this caused dissention. As a result, the church instituted the office of deacon and appointed seven of them to oversee this ministry (See Acts 6:1-6).
While native Jews and Hellenistic Jews were not racially distinct, they were culturally distinct. Hellenistic Jews were from Greek sections of the Roman empire and were, therefore, looked upon with suspicion by native Jews. Thus, by instituting the office of deacon, the early church accomplished “cultural reconciliation,” an accomplishment so impressive that it resulted in the conversion of a large number of priests (Acts 6:7).
That is cultural reconciliation.
But soon the church expanded to include Gentile as well as Jewish believers. And at this point the church began wrestling with genuine racial prejudice. Numerous issues arose with the introduction of Gentiles into the church: Should Gentiles be required to be circumcised? Are Jewish and Gentile believers on equal footing before God? Should Jewish believers eat with Gentile believers?
Besides resolving these issues on a theological basis — and on one occasion through a divine vision — a primary way the Apostle Paul encouraged racial reconciliation between Jew and Gentile was with his Gentile collection for “the saints in Jerusalem,” that is, for the poorest of the poor believers in the Jerusalem church. This mission to the church in Jerusalem was a major part of Paul’s ministry. In fact, he devotes two chapters to this topic in 2 Corinthians.
“This service that you perform is not only supplying the needs of the Lord’s people but is also overflowing in many expressions of thanks to God. Because of the service by which you have proved yourselves, others will praise God for the obedience that accompanies your confession of the gospel of Christ, and for your generosity in sharing with them and with everyone else. And in their prayers for you their hearts will go out to you, because of the surpassing grace God has given you. Thanks be to God for his indescribable gift!” (2 Corinthians 9:12-15)
That is racial reconciliation.
It was mid September, 1965, and it was my first day back at school after summer vacation. I was now officially a proud 8th grader at Audubon Junior High School.
After lunch, I walked across the hot asphalt that was our “athletic field” to my science class in the temporary prefab classroom that had been hastily installed to house the increased number of students caused by the baby boom.
When I entered the classroom, I found an empty table and chair, plopped my books on the table and myself in the chair, and looked at the chalkboard up front.
And there it was.
On the chalkboard, written in beautiful cursive, was a message to us students from a Commander in the California National Guard. It turned out that my science classroom had been used by this Commander as his command post during the six day long Watts riots, which had occurred a month earlier.
The note he left thanked us for the use of our classroom, and for the use of our asphalt athletic field as a staging area for his guardsmen and their vehicles. And then he concluded by saying that he hoped that nothing like this ever happened again and that blacks and whites could live together in harmony.
The Watts riots were a traumatic event for me. Our home was just outside the curfew zone and for six nights I and my family watched from our second story balcony as business after business on the horizon went up in flames like tiki torches.
Riding in our car to church that Sunday morning along Crenshaw Boulevard, the western boundary of the curfew zone, we passed national guardsmen on the street corners sitting in their jeeps, rifles in hand, along with blocks of stores with boarded up windows, some with “Black owned” spray painted on the plywood.
Unfortunately, following the Watts riots, the hope expressed by that commander for peaceful coexistence between blacks and whites in Los Angeles was dashed to pieces almost thirty years later by the Rodney King riots.
By 1993, the year of those second riots, I and all four of my siblings had moved out of our childhood home. Mom had passed away, leaving my widowed father to ramble around alone in that huge four bedroom house.
Over the course of the almost three decades since the Watts riots, things had gotten much worse in our neighborhood. “Boyz in the Hood,” the all too realistic Hollywood movie about black gangs in Los Angeles, was filmed just five blocks away from Dad’s home.
Just a few months before the Rodney King riots, Patti and I made the mistake of taking a vacation to California from Texas and stayed overnight with my father. That night we heard people yelling and screaming, gunshots being fired, and a LAPD helicopter flying overhead shining a searchlight on the neighborhood. It was terrifying.
But in the morning, my father, who was in his late 80’s and almost completely deaf, knew nothing about it because he hadn’t heard it.
For years the family urged our father to move. It was just too dangerous. Dad had been robbed at gunpoint, assaulted, carjacked at gunpoint, and had his home set on fire. But he wouldn’t budge.
“That can happen anywhere,” he would say every time someone did something awful to him.
Finally, in exasperation, we gave up badgering him and assumed he was going to eventually die by being murdered.
Then the Rodney King riots happened. My family already had a heightened concern for Dad’s safety, who was now in his 90’s. But the Rodney King riots sent it off the charts.
Over a period of five days, more than 50 people died in the riots and 2,000 were injured. 1,000 buildings were damaged or destroyed and 12,000 people arrested. It took 10,00 National Guard troops, 1,100 Marines and 600 Army soldiers to quell the violence.
But unlike the Watts riots, which happened only near our home, this time the destructive mayhem of the Rodney King riots surrounded it.
My sister, who was Dad’s primary care giver, lived about twenty miles away from Dad’s home. But the riots made it too dangerous for her to get to Dad and take him to her house.
But then something remarkable happened. Dad’s black neighbors took it upon themselves to protect him and make sure his needs were met. They checked in on him constantly and, since he couldn’t go to the grocery store himself due to the violence, they brought him food.
I know this sounds like simple stuff, but it was so comforting to me and our family to know that Dad was being cared for this way. Even now, decades later, it brings tears to my eyes as I write about it. As a result, I have a deep love and affection for those black neighbors who came to my elderly father’s aid in his time of need.
That is racial reconciliation.
As I conclude this section on Promise Keepers, I have so many fond memories. But I also have one deep regret.
If only Promise Keepers had taken more seriously its example of the men’s ministry at Grace Community Church in Lincoln, Nebraska. Image what could have happened if PK had championed men’s team ministry to widows, single moms, and fatherless children to the tens of thousands of men attending just one of its stadium events.
“Hey, everyone, we want to draw your attention to the men of Grace Community Church. They are using teams of men to serve their “male-less households” and they are seeing amazing results. We want to encourage you to follow their example and go back to your churches and form your own teams to serve the widows and single moms in your church. And we also want to encourage you to use your teams to reach out to African American and Latino widows and single moms. Let’s see if we can get 1,000 churches with men’s team ministries!”
Promise Keepers could have accomplished with just one stadium event what it has taken me twenty years and almost one million donor dollars to do with my ministry.
And what if Promise Keepers had promoted men’s team ministry in every one of their stadium events? If they had, there would be tens of thousands of churches with teams of men serving hundreds of thousands of widows, single moms, and fatherless children to this very day.
But it was not to be.
Instead, the Lord took an unsuspecting pastor, who thought he would always be a pastor, turned his life upside down, and sent him on a mission.
As we have seen in my previous posts, 1999 wasn’t exactly a banner year for men’s ministry in America. By then Promise Keepers was in rapid decline, which was validated by its cancellation of the Millennial March that was supposed to take place on New Years Eve at all 50 state capitals.
I, on the other hand, was extremely optimistic about men’s ministry. I had just arrived at my new pastorate in Broomfield, Colorado and I was eager to get settled into my new church.
After a few months, I began talking to my board and other leaders in the church about the possibility of starting a men’s team ministry for our widows and single moms. I shared how God had blessed the men’s team ministry in my previous church and how much the widows, single moms, and the men involved in men’s team ministry enjoyed it. It didn’t take long for the entire church to catch the vision and for the board gave me an enthusiastic yes.
One change I made in the men’s team ministry model for my church in Broomfield was to reduce the frequency of service days from three hours on two Saturday mornings a month to three hours on one Saturday morning a month. Having lived in three large cities for many years (Los Angeles, Dallas, and Houston), I knew that the pace of life in suburban metro areas was much more hectic than it had been in Quincy, Illinois.
The change turned out to be a good decision. As the ministry developed in Broomfield, I could see that the less frequent service days didn’t impact the quality of the ministry and kept the men fresh for long term ministry.
The response to my appeal to the men of the church for volunteers was excellent. Out of a congregation of 250, 40 men volunteered for the ministry, enough for ten teams of four men each.
“There shall be no poor nor beggar among you: that the Lord thy God may bless you.” Deuteronomy 15:4
“There were no needy people among them.” Acts 4:34
“Let our people learn to engage in good deeds, to meet pressing needs, that they may not be unfruitful.” Titus 3:14
With ten teams, we had enough to provide a team for every widow and single mom in our church who needed and wanted one. We launched into the ministry with great eagerness and, as the months went by, I was not disappointed.
In fact, the ministry was so successful, after several months of faithful service, I could stand up in the pulpit one Sunday morning and make the following announcement: “Because of our men’s team ministry to our widows and single moms, to the best of my knowledge, there is no unmet pressing need in our church.”
What a blessing it was to be able to say that. When a men’s ministry eradicates all the pressing needs in their church, it has really accomplished something.
But it wasn’t just the fact that the pressing needs of our widows and single moms were being met, it was also the quality of relationships that were being developed and the testimony in the community that our teams and their care receivers had. We were experiencing the reality of the love of Christ in our congregation, the “fruit” that Paul mentions in Titus 3:14.
Here are some examples:
One of the first things I noticed about men’s team ministry is that the practice of a team meeting in the home of their care receiver every month on a regular basis provides opportunities for the team members to learn things about their care receiver that they might never have known by simply seeing her at church every week.
For example, a care receiver that one of our teams worked with, I’ll call her “Mary,” was a divorcee who struggled with depression. Over the course of several months, Mary’s team learned that she had a son who, while working on a fishing boat in the Pacific, fell overboard and was never found. She told them that she dreamed all the time about him coming home and knocking at her door.
Her team learned something new about Mary that they had never known before, even though they had known her for years.
Eventually Mary developed terminal cancer and her team faithfully walked with her through that trial until she died.
Those men would not have come to know Mary the way they did, and Mary would not have had the kind of care from the church that she had, without our men’s team ministry.
Our youth pastor, a young single woman, had a team assigned to her. One day she asked her neighbor, a single mom with two teen boys, if she would like to share her team with her. After explaining what her team did, her neighbor eagerly said yes.
Several months later, our youth pastor’s neighbor asked us if we would start a Bible study in her home. (She grew up in a Christian home, but had gotten away from the Lord.) Then she went door to door on her block and begged her neighbors to come to the Bible study. She told us she said to them, “You’ve got to meet these guys. You’ll never believe what they do for me!”
I call that reaction “the woman at the well effect” (John 4:28-20) and it illustrates how observable and public the love of Christ becomes when teams of men serve widows, single moms and fatherless children.
Some of the most enjoyable experiences I have had with men’s team ministry have been watching teams develop real compassion for for their care receivers that motivates them to do amazing things on their behalf.
I have already mentioned in a previous post how one team in my first men’s team ministry built a habitat for humanity home for their care receiver, a single mother of three children.
Something similar happened in this second men’s team ministry.
One of our teams had been assigned to “Joan,” a long time divorcee who had raised a daughter on an executive assistant’s salary. Over the years she saved enough money to purchase a small home. But she didn’t realize how expensive maintaining a home could be and began gradually depleting her remaining savings.
Eventually, Joan’s team learned about her financial situation. Realizing she had an unfinished basement, the team volunteered to put in a rental unit for her to supplement her income. Joan had enough in savings to cover the cost of the required materials and the men donated their time and labor. The project took a year and a half, but they succeeded in installing a kitchen, bathroom, living room and bedroom.
To increase the public exposure of our men’s team ministry, we began meeting at a McDonalds on our service day at 7 am before we split up into our teams and went out to serve our care receivers. But because we needed some privacy, we met in the playground area of the McDonalds, which created quite a spectacle: 40 grown men sitting in little chairs in an indoor playground.
After months of doing this, “Lucy,” who worked behind the counter, asked us who we were and what we were doing. When I told her, she said she was a single mother and asked if she could have a team come over.
I told her we would be delighted to serve her. So the next month we formed a team for Lucy, showed up at her home, and did some projects for her. When we asked her what she would like us to do for her the following month, she couldn’t believe we were coming back. She began crying so hard, she couldn’t talk.
“Eunice” was an elderly widow and a long time member of our church, so it was natural for us to assign a team to her. Since she heated her mobile home during our long, cold Denver winters with firewood, one of the first projects my team (I was a member of her team) did was cut and stack two cords of wood for her. (One cord of wood is 4 feet high, 4 feet wide, and 8 feet long.)
We did several other projects for her over the course of a few months until one day, Eunice called the church to ask for a ride to her doctor’s office to see her for a sinus infection. I was free that afternoon, so I volunteered to take her.
We waited together in the clinic until her name was called, and to my surprise, when it was, she asked me to come with her and meet her doctor. I demurred, but she insisted. Finally, I relented and sheepishly went with her into the exam room.
When her doctor came in, he looked at Eunice and then pointed to me and asked her, “Who is he?”
“Oh, this is my pastor!” she said excitedly. “He is on my team of four men from church. They come out to my home once every month and do whatever needs to be done around my home!” Then she proceeded to list all of the projects we had done for her.
While she was rambling on and on about her team, the doctor just stood there akimbo and looked back and forth at us. When she finally finished, he paused for a couple of seconds and looked at both of us again. Then he shook his head and said, “I have never seen anything like this in my life!”
Inviting me into a medical exam room may have been extreme, but Eunice illustrates an important point: Men’s team ministry to widows, single moms, and fatherless children gives these dear care receivers a bullhorn for the gospel. They regularly brag to everyone they know — their friends, their neighbors, their relatives, their fellow workers — about their church’s men’s team ministry and how their team expresses the love of Christ to them through regular, committed service.
It is not just care receivers who get excited about men’s team ministry. Care givers get excited about it too. In fact, when men experience in practice what the love of Christ looks like in relation to the widows and single moms in their church, they get downright passionate about it.
That passion spilled out one Saturday morning when my team was painting Eunice’s porch. One of my men suddenly put his paintbrush down, turned around and said, “Pastor, this is so biblical. Why don’t other churches do this?”
I turned to him and shrugged my shoulders, “I don’t know,” was all I said.
We returned to painting Eunice’s porch, but the seed had been sown.
“Why don’t other churches do this?” I thought. I decided right then and there that I was going to pray seriously that other churches would.
The Mesa Trail is one of my all time favorite Colorado hiking trails. It begins at El Dorado Canyon near where I live and runs seven miles north along the base of the Rockies all the way to the Flat Irons and Chautauqua Park in the heart of Boulder. Along the way, there are beautiful vantage points that overlook Boulder and the northern suburbs of Denver. The whole area is what the locals call “the front range.” It wasn’t long after I moved to Broomfield that I began hiking this trail on a weekly basis.
After that experience on Eunice’s porch, I decided to combine my love for hiking the Mesa Trail with my burden to pray for opportunities to share the vision of men’s team ministry to widows, single moms and fatherless children with churches in my area. Whenever I came to an outcropping that gave me a good view of the front range, I would stop and pray for God to grant me favor in the eyes of pastors in the communities I could see.
I didn’t realize it at the time, but this particular section of the front range that I was praying over was also the Promise Keepers burned over district. In fact, at the northern end of the Mesa Trail, one can look right down on CU Boulder’s campus and on the very stadium where Promise Keepers started.
I didn’t have to wait long for the Lord to answer my prayer.
Soon after I started praying on the Mesa Trail, I was out on my front lawn when my neighbor, John, who lived in the house two doors down, walked over to talk with me. We had met briefly before, but I didn’t know much about him other than that he was a part time pastor in Boulder.
“Hi, Herb,” John said smiling as he walked up to me. “I’ve been thinking. We don’t know each other very well. I was wondering if you would like to go out to breakfast with me tomorrow morning.”
“Wow! Nice neighbor,” I thought. I told him I would love to do that.
So the next morning we met for breakfast and had a great time of fellowship. As we talked, I shared excitedly with John about how God had blessed the men’s team ministries in my past two churches.
Later that evening John called me. “Herb, I’ve been invited to speak to a men’s group in Boulder tomorrow morning. But I’m wondering if you would speak instead of me and share what we talked about this morning.”
It was late at night and I didn’t have time to properly prepare, but I jumped at the opportunity anyway and said yes.
John picked me up at 6:00 am the next morning. As we drove, I had a picture in my mind of a small group of men sitting around a table at a restaurant like Denny’s. But when we arrived at the meeting, I discovered something quite different. To my surprise, it was the Boulder Men’s Christian Fellowship.
I had never heard of the Boulder Men’s Christian Fellowship before, but I learned that it was a group of about forty men from churches all over the front range who had been meeting every Friday morning for twenty years.
Suddenly I realized that God had specifically answered my prayer and had given me a wide open door to talk about men’s team ministry to the exact kind of audience I had prayed for.
John introduced me to the MC for the meeting, who told me that they would begin with singing and then he would introduce me and give me twenty minutes to speak.
It is extremely unusual for me to do any speaking without detailed preparation, but I had a quiet confidence that morning that the Lord had put me there and that He would give me the right words to say.
And he did.
When it was my turn to speak, I introduced myself and explained how I had used teams of men to serve widows, single moms, and fatherless children in my pastorates. Then I told story after story of how the ministry impacted both the widows and single moms, as well as the men who served them.
When I finished and sat down, there was complete silence in the room. And then something remarkable happened. One by one the men stood up, some with tears running down their faces, and said that God had spoken to them that morning and that they needed to do this ministry in their churches.
Then, after the meeting finished, men began coming up to me individually. One of them said to me, “I’ve been attending this fellowship for twenty years and I have never seen these men respond this way before.”
Another gentleman spoke with me and asked if I could come and speak to the men in his church about men’s team ministry. I said I would be glad to and asked him when he wanted me to come.
“I want you to come Saturday morning, June 15,” he said, without any hesitation.
I agreed to go and we shared our contact information. But I thought the date was odd because, at the time, it was quite a ways off. He was very specific and confident, though, that that was the exact date he wanted me to speak on.
June 15, 2002, it turned out, would become much more than just a speaking engagement at a local men’s group. It would be the date God welded together in my mind a tragic event in my extended family with my thoughts on men’s team ministry to widows, single moms, and fatherless children.
I was so excited about being asked to speak to a church’s men’s group about men’s team ministry that I found it difficult to wait the several weeks it took for June 15 to roll around.
“Why couldn’t we set a date sooner?” I wondered impatiently.
I knew that being asked to speak at Boulder Men’s Christian Fellowship, and now being asked to speak for this upcoming church men’s meeting, were specific answers to my prayers that I had prayed on the Mesa Trail. I had been praying that God would open up opportunities to share about men’s team ministry with churches in the Boulder/Denver north metro area, but what I didn’t know was that I had made my scope too narrow. The Lord, it turned out, had bigger plans.
Saturday morning, June 15, finally rolled around. I had studied and prepared diligently for this day and I went to bed the night before with great anticipation.
But early in the morning my cell phone rang and woke me and Patti up. It was my sister calling from Whittier, California, to tell us that her husband had just died from complications from hepatitis C.
Patti and I knew that my brother-in-law was sick, but this was not expected.
Shocked by the news, I decided to cancel my speaking engagement. But later that morning I reconsidered and decided I should go. After all, wasn’t this appointment a specific answer to my prayers?
I managed to get in a few more hours of fitful sleep and then, with a heavy heart, I drove out to the church and spoke to their men about men’s team ministry to widows, single moms, and fatherless children. I must have been on autopilot because I don’t remember anything I said.
But I do remember what Patti said to me when I got home.
She opened the door, greeted me with a hug, and, with tears in her eyes, asked me, “Isn’t it ironic that you just spoke to a men’s group about men’s team ministry to widows, single moms, and fatherless children and your sister is a brand new widow and single mom, and her daughters are now fatherless?”
It was true. My brother-in-law was 48 when he died, leaving my sister with their two teenaged girls to raise by herself in Southern California. Complicating matters was the fact that I and my two brothers lived far away from them. It would be impossible for us to be of much practical help going forward.
The one thousand mile drive from Denver to Los Angeles is at times majestic and beautiful, but mostly it is utterly desolate. Either way, it gives one plenty of time to think. And time to think was what I needed because my sister had asked me to officiate the funeral.
It was on one of the desolate stretches of endless highway out in the middle of nowhere, probably somewhere in Utah or Nevada, that I had a strange experience. As I drove along, I was praying and meditating about what I should preach on when suddenly I felt a deep conviction that I should speak to the church about men’s team ministry.
At first I resisted because I thought it would be weird and imprudent. But the more I resisted, the deeper the conviction became. In fact, it came to feel like an unbearable burden had fallen on me out of the sky. Finally, I acquiesced and told the Lord I would preach on it.
“This must be what the Old Testament prophets meant when they wrote about ‘the burden of the Lord’,” I thought. That conviction that I must preach on men’s team ministry to widows, single moms, and fatherless children, and that I would be woefully disobedient if I didn’t, stayed with me the entire time I was in Southern California.
First Evangelical Free Church of Fullerton, or Fullerton EvFree, as it is commonly called, is the church where the funeral for my brother-in-law was to be held. My sister and her husband were active and well known members of the church, so a large crowd was expected
EvFree is an interesting church. It is a mega church that serves as an anchor church for the conservative Christian community in the southwestern suburbs of Los Angeles. It is also known as the church that the national radio teacher, Dr. Chuck Swindoll, pastored during the late twentieth century before he became the President of Dallas Theological Seminary.
The church sanctuary seats about 2,000. Immediately behind the sanctuary is a chapel that seats 500. To one side of the chapel, a wall of large panels can be rolled back, exposing a giant banquet area and kitchen.
By the time my family and I arrived at the chapel for the funeral, it was packed, with people standing in back. Round tables beautifully covered with immaculate white table cloths, dinner settings and center pieces filled the open banquet area for the meal that would follow the funeral. It was clear that the chapel and banquet room had been designed specifically for events like this.
As I entered the chapel, I was overcome by what I saw: the hundreds of people packed into the chapel, the overflowing flowers at the front, and the beautiful banquet room. It was all a wonderful display of love and concern for my sister and her girls.
But I knew what was about to happen, because it happens all the time in churches across America. Soon the funeral would be over and the the meal would be finished, friends and family would say goodbye and go back to their busy lives, and my sister and her two girls would be left alone to fend for themselves.
I also knew that in order to love fellow believers who are widows, single moms, and fatherless children the way Christ loves us, the church must do better than that, much better than that.
And I knew that God sent me there that day to say so.
There was just one problem, and it is every pastor’s nightmare: at the last minute, my bible and my sermon notes were accidentally locked away and were inaccessible.
Fortunately, I knew that the Lord had put me there that day, and that He would help me.
The passage I chose to preach from was Jesus’ new commandment in John 13:34-35: “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.”
I wanted to challenge the church to consider what it really means to obey this command in relation to my sister and her two daughters.
I began my message my talking about how Christ Jesus has loved us. He loved us by becoming a human being; by identifying with us so that he knows by experience what it is like to be human. He also loved us by committing to us; by becoming a human being forever to prove that his love for us will never end. And finally, he loved us by sacrificing himself for us; by giving his life to meet a need we could not meet, the payment of the penalty for our sins.
Then I pointed out that Jesus commands us to love each other, that is, our fellow believers, this exact same way: by identifying with each other, by committing to each other, and by sacrificing for each other.
I continued by thanking the church for the beautiful funeral that they had arranged, and for the family meal that we were about to enjoy.
“But my sister and her daughters need much more from you than a funeral and a family meal,” I said. “They need you to love them with the actual love of Christ, not just with these kind gestures. They need you to identify with them, to commit to them, and to sacrifice for them.”
I told the audience that soon we were all going to leave, including myself and my brothers, and that then my sister and her girls would be all alone.
Then I explained that there was a way that the church could love my sister and her daughters in their time of need with the love of Christ: by providing a team of men who would identify with them, commit to them, and sacrifice for them. I went on to describe the men’s team ministry model that I had effectively used in my churches.
After telling story after story of how God had blessed the men’s team ministries in my two previous pastorates, I ended by saying, “Please do not leave my sister and her girls alone. Would you form a team of men for them who can be brothers for my sister and father figures for her girls?”
After I concluded the funeral with a word of prayer, I looked up and, to my surprise, man after man in the audience spontaneously stood up, moved to the isle, and came forward. I counted fifty men in all, enough men to form a team for my sister and for other widows and single moms in the church as well.
As I chatted with the men at the front of the church, one of them asked if he could get a copy of my sermon notes. The other men said they would appreciate getting copies too. So I got everyone’s email address and later sent them my notes. Those notes would eventually form the core of my men’s team ministry training.
A few weeks after the funeral, I flew back to Southern California to see my sister and also to follow up with the men at Fullerton EvFree. A team of four men had been formed for my sister and I was able to meet with them. They were all men from my sister’s adult Sunday School class that she had attended for years. So not only would these men serve my sister one Saturday morning a month, but also see her every Sunday morning at Church in their class.
I remember flying home and being so relieved. These men were filling a real need and I knew they would faithfully serve my sister and her girls.
And they did…for thirteen years! They were amazing. They basically redid my sister’s entire house. What a display of faithfulness and love.
But it wasn’t just the projects that the team did for my sister, but the examples they proved to be for my nieces. Those girls were able to witness godly men faithfully serving them year after year after year.
So when it came time for my nieces to marry, they married wonderful godly men as well, because they knew what qualities to look for. As a result, my sister’s girls and their husbands took over and became her new “team” that cares for her to this day.
Seeing how the Lord was at work at Fullerton EvFree in providing for my sister and her girls was exhilarating. I didn’t realize it then, but eventually I came to understand that my brother-in-law’s funeral was God’s call on my life to help churches around the world develop teams just like my sister’s team, and to help their widows, single moms, and fatherless children just like my sister and her daughters.
But it took the Lord a while to get that message through my hard head.
A few months after my brother-in-law's funeral in June of 2002, I was on the internet and by chance (at least from my perspective) I came across an organization called The National Coalition of Ministries to Men, or NCMM. I had never heard of it before and I was fascinated to learn that it was an organization of professional men's ministers and ministries that was founded in 1996 to nurture the many local, regional, and national men's ministries that had developed in response to the Promise Keepers movement.
At the time, NCMM had planned a national conference gathering of its members later that year in Indianapolis. As I read about it, I sensed that God wanted me to go and talk to the men attending about men's team ministry to widows, single moms, and fatherless children. "This would be a perfect way to spread the word," I thought.
I wasn't interested in starting a men's parachurch ministry myself, I just thought attending the conference would be a way to get these other ministries to do men's team ministry themselves. I discussed it with Patti and she strongly encouraged me to attend.
So I reserved a place at the conference and began praying that the Lord would open up opportunities for me to tell others about the success I had been having with men's team ministry.
When I arrived at NCMM, I discovered that there were several hundred men attending the conference and I knew none of them. So during breaks, I would randomly walk up to someone, introduce myself, and tell them my story about men's team ministry. After listening to me, their reactions were all the same, like they were reading from the same script.
"That's a great ministry idea, Herb," they would say. "No one is doing this. You should do it."
"No, no, I am a pastor," I would think to myself. "You guys are the men's ministers. You need to do it."
All my life, since I was in junior high school, I had never thought of myself as anything other than a pastor. I loved the pastorate. I loved studying the Word. I loved preaching. I loved working with boards. I loved church administration. I loved the comradery I had with my staff. I loved visitation. I loved shepherding and discipling people. I loved crisis intervention. I loved doing baptisms and weddings and funerals. And I loved counseling. Well, except marital counseling. That I didn't love so much.
There was a period of a year and a half, prior to my first pastorate, when I worked in Texas as an oil and gas lease broker leasing mineral rights for oil companies. I made a good salary. My wife, a nurse practitioner, also made a good salary. We built a new home. We bought new furniture and a new car.... but I was miserable. Why? Because what I was doing wasn't what God called me to do.
When I finally received my first call to a pastorate, I was one happy man. Patti and I quit our jobs, sold our home, and moved into a tiny parsonage in what seemed to us to be an even tinier town.
So at the conference, when the men I was talking to suggested I do something other than be a pastor, my natural response was to discount what they were saying. "God has called me to the pastorate," I would think in a huff, "not to start one more parachurch ministry."
As I boarded my plane back to Denver, I noticed a man I had met briefly at the conference, but didn't get a chance to talk with about men's team ministry. His name was Chris Van Brocklin and he was the national men's ministry director for the Evangelical Free Church of America. After our flight took off and reached altitude I could see that there was an empty seat next to him, so I went and sat in it.
Just like I had been doing with the others at the conference, I excitedly told Chris about my experience with men's team ministry to widows, single moms, and fatherless children. As I shared my story, I happened to mention the 50 men at Fullerton EvFree asking for my funeral sermon notes. When I finished, Chris asked me to send him the notes as well.
When I got home, I sent Chris the notes and a few days later I received the following email from him: "With your permission, I'd like to send your sermon notes on men's team ministry to all 600 men's ministry leaders in the Evangelical Free Church of America! And you should do this!"
I was stunned. Something like this was exactly what I had hoped would happen by attending the conference. I wanted men's ministry leaders themselves to promote men's team ministry.
As for me, my mind was still set on the pastorate.
A few weeks after my trip to Indianapolis, I learned about a vacant pastorate in a church in Southern California that was just a few miles from my sister and nieces.
"This is perfect!" I thought. "I can pastor this church and be near enough to my sister to be able to help her out."
What made the situation even better was that there were some people in the church that I knew personally. So I applied to the church and received an invitation to come and be interviewed by the church board.
The interview went smoothly enough. In fact, it felt like a slam dunk. I even had a chance to share my experience with men's team ministry. I returned home and eagerly waited for the call from the board chairman to come and officially candidate.
But instead, I got the surprise of my life when the chairman called. "Herb, we're not going to ask you to candidate. We think you should do this men's team ministry to widows, single moms, and fatherless children thing instead."
I couldn't believe it. I hung up the phone in shock. But then, as I prayed and looked back on the previous seven years, everything fell into place: Dan's death and Teresa's grief, learning about men's team ministry at the PK conference, my first experience with men's team ministry in my church in Quincy, my second experience with men's team ministry in my church in Broomfield, speaking at the Boulder Men's Christian Fellowship, my brother-in-law's death, the funeral at Fullerton EvFree, the team for my sister, the men at the NCMM conference telling me "You should do this," Chris sending my sermon notes to 600 men's ministry leaders, and now a church board telling me to do this instead of being their pastor.
Finally, after 7 years, the Lord had gotten through to me and I realized that I would be disobedient if I didn't "do this."
I had just one question: "But how, Lord? How do I 'do this'?"
God had called me to do "this men's team ministry thing." But I had no idea how I was to do it.
How does one go about telling churches about a simple and effective men's ministry concept that energizes men while addressing significant issues relating to the church's widows, single moms, and fatherless children, groups of people who are almost completely ignored in America's churches?
It seemed like a daunting task because I knew how difficult it is to contact pastors; after all, I had been a pastor for twenty years. Over two decades, I had averaged at least one cold call per day. Someone was always trying to sell me something related to church, or raising support for their missionary endeavor, or asking for a handout. You name it, I got calls for it. The last thing I wanted to do was spend the rest of my ministry years bugging pastors the way I had been.
I just knew that the Lord had undeniably called me to somehow persuade churches to consider using teams of men to meet their pressing needs and that he would show me how to do it.
I also knew that in order to carry out the ministry in an organized, sustainable, and accountable way, I first needed to start a non-profit.
"Let all things be done decently and in order." 1 Corinthians 14:40
While I had two decades of experience managing churches and ministering in churches, I had little experience with parachurch non-profits. Compared to churches, parachurch non-profits are a completely different animal and starting one presented a huge learning curve for me. Here are some of the questions I had to grapple with:
Since this is a legal matter, I am simply going to quote The Free Dictionary by Farlex's extended definition of a non-profit.
A non-profit is "An organization incorporated under state laws and approved by both the state's Secretary of State and its taxing authority as operating for educational, charitable, social, religious, civic or humanitarian purposes. A nonprofit corporation (also called "not for profit corporation") is formed by incorporators, has a board of directors and officers, but no shareholders....In order for contributions to the corporation to be deductible as charitable gifts on federal income taxes, the corporation must submit a detailed application (with a substantial fee) for an Internal Revenue Service ruling that it is established for one of the specific nonprofit purposes spelled out in the Internal Revenue Code."
While this definition sounds daunting, by researching Colorado's Secretary of State's website as well as the IRS' website, I discovered that one can normally set up a non-profit without having to consult an attorney.
Another solution to forming a non-profit I came across is the non-profit under the umbrella of another, already established, Christian men's ministry non-profit. For information on men's ministries that specialize in providing this service, contact National Coalition of Ministries to Men at NCMM.org.
In January, 2003, New Commandment Men's Ministries successfully launched as a non-profit 501 (c)3 corporation with EIN #05-0556506.
Michael Hyatt, a Christian expert on business leadership, says every non-profit organization should be able to complete this one sentence: "We do ___________(this)___________ so that __________(this will happen)_________." Going through this exercise helps non-profits remain focused on what it is that they are attempting to do and what exactly they expect to accomplish by doing it.
For New Commandment Men's Ministries, that sentence reads like this, "New Commandment Men's Ministries helps churches recruit, train, organize, and deploy teams of men who permanently adopt their widows, single moms, and fatherless children so that their churches can say, 'There is no needy person among us.'"
The new commandment, mentioned three times by Jesus in his last night discourse, but most extensively in John 13:34-35, commands believers to love each other as Christ loves us. Since, according to James 1:27, loving those in our churches who are widows, single moms, and fatherless children is the highest expression of Christ's love, we decided to call our ministry New Commandment Men's Ministries.
Over the years, New Commandment Men's Ministries has been financed in a variety of ways. While the ministry has always received the bulk of its financial income through faithful monthly supporters, early on the ministry was also supported by charging churches a consultation fee. Later, when we started working with men's conferences, we stopped charging consulting fees and supplemented donations with the sale of books and DVDs.
Currently, all of our training resources, including our books and DVDs, are provided free of charge and the ministry is supported 100% by donations. (You can make a special donation or become a regular donor here.)
New Commandment Men's Ministries chose to be a consulting ministry. That is, we decided to be the type of ministry that provides training, advice, and a service model that churches can use to serve their widows, single moms, and fatherless children.
In this type of ministry, churches have no official relationship with New Commandment Men's Ministries, can modify our recommended service model any way they want, and they can name their men's team ministry to their widows, single moms, and fatherless children anything they want.
Another option was to form a franchise ministry, where we would start local New Commandment Men's Ministry chapters in churches with a standardized program. However, we went the consulting route instead so that we could reach the broadest possible audience.
We decided from the very beginning that we would help any church that has an interest in using its men to meet the needs of their widows, single moms, and fatherless children. Since 2003, New Commandment has helped over 1,000 churches in dozens of denominations start men's team ministries.
I and my board knew nothing about how to market this ministry when we started New Commandment. In fact, we knew nothing about marketing period.
Prior to the launch of the ministry, I had helped three churches start men's team ministries. It was hardly a huge track record. So I set about buttonholing pastors whom I knew personally, sharing my story with them of how God had called me to do this ministry. Several of my first churches started their men's team ministries this way.
Over the years we have tried a number of different marketing approaches. We have been interviewed on TV and radio, run ads online, used free and paid social media, written a blog, published a promotional DVD, provided pulpit supply in churches, advertised in men's conferences, held regional pastor luncheons, and, yes, even made cold calls (ugh). We've tried pretty much everything except flying a banner behind an airplane at the beach on the fourth of July.
But the most successful means of reaching out to churches have been conducting workshops at men's conferences, ranking high in organic and paid Google and Bing search tools on the internet, and plain old word of mouth.
Measuring progress with this ministry is pretty straightforward. We base our progress primarily on the number of churches we have helped start men's team ministries to their widows, single moms, and fatherless children.
But there are a number of other metrics we use as well, such as the total number of men on teams, the total number of care receivers being served, the number of states that have churches with men's team ministries, the number of countries that have churches with men's team ministries, and the number of online downloads of our training material.
For more thoughts on starting a non-profit men's ministry, read my post "Starting a Non-Profit Men's Ministry?"
The core message of New Commandment Men's Ministries is this: while the love of Christ has practical application for men in all of their relationships, such as with their wives and children (Ephesians 5:25), it especially has direct and immediate practical application in their relationships with widows, single moms, fatherless children, and others with long term pressing needs in their churches (1 Timothy 5:1).
We emphasize that men should practice the application of the love of Christ for widows, single moms, fatherless children, and others because we see this same emphasis for men in the Old Testament (i.e. Job, who made "the widow's heart sing" in Job 29, Boaz and Ruth in the book of Ruth, Elijah and the widow at Zarepath in 1 Kings 17, etc.), as well as in the earthly ministry of Jesus (i.e., when he was on the cross and assigned his mother Mary, a widow and single mom, into John's care in John 19), and especially in the ministry of the early church as recorded in the book of Acts and the epistles (i.e., Barnabas in Acts 4, deacons in Acts 6, the Ephesian elders in Acts 20, Timothy in 1 Timothy 5, etc.).
Consequently, all of my writing has focused on the love of Christ and how men can practice it in the local church by meeting the pressing needs of widows, single moms, fatherless children and others. Here are the results:
When I have been at men's conferences and taught my workshop on men's team ministry, the section on the three unique qualities of the love of Christ (personal identification, commitment, and sacrifice) and how they apply to widows, single moms, and fatherless children, were from my funeral sermon notes (See video #2 at this link.).
These are the sermon notes I preached at my brother-in-law's funeral and also the notes Chris Van Brocklin sent to 600 men's ministry leaders in the Evangelical Free Church of America. I have repeated the central message of that sermon all over North America and Europe a couple of hundred times over the last nineteen years. I never get tired of it. In fact, every time I teach this material it feels like I'm teaching it for the first time.
When the ministry first started, I worked directly with churches and personally lead orientation meetings for their men. I quickly realized that I needed to write printed material for the men I was training so they could have something to keep after I left.
So nineteen years ago I wrote a workbook entitled "Developing a Men's Team Ministry to Widows, Widowers, and Single Parents." The workbook has since been updated and expanded. Through the years over ten thousand copies have been sold. It is currently available for downloading, copying, and distributing free of charge.
New Commandment Men's Ministries encourages men's team ministries to meet together at their church at the start of their once a month service day for an hour of Bible study, prayer, and last minute planning. They then split up into their teams and go out to serve their care receivers. To facilitate the devotional time, I wrote a devotional study guide called "Doing Good Well". It is also available for downloading, copying, and distributing free of charge.
A third book that is available for downloading, copying, and distributing free of charge is "The One Amazing Thing God Wants to Do with Men." This e-book provides a general map for a man's good works by showing men how service to widows, single moms, and fatherless children fits in with God's overall plan for his good works. I describe this plan with five concentric circles.
The first, inner circle represents a man's responsibility to himself. God wants men to be self-sufficient so they are not a burden to others. The second circle represents a man's responsibility to provide for his wife and children. The third circle represents a man's responsibility to make sure no one in his extended family has pressing needs. The fourth circle is the one New Commandment focuses on. This circle involves a man's responsibility to join with other men in meeting the pressing needs within his church. The fifth and final concentric circle represents a man's responsibility to plead the cause of his neighbors who are in need.
I started out by writing a monthly printed newsletter that I sent by snail mail to all my supporters. By my second year with New Commandment, the internet was coming into its own. It didn't take long to realize that I could keep everyone informed on the ministry's progress, as well as do some significant writing, by starting a blog.
Not only did my blog accomplish everything my newsletter did, but it also took much less time and money to publish. Through the years, I have written over six hundred posts that go out to several hundred recipients.
I remember attending a men's conference in late 2003 and someone asked me for my ministry's website address. I told him I didn't have a website and he promptly told me that soon every ministry was going to have to have a website or they would be completely sidelined.
So I went home, contacted a volunteer who knew something about the internet, and he worked up a simple, one page website for me. That website sat on the internet for several years before I realized how much more I could accomplish with the internet. Over time, and after hundreds of hours of hard work, I have become relatively well educated about websites and we now have an effective training website.
Cornerstone articles are extensive articles on the internet on any given topic that serve as go-to resources for those topics. They normally rank at the top, or near the top, of page 1 in the search results on their topic. Cornerstone articles are valuable because they are free advertising for whoever writes them.
I have spent the better part of the past year writing cornerstone articles. The three that I have completed are on the topics of ministry to widows, ministry to single moms, and ministry to fatherless boys. All of them rank at the top, or near the top, of Google search results for those terms. In just the last month, two hundred and thirty-seven people from around the world searched on these topics and then found and read my articles. Currently, I am writing a cornerstone article on ministry to men. (My previous posts for the last few months are a part of this project.)
Contacting churches with pastors and pastoral staff that I knew proved to be an effective strategy. Within nine months from starting New Commandment Men's Ministries, First Evangelical Free Church in Fullerton, California had 12 teams, Crossroads Church in Northglenn, Colorado had 12 teams, New Hope Community Church in Aurora, Colorado had 12 teams, and South East Christian Church in Aurora, Colorado had 1 team, First Southern Baptist Church in Westminster, Colorado had 2 teams, Green Valley Church in Denver had 3 teams, and North Huron Christian Center in Northglenn, Colorado had 2 teams, for a total of 44 teams in 7 churches. This meant that in just nine months, about 140 men were serving around 35 widows and single moms for two hours one Saturday morning every month, for a total of 280 man-hours of service per month.
The reports I received back from these churches were encouraging. The men loved the ministry because it was only one Saturday morning a month for two hours. And since they were on teams, if they had to miss a service day, the rest of the team could pick up the slack. The widows and single moms were ecstatic that their churches were providing this service for them. And finally, the pastors appreciated how easy the ministry was to start and maintain.
One of the early churches to start men's team ministries, Crossroads Church in Northglenn, Colorado, is especially dear to me. Patti and I have attended Crossroads for two decades and I head up the men's team ministry there as a volunteer. We started in May of 2003 with three teams and within a year had fifteen teams.
I serve on a team at Crossroads that over the years has had a truck driver, a retiree, a commercial airline pilot and an accountant as team members. We have had four different care receivers assigned to us, each with unique needs. We currently serve an elderly widow who has no children and only a few relatives who live in other states.
Needless to say, when you work with men you have known for years and years, you develop very deep relationships, and that has definitely been our experience. We have walked with each other through good and bad times as we have served our care receivers.
On a couple of occasions, my former pastor, who is now retired, made the comment to me that ministries in churches often involve conflict, but he was impressed that he had had no problems with our men's team ministry. I think the reason is because we just see ourselves as servants who support each other as we serve our care receivers.
Of course, our care receivers have deeply appreciated the men's team ministry. On one occasion, we held a breakfast in their honor and during a share time three of them, all widows, stood up and said that they used to be depressed, but now that they had a team, they no longer were. That is the love of Christ in action.
All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work. 2 Timothy 3:16-17
But there was a problem with my marketing strategy: I only knew a limited number of pastors, most of them within a few miles of my home, and soon I had contacted all of them. Fortunately, at about the same time I realized I needed to adjust my marketing strategy, I got a phone call from Chris Van Brocklin saying that he had recommended New Commandment Men's Ministries to Brian Doyle as a potential seminar presenter at his Iron Sharpens Iron Men's Equipping Conferences, which, at the time, were being held in New England.
Like myself and many other men's ministry leaders, Brian Doyle had been influenced by Promise Keepers. Seeing the huge amount of capital PK needed to run a two day men's ministry stadium event, Brian founded Iron Sharpens Iron men's conference ministries and kept PK's basic model of providing men with a quality worship experience comprised of excellent music and compelling speakers, but scaled everything else back. For example, instead of meeting in stadiums, ISI conferences meet in churches, often provided free of charge. And instead of PK's two day events, Iron Sharpens Iron conferences are one day events.
Another important distinction between Promise Keepers and Iron Sharpens Iron are the 16, seventy-five minute long, breakout "equipping seminars" (eight in the morning and eight in the afternoon) that ISI provides at each conference on different topics that are relevant to men. Both local and national ministries lead these workshops for the conferences and also host booths in the conference break areas.
When Chris Van Brocklin explained to me what Iron Sharpens Iron and its breakout seminars were all about, the opportunity to lead a seminar seemed perfect to me and I quickly accepted the invitation. It proved to be a good decision, because Iron Sharpens Iron has been a boon to New Commandment ever since.
Since 2003, I and other trained volunteers have given almost 200 seminars at Iron Sharpens Iron Men's Equipping Conferences on how to start a men's team ministry to widows, single moms, and fatherless children. As a result, men from 947 different churches in dozens of states have purchased our training material through those seminars!
I can only say, praise the Lord for Brian Doyle and Iron Sharpens Iron.
I call the internet the modern version of Paul's Roman road; just as Paul used Rome's network of well-maintained roads throughout its empire to spread the gospel, so I have come to see the internet as an effective and efficient way to train churches around the world how to use teams of men to serve their widows, single moms, and fatherless children.
I began the process of transitioning from conducting seminars at men's conferences to utilizing the internet for training men in 2017. Since the seminars had provided an important source of income for the ministry through book sales, I decided I would turn the website into a paid membership site. I spent several months learning how to do that and then wrote material for the site.
The project was not easy. It took me hundreds of hours to learn the necessary skills to build out the membership site (the ministry didn't have the finances to hire someone to do it, or the volunteers who had the skills to do it).
By 2019 I finished my last men's conference and went full time with online ministry. The membership site was moderately successful. About fifty churches utilized it to start their men's team ministries. But then the pandemic hit. Since most churches were focused on just surviving, very few new churches were interested in starting a new men's ministry.
But at least I could keep busy writing during the pandemic and providing material for the site. If I had still been doing conference ministry when the pandemic started, I would have been completely sidelined with little to do for a couple of years.
In March of this year (2022), New Commandment Men's Ministries made a major change to its ministry model. We did away with the membership site and transitioned the website to a free, all-access site. Overnight, anyone anywhere in the world could access our training on the site and download and share all of our material, including our books and videos, completely free of charge.
The response has been terrific. In just the past seven months, our training material has been downloaded 500 times.
"But does this work?" That is the question every single pastor, men's ministry leader, and potential men's ministry volunteer automatically asks, either verbally or to himself, when presented with the men's team ministry model.
After twenty-four years, both as a pastor who has done men's team ministry for the widows, single moms, and fatherless children in my own churches, and now as a full-time proponent of men's team ministry to widows, single moms, and fatherless children, the answer is unequivocally, "Yes, it works!"
We have seen this ministry work in very small churches and in very, very large churches. In urban churches, in suburban churches, and in rural churches. In churches on the east coast and on the west coast. In churches in the mid west and in the south. We have seen it work in churches in the US, in Canada, in Latvia, in Greece, in Nigeria, in South Africa, in New Zealand, and in Australia.
Men's team ministry works because it is biblical, because it is pleasing to the Lord, because it makes "the widow's heart sing," because it meets the needs of single moms and their fatherless children, because it fulfills Christ's command for believers to love each other as he has loved us, because it adorns the gospel and draws the unsaved to faith in Christ, because men love it, because it is easy to start and easy to maintain, and because it effectively compensates for our highly mobile, impersonal, and individualistic culture.
As a result of this fruit, I have had the privilege of speaking on men's team ministry on Focus on the Family radio, on Day Star TV, on podcasts, as well as in seminaries and churches in North America and Europe. The ministry has been mentioned in books on men's ministry and articles about it have appeared in Christian magazines.
And when I have died and gone to be with the Lord, should he tarry, this ministry will, by the grace of God, continue on the internet for many more years to come.
For all of this I give God the praise and the glory.
I want to tell you about a men’s ministry I didn’t know existed. And yet, it was the one men’s ministry that has most impacted my life. This "stealthy men’s ministry," so to speak, also explains why I’m so passionate about men’s ministry today.
To help you understand why these men had such an influence on my life, I need to describe my upbringing. In a nutshell, I grew up surrounded by what you might call “adult men at a distance.”
Take my father, for example. Ben Reese was a wonderful father in many ways and a very godly man. But he was forty-seven years old when I was born and he was extremely shy. So growing up with Dad was like being raised by an introverted grandfather: he was always around, but he was two generations removed and we rarely talked.
And then there were my three brothers. The oldest, who is no longer living, was eighteen years older than I am and severely mentally handicapped. Good luck relating to him.
The next oldest is fifteen years older than I am. My earliest memories of Paul are of him attending college. Needless to say, I wasn’t exactly a focal point of his life.
My third brother is twelve years older than I am. My earliest memories of John are of him during his late high school years. So I wasn’t a focal point of his life either.
See what I mean? Four older men in my family, all adults – or almost adults – when I was young who had little social or emotional interaction with me.
Fortunately, I grew up in an outstanding church that had dozens and dozens of godly male role models of different ages whom I could relate to.
They were amazing men: biblically literate, spiritually mature, faithful husbands and fathers, intelligent, well-educated and successful in their careers.
They were men like Warren Olsen, who led our high school Sunday School class; Art Meier, who taught us on Thursday evenings; Jim Klubnik, my youth pastor, who gave me a love for ministry; Leighton Ogg, who personally took me under his wing and discipled me; Mark Neuenschwander, who gave me a vision for Christian community; and John "Bugsie" Bogosian, who always made church camp so much fun.
These were the men who “filled in the blanks” in my young Christian discipleship experience.
As I look back on my early church years, the interesting thing was that there was no “official” men’s ministry. Nevertheless, because the men in my church were always being ministered to so effectively, and as a result, always ministering to others so effectively, my church had many mature, godly, and spiritually fruitful men in it, several of whom had a lasting and, indeed, eternal impact on my life.
In other words, I was the personal beneficiary of a church that had been "fine tuned for men's ministry."
This is not to say that there is no place for a dedicated men's ministry in a church. I believe there is and below I discuss what a fully developed dedicated men's ministry in a local church can look like and why it is needed.
But to be optimally effective, a local church's men's ministry must be surrounded by - or better, engulfed by - a church that is effectively reaching and utilizing all of the men in its congregation, not just the men involved in its dedicated men's ministry. When a church succeeds in doing this, it has indeed been fine tuned for men's ministry.
It has been almost fifty years since I left my home and church in Los Angeles and went off to seminary in Dallas. Over the years, I have observed and studied the congregational lives of many churches. Some of these churches were effectively reaching and utilizing their men. Others were not. The ones that did share several men-reaching and men-utilizing qualities.
But before I discuss what these qualities are, I'm going to explain what it means to reach men and utilize men. And finally, what it means to reach and utilize all of the men in your church.
God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” made his light shine in our hearts to give us the light of the knowledge of God’s glory displayed in the face of Christ.
2 Corinthians 4:6
Every Christian who reads 2 Corinthians 4:6 knows exactly what the Apostle Paul is talking about: that aha moment when God reached down and turned the light switch on in our souls; when we suddenly realized that God does indeed objectively exist, that he is personal and holy, that we have been trying to ignore him and even actively opposing him, and that we are sinners in need of salvation from His holy wrath.
And then, just as suddenly, the radiant face of Jesus Christ came into view. We recognized him as God's Son, that He died for us on the cross because of our sin and for our sin, and that he now lives in glory at God's right hand.
And so we looked to Christ in faith, confessing that we are sinners in need of forgiveness, and trusting in him to provide that forgiveness.
We did not know all the implications of what this experience meant at the time of our salvation. But we did know that everything had changed. Our entire world had been turned upside down and our lives would never be the same.
This salvation experience, the moment when God "caused his light to shine in our hearts," is what it means to "reach" men. Reaching men is bringing men into a right relationship with the living and true God through faith in his Son, and then helping men live out all of the implications of their faith.
We are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.
Ephesians 2:10
By "utilizing" men in your church, I mean helping your men discover the good works that God saved your men to do.
The topic of good works is often ignored in men's ministry. But the biblical commands to do good works are numerous, explicit, and well distributed throughout the New Testament. To help us get a grasp of the emphasis in the Bible on good works, below are eleven essential verses on this topic.
1. The foundational passage for good works in the New Testament is found in the Old Testament.
Isaiah 1:17 - Learn to do right (lit. "Learn to do good"); seek justice. Defend the oppressed. Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow.
2. Jesus commanded us to do good works in public.
Matthew 5:16 -In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven.
3. Salvation is apart from good works.
Ephesians 2:8-9 - It is by grace you have been saved, through faith and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God; not by works, so that no one can boast.
4. But good works are the goal of salvation.
Ephesians 2:10 - For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.
5. Good works are also a goal of Christian fellowship.
Hebrews 10:24, 25 - Let us consider how we may spur one another on toward love and good deeds, not giving up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day approaching.
6. Good works are something to be passionate about.
Titus 2:14 - Who gave himself for us to redeem us from all wickedness and to purify for himself a people that are his very own, eager to do what is good.
7. Good works bring glory to God in a pagan world.
1 Peter 2:12 - Live such good lives among the pagans that, though they accuse you of doing wrong, they may see your good deeds and glorify God on the day he visits us.
8. We are to be rich in good works.
1 Timothy 6:18 - Command them to do good, to be rich in good deeds, and to be generous and willing to share.
9. We are to be an example of good works.
Titus 2:7 - In everything set them an example by doing what is good.
10. One purpose of good works is to provide for urgent (pressing) needs.
Titus 3:14 - Our people must learn to devote themselves to doing what is good, in order to provide for urgent ("pressing") needs and not live unproductive lives.
11. Our good works determine how we as believers will spend eternity in heaven.
1 Corinthians 3:11-15 - No one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ. If anyone builds on this foundation using gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay or straw, their work will be shown for what it is, because the Day will bring it to light. It will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test the quality of each person’s work. If what has been built survives, the builder will receive a reward. If it is burned up, the builder will suffer loss but yet will be saved even though only as one escaping through the flames.
Every pastor knows that just because men attend their church on a regular basis doesn't mean they are growing into mature Christians. It doesn't even mean they are saved.
Thus, if we are to reach and utilize every man in our church, we must reach them as they truly are, that is, in their true spiritual state.
Therefore, reaching and utilizing all the men in your church means that you are communicating by the power of the Holy Spirit to all of the unsaved men in your church, to all of the immature Christian men in your church, to all of the growing Christian men, and to all of the mature Christian men in your church the deep spiritual, emotional, intellectual, and practical truths about God and his Son, Jesus Christ, that we find in the Bible.
And then reaching and utilizing all your men means showing your men how they can be saved and how to practice the implications of their salvation through good works in their church, home, and community.
Clearly, reaching and utilizing all the men in your church is a tall order. But it can be done, and it has been done by churches many times.
What, then, do churches that reach and utilize all of their men look like?
"Now it is required that those who have been given a trust must prove faithful." 1 Corinthians 4:2
Here is a sad statistic: the average tenure of a pastor in a church is 4 years. That is shorter than the average tenure of an NFL coach, which is 4.6 years. An even sadder statistic is the average tenure of the previous pastors in my first church: 18 months. No church is going to successfully reach and utilize all of its men with that kind of track record.
When I took my first church, I made a commitment to stick around. I am glad I did because it was not until my third and fourth years that I began to make real headway with the men in that congregation. Why? Because I had to earn their respect so they could trust me.
Church experts agree that there is a strong correlation between the length of a pastor's tenure and the health of his church. I might add that there is also a strong correlation between the the length of a pastor's tenure and his ability to reach the men in his church.
It is often difficult to stay through the hard years, which are normally years three and four during a pastor's tenure at his church. Those are the years when people in the congregation who don't like the new pastor either leave or stay and cause dissention. A pastor must wade through this type of conflict by being both faithful and strong if he is going to reach his men; he must be willing to take the hits when the going gets tough in order to reap a harvest.
"The elders who direct the affairs of the church well are worthy of double honor, especially those whose work is preaching and teaching." 1 Timothy 5:17
The Greek word here for "honor" in its verb form is timao. It can be translated "to honor," but also "to pay a salary." The latter meaning is how the NLV translates the verse: "Leaders who do their work well should be given twice as much pay, and for sure, those who work hard preaching and teaching."
The relationship between these two meanings, "to honor" and "to pay," is logical. For example, business owners honor their employees by paying them well.
All too often churches dishonor their pastoral staff by paying them poverty wages. That is a sin. Impoverishing your pastors is disobedience to the teaching of the Word of God. No pastor is going to be able to reach and utilize his men when the church dishonors him this way.
Here are some suggestions on making sure your senior pastor and pastoral staff are being compensated well.
“It would not be right for us to neglect the ministry of the word of God in order to wait on tables. Brothers and sisters, choose seven men from among you who are known to be full of the Spirit and wisdom. We will turn this responsibility over to them and will give our attention to prayer and the ministry of the word.” Acts 6:3-4
Olympic gymnasts and preachers have one thing in common: they take something that is extremely difficult and even scary to do and make it look natural and easy. Gymnasts go through agonizing training for years so they can throw their bodies around in amazing and seemingly effortless ways on balance beams, high bars, long horses, even on a gym floor.
In similar fashion, preachers go through years of stressful and expensive undergraduate and graduate training to learn how to study the Bible and then preach it to their congregations. In their pastorates they agonize mentally and spiritually for hours every week on sermon preparation so they can stand up and preach a coherent, soul nourishing, message on Sunday morning for twenty to forty minutes.
Imagine doing a twenty page term paper every week and then delivering it orally to a classroom filled with your fellow students and your professor. That is what it is like preaching weekly in a church, only your fellow students are your congregation and your professor is God.
Churches that reach and utilize all of their men have pastors who take their preaching responsibility very seriously; they unapologetically spend a huge part of their time in sermon preparation, and they grow in their ability to preach clear sermons that men can relate to spiritually, intellectually, and emotionally.
All pastors know that on any given Sunday morning there are probably people sitting in the pews listening to him who are not saved. A conscientious pastor will make sure he gives a clear and compelling presentation of the gospel in the worship service on a regular basis.
This doesn't mean that every sermon has to be an evangelistic message. Otherwise, you will wind up with a congregation of immature Christians who just know the gospel. But it does mean that everyone in your congregation should know how to be saved.
“Here is a trustworthy saying: Whoever aspires to be an overseer desires a noble task.” 1 Timothy 3:1
When it comes to choosing laymen to lead the church, I sometimes see pastors and congregations make the following mistake: they assume that just because a man is successful in business and makes generous contributions to the church that therefore he is qualified to participate in leading the church. But there is nothing in scripture that tells us that being a successful and generous businessman qualifies him for spiritual leadership.
Rather, what qualifies a Christian man for church leadership are the character qualities that are listed as the requirements for elders in 1 Timothy 3:1-7 and Titus 1:6-9, as well as the requirements for deacons in 1 Timothy 3:8 and Acts 6:3.
I suggest reading all of these qualifications slowly and deliberately, so as to apply them to ourselves.
Here are the qualifications for elders:
The qualifications for deacons are as follows:
What is clear from these lists is that the qualifications for elders and deacons are not just expected of men in church leadership positions, but of all Christian men in general. Taken together they describe what mature Christian men who are consistently living out their Christian faith look like.
With this expanded view of the qualifications for elders in mind, Dr. Gen Getz wrote The Measure of a Man, one of the most widely read men’s ministry books ever written. (Why he left out the qualifications for deacons is unknown.) I highly recommend this book to all men’s ministries.
“So I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh.” Galatians 5:16
The Holy Spirit is a person, the third person of the Trinity. As such, the Holy Spirit indwells all believers. Men who consistently walk in the Spirit are men who actively enjoy his presence through worship, meditation on Scripture, and prayer (John 4:24), who listen to the Spirit’s leading in their daily lives (Romans 8:4), who display the fruit of the Spirit wherever they go (Galatians 5:22-23), and who exercise their spiritual giftedness in service to the church (1 Corinthians 12:8-10).
Spirit filled men are spiritual powerhouses who demonstrate victory over sin in their lives, accomplish amazing good in the lives of others, and boldly point people to Christ as a result of their testimony.
“The goal of this command is love, which comes from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith..” 1 Timothy 1:5
In its art, music, literature, indeed, in all of its culture, the world has a lot to say about its version of love. But actually loving like Jesus Christ is a foreign concept to the natural man. One must be born again in order to love like Jesus (John 13:34-35). This distinctiveness of Christ’s love is why the goal of all men’s ministry is to train men to love like him.
Christian men love like Jesus by freely entering into binding covenant relationships with others, called “hesed love” or “covenant-keeping love” in the Bible. They demonstrate their covenant-keeping love by identifying with the people they have covenanted themselves to the way Christ identified with us in the Incarnation, by being faithful to the people they have covenanted themselves to the way Christ has been faithful to us in the Incarnation, and by sacrificing for those they have covenanted themselves to the way Christ sacrificed for us in redemption.
In marriage, Christian men express this covenant-keeping love when they enter into a sacred marital covenant with their wives and children. They practice their marriage covenant by coming to know and understand their family well (identification), by being faithful husbands and fathers (commitment), and by doing whatever it takes to meet the needs of their family members (sacrifice).
In their churches, Christian men express this covenant-keeping love by entering into a sacred covenant, the New Covenant (Luke 22:20) at the time of their salvation. This new covenant is governed by the New Commandment given to us by Jesus in John 13:34-35. In it he commands us to love each other as he has loved us. This commandment is especially relevant to the neediest in the church, such as widows, single moms, and fatherless children (1 John 3:16-18). As Christian men learn to identify with, commit to, and sacrifice for these neediest of all in their churches, they experience the highest expression of their faith (James 1:27).
In their communities, Christian men participate in a “social contract,” the general organizing principles that govern society at large. As they do, they inject their “salt,” their spiritual influence, by loving their neighbors as themselves with good works (Matthew 22:37-39; Galatians 6:10), thus fulfilling the law of Christ.
“Go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.” Matthew 28:19
Of course, all churches should have as their goal winning people to Christ and making disciples. But many churches also have specific emphases in how they address this goal.
For example, the church I grew up in had a very strong emphasis on foreign missions. Not only did the church support over one hundred missionaries in dozens of countries, but it had a fifty foot high map of the world at the front of the sanctuary with the locations of those missionaries marked with tiny bright lights. Underneath the map was the verse in giant letters: “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature” (Mark 16:15). No wonder, then, that three of my siblings have been deeply involved in foreign missions.
On the other hand, some churches may be located next to a college or university campus and have a college ministry as their primary mission. I know of churches that have as their mission to reach young families, gangs, addicts, immigrants from certain countries, inner city residents, even cowboys!
Whatever the mission of a church is, the men in the church should know it well, be able to articulate what it is, and be supportive of it 100%.
“In everything set them an example.” Titus 2:7
Children’s ministers and youth ministers in all churches in America should keep this one fact in mind: mother only households comprise over 20% of all households.9
This paucity of men living with their children makes it imperative that churches include mature Christian men as participants in all levels of a church’s Cristian education and youth programs. Boys especially must have clear godly male role models while growing up in church. Having only women leading in younger CE classes and teen youth programs only reinforces what many children already experience in their homes.
“ We proclaim to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also may have fellowship with us.” 1 John 1:3
One of the first lessons I learned when I finished my masters degree and entered ministry was that my advanced education actually isolated me from the men in my church. I was now the Christian “expert” and they were the Christian “amateurs.” They saw in me everything they couldn’t do: translate biblical Greek and Hebrew, speak in public, pray in public, counsel people, visit people in hospitals, respond to people in crisis situations, perform weddings and funerals, and on and on.
The very palpable but often subconscious response the men in my church had to me was, “I can’t do that.”
On the other hand, I had spent so much time and effort getting my education (and struggling to support myself in the process) that I had not learned to enjoy any of the things my men enjoyed, like fishing, hunting, sports, music, you name it. When it came to these typical manly pass times my response to my men was also, “I can’t do that.”
In my struggle to bridge the gap between myself and the men I was ministering to, over the years I learned to enjoy playing softball and golf. I went on camping trips with my men, or just took long hikes with them. And I recruited men to help me work on the church building.
I also found ways to get men involved in the church’s ministry, such as inviting them to participate in our CE and Youth programs, or in small home groups.
But the most successful ministry I had with my men was our men’s team ministry to our widows, single moms, and fatherless children that I started in my pastorates in Illinois and Colorado. My men absolutely loved this ministry because they were able to build years-long relationships with other men on their teams as well as with their teams’ care receivers, all while doing projects together that they were good at.
Suddenly, men who kept thinking “I can’t do that” when it comes to ministry developed an “I can do that” attitude as they saw the impact their faithful service was having on their care receivers, their care receivers’ families, friends, and neighbors, as well as on themselves, and on their entire church.
“Because we loved you so much, we were delighted to share with you not only the gospel of God but our lives as well.” 1 Thessalonians 2:8
Here are some sad statistics about American men and their friends. According to the Survey Center on American Life, “Fifteen percent of men have no close friendships at all, a fivefold increase since 1990.” The report also states that “Thirty years ago, a majority of men (55 percent) reported having at least six close friends. Today, that number has been cut in half. Slightly more than one in four (27 percent) men have six or more close friends today.”10
One of the primary benefits of knowing Jesus Christ is the opportunity for men to develop close friendships with other men at church. Loneliness is epidemic in American culture. A recent Harvard Graduate School of Education survey of 950 Americans found that “36% of all Americans—including 61% of young adults and 51% of mothers with young children—feel “serious loneliness.” Not surprisingly, loneliness appears to have increased substantially since the outbreak of the global pandemic.”11
But at the very core of Christianity is the concept of fellowship, as John tells us in 1 John 1:3 – “We proclaim to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also may have fellowship with us. And our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son, Jesus Christ.”
Thus, churches that are successfully reaching and utilizing their men provide opportunities for many different kinds of fellowship with other men. Some of this fellowship occurs for example before and after services, in small home groups, while working on church committees, on mission trips, and while doing church projects. But the most significant times of fellowship happen when men know each other well enough that they can communicate their deepest thoughts, feelings and concerns with each other in mentoring relationships and in accountability groups.
“I have become all things to all people so that by all possible means I might save some.” 1 Corinthians 9:22
Conservative Christian churches are not doing well when it comes to men regularly participating in church life. The leading authority on this problem is David Murrow. In his book, Why Men Hate Going to Church, Murrow writes:
“So who goes to church? Women. The US Congregational Life Survey pegged the typical churchgoer as a fifty-year-old, married, well-educated, employed female.12 An ABC News/Beliefnet poll found that a worshipper is most likely an older, black female who lives in the South.13 By combining figures from the US Census and a study by Barna Research, we can estimate a weekly gender gap of more than thirteen million in America’s churches.14 The US Congregational Life Survey concurs: “While the U.S. population is split fairly evenly between men and women, there are more women (61%) than men (39%) in the pews. This difference is found in every age category, so the fact that women live longer than men does not explain the gender difference in religious participation.” 15 Almost a quarter of America’s married, churchgoing women regularly attend without their husbands.16 (Murrow, David. Why Men Hate Going to Church (pp. 13-14). Thomas Nelson. Kindle Edition.)
These statistics demonstrate that churches are doing a great job reaching women, but when it comes to men, not so much. I suggest every pastor get Why Men Hate Going to Church, devour it, and then implement his recommendations.
“Make every effort to add to your faith goodness; and to goodness, knowledge; and to knowledge, self-control; and to self-control, perseverance; and to perseverance, godliness; and to godliness, mutual affection; and to mutual affection, love. For if you possess these qualities in increasing measure, they will keep you from being ineffective and unproductive in your knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. 2 Peter 1:5-8
Men who have been reached spiritually by their churches and are functioning effectively in their churches see improvements in their marital and family relationships, in their relationships with fellow believers, and in their relationships with their neighbors and fellow workers because they are learning how to love others the way Jesus does.
As these men walk with the Lord they see improvements in their character, experiencing victory over besetting sin, more transparency with others about their sin, more inner peace, more joy in the Spirit, more hope and sense of purpose. This inner strength and discipline translates into increased physical health, more productivity at work, and increased financial wellbeing.
And what man wouldn’t want that?
Fine-Tuning Your Dedicated Local Church Men's Ministry to Reach and Disciple Men to Do Good Works
Something unusual. Something unexpected. Something spectacular. Something important. Something excellent. Something renowned. Something valuable. Something admirable. Something heroic. When something like this appears, word of it spreads rapidly and people come running.
They stand on tiptoe in the crowd and crane their necks to get a better view. Then when it finally passes by and they catch a fleeting glimpse of it, they turn in awe to the total strangers standing next to them and without any hesitation at all impulsively exclaim, “WOW! Did you see that?”
That response is called “The WOW! Factor.”
Queen Elizabeth’s funeral, the most watched event in TV history, had The WOW! Factor.
A presidential motorcade that shuts down entire freeways as it passes by has The WOW! Factor.
A rocket that blasted off at sunset at Vandenberg Air Force Base for all of Southern California to watch as its multi-colored florescent contrail ascended into space had The WOW! Factor.
The San Francisco 49ers, when they drove 92 yards in 1989 to win the Super Bowl with only 34 seconds left, had The WOW! Factor.
The WOW! Factor does three things well: it gets everyone’s attention, it creates admiration, and it drives inquisitiveness. Something that has The WOW! Factor cannot be ignored, it overwhelmingly impresses, and it demands to be understood. People simply can’t get enough of whatever it is that has wowed them.
The WOW! Factor is what we want to achieve with local church men’s ministry. We want entire communities to be aware of their local church men’s ministries, to admire what the men in them are doing, and to want to know more about why they are doing what they are doing.
How does a local church men’s ministry become so renowned in their community that they make the front page of the local newspaper? What do they need to do so that, when people drive by their church in their cars, they point out the window and tell their fellow passengers, “That is where those men I was telling you about attend church”?
What would it take for national men’s ministries to point to a local church’s men’s ministry as an example of what men’s ministry is all about? What great acts do these men need to do so that people brag, “You won’t believe what the men in my church do!”
Do you have doubts about whether churches should make it a goal for their men’s ministries to have The WOW! Factor? Maybe this will convince you: Jesus himself commands men’s ministries to have it. “Let your light shine before others, that they may see your good works and glorify your Father in heaven” (Matthew 5:16).
“Did you see that? Praise God! Hallelujah! Glory to God!… WOW!” That is the reaction Jesus wants our local church men’s ministries to produce when people observe them in action; non-Christians spontaneously glorifying God because of what your men’s ministry is accomplishing.
So what is it that produces The WOW! Factor in local church men’s ministries and how do we instill The WOW! Factor into every aspect of those ministries? We find the answer to this question in the life and ministry of Jesus Christ himself.
Jesus Christ overwhelmingly had The WOW! Factor. Everyone who met him immediately realized that they were in the presence of someone exceedingly special. Jesus grabbed people’s attention and drew them in like a Star Trek tractor beam. He created in those around him a sense of awe, along with an insatiable desire to know more. Many passages in the gospels demonstrate how Jesus had this effect on people. Here are several examples from the Gospel of Matthew.
Jesus went throughout Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, proclaiming the good news of the kingdom, and healing every disease and sickness among the people. News about him spread all over Syria…. Large crowds from Galilee, the Decapolis, Jerusalem, Judea and the region across the Jordan followed him. Matthew 4:23, 25
When Jesus came down from the mountainside, large crowds followed him. Matthew 8:1
The men were amazed and asked, “What kind of man is this? Even the winds and the waves obey him!” Matthew 8:27
But I want you to know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins.” So he said to the paralyzed man, “Get up, take your mat and go home.” Then the man got up and went home. When the crowd saw this, they were filled with awe; and they praised God, who had given such authority to man. Matthew 9:6-8
After the crowd had been put outside, he went in and took the girl by the hand, and she got up. News of this spread through all that region. Matthew 9:25-26
Then he said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” So he stretched it out and it was completely restored, just as sound as the other. But the Pharisees went out and plotted how they might kill Jesus. Aware of this, Jesus withdrew from that place. A large crowd followed him, and he healed all who were ill. Matthew 12:13-15
That same day Jesus went out of the house and sat by the lake. Such large crowds gathered around him that he got into a boat and sat in it, while all the people stood on the shore. Matthew 13:1-2
Great crowds came to him, bringing the lame, the blind, the crippled, the mute and many others, and laid them at his feet; and he healed them. The people were amazed when they saw the mute speaking, the crippled made well, the lame walking and the blind seeing. And they praised the God of Israel. Matthew 15:30-31
When Jesus had finished saying these things, he left Galilee and went into the region of Judea to the other side of the Jordan. Large crowds followed him, and he healed them there. Matthew 19:1-2
The disciples went and did as Jesus had instructed them. They brought the donkey and the colt and placed their cloaks on them for Jesus to sit on. A very large crowd spread their cloaks on the road, while others cut branches from the trees and spread them on the road. The crowds that went ahead of him and those that followed shouted, “Hosanna to the Son of David! Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord! Hosanna in the highest heaven!” When Jesus entered Jerusalem, the whole city was stirred and asked, “Who is this?” The crowds answered, “This is Jesus, the prophet from Nazareth in Galilee.” Matthew 21:6-11
That, my friends, is The WOW! Factor. Jesus got the entire nation of Israel’s attention, which resulted in overwhelming admiration by the masses, who then developed such an insatiable desire to know more that they followed him everywhere he went.
I’m not saying that local church men’s ministries should think up grandiose schemes just to get the public’s attention. The public can be impressed for the wrong reasons.
The crowds that followed Jesus were often enthralled by him for the wrong reasons. Some just wanted to be entertained by a great miracle (Luke 23:8). Some tagged along to see what all the excitement was about (Luke 19:2-9). Some thought following Jesus was their ticket to success (Matthew 20:21). Some even thought Jesus was their free meal ticket, as we see in John chapter six.
Then some boats from Tiberias landed near the place where the people had eaten the bread after the Lord had given thanks. Once the crowd realized that neither Jesus nor his disciples were there, they got into the boats and went to Capernaum in search of Jesus. When they found him on the other side of the lake, they asked him, “Rabbi, when did you get here?” Jesus answered, “Very truly I tell you, you are looking for me, not because you saw the signs I performed but because you ate the loaves and had your fill. John 6:23-26
Because the crowds did not understand the purpose of Jesus’ miracles (to reveal himself as the prophesied messiah sent by God), they did not understand the nature of his person (that he was God incarnate), nor the ultimate goal of his ministry (to sacrifice himself for the sins of the world). Thus, Jesus had to constantly extricate himself from the false expectations of the crowds around him and even from the false expectations of his own disciples (Matthew 16:21-23).
As the day for Jesus to sacrifice himself on the cross drew closer, Jesus’ WOW! Factor began to rapidly fade away, along with the crowds who followed him into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday. By the time Jesus hung on the cross one week later, he was almost completely deserted.
But it was during his last week on earth before he died, the Passion Week, that Jesus demonstrated the one element that would properly wow his disciples: his love for them.
It was just before the Passover Festival. Jesus knew that the hour had come for him to leave this world and go to the Father. Having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them to the end. John 13:1
The phrase, “to the end” in this verse can be translated “to the greatest extent.” That is, Jesus’ focus was on proving to his disciples “the full extent of his love” for them, as the NIV translates it. In other words, his eleven disciples would have a front row seat as they witnessed the complete demonstration of Christ’s love for them.
Jesus started his demonstration by washing his disciples’ feet, an act of utter humility before a group of men who only minutes before had been arguing about who was the greatest among them.
Jesus ended his demonstration by dying on the cross for his disciples, and for all of us, an act of love that only later would be understood when illuminated by the Resurrection and the giving of the Spirit, resulting in a cascading sense of awe and wonder at what God, in Christ, had accomplished.
The WOW! Factor was back.
“A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” John 13:34-35
When Jesus gave this command, known as the New Commandment, in the last night discourse, he gave it to a group of men not unlike any ordinary men’s ministry in any ordinary church. Jesus’ disciples had met to eat a meal, and a sacred meal at that. There were just twelve of them, soon to be just eleven; probably around the average size of most men’s ministries.
It was these men whom Jesus commanded to “love one another” as he had loved them. Note that Jesus didn’t command them to love the world as he had loved them. He didn’t command them to love their neighbors as he had loved them. He didn’t even command them to love their wives and children as he had loved them.
He commanded them to love each other as he had loved them.
United solely by faith in him, not by blood, not by race, not by family, but by their new spiritual birth, Jesus commanded his eleven men to love each other.
This love Jesus wanted his “men’s ministry” of eleven men to have for each other was no ordinary love. They were to love each other as he had loved them, that is, to the death.
And then Jesus said that he wanted their love for each other to be their defining characteristic, their WOW! Factor, because by it the entire world would recognize them as his disciples.
In other words, the world may be alienated from God, spiritually blind, and dead in their trespasses and sins, but nevertheless, God has hardwired unbelievers to know when they are in the presence of the love of Christ.
And the love of Christ at work in us, my friends, is The WOW! Factor Jesus Christ wants every men’s ministry to have.
When a local church’s men’s ministry has something unusual. Something unexpected. Something spectacular. Something important. Something excellent. Something renowned. Something valuable. Something admirable. Something heroic. When something like this appears in ordinary men in an ordinary local church, word of it spreads rapidly and people come running.
That something is called the love of Christ, the greatest WOW! Factor in the history of humanity.
And when a local church men’s ministry has the love of Christ and practices the love of Christ in everyday life, when it has that WOW! Factor, it becomes a men’s ministry men want to know.
But you are living with evil people all around you,
who have lost their sense of what is right.
Among those people you shine like lights
in a dark world. Philippians 2:15 (ERV)
Nothing elicits The WOW! Factor like diamonds, especially when they are set on black felt under a bright light. The contrast between the non-reflective felt and the light dancing off of the diamonds magnifies their awesome beauty.
We live in a time of rapid male declension. But as male culture around us grows ever darker, local church men's ministries, like diamonds on black velvet, have an opportunity to shine brilliantly.
In other words, when the lights go down, it just means that the show is about to start. Men, this is our opportunity to shine!
But in order for local church men's ministries to shine as brightly as they can in this dark world, we first need to understand what the current dissolution of male culture is all about, why the world cannot explain it, and why it cannot correct it.
It has always been the case that more men than women engage in anti social and self destructive behavior as exemplified by the fact that, historically, far more men have populated prisons than women. But until the last half of the twentieth century, men who exhibited pathological behavior represented a minority on the fringes of our culture. The vast majority were stable, self assured, goal oriented men who formed a functional and productive part of society as husbands and fathers as well as business, church and community leaders.
Now, however, it is becoming increasingly clear that men in general have a problem; men as a whole no longer know who they are, why they are here, nor where they are going. They are not “fitting” into society well. What exactly is an adult man supposed to be and do, anyway?
Kay Hymowitz cites a long list of book and magazine article titles that demonstrate how rudderless men have become. “Articles and books with such titles as “The End of Men,” “Are Men Necessary?,” The Decline of Males, “The Death of Macho,” “Women Will Rule the World,” and “Is There Anything Good About Men?” point toward a growing recognition that men are not thriving in today’s cultural and economic environment.”
To this growing literary genre we can add these alarming titles: “Men to Boys: The Making of Modern Immaturity”; “Save the Males”: “Why Men Matter, Why Women Should Care”; “Stiffed: The Betrayal of the American Man”, “The Demise of Guys, The Myth of Male Power”, “Why Men Are the Way They Are”; “Mismatch: the Growing Gulf Between Men and Women”; and Hymowitz’s own book, “Manning Up: How the Rise of Women Has Turned Men into Boys”.
A common theme winding through this literature is that men no longer have a road map for life and, as a result, they extend their adolescence well into their late twenties and even thirties, becoming “child-men,” “man-boys” or “preadults” instead.
“The child-man, then, is the lost son of a host of economic and cultural changes: the demographic shift I call preadulthood, the Playboy philosophy, feminism, the wild west of our new media, and a shrugging iffiness on the subject of husbands and fathers. He has no life script, no special reason to grow up,” writes Kay Hymowitz.
Gary Cross observes, “There is not a clear path towards the kind of indisputable maturity that my fathers’ generation could feel”. Cross continues, “Our age has systematically rejected the Victorian [Read “Christian.”] patriarch without finding an adequate alternative… Some men have abandoned the traditional ideals of paternal responsibility of family, community, and culture without replacing them with new models of “grown-up” behavior.” (Material in brackets added.)
Numerous demographic statistics on men with respect to education, work and family life provide concrete evidence that the directionless male has become the new norm in modern society. Since it is de rigueur for writers on the subject of contemporary men to quote these statistics, I also will oblige.
Fewer men (90 per cent) than women (92 per cent) graduate from high school. By 2017, women are projected to earn 64.2 per cent of Associate’s degrees, 59.9 per cent of Bachelor’s degrees, 62.9 per cent of Master’s degrees, and 55.5 per cent of Doctorates. Unmarried, childless women are out earning men in 147 of the 150 largest U.S. cities.
Since 1970, the median age for first marriage has increased five years for both men and women to almost 28. The divorce rate is double the rate in 1960. Prior to 1970, only about 1 per cent of all couples cohabitated. 12 per cent do now. 60 per cent of all adults ages 25-44 have cohabitated at some point. Just 53 per cent of American households have a married couple in them, compared with 70 per cent in 1970.
Up to 40 per cent of children sleep in a home without their birth father. Once a rarity, the number of children living in fatherless homes has tripled since 1960, from 8 million to 24 million.
The result of these depressing figures is that American culture, once dominated by men, is now becoming a woman’s world. “This is what I call the New Girl Order,” writes Hymowitz. “For the first time ever, and I do mean ever, young women are reaching their twenties with more achievements, more education, more property, and, arguably, more ambition than their male counterparts.”
And what about men? “The child-man is the fun house mirror image of the alpha girl. If she is ambitious, he is a slacker. If she is hyper-organized and self-directed, he tends toward passivity and vagueness. If she is preternaturally mature, he is happily not.”
This escalating failure to socialize men is having dramatic and deleterious effects on American culture. “If being unmarried is a measure of “adultescence,” writes Cross, “single American men are seven times more likely to go to prison than married men, four times more likely to be victims of violent crime and twice as likely to be in an accident than the married. Bachelors are much less likely to hold a full time job (62 vs. 75 per cent). It is also true that single American men tend to be less well off than married ones (only 21 per cent earning more than $50,000 compared with 49 per cent of their married counterparts)…. In sum, men remain longer in the gang, that is, the irresponsible life. They are allowed, almost obliged, to cling to their teenage mindsets. Some cynics (or evolutionary anthropologists) might just say that men have always been boys-oversexed, irresponsible, self-indulgent, and prone to violent competitiveness. This ignores, however, centuries of culture, especially the civilizing efforts of our Victorian [i.e. Christian] predecessors that created models of maturity for men. And while these efforts were not always successful and often were tainted with hypocrisy, they did produce many men who were not boys. Something has changed.”
So what has changed? What is the cause of this historic male role amnesia? What forces cut the mooring lines for men and set them adrift? Three social factors have been cited: the feminist movement and its attendant sexual revolution, changing economic conditions that favor females, and a mass media that exploits and denigrates young men.
On the evening of September 20, 1973, in the Houston Astrodome, 90 million Americans watched Billie Jean King defeat Bobby Riggs in tennis 6-4, 6-3, 6-3. If there ever were a tipping point in the battle of the sexes, this was it. As a young man coming of age in Southern California in the 60’s and early 70’s, watching a woman tennis pro soundly defeat a male tennis pro cemented in my mind the impression that life as I knew it was changing.
It seemed, as the song goes, that everything men could do, women could do as well or better. Women, I would learn, have better relationships, are less violent, go to college in greater numbers, raise children better, communicate better. The list goes on and on. Now, the only thing left for men, it seems, is football and certain forward combat positions in the military.
No longer were women confined to the preordained roles of housewife and mother. An entire horizon of possibilities awaited them. Marriage and children were simply options, not requirements.
“With the emergence of feminism, there was an ever-sharper break with the past-regarding everything from dating and marriage to child rearing and male domestic roles, as well as women’s access to jobs, education, and legal rights,” writes Gary Cross. The old order was fading away and, for women, a bright future seemed to await them.
That old order included the old sexual mores of chastity and marital fidelity. With the arrival of the pill, women no longer had to fear unwanted pregnancy. With education and the marketplace opening up to them, economic independence was now within their reach. And with no fault divorce making the act of dissolving a marriage bond almost as easy as picking up milk at the local store, permanent unions seemed like an anachronistic hangover from the past.
For men, on the other hand, the future was not so clear, perhaps because their past was being reinterpreted by radical feminists. Their former male role models were patriarchs, heads of households epitomized by the sitcom, Father Knows Best. But with the rise of feminism, those role models were viewed as oppressive to women. But if this was the case, then how were men supposed to relate to their future wives and children?
Increasingly, the answer men have given to this question has been, “We won’t relate to them at all.” More and more, young men have jettisoned marriage and fatherhood in favor of the hook up and the absentee father. “Minimized by cultural forces and stripped of the roles that have defined males for centuries, men have been delivered of the expectation that they behave honorably toward the physically more-vulnerable sex and the dependent children she bears,” writes Kathleen Parker.
The result is a view of manhood that resembles some kind of amorphous sludge. As Kay Hymowitz observes, “A girl walks into a bar. A guy gives her the once-over. Is he only interested in one thing, as the old saying used to go? Or is he soul mate material? Is he looking for a friends-with-benefits arrangement or for romance? He could have a girlfriend, a wife, an ex-wife, children, or a spreadsheet. Does he like women or is he gay? Worse, is he one of those guys so filled with bitterness that he hangs around websites like Nomarriage.com, MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way), or Eternal Bachelor (“Give Modern Women the Husband They Deserve. None.”)?”
And “None” has become pretty much the default option for many women. Having clawed their way to the top of so many social indicators, women stand up, brush themselves off, look around and ask, “Where did the men go?”
As Abigail Trafford laments in an op-ed piece in the Washington Post, “We didn’t want to push men aside. We wanted to join them in the upper deck and enjoy the synergy of merging our talents and responsibilities-in both the public and private spheres of life. After all, we love men. They are our partners, the fathers of our children. We worked hard to get rid of labels that branded women the fragile sex and men the favored sex. We never imagined that society would swap the labels.”
It’s hard to believe now, but prior to 1970 the majority of households in America were comprised of a husband/breadwinner, along with a wife/homemaker and their dependent children.
I grew up in just such a home. My father graduated from high school and took a job as an errand boy for a large California title insurance firm located in downtown Los Angeles. Over the next forty-five years, Dad worked his way up to become a major executive in his company. During that time, he married my mother and had five children.
On his one salary my father provided for himself along with his wife and children, financed a retirement that spanned thirty-four years until he died at the age of 99, and left a significant inheritance for me and my siblings. Besides all this, Dad tithed ten per cent to his church his entire life. We weren’t rich. We weren’t poor. We were solidly middle class.
Family scenarios similar to mine played out in households all over America in the first half of the twentieth century. With a high school education, a man could get a well paying job, usually in manufacturing or construction, marry in his early twenties and raise a family all on his income alone.
In short, the road to manhood was quick and clearly defined. “Men married young, as early as a median age of 22.5 years in 1956. It seemed that almost every man bought into the provider’s role-few sought to prolong their independence or the playful self-indulgence of the teenager,” writes Gary Cross.
Not so today. Now families comprised of a father as the sole breadwinner, a stay-at-home mother, and dependent children make up only twenty per cent of American households. No longer are families dependent on men alone.
Four factors converged to cause this tectonic change in family structure. First, women who had been hired to replace drafted men in their jobs during WWII, continued working outside the home following the war. Then, in the next three decades, what began as a trickle turned into a full fledged flood as women entered the workforce in droves.
Second, manufacturing jobs, the traditional male source of high paying work, were “outsourced” oversees. American males were now competing with cheap foreign labor. The dream of earning a “living” wage, i.e. of being able to support a family on one salary alone, quickly faded, especially for men with only a high school education.
Third, the American economy, hammered as it was in its manufacturing sector, shifted its focus to a knowledge and service based economy, sectors that favor women.
And fourth, women are now outpacing men in higher education. “Between 1975 and 2006, the percentage of women with at least a college degree increased from 18.6 to 34.2 percent. Men barely budged: their numbers went from 26.8 percent to 27.9,” writes Kay Hymowitz.
As a result, men, once the financial backbone of the American family, have become more or less superfluous. Wives and mothers can leave a marriage at any time, and often do simply because they can afford to. “With women moving ahead in an advanced economy, provider husbands and fathers are now optional, and the character qualities men had needed to play their role-fortitude, stoicism, courage, fidelity-are obsolete and even a little embarrassing” writes Hymowitz.
As a young boy growing up in the fifties and sixties, it wasn’t difficult to find male role models on TV worthy of my emulation. There was Jim Anderson, the affable father in Father Knows Best, Andy Taylor, the bemused sheriff and single dad in The Andy Griffith Show, Steve Douglas, another single dad in My Three Sons, Ward Cleaver, the wise father in Leave it to Beaver, and Mike Brady, the head of the bunch in The Brady Bunch.
All of these men had several things in common: they were family men, they held jobs and provided for their families, they loved their wife (when they had one) and their children, they were on top of their game, and, most of all, they were respected.
It’s been downhill for males on TV ever since. One can think, for example of Al Bundy, the loser father in Married With Children, Archie Bunker, the bigot clod in All in the Family, Arthur Spooner, the anger management dropout dad in King of Queens, and Ray Barone, the clueless and directionless husband and father in Everybody Loves Raymond. Safe to say, none of these men are worthy of our respect or admiration.
This coarsening view of males in society has been the trend throughout American culture over the last fifty years, from John Wayne to Adam Sandler, from Carey Grant (in his roles) to Hugh Grant.
Observes Kathleen Parker, “In film and music, men are variously portrayed as dolts, bullies, brutes, deadbeats, rapists, sexual predators, and wife beaters. Even otherwise easygoing family men in sitcoms are invariably cast as, at best, bumbling, dimwitted fools…. At the same time that men have been ridiculed in the public square, the importance of fatherhood has been diminished along with other traditionally male roles of father, protector, and provider, which are increasingly viewed as regressive manifestations of an outmoded patriarchy.” The result, Parker writes, is that “Young men now in their twenties have never experienced a culture in which men were respected or expected to be gentlemen.”
The mass media message is clear: men today never really mature because there isn’t any actual need for them to do so. No one depends on them. No one needs them. The only thing left for men to do is seek to maintain their youth by playing at life. And consumer culture has been happy to oblige.
“Makers of modern consumer and media culture have gradually learned to feed on this rejection of past models of maturity and the desire to return to or retain childhood. In turn, they have figured out how to sell back to men this longed-for image of perpetual youth. Over time, this makes youth, once a life stage, into a permanent and highly desirable lifestyle,” writes renowned cultural historian, Gary Cross. The result is that our culture now openly mocks men at almost every turn.
These, then, are three causes for modern male immaturity often cited by commentators: the feminist movement and sexual revolution, changing economic conditions, and mass media.
The problem, however, is that few of those following the decline of the modern male offer solid solutions to the problem. And when they do, the solutions they propose are vague, such as appeals to tradition (Parker: “Traditional values are traditional for a reason. They have survived the passage of time because they work.”) or altruism (Cross: “We must recognize that as adults we have responsibilities to our partners, families, and communities beyond our own need for experience and pleasure.”)
One would think that an accurate and incisive analysis of the problem with contemporary men would hold within it the seeds of an answer. Could it be that these social causes of male immaturity, as important as they are, are not sufficient to explain the origin of the problem?
I believe the answer to that question is yes. To understand the real reason why men today are acting out as they are, we must look on a more fundamental level, the level of world view-what men believe about reality in general and how their belief system has changed over time.
One hundred years ago, the divorce rate in America was 5%, out of wedlock births were almost unheard of, and cohabiting couples were considered scandalous. This reflected a pattern that had existed for four hundred years in western civilization, starting with the legalization of divorce during the Protestant Reformation.
True, at the beginning of the twentieth century, the topic of sex was taboo, women had back alley abortions and a significant per cent of marriages were brutal. But there was a general consensus about what a family should look like and how men were supposed to act.
The process of becoming an adult man itself was clear and simple: Young men coming of age worked the farm or got a job in the city, married, had children and supported their families. That was it. Adolescence was a brief sojourn on the way to manhood and family life. And while a man’s life could be washboard hard and fleetingly brief, it had this to say for it: it was straightforward and productive.
Buttressing all of this was a set of Judeo Christian beliefs and values that formed the bedrock for a coherent and predictable society. Although theism was no longer accepted dogma in intellectual circles at the beginning of the twentieth century, it still permeated and influenced much of American culture.
For the average man on the street, God was an omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent Person, holy and supreme, someone to be feared and whose moral law as revealed in Scripture was to be obeyed.
Out of this respect for God’s law came a sense of duty to fulfill one’s responsibility to one’s wife and children. In his marriage and family a man corralled his passions and reconciled himself with the laws of God. Freedom wasn’t seen primarily as the ability fulfill oneself, but rather the ability to worship and serve this God according to one’s conscience.
And conscience reigned supreme. The fear of spending eternity in hell kept most men in line. Sex outside of marriage often resulted in intense personal guilt, not to mention the approbation of the community. A man’s church, his Bible and his culture were univocal: fornication and adultery were sins worthy of damnation.
The result of a culture with a broadly intact family structure and men who played an integral role in supporting it was an upward mobility among the poor. While a married couple themselves might live in poverty in the early 1900s, their generally stable relationship and faith in God formed the template and rationale for their children to marry, sacrifice and be able to work themselves out of poverty.
My own family history is an example of this upward mobility. My father’s parents were poor immigrants from rural, sub-artic Norway. They came to America through Ellis Island, my grandfather at the age of five with his parents in 1880 and my grandmother at the age of twenty-six in 1902.
They met, married, had a family and lived near the poverty line for most of their lives. But their five children went on to build healthy families and achieve the American dream of owning their own home. These in turn had children and grandchildren who, for the most part, also established healthy families and did even better.
Among the descendants of my grandparents are teachers, professors, a land developer, a test pilot, an insurance executive, an engineer, missionaries, a pastor, physicians, artists, computer specialists, and business managers.
Now fast forward to the present. In the last one hundred years, the Judeo-Christian world view has been acid washed almost entirely from western civilization. The Bible has been stripped of its authority and the church has been demoted to the sidelines, leaving only a faint patina of Christianity layered on the culture.
In America, the Christian religion is simply one among many now. In its place philosophical materialism and its scientific handmaid, Darwinism, reign supreme. Everything, it seems, can be explained by matter, energy, chance and natural law, resulting in cultural reductionism.
People, once regarded as immortal souls created in the image of God, are simply the end result of millions of years of chance mutations and natural selection; just one more species of animal — brilliant, creative and amazingly social — but animals none the less.
The world itself is only a pinprick in an unimaginably vast universe. And morality is no longer founded on the bedrock of a holy God, but rather on utilitarian and always malleable “values”: the social expression of whatever works, “a biological adaptation no less than are hands and feet and teeth,” as philosopher Michael Ruse described the human propensity to moralize.
Given the current intellectual milieu, if one wonders why men act the way they do today, consider this: men are nothing if not logical. And if you tell men over and over again for a long enough period of time that life has no meaning, that all there really is to our existence is immediate physical gratification and that they are just animals, well, pretty soon they will start acting as if — you got it — life has no meaning, that all there is to their existence is immediate physical gratification and that they are, in fact, just animals and should act like they are just animals.
We ought not be surprised, therefore, when they treat women like they’re just animals too. What logical reason do men have to behave otherwise? Kay Hymowitz calls young single men who accept the modern world view and have, consequently, a Darwinian ideology “dating Darwinists” and about them she writes, “Rejecting all manners that enshrined respect and care in an area of human interaction rife with opportunities for pain and humiliation, dating Darwinists unapologetically endorse ruthlessness and deception. ‘You see, Nature doesn’t care about hurting people’s feelings,’ explains dating coach Mike Pilinski…. ‘It cares ONLY about reproductive success in order to keep those precious DNA molecules traveling forward in Time.'”
Laments Kathleen Parker, “Once sex is free of all considerations except what pleasure it brings in that moment, then what? Well, we’re nothing but beasts.” She goes on to quote Theodore Dalrymple: “It is precisely the envelopment of sex (and all other natural functions) with an aura of deeper meaning that makes man human and distinguishes him from the rest of animate nature. To remove that meaning, to reduce sex to biology…is to return man to a level of primitive behavior of which we have no record in human history. All animals have sex, but only man makes love. When sex is deprived of the meaning with which only the social conventions, religious taboos, and personal restraints so despised by sexual revolutionaries…can infuse it, all that is left is the ceaseless-and ultimately boring and meaningless-search for the transcendent orgasm.”
Think this is an exaggeration? One estimate puts the percentage of men currently involved in pornography on a regular basis at 70 per cent. “Everyday, 260 new porn sites go online. In 2005, Time put U.S. porn sales at $20 billion annually,” notes Parker. “The mainstreaming of pornography is no longer a concern,” she writes, “but a reality. Once the world of lowlifes, back alleys, and organized crime, pornography has morphed into a family business where anybody can be a star."
Devoid of any transcendent values to halt the process, our culture in general, and men in particular, are rapidly descending into the sewer. Recent episodes of mainstream, prime time TV shows increasingly display frontal nudity (The Office and America’s Got Talent are two examples) and Clint Eastwood openly refers to unspeakably vulgar sexual acts in a prime time, nationally broadcast speech at the Republican Convention.
The result is increasing chaos in American family life. Want to see what American families are going to be like in twenty years? Then look at the African American community. Writes Joy Jones, “Often what happens in black America is a sign of what the rest of America can eventually expect.”
She then cites Andrew Hacker in “Mismatch: The Growing Gulf between Women and Men: “Andrew Hacker noted that the structure of white families is evolving in the direction of that of black families of the 1960s. In 1960, 67 percent of black families were headed by a husband and wife, compared to 90.9 percent for whites. By 2000, the figure for white families had dropped to 79.8 percent. Births to unwed white mothers were 22.5 percent in 2001, compared to 2.3 percent in 1960.” Today, 73 percent of black children are born outside of marriage and we have no reason to think that the white population will not eventually catch up.
Sadly, it is the poor who suffer most from the tectonic cultural change in world view that has taken place in the past 100 years. Marriage in lower class America is in shambles. Dad has gone AWOL, resulting in single moms with dependent children becoming the norm for families in poor neighborhoods.
No longer do second and third generations of poor people work themselves out of poverty. Rather, the poor have become a permanent underclass, virtual wards of the state with little hope of ever escaping poverty.
I personally lived in inner city Los Angeles — in a black community — and inner city Dallas — in a white community — as a young adult and observed this cycle of poverty and family disintegration first hand. Without a moral, theistic world view and a culture that supported it, impoverished young adults were virtually guaranteed a future of single parent families, bad schools, violence, drugs, alcohol, gangs and prison.
A second demographic dramatically affected by the ascendancy of a materialistic world view is men. On the one hand, women carry with them a natural accountability system called a womb, mitigating some of the effects of philosophical materialism. The knowledge that unplanned and unprotected sex can lead to conception, nine months of gestation, birth and dependent children — not to mention disease — tends to focus a woman’s mind. Even in a universe perceived as godless, babies still have to be fed.
The reality that men are quickly becoming less dependable and less agreeable to parenting and supporting the children they sire forces women to plan ahead for theirs and their children’s future by making sure they get the education they need. And the ticking time bomb of future infertility gives it all a sense of urgency for women.
Not so men. In the new universe, men have been inculcated with the attitude that sex is merely an animal function. “Their problem,” observes Kay Hymowitz, “is coming of age in a culture without reliable conventions to tame the raw egotism and roughness of nature’s mating dance. It’s all about sex anyway, a lot of guys conclude, so why dress it all up in silly manners?”
So men shrug off normal family relationships like sweaty socks and become completely immersed in their selves. As a result, they take American individualism to its extreme conclusion: “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for me”. Why should men sacrifice for women and children if there isn’t any real need for men anyway, if society only winks at their mutiny, and if there are no moral codes to condemn their behavior?
“Today,” laments Gary Cross, “in some circles there is a veritable rejection of maturity in all of its meanings. Living for today, disdainful of pretense and formality, ever open to new thrills and experiences, but also mocking convention in celebrations of amoral violent fantasy, crude vulgarity, and unrestrained appetite, the boy-man makes a fetish of the ‘cool.’ He turns maturity into a joke, a pitiful loss to be avoided at almost all costs."
The tragic result of this degrading trend is that our once noble western institutions are being transformed into little more than “animal houses” – stables for men in heat. A president gets caught literally with his pants down engaging in oral sex in the oval office. A famous general and head of the CIA resigns over an affair with his biographer. A California governor gets his house maid pregnant and raises the love child in the presence of his unsuspecting wife. The SEC misses massive bank fraud because its examiners are watching porn online for hours on end. A football coach besmirches the reputation of an entire university for looking the other way while an underling engages in pedophilia in the school showers. A major Christian denomination pays out hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements for not reporting pedophilia in its own ranks. The head of a national religious organization gets caught having sex with his male masseuse…. And on and on and on it goes.
It would be nice to think that these examples are just the dalliances of famous and powerful men; that ordinary men behave better. But drive down any suburban street in America and the same sad stories can be found — in spades. All we have to do is look at the content of the TV programs, the movies, the music, the magazines, the novels and the online websites that we demand be given us. The same animal house effluent is spewing forth from every mass media orifice. Why? Because this is the logical conclusion of what our modern culture believes to be true: we are just animals, so why not act like it?
For Christians, contemporary society resembles a mass zombie invasion: legions of soulless people lurching forward on sclerotic legs, jaws slacked, eyes glazed, arms stretched out searching for something — anything — to devour, controlled by some unknown evil, and oblivious to the death and decay that dwells within them and the destruction and despair that lies around them. And in the crevasses and fissures of the wasteland these ghouls are creating hide the Christians, crouched down like roly-poly bugs, squatting on their heels, chins glued to their knees, eyes cringed shut, ears muted with trembling hands as they wait for the jeremiads they’ve lobbed into the advancing horde to explode. But still they come. And out of holes that no longer resemble mouths are heard barely audible chants at first, set to a macabre rendition of a long forgotten children’s tune. But as they continue their inexorable march, the song grows louder and clearer until it reaches unbearable decibels: “We’re all just animals after all…. WE’RE ALL JUST ANIMALS AFTER ALL!”
One might think that this garish vision is just the disgruntled screed of an exhausted evangelical who has been on the losing side of one too many culture wars. But in the very recent past my community has witnessed-all within a few minutes’ drive of my neighborhood-the mass killings at Columbine High, parishioners murdered while worshiping at church (some ushers at our church not only pass out bulletins now, they’re also secretly packing heat and scanning the congregation with furtive eyes, looking for the next mass murderer), another mass killing at a theater, an eleven year old girl abducted, killed, dismembered and then abandoned in a black trash bag by the side of a nearby road, and a student arrested for plotting to kill the President, along with as many children as possible on Halloween (he also possessed blueprints of my daughter’s high school).
Not surprisingly, all of these individuals are men. The philosophical materialism men find so attractive has a certain inextricable logic to it that ends in nihilism. “Some people just want to watch the world burn down, and I’m one of them,” explained our neighborhood wannabe presidential assassin. One might be impressed if this were the kernel of an original thought, but he was simply paraphrasing The Dark Night: “Some men just want to watch the world burn.”
Nihilism oozes through the minds of more and more men like a slow moving sludge seeking the lowest sewer. Truth be told, the day is coming when we will look back on our time with this wistful hope: if only men did act like they were just animals it would be an improvement. Even animals treat their own better than the way these men do.
To do so, I am going to start by giving a secular example of how groupthink negatively impacts a group of individuals in following wise counsel, which I call a "protocol," and instead arrive at inadequate, and even self-destructive, conclusions.
As an illustration of groupthink, I'm going to use the rise of mass shootings in America, often by young men, and how some first responders allowed groupthink to affect how they utilized their protocol.
May 24, 2022, Robb Elementary School, Uvalde, Texas
By now most everyone reading this has heard of the tragic mass shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas.
On May 24, 2022, 18 year old Salvador Ramos entered the school and committed one of the most evil, vile, and senseless acts in the history of America. He shot 34 innocent children and 2 adults in two adjoining classrooms, killing 19 of the children and both of the adults, along with wounding 17 other children. The shootings lasted for more than an hour.
But just as shocking as the murders in Uvalde themselves was the fact that Ramos' intermittent shooting lasted 74 minutes after first responders arrived. Instead of going immediately into the classrooms and neutralizing the gunman as their protocol mandated they do, law enforcement officers waited in the school corridors and outside the school until finally, mercifully, members of the United States Border Patrol opened the unlocked door, entered the classroom, and killed the shooter.
In all, over 360 officers, including high-ranking police officers, experienced Texas state troopers, police academy instructors, Border Patrol elite tactical agents -- even federal SWAT specialists, stood paralyzed for over an hour as they heard the gunman shooting the students inside the two classrooms. Outside, parents pleaded with the officers to let them go in themselves and subdue the gunman, but were restrained from doing so. Even 911 calls pleading for help from children inside the classrooms fell on deaf ears.
This all happened in spite of Texas' official active shooter protocol that requires every individual officer, local, state, or federal, responding to an active shooter to immediately engage the gunman without waiting for orders or backup.
Every one of those 360 officers had been trained in that protocol and knew what they were supposed to do, especially the very first officers to arrive at the scene. All it would have taken was for one officer to do what the protocol said he was supposed to do and immediately break into the classroom and kill the shooter. Just one. But not one did...for 74 minutes.
Like Salvador Ramos and the first responders at Robb Elementary School, something similar is happening with local church men's ministries and the aimless, rootless, and destructive men we are supposed to be reaching.
Local church men's ministries are standing by, paralyzed and ineffective, as they witness the decades-long degradation of men in America and the trail of pain and suffering they are leaving behind them.
True, Salvador Ramos is an example America's nihilistic male culture that I have written about. But there is an important lesson to be learned from the first responders who arrived at the school.
The first responders to Ramos' massacre are examples of what we as men's ministry leaders are not to do in response to our degraded male culture. Just as the first responders to Robb Elementary School - along with the hundreds of responders who arrived after them - went against their protocol and instead stood by and did nothing while a great tragedy was taking place, so local church men's ministries are ignoring their "protocol" and instead stand paralyzed and ineffective while hundreds of thousands of men like Salvador Ramos live out their destructive lives.
I make this accusation about local church men's ministries not because I disdain them, but because I love them. Indeed, I firmly believe that they are America's last and best hope for genuine revival and reformation among men.
Local church men's ministries can be great. They can be amazing. But instead of the vibrant and culture transforming men's ministries I know they can be, and the Bible says they should be, I have observed over the years several problems local church men's ministries have that mitigate their effectiveness. Here are some of them:
But there is one problem in particular that local church men's ministries grapple with and that is the problem of groupthink.
Groupthink: the key problem at Robb Elementary School
What we witnessed with how the law enforcement officers failed to respond properly to Salvador Ramos at Robb Elementary School was a classic example of groupthink and its consequences.
Groupthink is a debilitating psychological phenomenon that can take hold on a group of people and make them, and the people who follow after them, captive, sometimes for hundreds of years, to a prevailing, but obviously wrong, conviction. Succumbing to groupthink makes us weak and vulnerable. It makes us us ineffective. It can even force us to abandon our convictions.
Here are two definitions of groupthink, one from Wikipedia and one from Psychology Today:
Now that we know what groupthink is, let's do a mind experiment.
Imagine that you are the 361st law officer to arrive at Robb Elementary School that fateful day. You hear the sporadic gunshots coming from the two adjacent classrooms. You know the gunshots mean children are still being murdered. You see the children's parents standing outside the school pleading for someone to go in and save them. And you know that the protocol you were given in your law enforcement training demands that you run into the classrooms and engage the gunman without waiting for orders or backup. But you also see hundreds of officers, many of them your superiors, standing around and doing nothing.
What would you do? Would you do what your protocol tells you to do and go in and subdue the gunman without waiting for backup or permission? Or would you submit to groupthink by following the example of everyone else and do nothing for 74 minutes so you don't rock the boat?
As you do this mind experiment, what you are wrestling with is the power of groupthink. It would take immense courage to say that 360 of your fellow officers are wrong and instead obey your protocol. But that is what you would have to do to save the lives of those children.
Of course, you would have to risk your life to save them. But you would have already demonstrated courage by breaking out of the groupthink that turned 360 law enforcement officers into cowards.
I have taken pains to describe the serious moral declension modern men are experiencing because it is easy for those of us involved in men's ministry to think that we bear no responsibility for that declension. After all, it is secular culture's rebellion against God that has caused that decline, isn't it?
And so we form our local church men's ministries as isolated social islands in the midst of a sea of men who are lost and hopelessly enslaved to their lusts. We watch from the safety of our church parking lots as across the street marriages dissolve, men forsake their sons, and fatherless boys grow up to sire and abandon more fatherless boys. This happens because those men across the street from our church parking lots think that whatever is happening in "that church over there" has nothing to do with them as men.
In desperation, we turn to our politicians to do something about the spiraling crime those fatherless boys across the street commit without thinking for a minute that maybe our local church men's ministries could themselves be the real source of peace, safety and healing in our communities.
And all the while we completely ignore our "protocol" because we think it is irrelevant to the situation at hand, if we think about it at all.
Yes, to a great extent unbelievers are responsible for the moral chaos around us. But, like the first responders in Uvalde, Texas, the Bible says that we Christian men also bear responsibility for that decline. To paraphrase Paul, "The name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of us" (Romans 2:24).
When a culture in which believers live descends into the moral abyss and believers themselves become objects of disdain, along with the God they worship, it is because they are not following their "protocol," and as a result, they have lost their influence. 'You are the salt of the earth. But what good is salt if it has lost its flavor?" (Matthew 5:13). Or, to put it another way, believers have no WOW! Factor.
Men, we have been paralyzed by our groupthink: "It's all their fault and there is nothing we can do, except hunker down with some other Christian men in our little local church men's ministry and live out our lives the best we can."
Hogwash. God has given us clear and specific instructions for what to do in a situation like this. Those instructions are our protocol. All we need is for men to break out of their hypnotic groupthink and say, "Hey, guys. Here is what we need to do. It's written right here in the Bible in black and white. Let's go do it."
Just one warning: following your protocol may cost you your life.
When it comes to the topic of police responding to a mass shooting, it is all about them following this simple and clear protocol: do not wait for permission or backup, go in immediately and take down the shooter. Police officers are trained in this protocol in spite of the fact that, on average, “one third of the police officers who made that solo entry got shot.”3
Unfortunately, the 360 first responders to the shooter in Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas became the victims of groupthink and did not follow their protocol. Instead, they put their own safety ahead of the safety of the children and adults they were supposed to protect, resulting in the deaths of 19 children and two adults, and the wounding of 17 other children.
By comparison, on Monday of this week (October 24, 2022), a shooter in St. Louis entered Central Visual and Performing Arts High School with an AR-15-style rifle and 600 rounds of ammunition. He obviously intended to kill as many people as he could, just like the shooter at Robb Elementary School, and many other shooters before him. But in contrast to the first responders in Uvalde, the first responders in St. Louis followed their protocol, immediately entering the school and taking out the shooter within just a few minutes, risking their own lives in the process. The result: only one adult and one student died, with several others wounded.
Christian men in local church men’s ministries stand by passive and helpless while they witness a similar tragedy: American men experiencing a decades-long spiritual, moral, and social conflagration that negatively impacts all aspects of our culture. Local church men’s ministries can be God’s primary means by which this disaster that afflicts men can not only be slowed down and stopped, but reversed, if only we would obey our God-given “protocol.”
But like the first responders in Uvalde, Texas, we are not obeying our protocol. We shrug off our responsibility to properly respond to the male moral and social dysfunction we see around us and instead we isolate ourselves from it by creating our own little social bubbles – our men’s ministries – behind the four walls of our church buildings. Our focus is primarily on our own spiritual lives and our marriages and families, but we ignore our protocol and the outside world it is intended to reach.
So what is our protocol? To answer that question, I will first begin with the protocol God gave Judah as a way to respond to the moral and social declension the nation found itself in.
The Bible states Judah’s protocol simply and clearly, and many times, in the Old Testament. Here is one example:
Learn to do right [lit. “good”]; seek justice. Defend the oppressed. Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow. “Come now, let us settle the matter,” says the Lord. “Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be like wool. Isaiah 1:17, 18 (Note: For other Old Testament references to God’s concern for widows and the fatherless, see Deuteronomy 1:18; 14:29; 16:11, 14; 24:17, 20, 21; 26:12, 13; Job 6:27; 24:3, 9, 21; 31:16-22; Psalm 10:14, 18; 68:5; 82:3; 94:4-7; 146:9; Proverbs 15:25; 23:10; Isaiah 1:23; 10:1, 2; Jeremiah 5:28; 7:6; 22:23; Ezekiel 22:7; Hosea 14:3; Zechariah 7:1-14; Malachi 3:5.)
In Isaiah 1:17, God gives Judah specific instructions about what he wants the nation to do (i.e., a protocol) as a response to their current perilous situation. Then, in verse 18, God explains what he will do if the nation follows their protocol. I want to develop these ideas by first starting with verse 18 and then working backwards to verse 17.
“Come now, let us settle the matter,” says the LORD. “Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be like wool.” Isaiah 1:18
I memorized this wonderful and amazing verse as a child. At the time, I was taught that it referred to my personal salvation; that when I placed my faith in Jesus Christ, God wiped all of my sin away and sees me as righteous in Christ Jesus. I am now “white as snow” in God’s sight.
Unfortunately, Isaiah 1:18 is not talking about my personal salvation – or anyone’s for that matter.
Of course, the Bible teaches in other places that at the moment of our salvation, God forgives us of all our sin. “To the one who does not work but trusts God who justifies the ungodly, their faith is credited as righteousness,” Paul writes in Romans 4:5. But personal salvation and forgiveness are not what Isaiah 1:18 is talking about.
What Isaiah 1:18 is talking about is national transformation. The reason we know this is from the context. “Woe to the sinful nation!” God says to Judah in verse 4. In verse 7, God again addresses his litany to the entire nation: “Your country is desolate, your cities burned with fire.” Then He turns his anger on Judah’s political leadership: “Hear the word of the Lord, you rulers of Sodom,” (verse 10). God’s disgust with Judah even includes its religious leaders: “The multitude of your sacrifices, what are they to me?” says the Lord. “I have more than enough of burnt offerings, of rams and the fat of fattened animals” (verse 11).
In the first sixteen verses of Isaiah 1 God is making a case for judging the nation of Judah as a whole. The reason is because Judah has violated its covenant with God, the Mosaic covenant, which stipulated that if they kept his commandments, then God would allow them to dwell in the land that he promised them. But if they did not keep his commandments, then God would expel them from the land.
Unfortunately, because the nation did not keep their part of the covenant, God, as “prosecutor,” is about to haul the nation into “court” for judgement. But in verse 18, He is saying it is not too late, they can settle “out of court” and not go to trial: “Come now, let us settle the matter.”
What, then, does God want Israel to do in order to settle out of court and not be brought to judgment? We find the answer in the previous verse, Isaiah 1:17.
In an important statement that all believers need to pay close attention to, God gives Judah His condition. “Learn to do good; seek justice. Defend the oppressed. Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow.”
The reason why this verse is so important is because it is the foundational verse for every reference to good works in the New Testament. Every time we read about good works in the New Testament, those statements are referencing Isaiah 1:17: “Learn to do good.” For example, Paul’s exhortation in Titus 3:14, “Let our people learn to do good, to meet pressing needs, that they may not be unfruitful,” is a direct application of Isaiah 1:17.
Therefore, to fully comprehend what the New Testament writers are talking about, we must first have a clear understanding of Isaiah 1:17. To do that, we need to look at the three main parts of the verse.
To summarize: The nation of Judah is in deep trouble. Their nation is completely debased, their political leaders are corrupt, and their religious practice is vacuous (Isaiah 1:1-16). Consequently, God is about to judge them for breaking their covenant with him by removing them from the land he promised them and brought them to. But He offers Judah a way out (1:17). He promises them that if they “learn to do good,” – i.e., take up the cause of the oppressed, such as the fatherless and the widow – then he will completely transform their putrid culture into one that is “white as snow” and pure as “wool” (1:18).
Wow! That is quite a promise! God says all Judah had to do to escape judgment was make it a general practice of finding widows and fatherless children and then taking responsibility for their wellbeing. If they did that, he would completely transform their culture.
We can summarize Judah’s protocol this way: respond to the corruption in your nation by pleading the cause of your widows and fatherless children. That was it. All they had to do for God to transform their culture was to find fatherless children and widows, then defend them and plead their cause. That was their protocol. It may sound simplistic in the extreme, but that is what the passage is saying.
So here’s my question: Has Isaiah 1:18 ever actually happen? Do we have specific historic examples of anyone following the protocol and pleading the cause of someone in distress, like a fatherless child or widow, and then God in turn totally and completely transforming their culture?
The answer is both no and yes. No, it did not happen for Judah after Isaiah recorded this protocol. Judah did not follow its protocol – they did not “settle out of court” – and consequently God evicted the nation from the land.
But we do have examples of individuals obeying this protocol prior to this time and then seeing God transform their culture after they obeyed their protocol. In reality, in Isaiah 1:18 God is simply summarizing what had previously already happened.
Here are three examples of how God had already transformed Jewish culture prior to Isaiah 1:18 because someone had pleaded the cause of someone else in distress, like a widow or fatherless child.
“So now, if the boy [Benjamin] is not with us when I [Judah] go back to your servant my father [Jacob], and if my father, whose life is closely bound up with the boy’s life, sees that the boy isn’t there, he will die. Your servants will bring the gray head of our father down to the grave in sorrow. Your servant guaranteed the boy’s safety to my father. I said, ‘If I do not bring him back to you, I will bear the blame before you, my father, all my life!’ Now then, please let your servant remain here as my lord’s slave in place of the boy, and let the boy return with his brothers. How can I go back to my father if the boy is not with me? No! Do not let me see the misery that would come on my father.” Genesis 44:30-34
This story of Judah offering himself in place of his brother Benjamin,(who is about to be taken captive as a virtual “orphan” in Egypt the way his brother Joseph was), and thereby fulfilling his vow to his father Jacob to protect Benjamin, is the moral climax to the Book of Genesis.
It is also God’s answer to Cain’s question after Cain murdered his brother Abel in chapter four: “Am I my brother’s keeper?” God’s answer is, “Yes you are. Judah is your example of how to do that.” Judah offering to sacrifice himself for his brother Benjamin marks a moral turning point for the sons of Jacob and becomes a starting point for the rapid propagation of the nation of Israel in Egypt over the next four hundred years.
Judah obeyed the protocol and God, in turn, transformed Jacob’s sons from jealous, fratricidal liars to men who confessed their sin to their brother Joseph and to their father Jacob. As a result, the family became “white as snow.”
“Look,” said Naomi, “your sister-in-law is going back to her people and her gods. Go back with her. But Ruth replied, “Don’t urge me to leave you or to turn back from you. Where you go I will go, and where you stay I will stay. Your people will be my people and your God my God. Where you die I will die, and there I will be buried. May the Lord deal with me, be it ever so severely, if even death separates you and me.” When Naomi realized that Ruth was determined to go with her, she stopped urging her.
The Book of Ruth records events that happened during the time of the Judges – a period of spiraling spiritual, moral, social and political decline for the nation of Israel. The Book of Ruth references this period in its first verse, “In the days when the judges ruled…”. But then, in the last verse of the book of Ruth, we see a hint at the coming reign of King David – “Obed fathered Jesse, and Jesse fathered David.” The life of David, and especially his ascension to the throne, represents a period where the nation excelled, for the most part, spiritually, morally, socially and politically.
Therefore, the Book of Ruth is answering an important question: How did this happen? How did the nation make this amazing transition from the moral and social chaos of the judges to the reign of David and the Davidic Covenant?
The answer the book of Ruth gives to this question is Ruth’s pledge in chapter 1 to care for her mother-in-law, Naomi, a widow. That one pledge, and how Ruth fulfilled it and obeyed the protocol, began what would become a complete transformation of the entire nation.
Saul’s anger flared up at Jonathan and he said to him, “You son of a perverse and rebellious woman! Don’t I know that you have sided with the son of Jesse to your own shame and to the shame of the mother who bore you? As long as the son of Jesse lives on this earth, neither you nor your kingdom will be established. Now send someone to bring him to me, for he must die!” “Why should he be put to death? What has he done?” Jonathan asked his father. But Saul hurled his spear at him to kill him. Then Jonathan knew that his father intended to kill David. Jonathan got up from the table in fierce anger; on that second day of the feast he did not eat, because he was grieved at his father’s shameful treatment of David. 1 Samuel 20:30-34
It was clear to everyone in Israel except Saul that God was blessing David and not Saul. The implication being that David would eventually ascend to the throne of Israel. But that meant Jonathan, Saul’s son, would not be the next king. Nevertheless, Jonathan set aside his own personal ambitions, made a covenant with David to protect him, and then “plead the cause of David” before his father, risking his life in the process. Jonathan’s support of David eventually cost him his life.
Jonathan obeyed the protocol and God, in turn, established the Davidic dynasty that would eventually usher in the messiah, Jesus Christ.
So Isaiah 1:18 is both a promise of what God would do in the future if Judah obeyed the protocol, as well as a summary of what God had done in the past because certain individuals had already obeyed the protocol.
But is Judah’s protocol also our protocol? After all, Judah was under a different covenant (the Mosaic Covenant) than believers are today (the New Covenant). The answer is, yes, it is also our protocol. The reason is because Israel’s protocol perfectly fulfills, not only the Mosaic Covenant, but also our New Commandment that accompanies our New Covenant. The New Commandment simply, but radically, tells believers to love each other the same way our savior has loved us (John 13:34-35). And since believing widows, single mothers, and fatherless children are often the neediest in our congregations, our New Commandment has special application to them.
Near the cross of Jesus stood his mother, his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. When Jesus saw his mother there, and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to her, “Woman, here is your son,” and to the disciple, “Here is your mother.” From that time on, this disciple took her into his home. John 19:25-27
To be clear, the atoning death of Christ, and people coming to faith in Him, is what transforms cultures. But the reason this is so is because that faith has a practical outcome, or at least should have a practical outcome (Ephesians 2:8-10). Even at the cross, we see an emphasis on this practicality. The last act that Jesus did before he died was to plead the cause of a widow and single mother – His mother, Mary (John 19:25-27). By entrusting His mother to John, Jesus guaranteed her well being and provided an example for how his disciples were to follow the protocol.
And follow they did. From its very beginning, the church took up the cause of the widowed (and others) in their midst. We see this obedience to their protocol among Jewish believers in Acts 2:44-45, 4:32-35, 6:1-4, and among Gentile believers in Acts 20:32-35 Galatians 2:10; 1 Timothy 5; Titus 3:14; et al. The result? God, through the church, completely transformed its culture. More on this in a minute.
My seventh example is a modern one, and it is still ongoing. In my first church in Hitchcock, Texas, a dear couple by the name of Jacqueline and Raleigh Roush took on the care of an elderly neighbor on their block. His children, who lived nearby, were ignoring him in his time of greatest need. So every day, Jacqueline cooked their neighbor a meal and she and Raleigh took it to him and checked in on him. They did this consistently until the day he died.
Jacqueline and Raleigh’s example made a profound impact on me as a young pastor. Their love and care for their neighbor was one reason why I began this ministry to the widowed and single parents, a ministry that now reaches around the world.
So there you have it. Scripture gives us a clear protocol, and we have specific, concrete examples of how it works. If we want to see God transform our culture from the cesspool that it is, follow the protocol: find a widow, a fatherless child, an orphan, or anyone else who has a pressing need, and plead their cause the way Judah pleaded the cause of Benjamin, Ruth the cause of Naomi, John the cause of Mary, the early church the cause of its widows, and Jacqueline and Raleigh Roush the cause of their neighbor.
Now I want to go back to the topic of how the early church obeyed its protocol and look at it more thoroughly. By doing so we will learn some important lessons about the process by which God will use our obedience to our protocol to transform our culture.
Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world. James 1:27
When reading about the history of the early church in the book of Acts, or when perusing the letters the Apostles wrote to their churches scattered around the Northeastern Mediterranean, it doesn’t take long to notice the importance the church placed on meeting the needs of widows and others in their midst.
As early as Acts 2, where we have a glowing account of the first days of the early church, we see a strong hint at the presence of a significant widows ministry when we read, “They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need” (2:45).
Later, in Acts 4, that hint is repeated. “There were no needy persons among them,” we are told (4:34). This lack of need had to include widows, for in those days they were most often the neediest persons of all.
But what is hinted at in Acts 2 and 4 becomes explicit in Acts 6, when the Hellenistic Jews complained that “their widows were being overlooked in the daily distribution of food.” The result? The institution of the office of Deacon.
This emphasis on meeting the needs of widows continues throughout the New Testament (i.e., Acts 20:32-35; Galatians 2:10; James 1:27; 1 Timothy 5; Titus 3:14; 1 John 3:16-18).
But the question is why? Why did the early church have such a huge emphasis on meeting the needs of its widows and other destitute people? There are at least two reasons:
First, as we have seen above, the early church saw their ministry to their widows and others with pressing needs as proof of their obedience to God’s protocol as reflected in Isaiah 1:17 and in the other massive number of commands to serve and protect widows in the Old Testament.
Second, they saw their ministry to their widows as critical to having a positive testimony in their communities, which in turn provided a foundation for effective evangelism. In other words, their widow’s ministry was their WOW! Factor. We see this process unfold in the summary statements that follow the accounts of the widows ministry in Acts 2, 5, and 6: “…enjoying the favor of all the people. And the Lord was adding to their number daily those who were being saved” (Acts 2:47); “…they were highly regarded by the people. …More and more men and women believed in the Lord and were added to their number” (5:13, 14); “So the word of God spread. The number of disciples in Jerusalem increased rapidly, and a large number of priests became obedient to the faith” (6:7). Paul summarized the relationship between meeting the needs of widows and evangelism in Titus 3:14: “Let our people learn to engage in good deeds, to meet pressing needs; that they may not be unfruitful” (Titus 3:14).
We can summarize the progress the early church made in obeying its protocol and the results that it experienced this way: The early church obeyed God’s clear and explicit commands in the Old Testament to meet the needs of its widows. This obedience resulted in the church having favor among the larger external community. This favor in turn resulted in people coming to the Lord. As more and more people came to the Lord, they reduced poverty in their midst even more, thereby proving the efficacy of the love of Christ, resulting in the transformation of their entire culture.
Pretty simple stuff: Obediently serving widows (the protocol) = Favor in the general population (The WOW! Factor) = Lots of people getting saved (Evangelism) = Transformation of the culture (Saltiness).
So for the church, our protocol is also, like God’s protocol for Judah, a summary of what God has done in and through the church in the past as well as a promise of what God will do in and through the church now.
The problem is, obedience to our protocol and its resulting progression is generally absent in America’s churches today. The reason why is because we have substituted something else for our protocol: the good family man agenda.
When one reads current men’s ministry books and other publications, it doesn’t take long to notice that there is precious little emphasis on good works and no emphasis at all on ministry to widows and other believers with long term pressing needs. This in spite of the fact that these two topics occupy much space in the New Testament. Modern men’s ministry is ignoring its protocol, the protocol given to both Judah and the church.
In its place, the modern men’s ministry movement has an entirely different agenda, one that stresses the importance of building strong Christian marriages and families. By keeping our “focus on the family,” the thinking goes, men’s ministry will strengthen churches and rejuvenate our culture. This family centric agenda has formed the core of men’s ministry for the last fifty years.
Now I want to make it clear that I support marriage and family and ministries in the church that are devoted to them. As a pastor, I placed a strong emphasis on marriage and family. The books I had on these topics occupied four feet of shelf space in my library. And I spent many hours over a period of twenty years counseling couples whose marriages were in trouble.
I am also happily married to the woman of my dreams and we have a wonderful family. All of our children have made professions of faith and when they and their families get together with us for birthdays and holidays – all four generations of us – we have a blast.
I am just saying that upholding marriage and family as the ultimate expressions of our faith is putting them on too high of a pedestal. Having healthy marriages and families as our main agenda does not fulfill Christ’s command for us to love one another. As a result, this agenda has not changed our culture. Instead, things have gotten worse. Much worse.
One reason why the current men’s ministry focus on the family agenda has failed is because being a good family man is not unique to Christian men. I have known, and I am sure everyone else reading this has also known, many non-Christian men who are wonderful husbands and wonderful fathers. Their numbers may be decreasing, but there are still many of these men out there. Millions of them in fact. These men love their wives. They love their children. They work hard, obey the law, and pay their taxes. But they are not Christians.
Because being a good family man is not unique to Christianity, the men’s ministry movement has no WOW! Factor. There may be a Hmm-That’s-Nice Factor, but no WOW! Factor. (For additional thoughts on the good family man agenda in men’s ministry, see my post: “Jesus’ View of Marriage and Family“)
But the ultimate reason having a focus on the family agenda has not changed our culture is because it represents only partial obedience to the New Commandment: “A new commandment I give you, love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another” (John 13:34-35).
Clearly, the New Commandment has something more in mind that just loving our wives and children. The term “one another” repeats three times in this command. Therefore it is referring to men loving more people than simply their wives and children. Rather, they are to love each other, that is, fellow believers.
Prior to John 13:34-35, the term “one another” (allelos) occurs only once in the New Testament. But after John 13:34-35, it occurs dozens of times. In fact, many pastors often do a sermon series on the biblical “one anothers.” Here they are:
POSITIVE COMMANDS
NEGATIVE COMMANDS (how not to treat one another)
You will notice that there is nothing in this very long list about marriage and family. This is because the focus of the New Testament is on us loving one another, not on marriage and family. Of course, all of these commands include our wives and children. But the New Commandment is extra-familial in the sense that it is about much more than our wives and children. This is because the church, and our relationships in it, are eternal, but our marriages and families are temporal.
We can see this transition from an emphasis on marriage and family to an emphasis on relationships in the church as a family in Jesus’ ministry:
While Jesus was still talking to the crowd, his mother and brothers stood outside, wanting to speak to him. Someone told him, “Your mother and brothers are standing outside, wanting to speak to you. He replied to him, “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” Pointing to his disciples, he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers. For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother. (Matthew 12:46-50)
Then this transition progresses to actual implementation on the cross:
Near the cross of Jesus stood his mother, his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. When Jesus saw his mother there, and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to her, “Woman, here is your son,” and to the disciple, “Here is your mother.” From that time on, this disciple took her into his home. (John 19:25-27)
And finally it reaches its ultimate expression in the widow’s list in 1 Timothy 5:1-16:
Do not rebuke an older man harshly, but exhort him as if he were your father. Treat younger men as brothers, older women as mothers, and younger women as sisters, with absolute purity. Give proper recognition to those widows who are really in need...
Our protocol to plead the cause of the widow is the logical conclusion of the transition from an emphasis on earthly families to an emphasis on the church as our eternal family. Pleading the cause of widows in the church is the highest expression of the church as our eternal family. When we instead have a focus on the family agenda it is no wonder that we ignore our widows and others with long term needs in the process.
These widows and others in the church whom we are to love as Christ loves us are people we are not related to by birth, but by faith. And that non-familial love is what marks us out as followers of Jesus Christ. Jesus says that this kind of love we are to have for each other is so unique that unbelievers automatically recognize us as his followers.
It is true that being a good family man is not unique to Christian men. But caring for a widow one is not related to except by faith is unique to Christian men. I do not know of any non-Christian man who has taken care of a widow he is not related to, unless he does so as a professional and gets paid to do it. But caring for a believing widow, or anyone else with a long term pressing need, and expecting nothing in return, now that is unique to Christians. That is our WOW! Factor.
I have a mind experiment for you. Imagine you are a member of the First Church of Jerusalem. It has been a few years now since the death, Resurrection, and Ascension of Jesus Christ and some of the excitement has died down.
It’s Sunday morning and you are in the weekly worship service. As you listen to the message Pastor James is giving about pure religion, you notice that the Apostle John and his family are not sitting with Jesus’ mother, Mary. Instead, Mary is sitting alone on the other side of the church.
After the service, you corner John and ask him why Mary isn’t sitting with him and his family.
“Oh, she comes on her own now,” John says nonchalantly. “I’ve decided to devote more time to my wife and kids.”
“But didn’t Jesus want you to care for Mary as if she were your own mother, your own family?” you ask with a bit of irritation in your voice.
“Well…yes.” John replies, shifting his weight to another leg. “I did let her know that if she needs anything, to just ask.... By the way, have you met our new minister of Christian education?”
Full stop.
Is that what Jesus meant when he said to John, “Behold your mother”? Making yourself available to help once in a while, but otherwise ignoring her until you see her in church? Had John treated Mary that way, he would have compromised the entire mission of the church. History would be completely different.
Now let’s make it more personal. Isn’t it true that we Christian men are ignoring the widows in our church and instead focusing solely on our families? The Bible says, “Treat older women as mothers…. Give proper recognition to those widows who are really in need" (1 Timothy 5:1ff). In reality, Jesus is telling all of us regarding the widows sitting near us at our churches, “Behold, your mother.”
When we ignore this, our protocol, we compromise our mission as a church and lose our distinctiveness. Then we wonder why the world is going to hell in a handbasket.
If obedience to our protocol results in this progression: serving widows = favor in the general population = people getting saved, then disobedience to our protocol results in this progression: ignoring/dishonoring widows = disfavor in the general population = fruitlessness (Titus 3:14).
Shame, alienation, marginalization and fruitlessness, that is what is happening because local church men’s ministries are ignoring their protocol.
So there it is in black and white, our protocol: plead the cause of the widow.
We have seen that first responders to mass shootings have a protocol: do not wait for permission or backup, go in immediately and take down the shooter.
When they follow their protocol, they save lives, even as they risk their own life. When they don’t follow their protocol, they lose lives, and live the rest of their own lives in shame.
In the same way, when we men follow our protocol, we save lives and we transform our culture. When we don’t follow our protocol, we lose lives and our culture tanks.
Local church men’s ministries don’t need better husbands and better fathers, as important as they are, sitting around tables eating pancakes on Saturday morning behind the four walls of a church building.
What local church men’s ministries need is one million Judahs, one million Ruths, one million Jonathans who are willing to risk their lives to save one Benjamin, one Naomi, one David,…one widow,…one nation.
So which is it going to be?
When I first started New Commandment Men’s Ministries in 2003 I thought that because men’s team ministry to widows and others with long term needs is a no brainer, it would take off like a rocket.
After all, the Bible stresses the importance of serving widows throughout its pages. And using teams of men to serve them for two hours once a month has proved to be a successful way to accomplish this task, given the nature of our contemporary culture. Men love it. Widows love it. Their families love it. And churches love it.
Unfortunately, while it is true that we have had some success, it has not been the kind of exponential success I thought we would have. To be sure, we have helped around 1,000 churches start men’s team ministries. But in the beginning I thought by now we would be at well over 10,000 churches and on our way to seeing men’s team ministry become simply one of the assumed things that Christian men do at church.
Instead of smooth sailing, I found myself running up against some strong headwinds when telling church leaders about men’s team ministry to widows and single parents. Here are some of those headwinds:
In all of this, when it comes to ministry to widows, churches compare themselves with the poor job other churches are doing in serving their widows and assume that, in spite of what Scripture teaches, their meager widows ministry, if it exists at all, is adequate. They never ask themselves whether what they are doing for widows is really what Scripture means when it tells us to treat the older women in our churches as if they are our own mothers, that is, as their fiduciaries.
In other words, churches are victims of groupthink. As a result, the people who suffer silently in the pews of churches as a result of groupthink are their widows and anyone else in their congregations with an unmet long term pressing need.
“Plead the cause of the widow” (Isaiah 1:17).
Let’s face it, this protocol that God has given us is the furthest thing from most Christian men’s minds. After all, we have enough issues of our own. We have marital issues, financial issues, work issues, mental health issues, spiritual issues, physical issues, family issues, time management issues. Why obligate ourselves to a widow in our church or anyone else in need with whom we are not even related to?
Consequently, it is “the issues men have” that we think of first when we think of men’s ministry: How do we show men how relevant Jesus Christ is to resolving men’s issues?
The problem, however, is that men’s ministry is not just the process of making Jesus Christ relevant to men by showing them how he can solve their problems. Men’s ministry is above all the process of making men relevant to Jesus Christ so that they accomplish his will on this earth.
For example, a thief definitely has issues. But when we lead a thief to Christ, scripture commands us to first exhort him “to work with his hands, that he may have to give to those who are in need” (Ephesians 4:28). That is, he is to obey our protocol. Then we deal with his issues. Modern men’s ministry leads the thief to Christ and deals with his issues, but rarely gets around to exhorting the former thief to work hard so he has something to give others in need.
Yes, there is a place for felt need men’s ministry; showing men how Jesus can address their issues. But the ultimate goal of men’s ministry is bringing men into a right relationship with God through faith in his Son, Jesus Christ, so that they can then go on to accomplish God’s righteousness.
““Learn to do right! Seek justice, encourage the oppressed. Defend the cause of the fatherless, plead the cause of the widow” (Isaiah 1:17).
“Come now, let us settle the matter,” says the LORD. “Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be like wool” (Isaiah 1:18).
Isaiah 1:18 is God’s promise to a nation in deep spiritual and moral decline: do the protocol – plead the cause of a widow – and I will transform your nation. I will make its sins as white as snow.
We have seen how the early church took this promise in Isaiah 1:18 seriously and made the protocol in 1:17 one of its primary objectives from day one.
But Isaiah 1:18 is also God’s promise to the church today. Do we live in a culture that is in increasing moral decay? I think we can all agree that we do. Then, given the situation we are in, God says find a widow in your church, or outside your church, and plead her cause. If you do, I will utterly transform the moral climate in your culture.
It is as simple as that…and as hard as that.
The problem, then, is groupthink. Nothing I am saying here is new. We know what Scripture says we are to do, but it doesn’t correspond with what the churches we see around us doing. They don’t even come close. So, to keep the peace, we go along with the crowd and continue to do next to nothing for our widows and others.
It only takes one person to help a group awaken from the stupor of groupthink. Here are two examples.
The story of David and Goliath is the story of how David helped an entire nation – the nation of Israel – awaken from groupthink. The Israelites knew about God’s mighty acts. They knew how God had given Abraham a son when he was 99 years old. The knew how God had miraculously delivered their forefathers from slavery in Egypt. They knew how God spoke personally with Moses and gave them the law at Mt. Sinai. They knew how God miraculously sent their forefathers mana in the wilderness. They knew about the deeds of their judges and how God used them to deliver Israel from their enemies.
But in spite of all of this, the strongest men in Israel stood paralyzed before the giant Goliath. They had become paralyzed in the quicksand of groupthink that turned them into faithless, useless cowards.
But then David came along, the youngest in his family, and a lowly shepherd at that. Because of the isolation he endured as a shepherd, he had not received the memo that everything was hopeless when he arrived at the battlefront. In fact, David had already witnessed the power of God as he defended his little flock of sheep against wild animals.
And so David made a simple assumption: those stories they had heard about how God had acted on behalf of their nation were true. And because they were true, he was going to act on that truth and fight the uncircumcised Philistine.
David refused to submit to the groupthink all around him. Instead, he stood up, grabbed his sling and ten stones, and defeated Goliath.
Because of David’s act, suddenly, everything looked entirely different to the nation of Israel. All because one man took God’s promise that he would act on behalf of his people at face value.
“Unless I am convinced by Scripture and plain reason – I do not accept the authority of the popes and councils, for they have contradicted each other – my conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot and I will not recant anything for to go against conscience is neither right nor safe.” Martin Luther defending himself to Pope Leo X in 1520.
The more Martin Luther, a German Priest, compared the practices of the Roman Catholic Church with scripture, the more disturbed he became. The straw that broke the camel’s back was the church’s sale of indulgences to raise money for the building of St. Peter’s Basilica.
Indulgences were guarantees of the forgiveness of sins that one could purchase. In essence, the church had monetized salvation. “As soon as the coin in the coffer rings, the soul from purgatory springs” was the fundraising scheme’s byline.
Luther proposed a debate about indulgences when he nailed his 95 Theses to the door of his Wittenberg church on October 31, 1517. Luther argued that one cannot purchase salvation and the church cannot grant it. Rather, salvation could only be obtained through faith in Christ, as clearly stated in the Bible.
By raising the Bible’s authority above that of the church and the pope, Luther broke out of a centuries long groupthink and began the Reformation, transforming world history in the process. All because one man took God’s promise of salvation by grace through faith at face value.
“By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” John 13:35
Jesus Christ promised his disciples that if they love each other as he loved them, then the world would recognize them as his disciples. That is exactly what happened. Early believers loved each other by obeying their protocol, as Tertullian so beautifully describes in his Apology:
“On the monthly day, if he likes, each puts in a small donation; but only if it be his pleasure, and only if he be able: for there is no compulsion; all is voluntary. These gifts are, as it were, piety’s deposit fund. For they are not taken thence and spent on feasts, and drinking-bouts, and eating-houses, but to support and bury poor people, to supply the wants of boys and girls destitute of means and parents, and of old persons confined now to the house; such, too, as have suffered shipwreck; and if there happen to be any in the mines, or banished to the islands, or shut up in the prisons, for nothing but their fidelity to the cause of God’s Church, they become the nurslings of their confession. But it is mainly the deeds of a love so noble that lead many to put a brand upon us. See, they say, how they love one another.” Tertullian, Apology, XXXIX
This passage proves that Tertullian and his fellow believers, who lived hundreds of miles from Jerusalem in Carthage, North Africa, were still practicing the protocol – and seeing the fruit that comes from it – 150 years after Christ died! In reality, the church conquered Rome one widow at a time as it obeyed its protocol.
“See how they love one another.”
Tell me, what are we modern American conservative Christians known for? Is it for the way we love each other the way Tertullian and his fellow believers were? I think not.
I believe an honest response to that question is that instead of being known for our love for each other we are known for our strident political positions, for our divisions, for our racism, for our huge mega churches, for our loud clanging TV preachers, for our love of money, for our arrogant cultural hegemony, and for our immoral pastors.
But love? People would laugh at us if we suggested that love is our primary characteristic.
The result? Over a recent ten year span (2011-2021), the number of self-identified Christians in America has declined by 12%.(3) If this trend continues, a Pew research study has concluded that Christianity in American will cease being a majority religion in America by 2070.(4)
“Let our people learn to engage in good works, to meet pressing needs, that they may not be unfruitful” (Titus 3:14). Paul warns Titus that if his flock fails to obey their protocol, then they will be unfruitful. How true. We are witnessing the reality of this truth every single day in America.
The story goes that a leader of a Chinese church was invited to come to America and visit our churches to see what they are like. In one of the churches he was asked to say a prayer. So he stood up and prayed, “Lord, deliver us from American Christianity!”
That is a prayer all of us can pray, and we can add to it, “Help us, instead, to become known for the way we love each other. We pray that you, Lord, will pour out the love of Christ into our broken and repentant hearts and create something incredibly beautiful for all to see.”
““Wake up, sleeper, rise from the dead, and Christ will shine on you.” (Ephesians 5:14)
I believe God has raised up the modern men’s ministry movement in America to help all Christians in our country break out of our groupthink.
I am asking every man, everyone, reading this to “plead the cause” of a widow. Take your wife and your kids, if they are old enough, or find another man or two at church to go with you, and serve the neediest person in your church on a regular basis. Usually that person is going to be a widow, but it can be anyone with a long term unmet pressing need. Then serve that person on a regular basis, say a couple of hours each month. Get to know them. Learn to love them. Find out what their real needs are and then meet their needs. If their needs are greater than your resources, then “plead their cause” before your church.
You do not need to start a major program in your church to do this. (Although, if your church is amenable to start one, then New Commandment Men’s Ministries can help.) All you need to do is be a faithful example over the years to others in your church.
But hold on for the ride, because the love of Christ has a track record of taking people places they never dreamed they would go.
We have seen how Isaiah 1:17-18 describes what our local church men’s ministry protocol should be, the protocol we are to follow in a dying and desperate culture: “plead the cause of the widow.”
We have also seen that many churches are not following the protocol because of groupthink. They have allowed themselves to drift away from their primary task of caring for people in their congregations with long term needs, such as widows, single moms, and fatherless children. This in turn has affected our witness to the world.
Consequently, we need to shake ourselves awake and, as Isaiah 1:17-18 says, "plead the cause of the widow."
But note that Isaiah 1:17-18 also tells us that our protocol does not come naturally. Instead, it must be learned: “Learn to do good.” But how do we learn to do this good? How do we learn it so well that it becomes natural and spontaneous for us? In short, when it comes to “pleading the cause of widows” and others with long term pressing needs, how do we men get there?
I believe 2 Timothy 3:12-17 is an excellent foundational passage for all local church men’s ministries. The reason is because it succinctly describes the process by which God takes a sinful man who is helplessly immersed in a decadent culture, and transforms him into a man of God who is capable of doing immense good for everyone around him.
Here is the passage in its entirety:
“Indeed, all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will be persecuted. But evil men and impostors will proceed from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. You, however, continue in the things you have learned and become convinced of, knowing from whom you have learned them, and that from childhood you have known the sacred writings which are able to give you the wisdom that leads to salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.” 2 Timothy 3:12-17 (NASB)
I will discuss this passage in detail below, but first I want to answer some questions about how 2 Timothy 3:12-17 relates to the protocol in Isaiah 1:17, 18 and to the role of good works in the Christian life.
When I began this series on local church men’s ministry, I started with the idea that Jesus wants all local church men’s ministries to have the WOW! Factor. The WOW! Factor is anything that get’s people’s attention, creates admiration, and drives inquisitiveness. While it is true that at first Jesus utilized his miracles to create the WOW! Factor and get his message out to a broad national audience, in the end he narrowed the WOW! Factor down to one specific thing: his love for us. He commanded believers to love each other the same way he loves us so that we, too, will have the WOW! Factor. That is, Jesus wants others to recognize us as his disciples because they see his love in us, admire his love in us, and ask about his love in us. (John 13:34-35)
After describing the WOW! Factor that all local church men’s ministries are to have, I made an abrupt transition with my post entitled “The Misery of Modern Men” where I described the current rapidly disintegrating moral and social state of men in America. In response to this dire situation, Jesus wants local church men’s ministries to reach these very men with their WOW! Factor, their observable, Christ-like love in action.
I went on to explain that local church men’s ministries are largely failing to reach contemporary men and the reason is because of a situation in our churches that I have labeled “groupthink.” Groupthink is what happens when we ignore our protocol in Isaiah 1:17, 18 and go along with the crowd when we know better in order to keep the peace.
As a result, instead of manifesting the love of Christ in an observable way to secular men in our culture by meeting the needs of widows and others with long term needs in our churches -- that is, our protocol -- local church men’s ministries have hidden behind the four walls of their churches, making the practice of the love of Christ invisible to the rest of the world.
Next, I elaborated in detail on the protocol we find in Isaiah 1:17, 18. This protocol provides a biblical solution to the problem men's ministry has of isolating the practice of the love of Christ in the form of “fellowship” in a church building. In our protocol, God promises that if we plead the cause of the widow, then he will transform our culture. I gave several Biblical examples of how God has already done this in the past.
After that, I challenged my readers to “break out of groupthink” by finding a widow in their church or community, or someone else with an unmet pressing need, and “plead their cause” by meeting with them on a regular basis, getting to know them, serving them, and committing to finding resources to meet any of their unmet pressing needs.
Finally, I suggested a passage, 2 Timothy 3:12-17, as a way to "learn to do good" as Isaiah 1:17, 18 commands. That is, 2 Timothy 3:12-17 is a roadmap for how we can become "men of God" who accomplish "every good work" that God saved us to do.
Yes. Here are two more passages that reflect the primacy of good works as the goal of our salvation.
“For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast. For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.” Ephesians 2:8-10
“Who gave himself for us to redeem us from all wickedness and to purify for himself a people that are his very own, eager to do good works.” Titus 2:14
Therefore, because of what Scripture teaches, all local church men’s ministries must have a major emphasis on good works. In fact, the Bible teaches that one of the primary reasons for Christian men meeting together is so they can think up ideas for good works that they can do: “Let us consider how we may spur one another on toward love and good deeds, not giving up meeting together…” (Hebrews 10:24 25) Not having an emphasis on good works violates the whole purpose of our salvation.
There are an infinite number of good works that both Christians and non-Christians the world over do. For example, Jesus said that even a drink of water given in his name does not go unnoticed. (Matthew 10:42; Mark 9:41)
In addition, the New Testament enumerates specific things that qualify as good works: being generous and sharing is a good work (1 Timothy 6:17-19); aspiring to the office of overseer is a good work (1 Timothy 3:1); and “bringing up children, showing hospitality, washing the feet of the Lord’s people, helping those in trouble” are also good works (1 Timothy 5:10).
But our protocol – plead the cause of widows and the fatherless2 – is unique to Christians and uniquely supreme for Christians for a number of reasons.
Yes, there are many good works that we can and should be doing. But the protocol takes precedence over them all. The reason is because ignoring the protocol means that there are widows, fatherless children, and others in the church with long term pressing needs that are not being met. Not meeting their needs means that the church will be unfruitful (Titus 3:14).
Of course men have legitimate needs that should also be addressed in men’s ministry. But training men to obey the protocol first makes addressing those needs much easier. Here are two illustrations. The first is an exhortation Paul gives us in Romans 6:
“Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body so that you obey its evil desires. Do not offer any part of yourself to sin as an instrument of wickedness, but rather offer yourselves to God as those who have been brought from death to life; and offer every part of yourself to him as an instrument of righteousness. For sin shall no longer be your master, because you are not under the law, but under grace.” (Romans 6:12-14)
In this passage, Paul exhorts us to offer ourselves to God “as an instrument of righteousness.” Every man who has been involved with New Commandment Men’s Ministries knows exactly what this means. When we go out and serve widows and single moms and fatherless children in and around their homes, we are offering “every part of ourselves to [God] as an instrument of righteousness.” It is a wonderful, thrilling, joyful experience.
Then, in contrast to this amazing and holy experience of using our bodies as instruments of righteousness, Paul commands us to “not let sin reign in our mortal bodies so that we obey its evil desires.” The beauty of serving a widow and others with long term needs is that doing so provides a holy context in which the destructive nature of sin becomes evident and even repugnant. Serving widows and God himself gives men something to turn to as they turn from sin.
Another example is what happens when we train men in how to practice the love of Christ towards widows. We teach men that loving widows and others with long term needs as Christ loves us involves identifying with them so that we come to know and understand them, committing to them so that their care receivers feel secure, and sacrificing for them so that their pressing needs are met. We do this because in the Incarnation, Jesus Christ identified with us and committed to us, and in redemption, Jesus Christ sacrificed himself for us.
In the same way, practicing the love of Christ also applies directly to a man’s marriage and family: “Husbands, love your wives just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her.” (Ephesians 5:25) Just as our men in New Commandment Men’s Ministries imitate Christ by identifying with widows, committing to them, and sacrificing for them, in the same way, husbands are to work at understanding their wives (identification), never leaving them (commitment), and giving themselves up for them (sacrifice). Showing men how important these elements are in serving widows, makes it natural to stress these same elements in their marriages as well.
But it is true. Men are attracted to righteousness. Men are attracted to heroic behavior, as exemplified by their participation in the military, in protective services, and in fire prevention. And men are attracted to teamwork. Over the past twenty-five years that I have been doing men’s team ministry to the widowed and single parents, we have never had a difficult time recruiting men for this ministry. And the men involved in working with widows love to talk about it with their non-Christian friends.
No. The goal of meeting the needs of widows and others in the church with long term needs will draw in men of all stages, resulting in a truly multi-generational ministry.
Now that I have addressed some issues regarding the protocol, we are ready to look more in-depth at the process Paul describes in 2 Timothy 3:12-17 by which God takes a sinful man in a godless, sin-infested culture and transforms him into a man of God who is equipped for every good work.
"... you have known the sacred writings which are able to give you the wisdom that leads to salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus." 2 Timothy 3:15
In Isaiah 1:17, 18 we have seen that we have to "learn to do good." But how do we do that? Fortunately, 2 Timothy 3:12-17 tells us how. And it involves several steps. The first and most important step to being able to do God's good works is recognizing that we have to be saved from God's wrath through faith in Christ Jesus in order to do the good works God wants us to do. That is, we have to come to grips with the fact that we are natural rebels against God and need to be reconciled to Him.
But this prerequisite that we must be saved in order to do God's good works raises the question...
Why is it necessary for a person to believe in Jesus Christ as his savior from sin in order to be reconciled to God? Doesn't becoming a Christian simply result in attending a lot of meetings for the rest of your life?
Several years ago I was sharing my faith with a social worker in my community when he responded by saying, “I don’t want to be a Christian because I don’t want to spend the rest of my life, not to mention eternity, in meetings.”
He had a point. In his mind, all Christians do is attend meetings that have no purpose or practical outcome.
Of course, Christians attend meetings because we are followers of Jesus. We worship God and his Son, Jesus Christ, in meetings. We make close friends and fellowship together in our meetings. We also learn about how to follow Jesus better by meeting together.
My social worker friend didn’t understand the purpose of our meetings because he didn’t understand the importance of Jesus. No one had answered his underlying question: Why Jesus?
That simple question — Why Jesus? — is one of the most important questions every men’s ministry must answer clearly, passionately, persuasively, and persistently.
Why? Because men have plenty of things to do other than just attend meetings.
But if they know their lives depend on meeting together, and if they know there are going to be concrete and positive outcomes as a result of it, not only in their own lives, but also in the lives of the people they know and love all around them, then they will not only be there, they will drag their loved ones and friends to the meeting along with them.
So why Jesus? Why, two thousand years after he walked the face of this earth, do we still meet together to worship him and learn how to follow him?
Consider this: the further away American culture has gotten from Jesus, the more aimless, destructive, and depraved American men have become. For the first time in two thousand years Christianity is facing, not just a post-Jesus Western civilization, but an anti-Jesus, pagan civilization.
But ironically, the best apologetic for Jesus is the increasing absence of Jesus from our culture. Why? Because, without Jesus permeating Western culture as he has to varying degrees over the past two millennia, we are witnessing the greatest social experiment in the history of the world: what happens to men in a Jesus-less culture.
In Jesus-less America, men are losing their ability to control their sexual lust. They are losing their desire to marry. They are losing any commitment to raise their own children. They are losing any transcendent purpose in life. They are losing their passion for education. They are losing their work ethic. They are losing their ability to keep the law and stay out of prison. They are losing their resistance to drugs and alcohol. And finally, in a Jesus-less culture, men are losing their self respect, because they no longer know who they are, why they are here, or where they are going.
One cannot have a positive outcome to a problem until one knows the reason for the problem. Here is Jesus’ diagnosis for men’s problems.
Every man has an evil nature he cannot tame…without Jesus.1 He lives in an evil world he cannot overcome…without Jesus.2 He has an evil enemy he cannot defeat…without Jesus.3 And he faces a holy God he doesn’t know and cannot please…without Jesus.4
What, then, is the root cause of men’s problems? The root cause of men’s problems is that they don’t know or care about Jesus.
Let’s face it, we men love sin. Or to put it in ordinary secular language: we men love evil. We love illicit sex. We love porn. We love exalting ourselves at the expense of others. We love living off of someone else’s dime. We love lying when we can get away with it. We love going our own selfish way, even if it means abandoning our wives and kids. We love cursing. We love road rage. We love warfare. We love beating people up and watching people beat each other up. We love getting even. We love putting others down. We love climbing the ladder and stepping on everyone else in the process. We love clicks. We love getting high. We love avarice. We love gluttony. We love being noticed. We love having a nicer car and living in a nicer home than our neighbors.
We may think these things are just temptations. But we are only tempted by the things we love. Dog food does not tempt us. Baby back ribs do.
It’s true. Men have a chronic temptation to descend into barbarism, or “toxic masculinity,” as some call it. In response to this overwhelming temptation, human culture has devised two polar opposite and contradictory solutions, which I call “The Bikini” and “The Burka.”
When it comes to lust, most men choose hedonism…at first. They choose it because indulging oneself is the path of least resistance. There are no moral absolutes, men think. So why bother with niceties? All that exists is the physical world and the pleasures it offers. “I’m just a man, doing what men do.”
The problem with this approach to dealing with one’s passions, as men soon find out, is that hedonism is both self destructive and also relationally destructive. It is self destructive because we become addicted to our chosen evil. It is relationally destructive, because no one wants to live with a selfish, self-absorbed man who hurts those around him.
Legalism is the exact opposite of hedonism. Instead of addressing men’s lusts by giving in to them and even encouraging them, legalism seeks to tame lust through external sets of strict social rules — usually religious rules — enforced with various cultural sanctions like ostracism, corporal punishment, prison, and even execution.
The Taliban in Afghanistan, Amish culture in Pennsylvania and elsewhere, and Hasidic Jews in urban New York, Los Angeles and Israel, all exemplify this legalistic and artificial approach.
The problem with legalism is that it is external and superficial only and does not deal with the real interior spiritual, emotional, and psychological problems men face. All legalism does is repress, control, and restrict both men and women with contrived rules and regulations that make no real change in their moral fiber.
Notice, too, that both the bikini and the burka solutions to men’s natural attraction to evil have this in common: they result in men becoming obsessed with dealing with it. On the one hand, indulging one’s lusts results in deeper and deeper addiction, more and more broken relationships, chronic sickness and even death. On the other hand, trying to control one’s lusts results in endless and fruitless ritualistic behavior.
You noticed that I changed my terminology from “sin” to “evil” above. That is because modern men can stomach the concept of evil, but we have a knee jerk reaction to the concept of sin. Why? Because evil doesn’t make any reference to the God of the Bible, but sin does. One can imagine evil as something impersonal that just exists — like “the dark side” in Star Wars. But sin is personal, very personal. Sin is open rebellion against a holy and personal God.
The problem isn’t just that we men love evil, but that we love evil because we hate God who is holy. We hate any claim he has over us. We hate his authority and we hate his character. This is why we love to debase God by using his name and his son, Jesus’ name, in curses.
This is also why we men are willing to endure the painful consequences of evil, and even inflict evil on others around us, if only we can ignore a holy God to whom we know, either consciously or subconsciously, we are answerable. We are, to put it bluntly, damned and worthy of God’s wrath.
But God, who is holy, is also love. God is not just loving, God is love itself. God is all that love ever has been and ever will be. So, to satisfy both his holiness and his love, God sent his Son, his only son, to die in our place so he could take on himself God’s just wrath for our sin. In doing so, God satisfied both his holiness and his love.5
As a result of Jesus’ sacrifice, God offers us forgiveness and eternal life if we acknowledge our sinful state and put our faith — meaning our confidence — in Jesus Christ as the one who paid the penalty for our sin. Won’t you do that right now by telling God in prayer that you are trusting the Lord Jesus Christ as your savior from sin and its penalty?
As a result of a man’s faith in Jesus, many wonderful things happen to him, both immediately and long term. He is born again and becomes a “new man.” All of his sins are forgiven. He enters into a right relationship with God. He has eternal life. Suddenly the spiritual world comes alive for him because he receives the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit. He becomes a member of the universal church, the Body of Christ. He has a special supernatural spiritual gift given to him to use in service to others. Jesus becomes his intercessor in the presence of God. As a result, this new believer has direct access to God through prayer. He has new insight into the Bible, God’s inspired Word. And, most importantly, he has a new love for God and his Son, Jesus Christ, and wants to do things that please them.
On the other hand, this new man still has issues. He still has his old sinful nature that has not been touched by his salvation. He also still lives in a sinful world with all of its temptations. And he still has an enemy, Satan, who hates the fact that he has now become a Christian.6
At first, this situation can seem untenable. But this new Christian man has been given a solution, and it’s called The Cross.
The mistake new Christian men often make is that they think the the purpose of their salvation is to remake their sinful nature into something good, or at least something better than it is. But that is impossible, as they soon find out; they discover that they still have the same temptations coming in from the outside world, and the same lusts going out from their sinful nature. And they will experience these realities until the day they die. So the tendency is to revert back to either giving in to those temptations and lusts (hedonism), or trying to subdue them through keeping a list of things they have to do (legalism): in this case, the “Christian” version of legalism usually takes the form of a checklist that looks like this:
Because I am a Christian, I must be sure to do the following:
The problem is that, as we have seen above, keeping obligatory legalistic checklists such as this have no impact on our sinful flesh. In fact, they just give our flesh opportunities to rebel even more.
So what is the solution Jesus gives us? The solution he gives us is a third option: instead of giving in to the flesh through hedonism, or trying to control it or reform it through legalistic efforts, we simply ignore the flesh and focus on Jesus, on what he has done for us, and on what he wants us to do for others. In this way, Christian practices like attending church and reading the Bible become means to an end and not merely ends in themselves. With this third option in mind, the Christian practices above (and any other Christian practices) look like this:
Because of what Jesus Christ has done for me on the cross:
As we men learn to engage in these practices for the proper reasons, something begins to happen: we become more aware of God, we enjoy the presence of the Spirit of God in our lives, we have a deeper appreciation of Jesus’ love for us, and we are motivated to engage in sacrificial service for others in need. In essence, we have been set free from slavery to sin and our sinful nature and have, instead, become willing and joyful slaves to God.
As a result, we are no longer obsessed with our flesh and instead, as we have victory over sin in our lives, we acquire a strong inner motivation to do the good that God saved us to do. We are, in effect, experiencing “the expulsive power of a new affection,” as Thomas Chalmers put it in his famous sermon by that title.
Of course, none of this matters if Jesus is dead and gone. But Jesus is not dead and gone. Jesus rose from the dead, just as the Bible predicted he would, and ascended into heaven. And there is plenty of historical evidence to prove this.
Of course, no amount of evidence for the resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ will ever be enough for a man who is unwilling to acknowledge his sin and his love for evil. But for the one who has, and who has cast himself in faith on Jesus Christ, Jesus is very much alive and impacts everything he thinks, says, and does.
He lives for Jesus now, and he looks for Jesus in the future, because he knows that Jesus is coming soon and that he will see him face to face.
And that is the greatest meeting of all.
So, Men, here is a question we must ask ourselves: Are we saved?
with Other Men of God
"But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have become convinced of, because you know those from whom you learned it..." 2 Timothy 3:13
We have seen that God’s good works do not just happen. Nor are they just random nice things that we think up and do. Rather, God’s good works require that we first be saved and be reconciled to God.
There are other requirements as well. In this section, I discuss the importance of using teams to accomplish God’s good works.
Timothy came to faith in Christ as a result of the teaching and testimony of his grandmother Lois, and his mother Eunice (2 Timothy 1:5). Timothy then grew to spiritual maturity because of his association with Paul and his fellow workers. Finally, Timothy would go on to minister in the company of other elders as well as deacons. At no time was Timothy alone in his salvation, spiritual growth and ministry.
Like Timothy, all Christians stand on the shoulders of believers who have gone before us. It is because of their service, their labor, and their obedience that we came to faith in Christ and have grown to some degree of maturity in our walk with the Lord.
After listing the great heroes of the faith in Hebrews 11, the writer to the Hebrews concludes with this exhortation in 12:1, "Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles. And let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us."
If we could see all of the people whose decisions to follow Christ eventually had an impact on our salvation, we would indeed be "surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses."
Those believers who went before us make up the church-unseen. But we are also surrounded by another "cloud of witnesses," the church-seen; that is, believers who walk with us in our daily lives. It is those believers we are to tap into as we seek to do God's good works.
"Let us consider how we may encourage one another to love and good works." Hebrews 10:24
Therefore, no one is saved in a social vacuum and no one should try to do God's good works in a social vacuum.
Most, if not all, of the good works God has for us to do are not doable by ourselves anyway. Here is a prime example of an amazing good work that God called me to do. But there was no way I could do it on my own.
When I was a student at UCLA, I commuted from home along with a friend I had known since high school. His name was Leslie and he was Jewish.
As the semester progressed, I began praying for an opportunity to witness to Leslie and sure enough, one day Leslie said to me, “Herb, I’m the president of my youth group at my synagogue and our meetings are quite boring. I’m wondering if you could introduce me to some of your Christian friends and if you and your friends could come and talk about Christianity in our youth group.“
At the time, I was driving on I-5 and I was so shocked by what Leslie said, I felt like I was going to fall through the floorboard of the car and onto the interstate.
I told Leslie I would be happy to come speak to his youth group. Since I was attending a Bible study off-campus from UCLA, I invited Leslie to go to the Bible study with me. I had someone I wanted him to meet.
The Bible study I was attending was no ordinary Bible study. It was led by Hal Lindsey, the the author of the book on biblical prophecy entitled “The Late Great Planet Earth,” one of the best selling books of the 1970s. Hal held his Bible study at a former fraternity house a couple of blocks off of UCLA’s campus. Hal’s organization had bought the old frat house and converted it into a Christian student learning center. They named it The JC Light and Power House.
In preparation for their public bible study every Wednesday evening, the resident students at The JC Light and Power House removed all the furniture from the dining room and living room to make space for the 100 or so students who attended from UCLA. There were so many, we just sat on the floor, jammed together, shoulder to shoulder. A friend of mine by the name of Bill lead the singing at the beginning of the Bible study. He was the one I wanted to introduce Leslie to.
I took Leslie to The JC Light and Power House and we sat through Hal Lindsey’s Bible study. Afterwards, I introduced Leslie to Bill and Leslie invited him to come to his youth group at his synagogue and talk about Christianity. When Bill heard what Leslie wanted him to do, his eyes lit up and he said, “Come with me, I have someone I want you to meet. “
Then he took Leslie and me across the room to meet Hal Lindsey. After Bill introduced Leslie to Hal, Leslie invited him to come with us to his synagogue as well. To my pleasant surprise, Hal said that he would love to do that.
I was thrilled, of course. I couldn’t believe that I had one of America’s leading scholars on biblical prophecy coming with me to a Jewish synagogue to talk to my friend’s youth group about Christianity.
On the night of the meeting, I picked up Bill, along with Hal and a third man who was a resident student at The JC Light and Power House. The four of us crammed into my Datsun 411 and I drove them over to Leslie’s synagogue. When we arrived I was greeted with a huge surprise.
As I walked into the room where the meeting was to be held, there was the synagogue’s rabbi and my Hebrew professor from UCLA!
I had been taking conversational Hebrew in school in preparation for Hebrew studies at Dallas Seminary. The last person I expected to see at the synagogue was my professor. And I’m guessing that I was the last person she expected to see, because, when she and I saw each other, we were both stunned. After we regained our composure, my professor turned to her rabbi and said excitedly, “Oh, this is one of my students from UCLA!”
The rabbi was impressed and began speaking to me in Hebrew.
“Ma shemcha?” (“What is your name?”) He asked me.
My normal response should have been, “Shmi Herb.” (“My name is Herb.”) But suddenly, with the shock of everything that was happening, my mind went completely blank. I just stared at the Rabbi, slack-jawed and paralyzed with fear. My professor got this disgusted look on her face and blurted out, “Oh Herb, don’t embarrass me!” Which succeeded in cementing my transient Hebrew amnesia.
My utter humiliation continued its downward spiral when Leslie sat me and my three friends in chairs in the middle of the room. The rabbi and my professor had gone and, surprisingly, left me and my three friends alone with Leslie’s youth group, which numbered around 25 high school and college students. With the four of us sitting in the middle of the room, Leslie and his group sat in chairs, surrounding us along the rooms four walls. It felt very much like Indians surrounding settlers in their wagons.
From the expressions on the faces of the students, it was clear that they were not happy at all that Leslie had invited us Gentile Christians into their synagogue. This impression became explicit when Lesley asked one of his fellow students to open the meeting with prayer.
We bowed hour heads and Leslie‘s friend prayed, loud and fast, “Dear God, help this meeting to be short! Amen.” I opened my eyes and the entire room of students was smirking.
“This is not going to be good.” I thought to myself.
Then Leslie briefly introduced me and my friends and handed the room over to me.
I don’t remember what I said, but I do remember how I felt. I was so tense, my words felt like bricks falling out of my mouth and onto the floor in front of me.
After I stumbled along for one or two excruciating minutes, I paused and looked helplessly at Hal Lindsey. Sensing my desperation, he took the floor.
Hal began to talk about God‘s plan for Israel and how it was expressed in biblical prophecy. He quoted prophecy after prophecy from the Hebrew scriptures and showed how they were partially fulfilled in world history, how they were being fulfilled now with the founding of Israel, and how they would eventually be completely fulfilled in the future.
As Hal spoke, something remarkable happened: the expressions on the faces of the students began to change from anger and scorn to genuine inquisitiveness. Eventually Leslie and his friends began asking questions. By the end of the meeting, which was supposed to last an hour, but wound up lasting two, the students were sitting on the edge of their seats.
It was getting late and we had to close. Leslie asked the same student who opened in prayer to close in prayer.
“Dear God,” he prayed, this time slowly and respectfully, “I’ve really learned a lot tonight. And I’d like to learn a lot more. Amen.”
Driving home that night, the four of us rejoiced at how privileged we felt to be able to speak to that Jewish youth group about the Lord and his plan for Israel.
Looking back, if I had gone into that situation alone–young, inexperienced, and ill-prepared as I was–I would have done more harm than good. God had made it clear that there was something special he wanted me to do, but I needed help. I needed a team. And he definitely provided one for me.
The works that God has for each believer to do are something special, we are told in Ephesians 2:10. They are preordained and designed just for us. Or rather, we are designed just for them. As such, they are way beyond our simple ability for us to do. Take Moses, for example.
We are not told if Moses stammered or stuttered, or both, but we do know that Moses had a speech problem and he was acutely aware of it. Yet, there he was, being asked by God to go and speak to Pharaoh, the ruler of the most powerful nation in the world.
When Moses continually objected to God’s call on his life, God provided him with a solution: a teammate, Aaron.
It can be easy to feel completely overwhelmed by God’s call on our lives to do the good works he has for us. They are, after all, God’s good works, not ours. Therefore, there is a natural tendency to get discouraged.
The prophet Elijah definitely had that problem. Queen Jezebel had sworn an oath to kill him and Elijah fled for his life to a cave, where he spent the night. In the morning, God woke him up with a question:
“And behold, there came a voice to him and said, “What are you doing here, Elijah?”
Have you ever asked yourself that question as you pursued God’s good works? “What am I doing here?” I sure did that night I was at the synagogue with Leslie and his friends. “What in the world am I doing here?” I wondered.
Notice in Elijah’s answer how his crushed dreams had led him into a loneliness and hopelessness that culminated in toxic despair.
He said, “I have been very jealous for the Lord, the God of hosts. For the people of Israel have forsaken your covenant, thrown down your altars, and killed your prophets with the sword, and I, even I only, am left, and they seek my life, to take it away.” 1 Kings 19:13, 14
Elijah felt completely isolated and also foolish for being so zealous for the Lord.
So how did God respond?
“Yet I will leave seven thousand in Israel, all the knees that have not bowed to Baal, and every mouth that has not kissed him.” 1 Kings 19:18
“No, you are not alone,” God told Elijah. “In fact, there are 7,000 people who still follow me.”
Then what did God do? God provided Elijah with a teammate: Elisha the son of Shaphat.
“So he departed from there and found Elisha the son of Shaphat, who was plowing with twelve yoke of oxen in front of him, and he was with the twelfth. Elijah passed by him and cast his cloak upon him….Then he arose and went after Elijah and assisted him.” 1 Kings 19:19, 21
The essence of Christianity is relationship. And teams provide relationship. The Bible teaches that we are to do our good works in relationship with other believers. “Let us consider how to encourage one another to love and good works,” the writer to the Hebrews exhorts. By working in teams we can mutually encourage each other during times of discouragement, which will surely come.
One of the reasons why New Commandment Men’s Ministries promotes using teams of men to serve widows, single moms and their fatherless children is because team members can and will change through the years. Team members may move away, be called to another ministry, or even die. But as individual team members share their knowledge of their care receiver with each other, they create an “institutional knowledge reserve” that transmits to newer team members as other team members leave the team.
The Apostle Paul refers to this process of team members transmitting knowledge to newer team members when he writes to Timothy in 2 Timothy 2:2, “The things you have heard me say in the presence of many witnesses entrust to reliable people who will also be qualified to teach others.”
Churches do reasonably well in addressing the one-time project needs of people. But when it comes to providing for long-term pressing needs, churches fail miserably. But working together with other believers on teams to address these types of needs makes long term ministry possible. Teams also make addressing these types of pressing needs much more consistent.
“Let our people learn to engage in good works, to meet pressing needs, that they may not be unfruitful.” Titus 3:14
The love of Christ flourishes when Christian men meet together to do good works. When we become other-centered instead of self-centered, we automatically grow together in oneness. The joy of working together to accomplish God’s good works is one of the most fulfilling experiences any Christian man can have.
“Therefore if you have any encouragement from being united with Christ, if any comfort from his love, if any common sharing in the Spirit, if any tenderness and compassion, then make my joy complete by being like-minded, having the same love, being one in spirit and of one mind. Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves, not looking to your own interests but each of you to the interests of the others.” Philippians 2:1-4
The Bible teaches that all believers have spiritual gifts. But not all believers are gifted in the same way. We are part of a body, the body of Christ, that has different members with different functions. “For just as each of us has one body with many members, and these members do not all have the same function, so in Christ we, though many, form one body, and each member belongs to all the others. We have different gifts, according to the grace given to each of us.” Romans 12:4-6
The old adage, “Many hands make light work.” certainly applies to teams. When we work together on a team to meet pressing needs, we “bear one another’s burdens” and in the process “fulfill the law of Christ.” Galatians 6:2
Teams make accountability natural, lighthearted, and effective. “Hey, we missed you last week.” “Oh, my son had a soccer game.” That is accountability in action, but without being burdensome and overly strict.
All men relate to the concept of a team because men tend to be goal oriented. “What are we here for?” is the question every man asks of a men’s meeting. Being on a team with other men implies action towards accomplishing a goal. In our case, the goal is doing God’s good works to meet the pressing needs of widows, single moms, fatherless children, and anyone else with a long term need.
Of course, the most famous example of a “team” in the New Testament is Jesus and his twelve disciples. And when Jesus sent out seventy-two of his disciples, he didn’t send them out alone, but in teams of two. “After this the Lord chose another seventy-two men and sent them out two by two, to go ahead of him to every town and place where he himself was about to go” (Luke 10:1).
When the apostles ran into trouble administering their widows, they formed a team of seven to oversee the ministry (Acts 6:1-6).
When the apostle Paul set out on his mission trips, he was almost always, except in Athens, accompanied by a team. And when he took up the collection for the saints in Jerusalem, the funds were transported by a team.
To put it in military terms, teams are a “force multiplier” for good. We do well when we do good by using teams.
Are you trying to do God's good works alone? Maybe it is time for you to reach out to others and ask them to join you.
There are many ways that I identify with young pastor Timothy as he was starting out on his ministry. Both Timothy and I are rather shy. Both of us had strong godly male role models who were pastors. And both of us grew up in homes with multiple generations of Christians.
But the primary way I identify with Timothy was that he learned the Scriptures “from infancy.”
Timothy learned the Bible from his Christian grandmother Lois and mother Eunice (2 Timothy 1:5) while I also learned the Bible as a child from my parents and from my church.
Here is my story.
The room with the red ribbons was a room in my childhood church, Church of the Open Door in Los Angeles. It was dedicated to Scripture memory and had no furniture in it. Instead, all four walls were completely covered with dozens and dozens of long thin red ribbons that dangled down to the floor. At the top of each ribbon were the names of students in the children’s ministry. One of those ribbons had my name on it, “Herbie Reese.”
On those red ribbons were various colored paper emblems with Scripture references on them. The emblems corresponded to the Scripture references. For example, the emblem for Psalm 23, “The Lord is my shepherd…,” was a sheep, for Ephesians 6:10-18, “Put on the whole armor of God…,” a shield, and so forth. Every time you memorized a passage, you got to put the corresponding emblem on your red ribbon. Obviously, you also got to compare your own progress with the progress of the other kids at church. Some only had one or two emblems on their red ribbon while others had emblems down to the floor and even onto the floor.
The cool thing about this was that the passages were not just one or two verses, but often long sections of scripture or even entire chapters, like Isaiah 53, Psalm 1, Psalm 2, Psalm 110, Ephesians 1, the Ten Commandments, the Beatitudes, and on and on.
I have fond memories of sitting at the table after eating breakfast and memorizing those passages with my mother’s help before I went off to school.
I wasn’t the best in my Sunday school class, by far. But I did pretty well. I think I almost got down to the floor on my ribbon. As I matriculated through the Christian education program at church, I continued to memorize Scripture, including most of the Book of Romans and all of 1 John.
Now here’s the interesting thing. Later, when God called me into ministry, I went on to do the four year master’s program at Dallas Seminary and then I entered the pastorate, where I prepared and preached sermons every week. As I did my preparation for those sermons, I noticed something. What first came to my mind as I studied for those messages wasn’t what I learned in four years of seminary, but the Scripture passages I had learned as a child.
And that still happens. It’s been six decades since I learned many of those passages, but I still remember them as if it were yesterday.
And that means I’ve had six decades to meditate on them.
And that means I’ve had six decades to live them.
“Everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, while evildoers and impostors will go from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have become convinced of, because you know those from whom you learned it, and how from infancy you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.” 2 Timothy 3:12-17
Of course, unlike Timothy and myself, many of us did not grow up in a Christian home and consequently were not taught the scriptures “from infancy.” We can, however, make sure that our own children begin learning the Bible at an early age. We can also participate in our Church’s Christian education program and help teach children the Word.
But what if some who are reading this are adult believers who feel that their knowledge of the Bible is rather shallow. If this is so, then I would encourage you to take some steps to learn the Word of God well. Our “passage for getting there,” 2 Timothy 3:12-17, gives us three reasons why we should make sure we have a solid knowledge of the Bible.
We live in a sinful, God-forsaking world that is filled with hatred and loneliness and ugliness and pain and suffering. But there is one thing that we can hold in our hands and instill into our minds and infuse into our hearts that is utterly holy, the Word of God.
As such, our Bible is for us what scuba gear is for a scuba diver: something physical that contains information that is spiritually life-sustaining in a world that is spiritually life-destroying. Without the Bible, we simply cannot sustain a healthy and holy spiritual life for long.
If you took forty people, put them in a room and told them to write something about God, what you’d get is forty disassociated essays that would make little sense when put together.
On the other hand, the Bible was written by over forty authors over a period of more than fifteen hundred years. Yet it has a coherence that is undeniable. It tells us the story of God and his dealings with humanity. It tells us who God is, who we are, and why we humans are the way we are. It tells us about sin and death and what the solution is to sin and death. It tells us what God has done in the past about our sin, what God is doing now about his kingdom, and what God is going to do in the future.
Consequently, the Bible is the most influential book in the history of the world.
The Bible has this coherence and influence because, while it was written by dozens of people, it really has only one author, God himself. In our “passage for getting there,” 2 Timothy 3:12-17, Paul reminds Timothy that all Scripture is useful because all Scripture is God-breathed, or inspired. We sense the breath of God on every page of the Bible, for it speaks of him and through his Spirit, it speaks to our souls. As such, the Bible is completely trustworthy and our ultimate authority for living.
This is why, if there is one word you could use to describe me, it would be “biblicist.” I believe the Bible is inerrant in the original manuscripts and I use it as my authority in everything I do and teach. Hopefully, you have noticed that emphasis in my writings.
Imagine you suddenly come across a set of written instructions that tell you exactly how to please God and how doing so will bring you and others around you immense benefits forever and ever.
That is what we hold in our hand when we pick up your Bible. Our Bible is a handbook for doing good, God’s good. We live in a world that is against us. It wants to exploit us, enslave us, even kill us. Our Bible, on the other hand, tells us how to get the God of this universe on our side: through faith in his Son and obedience to his will as expressed in our Bible.
The good works that God’s Word then equips us to do are not the good works of the world; mere kind gestures the preserve the self-will of the one doing them. The good works our Bible frees us to do are revolutionary because they are done by someone who knows God, loves God, and loves those around him with their very lives.
“Blessed is the one who does not walk in step with the wicked or stand in the way that sinners take or sit in the company of mockers, but whose delight is in the law of the Lord, and who meditates on his law day and night. That person is like a tree planted by streams of water, which yields its fruit in season and whose leaf does not wither—whatever they do prospers.” Psalm 1:1-3
I chuckle to myself when I hear men’s ministry leaders – and any spiritual leader for that matter – tell men that if they’re going to grow in their walk with the Lord then they need to read their Bibles every day. The reason I find that amusing is because printed books have only been around for the last five hundred years. If daily Bible reading is critical to to our spiritual growth, that means no Christian in the first fifteen hundred years of the church would have been able to grow to full maturity.
But obviously that is not the case. Scripture makes it clear that it’s not Bible reading that is critical to spiritual growth, but Bible memory. “I have hidden your word in my heart, that I might not sin against you,” the Psalmist writes in Psalm 119:11. The prime example of this verse? Jesus, who quoted Scripture each time he was tempted by the Devil.
Actually, it’s not just Bible memory that is essential to our spiritual development, but Bible meditation, of which Bible memory is a prerequisite. “On his law he meditates day and night,” the Psalmist writes in Psalm 1:2. One of my Greek professors at UCLA knew the entire New Testament by memory in Greek. But he didn’t believe a word of it. It was just Greek to him, so to speak. He was living proof that one can memorize the Word of God without thinking it worthy of our meditation. But on the other hand, we can’t meditate on the Word of God if we haven’t memorized it.
Unlike my Greek professor, the Bible is not just Greek to any believer…or Hebrew for that matter. It’s our lifeblood. Our very souls and our eternal destiny depend on our understanding of it. It is, in fact, a true depiction of reality. The degree to which we depart from it is the degree to which we lose contact with what is real, and then stub our spiritual feet in our self-imposed darkness. So our goal is to live in the Bible and then to live out the Bible. The only way to do that is to meditate on it…all the time.
And the only way to do that is to memorize the Bible.
Pay attention to the sermon and to the passage the sermon is based on. Also, find classes is your church that focus on the Bible. Your church doesn’t have such a class? Maybe you can start one.
I am assuming, of course, that your church teaches the Bible. Sadly, not all churches do. If yours doesn’t, then you need to find another church.
One great way to learn the Bible is to teach a children’s Sunday School class or youth group. Preparing Bible lessons for others naturally creates a weekly Bible study discipline. You will learn more than your students will in the process.
The great thing about studying the Bible on your own is that you can set your own pace. But be careful. You can wind up simply meandering randomly through your Bible without retaining much. I suggest you set goals and work toward them.
Obviously, you can’t do all of this in a week or a month, or even in a year. These goals will take several years. But that is the point: always be learning something new from your Bible.
Find other men who are serious about Bible study and learn with them. One organization that I highly recommend is Bible Study Fellowship for Men. Bible Study Fellowship (BSF) is a non-denominational, international organization that offers Bible study classes for people of all ages and genders. While BSF offers classes specifically for men, it also offers classes for women, couples, and children. The number of men’s classes offered by BSF may vary depending on the specific location and availability. It is best to check the BSF website or contact a local BSF representative for information on the availability of men’s classes in your area.
The Navigators are best known for their Bible memory system. You can access it at this link: Topical Memory System for iphone and ipad. Another organization that I like is BibleMemory.com, an online Bible memory group that emphasizes both individual verses and entire passages and books of the Bible.
I highly recommend the following two organizations that provide high-quality, free and/or low-cost Bible courses:
Of course, if you really want to thoroughly learn your Bible, take some time off to attend a reputable, biblically based Christian college or seminary. The time I spent getting my seminary training was well worth it. I simply would not be fully equipped to do ministry without it.
Whatever you do, know that the time you invest in the study of Scripture is well worth it and will increasingly enable you to do the good works God saved you to do.
In addition to being saved, joining with other believers in order to do good works as a team, and knowing our Bible well, Paul reminds Timothy in 2 Timothy 3:12-17 that the process of becoming equipped for doing all of God's good works involves learning sound, Bible-based doctrine.
While many translations of 2 Timothy 3:16 translate the Greek word διδασκαλιαν (didaskalian) as "teaching," that translation is ambiguous because the English word "teaching" can refer to both the act of teaching ("Teaching" as a verb. as in "I am teaching,") and also to a body of knowledge that is taught ("Teaching" as a gerund that acts as a noun, as in "He follows their teaching to the letter.").
Since the Greek word is not a verb but a noun, Paul is not saying that the Bible is useful for the act of teaching spiritual truth (which would be the verb form of didaskalian), but rather that the Bible is useful for defining what spiritual truth is (the noun didaskalian). While it is true that the Bible is indeed useful for helping us teach spiritual truth better, Paul is not saying that here.
For this reason, "doctrine" is a better translation than "teaching" because it clearly refers to the body of truth that the Bible is useful for learning. From our Bible we derive, or codify, basic spiritual truths--doctrines--about who God is, who human beings are, how sin entered the world, how we can be saved, what the future holds, and much more. Doctrines are biblical truths in short-hand that make it easier for us to understand and communicate important topics in the Bible.
In other words, Paul is saying to Timothy that because the Bible is inspired by God, we can build an accurate view of spiritual reality as summarized by the doctrines we derive from the Bible. Having an accurate spiritual situational awareness through sound doctrine will enable us to accomplish the good works God has prepared for us to do.
"Take heed to yourself and to the doctrine (διδασκαλια). Continue in them, for in doing this you will save both yourself and those who hear you." 1 Timothy 4:16
If doctrine summarizes biblical truths, then that raises the question: can one person's doctrine be a more accurate summary of biblical truth than another person's?
The answer to that question is yes. As we look at the Scripture supporting certain doctrines, we can decide how accurately a particular doctrine summarizes those passages.
Fortunately, the major doctrines of the Christian faith (Such as the nature of God, the deity of Christ, the atoning sacrifice of Christ, his physical resurrection and return to earth, justification by faith, the standing of believers before God, etc.) have numerous Scriptural passages supporting them. So it is not difficult to discern "sound doctrine" from false doctrine, or heresy, with regard to major Scriptural issues. This is also why, though there are dozens of conservative, Bible-believing Christian denominations in America, there is broad agreement on "the fundamental" doctrines of the Christian faith. (More on "the fundamentals" in a moment.)
But discerning sound doctrine from the Bible does require effort, as Paul's exhortation to Timothy illustrates, "Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a workman who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth." (2 Timothy 2:15)
The fact that the Bible exists so that we can derive sound doctrine from it implies that there is such a thing as unsound doctrine. Paul affirms the reality and danger of false doctrine when he writes to Timothy in 1 Timothy 1:3,4 "Stay there in Ephesus so that you may command certain people not to teach false doctrines (διδασκαλία) any longer, or to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies. Such things promote controversial speculations rather than advancing God’s work—which is by faith."
The battle between sound doctrine and false doctrine, between biblical belief and unbiblical belief, between orthodoxy and heterodoxy, is an ongoing battle the church has been waging for two thousand years. That battle is a manifestation of Satan's strategy of distracting, obfuscating, negating, and marginalizing biblical truth.
A recent example of the battle between sound and unsound doctrine was the rise of modernism in American mainline denominations that started in their denominational seminaries in the 1880's. Modernism was an attempt to harmonize the Christian faith with scientific materialism, including Darwinism. The result was a reinterpretation of major Christian doctrines that eviscerated them of their original biblical meaning.
For example, modernism regarded the Bible, not as "inspired," but as "inspiring." Jesus was not God incarnate, just a good man. His miracles didn't actually happen. They were invented by the early church. In fact, Jesus may not have existed at all. But that didn't matter, these heretics thought, because we can still gain some insight from the teachings the early church put into his mouth. In the view of modernism, the resurrection did not physically happen, but believing in it anyway in a spiritual sense gives us hope. "Salvation" was redefined in social terms as salvation from poverty, hunger, ignorance, and poor health; concepts that were branded the "social gospel."
This massive apostasy permeated almost all mainline denominations in America until, by the 1930's, the majority of American mainline churches had been impacted by it. It is hard to comprehend now, but by the end of the first half of the twentieth century, Bible-believing Christians who held to historically orthodox theology had become a minority in America.
"People act the way they think," conservative theologian and philosopher, the late Dr. Francis Schaffer, used to say.
How true. While I have previously documented the moral decline of American men that started in the 1960's and continues to this day, my purpose here is to point out that male moral decline hasn't happened in a vacuum. Rather, men are simply living out the logical conclusions of the heretical naturalistic doctrines that decimated American Christianity over one hundred years ago.
Prior to 1880, there was a broad cultural belief that existed in America in the inspiration and authority of the Bible, in a personal God who is holy, that Jesus Christ was God incarnate who died for the sins of the world and rose again physically from the grave. The vast majority of Americans believed that people have been created in God's image, have fallen into sin, and need to be saved from his wrath. That belief produced a very specific set of cultural practices.
But by 1950, that broad consensus in the authority of the Bible and all that it taught had been replaced in mainline seminaries, denominations, and churches by naturalism and the belief that all that exists is matter and energy and chance. There is no personal God, they held, let alone one who is holy. There are no moral absolutes. And people are just the end product of evolution and have no intrinsic value. This new cultural belief has also produced a very specific, but very different, set of cultural practices.
The result? We now have the first thoroughly pagan culture in Western society in eighteen hundred years.
However, what has only recently been discerned by sociologists and psychologists is the deleterious effect this transition has had on men. Sound doctrine, it turns out, matters in men's ministry after all.
The conservative response to the tsunami of heresy besetting the church was to ask two questions. The first question was what doctrines are critical to the Christian faith? Where do we draw the line between essential doctrines and non-essential doctrines.
The second question was, how do we defend the essential doctrines of our faith?
The answer conservative Christian leaders at the beginning of the twentieth century gave to those questions came in the form of The Fundamentals.
"The Fundamentals: A Testimony To The Truth (generally referred to simply as The Fundamentals) is a set of ninety essays published between 1910 and 1915 by the Testimony Publishing Company of Chicago. It was initially published quarterly in twelve volumes, then republished in 1917 by the Bible Institute of Los Angeles as a four-volume set."(Wikepedia, "The Fundamentals")
It was the Bible Institute of Los Angeles (BIOLA) that made "The Fundamentals," a household term when, using funds provided by the oil baron, Lyman Stewart, BIOLA sent all four volumes to every English speaking pastor and missionary in the world. The goal was to refute Modernism, provide a "critique" of higher criticism of the Bible, prove the non-biblical foundations of contemporary cults, as well as to reassert the essential, or "fundamental" doctrines of the Bible. The result was the establishment of "fundamentalism" and "fundamentalists" as a major movement in Christianity in the first half of the twentieth century.
To give you a sense of what the fundamentalist movement was all about, here is a list of the essays as they appeared in the original twelve volume set:
The Fundamentals: A Testimony To The Truth
Volume I:
Volume II:
Volume III:
Volume IV:
Volume V:
Volume VI:
Volume VII:
Volume VIII:
Volume IX:
Volume X:
Volume XI:
Volume XII:
Years ago the producer of Focus on the Family's radio show contacted me and invited me and some of my ministry's volunteers to be on their program. I wondered why, out of the thousands of parachurch ministries in America, they were asking us to be on their show, so I asked him about it and he responded with one word, "orthopraxy."
"Orthodoxy," he went on to say, "is correct doctrine. Orthopraxy is correct practice. New Commandment Men's Ministries, with its emphasis on using men to serve widows and single moms, is a great example of orthopraxy."
Unfortunately, it has not always been the case that "fundamentalists" like me have stressed orthopraxy to the same degree that we have stressed orthodoxy.
And yes, I am a classic fundamentalist. The original four volume set of The Fundamentals has been in my library and in my father's library for over one hundred years. My father, brother and sister all attended BIOLA. My mother and father were members of BIOLA's sister institution, Church of the Open Door, for several decades and raised all five of us children in that church. My father and mother were close friends of Dr. Louis Talbot, pastor of COD and founder of Talbot Seminary, and also close friends of Dr. J. Vernon McGee, another well-known pastor of COD and the Bible teacher on Thru the Bible Radio. My uncle, Dr. John G. Mitchell, was in the first graduating class at Dallas Theological Seminary, the flagship fundamentalist seminary. I also graduated from Dallas Seminary and was ordained into ministry by IFCA (Independent Fundamental Churches of America) at Church of the Open Door.
Therefore, I have acquired from first-hand experience an extensive knowledge of, and deep respect for, the fundamentalist movement.
On the positive side, fundamentalism did succeed in reestablishing orthodox doctrine in much of the church as it exists in America today. Unfortunately, it did not succeed, except for a few instances,(Examples are Lutheran Church Missouri Synod and Baylor University) in restoring mainline seminaries, denominations and churches to orthodoxy. Instead, Fundamentalism, and its successors, evangelicalism and the charismatic movements, have largely replaced "mainline" Christian institutions as the primary drivers of American Christianity. In a very real sense, as the number of conservative, orthodox Christians in America have rapidly increased, mainline denominations have declined and become what I call, "sideline denominations."
But there was one primary problem with the fundamentalist movement that engendered several subsidiary problems. While many of those subsidiary problems have been--and continue to be--addressed over the past one hundred years, the main problem still exists. That problem is an emphasis on orthodoxy without an emphasis on orthopraxy.
Let us be clear, orthodoxy is foundational and essential to true orthopraxy. But while orthodoxy is essential, it is not sufficient. In our "passage for getting there," 2 Timothy 3:12-17, Paul tells Timothy that while the Bible produces sound doctrine, sound doctrine is insufficient in itself. Rather, it is but one of the necessary means ("so that") for being equipped for our ultimate goal, that of doing "every good work." Unfortunately, the fundamentalist movement forgot this truth and focused almost solely on holding to sound doctrine, often resulting in sterile intellectualism.
As a result of ignoring the importance of good works in the Christian life (When was the last time you heard a sermon on, or preached a sermon on, good works?), fundamentalists never learned about the biblical teaching on how to minister to widows, single moms, fatherless children and others with long term needs. Because of the church's failure to practice the biblical teaching on ministering to its widows, "in 1934, roughly one half of seniors were estimated to be poor." ("Social Security's Past, Present, and Future," Benjamin Veghte, National Academy of Social Insurance, https://www.nasi.org/discussion/social-securitys-past-present-and-future/)
In response to the desperate situation of seniors, the conservative, fundamental church could have stepped in, applied the clear biblical teaching on this subject, and provided a beautiful example to the entire nation of how the love of Christ functions (our protocol), just as Jesus Christ intended and just as the early church did. But it failed to do so and instead, the federal government stepped in (and rightly so) and met the need by establishing Social Security.
In place of demonstrating the practical application of the love of Christ towards those in its midst who were in deepest need, and the beauty that comes from doing so, fundamentalists fell back on legalism ("Don't go to movies. Don't dance. Don't play with playing cards. Don't smoke. Don't drink. Don't...) and reveled in their cultural isolation, resulting in cultural irrelevance.
Then, forgetting that the concept of fundamental doctrines implies that some doctrines are not fundamental, fundamentalists began fighting with each other over their differing views on doctrines of lesser importance such as biblical prophecy, speaking in tongues, and, more recently, the ordination of women. In essence, fundamentalists forgot the important adage, "In essentials, unity. In non-essentials, liberty. In all things, charity." It is no wonder then, that the term "fundamentalists" often conjures up in the mind of modern unbelievers pictures of harsh, unyielding, and condemning Christians--exactly the opposite of what Jesus intended.
So what are the practical applications of sound doctrine for men? Here are some of them (Of course, sound doctrine has practical implications for women as well. But since this article is about men's ministry, I'm focusing specifically on men.):
Take away sound doctrine, and you strip men of all of the above. Want to know why men are struggling in America today? It is because of the absence of sound doctrine in their lives.
As we proceed through the process of becoming men of God who are equipped for every good work, our next focus is the importance of being open to scriptural rebuke. For if we are unwilling to admit when we are wrong and are deviating from the Word, then we will most certainly permanently go astray.
But biblical rebuke is not fun. Here is one of my experiences of how the Bible rebuked me.
“Mommy, why is pastor Herb sitting in the back of that police car?”
“I don’t know, honey.” The mother grabbed her little girl’s hand and almost dragged her towards the theater entrance. “Hurry, we’re going to be late for the movie.”
The story of how I wound up with my hands in handcuffs behind my back in the back seat of a police car that was parked in front of our local AMC Classic Quincy 6 family theater in Quincy, Illinois on a Friday night begins that morning around 6 am.
I was eating my usual bowl of oatmeal with raisins and brown sugar in the deli section of Hy-Vee Grocery Store and reading the newspaper. This was back when people read actual physical newspapers. I came across an article about a new movie, “Showgirls.” It was rated NC-17, featured full frontal nudity and it starred a girl that was well known to underage children as a TV personality. It was showing in theaters nationwide.
I was shocked. I had never heard of an NC-17 rating before, but it sure sounded like pornography to me.
But I soon went on to read other articles and quickly forgot about it.
That evening my oldest son asked me to take him and his friend to see a movie and I said I would. When we drove up to our one and only movie theater in town, AMC Classic Quincy 6, I saw the marquee and on it were listed the six movies being screened, including the one we came to see. But the movie that jumped out at me the most was “Showgirls.”
Suddenly, everything I read about it came flooding back.
After the boys and I entered AMC and sat down in our theater and waited for our movie to begin, I started getting angry at the thought of a pornographic movie being shown in our family theater and I decided to do something about it.
I got up, left the boys to watch the movie, went out into the lobby and began preaching against Showgirls at the top of my lungs.
Not satisfied with that, and realizing that Showgirls was about to begin, I marched into that theater, went down to the front, and faced the audience. There were less than a dozen attendees present. I told them they may as well go home, because I was there to make sure Showgirls didn’t play. Then I began preaching at them.
It took about five minutes for the police to show up. There were two of them. They walked down to the front and stood next to me as I preached. After a few seconds of me ignoring them, they told me to stop. But I continued to ignore them and kept on preaching. Again they told me to stop. I still ignored them and continued to preach. Finally, one them grabbed my right wrist as I jabbed my arm out to make a rhetorical point. He twisted it down behind my back and put handcuffs on me.
I stopped preaching.
Silently, the two officers, one on each arm, marched me out of the theater and put me in the back of one of their police cars that was parked in front. I sat there for several minutes as the officers talked with the theater manager.
During the brief ride to the police station, I chatted with one of the police officers as he drove and explained why I had done what I had done. He, in turn, reminded me that there was something called freedom of speech in America and theaters had a right to exercise it.
“I have a right to exercise my free speech too.” I countered.
They told me that, yes, I had a right to my free speech. But there were lawful ways to exercise it and trying to stop a movie by preaching in a theater wasn’t one of them.
I expected a mug shot, finger prints, and a cell when we arrived at the station, but instead, the officer just sat me down in a room where I remained alone for an hour. I was charged with misdemeanor criminal trespass and bail was set at $40. Since I didn’t have enough cash on me to pay the bail, and my son and his friend were still back at the theater, they let me call the chairman of the board at my church (It was before cell phones and my wife wasn’t home.) to come and bail me out and another church member to pick up the boys at the theater.
To say that word spreads rapidly in small towns would be an understatement when describing Quincy’s reaction to what I had done. In a small midwestern town where a PTA meeting can headline the local TV news, the arrest of a pastor protesting a movie featuring nudity shot across Quincy like a sonic boom. On Saturday, pastors began calling me and saying they agreed with what I had done and that we needed to organize a mass demonstration.
So we did. We planned the demonstration for the following day, Sunday, after church at 1 PM in front of the theater. We preached about it from our pulpits and then invited our congregations to show up and protest.
And they did. Somewhere between five hundred to a thousand people arrived and demonstrated for two hours. We covered the entire block-long sidewalk in front of the theater. News of the demonstration even made the local news in St. Lewis.
I woke up Monday morning feeling pretty proud of myself. After all, hadn’t I stood up for morality and decency and led a demonstration that made an impact on the entire city?
But around 10 am that morning, something dramatic happened. A passage from the Bible seeped into my consciousness.
“Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended. For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience.” (Romans 13:1-5)
Suddenly, a deep sense of guilt spread through me like I had just bitten into a hot pepper. My Bible was doing its work. It was showing me clearly in black and white that what I had done was wrong. Civil disobedience is not an option for Christians today. “My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish leaders. But now my kingdom is from another place.” Jesus said to Pilate (John 18:36).
I immediately repented of my sin and confessed it to God. The following Sunday I stood up in my pulpit and confessed my sin to my congregation. I explained that while it is appropriate to lawfully protest a movie, breaking the law to do it is not. Then I preached a sermon on Romans 13:1-5.
Biblical rebuke is a normal experience in the Christian life. In fact, if we have never sensed the Bible rebuking us, something may be wrong with our walk with the Lord. There are many examples of God, or God’s representatives, rebuking believers in the Bible. Here are some of them.
Peter (3 times!)
(1) From that time on Jesus began to show His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem and suffer many things at the hands of the elders, chief priests, and scribes, and that He must be killed and on the third day be raised to life. Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him. “Far be it from You, Lord!” he said. “This shall never happen to You!” But Jesus turned and said to Peter, “Get behind Me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to Me. For you do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men.” Matthew 16:21-23
(2) Peter replied, “Even if all fall away on account of you, I never will.” “Truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “this very night, before the rooster crows, you will disown me three times.” But Peter declared, “Even if I have to die with you, I will never disown you.” And all the other disciples said the same. Matthew 26:33-35
(3) When Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. For before certain men came from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles. But when they arrived, he began to draw back and separate himself from the Gentiles because he was afraid of those who belonged to the circumcision group. The other Jews joined him in his hypocrisy, so that by their hypocrisy even Barnabas was led astray. When I saw that they were not acting in line with the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas in front of them all, “You are a Jew, yet you live like a Gentile and not like a Jew. How is it, then, that you force Gentiles to follow Jewish customs? Galatians 2:11-14
Paul
Paul looked straight at the Sanhedrin and said, “My brothers, I have fulfilled my duty to God in all good conscience to this day.” At this the high priest Ananias ordered those standing near Paul to strike him on the mouth. Then Paul said to him, “God will strike you, you whitewashed wall! You sit there to judge me according to the law, yet you yourself violate the law by commanding that I be struck!” Those who were standing near Paul said, “How dare you insult God’s high priest!” Paul replied, “Brothers, I did not realize that he was the high priest; for it is written: ‘Do not speak evil about the ruler of your people.’ Acts 23:1-5
Moses
“Moses and Aaron went from the assembly to the entrance to the tent of meeting and fell facedown, and the glory of the Lord appeared to them. The Lord said to Moses, “Take the staff, and you and your brother Aaron gather the assembly together. Speak to that rock before their eyes and it will pour out its water. You will bring water out of the rock for the community so they and their livestock can drink.” So Moses took the staff from the Lord’s presence, just as he commanded him. He and Aaron gathered the assembly together in front of the rock and Moses said to them, “Listen, you rebels, must we bring you water out of this rock?” Then Moses raised his arm and struck the rock twice with his staff. Water gushed out, and the community and their livestock drank. But the Lord said to Moses and Aaron, “Because you did not trust in me enough to honor me as holy in the sight of the Israelites, you will not bring this community into the land I give them.” Numbers 20:6-12
David
“Then Nathan said to David, “You are the man! This is what the Lord, the God of Israel, says: ‘I anointed you king over Israel, and I delivered you from the hand of Saul. I gave your master’s house to you, and your master’s wives into your arms. I gave you all Israel and Judah. And if all this had been too little, I would have given you even more. Why did you despise the word of the Lord by doing what is evil in his eyes? You struck down Uriah the Hittite with the sword and took his wife to be your own. You killed him with the sword of the Ammonites. 2 Samuel 12:7-9
The entire church in Galatia
You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? Before your very eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as crucified. I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by believing what you heard? Are you so foolish? After beginning by means of the Spirit, are you now trying to finish by means of the flesh? Galatians 3:1-3
The entire church at Corinth (one of many rebukes)
If any of you has a dispute with another, do you dare to take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the Lord’s people? Or do you not know that the Lord’s people will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life! Therefore, if you have disputes about such matters, do you ask for a ruling from those whose way of life is scorned in the church? I say this to shame you. Is it possible that there is nobody among you wise enough to judge a dispute between believers? But instead, one brother takes another to court—and this in front of unbelievers! 1 Corinthians 6:1-6
We should not be surprised, then, when we sense that we are being rebuked by the Word of God. In fact, we should expect it. The problem with doing good is that it can engender a sense of pride. And pride, in turn, can keep us from seeing that we may be attempting to do good in the wrong way.
We must fight to replace the temptation to be proud of our good by remembering that the good we are doing is simply obedience to God’s will and God’s Word. That is, we are just doing what we are supposed to be doing, as Jesus teaches in Luke 17:
“Suppose one of you has a servant plowing or looking after the sheep. Will he say to the servant when he comes in from the field, ‘Come along now and sit down to eat’? Won’t he rather say, ‘Prepare my supper, get yourself ready and wait on me while I eat and drink; after that you may eat and drink’? Will he thank the servant because he did what he was told to do? So you also, when you have done everything you were told to do, should say, ‘We are unworthy servants; we have only done our duty.’” Luke 17:7-10
My Credo
As a Christian, I am not engaged in the process of making America Christian, but in the process of making Americans Christian.
The first is political coercion. The second is the Great Commission.
The first is cultural warfare with flesh and blood. The second is spiritual warfare with Satan himself.
The first is Christians grabbing power and not letting go the way one clutches a live wire with a spasm’d fist…and dies. The second is Christians relinquishing power…and living out the life Christ.
The first always results in the corruption of the church. The second, the multiplication of the church.
The first forces people to obey the law of God through the laws of men. The second disciples Christians to obey the law of God out of love for God.
The first results in the society’s repudiation of the church the way one vomits a foreign object. The second results in the penetration of the church throughout society the way salt permeates a bowl of soup and seasons it.
The first is ugly Christians doing ugly things. The second is the beauty of meekness in the church that adorns the gospel.
The first is self-defeating. The second cannot be defeated.
The Great Commission
“Go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.” Matthew 28:19-20
Our Real Battle
“We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” Ephesians 6:12
Salt and Light
“You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt loses its saltiness, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled underfoot. You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden.” Matthew 5:13-14
We have seen how God, in preparing us to do his good works, uses his word to rebuke us when we sin. Sometimes this rebuke is subtle. Sometimes it is not subtle at all. Either way, Paul reminds Timothy that not only is Scripture profitable for rebuking us, it can also restore us after we have been rebuked…if we let it.
Often translated, “correction,” the Greek word epanorthosin in 2 Timothy 3:16 (επανορθωσιν, which appears only here in the New Testament) refers to a past state of wholeness that has gone bad and needs to be restored to its original condition. Paul is saying that the Bible is useful for restoring believers to their original state of fellowship with God and with others after they have sinned and been rebuked.
Paul knew that there would often be times when Timothy would need to rebuke those he ministered to. For example, Paul instructed Titus, another young pastoral intern, to severely rebuke the Cretans he was ministering to because of their reputation for being “liars, evil beasts, and lazy gluttons” (Titus 1:12).
But Paul wanted to make sure Timothy knew how to follow up a rebuke with restoration, and how to use scripture to accomplish that.
Of course, no one likes to be rebuked, especially by God through his word. It can be a jarring, even convulsive, experience. This is why it is essential that we be restored spiritually, emotionally, and relationally after experiencing a rebuke. Consider, for example, Isaiah’s experience after God rebuked him:
“In the year that King Uzziah died, I saw the Lord, high and exalted, seated on a throne; and the train of his robe filled the temple. Above him were seraphim, each with six wings: With two wings they covered their faces, with two they covered their feet, and with two they were flying. And they were calling to one another:
“Holy, holy, holy is the Lord Almighty;
the whole earth is full of his glory.”
At the sound of their voices the doorposts and thresholds shook and the temple was filled with smoke. “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.” Then one of the seraphim flew to me with a live coal in his hand, which he had taken with tongs from the altar. With it he touched my mouth and said, “See, this has touched your lips; your guilt is taken away and your sin atoned for.” (Isaiah 6:1-7)
In this passage, we see Isaiah’s intense guilt and shame as he realized how far he had strayed from God’s holiness, especially when it came to his speech. But his guilt and shame didn’t end there. They resulted in immediate repentance (“Woe to me!), acceptance of the consequences of his sin (burning coals on his lips), and God’s affirmation of his forgiveness (“Your guilt is taken away and your sin is atoned for.”)
Before God uses us to accomplish his good work, he deals with our issues by rebuking us and then restoring us to full fellowship
The important thing to notice after Isaiah 6:1-7 is what happened in verse 8:
“Then I heard the voice of the Lord saying, “Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?” And I said, “Here am I. Send me!” (Isaiah 6:8)
Before Isaiah was ready to do God’s good works, his sin had to be rebuked and restoration had to occur. Only then was Isaiah prepared to willingly and joyfully accept God’s commission to do the good work he had for him to do.
Restoration, therefore, is critical to the Christian life and to us being able to accomplish the good works God has prepared for us to do. Here are two classic examples of biblical restoration.
The first example of restoration after rebuke is the Corinthian church.
The church at Corinth was the problem child of all New Testament churches. What fascinates me is that there are no serious secular or theologically liberal scholars today who doubt the authenticity of 1 Corinthians because they understand that no author in their right mind who had an eye toward winning the civilized world to Christ would make this stuff up: Christians suing each other, someone in the church sleeping with his stepmother, drunkenness at their church pot lucks, treating visiting preachers like they were in some kind of talent contest, church services so out of control they would make holy rollers today blush. Some in the church even doubted the resurrection of Jesus Christ. If there had been newspapers at the time, the church of Corinth would have made the top fold of the front page of The Corinthian Times every day.
So what did the Apostle Paul do? He wrote 1 Corinthians to the Church at Corinth and, addressing each problem one by one in long passages, reproved them “severely” for their behavior.
The problem, however, is that after he reproved them in his first letter, he wasn’t sure how they would respond. Would they be resentful? Or would they genuinely repent? Communication and transportation being what they were in ancient times, it took several months for Paul to find out. In the meantime, he avoided the Corinthian church so as not to “make another painful visit” to them (2 Corinthians 2:1-4).
Finally, word came by way of Titus, Paul’s fellow worker, that the believers at Corinth had indeed repented and its congregation was making amends. Even more, the church had regained its love for Paul, or, as Paul relates Titus’ report in 2 Corinthians 7:7, “He told us about your longing for me, your deep sorrow, your ardent concern for me, so that my joy was greater than ever.”
Then Paul continues his second letter to the Corinthians with this long passage on reproof and restoration:
“Even if I caused you sorrow by my letter, I do not regret it. Though I did regret it—I see that my letter hurt you, but only for a little while—yet now I am happy, not because you were made sorry, but because your sorrow led you to repentance. For you became sorrowful as God intended and so were not harmed in any way by us. Godly sorrow brings repentance that leads to salvation and leaves no regret, but worldly sorrow brings death. See what this godly sorrow has produced in you: what earnestness, what eagerness to clear yourselves, what indignation, what alarm, what longing, what concern, what readiness to see justice done. At every point you have proved yourselves to be innocent in this matter. So even though I wrote to you, it was neither on account of the one who did the wrong nor on account of the injured party, but rather that before God you could see for yourselves how devoted to us you are.” 2 Corinthians 7:8-12
We can summarize the restoration process with the church at Corinth and Paul this way:
Thus rebuke, while difficult to give and to receive, is healthy when done properly. And when rebuke is responded to properly with repentance, it results in a restored relationship.
A second classic example of restoration after rebuke is David.
There are two sides to King David: the David whom God called “a man after my own heart” (1 Samuel 13:14), and the David who raped a man’s wife (Bathsheba), got her pregnant, and then murdered her husband Uriah to cover it up (2 Samuel 11).
We read about David’s repentance and restoration in David’s beautiful and poignant psalm of repentance, Psalm 51.
“Have mercy on me, O God, according to your unfailing love; according to your great compassion blot out my transgressions. Wash away all my iniquity and cleanse me from my sin. For I know my transgressions, and my sin is always before me. Against you, you only, have I sinned and done what is evil in your sight; so you are right in your verdict and justified when you judge.
“Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me. Yet you desired faithfulness even in the womb; you taught me wisdom in that secret place. Cleanse me with hyssop, and I will be clean; wash me, and I will be whiter than snow. Let me hear joy and gladness; let the bones you have crushed rejoice. Hide your face from my sins and blot out all my iniquity.
“Create in me a pure heart, O God, and renew a steadfast spirit within me. Do not cast me from your presence or take your Holy Spirit from me. Restore to me the joy of your salvation and grant me a willing spirit, to sustain me. Then I will teach transgressors your ways, so that sinners will turn back to you.
“Deliver me from the guilt of bloodshed, O God, you who are God my Savior, and my tongue will sing of your righteousness. Open my lips, Lord, and my mouth will declare your praise. You do not delight in sacrifice, or I would bring it; you do not take pleasure in burnt offerings. My sacrifice, O God, is a broken spirit; a broken and contrite heart you, God, will not despise.” Psalm 51:1-17
David’s restoration in Psalm 51 contains many similarities with the Corinthian church’s restoration in 2 Corinthians 7:8-12, with the key difference being that 2 Corinthians’ emphasis is on the Corinthian believers’ relationship with Paul while Psalm 51’s emphasis is on David’s relationship with God (“Against you, you only, have I sinned.”).
Here is a summary of the restoration process between David and God.
This restoration process did not mean that David escaped the temporal consequences of his forgiven sin. He definitely did not. “Whatever a man sows, that he shall also reap” (Galatians 6:7-9). But his restoration did mean that he was fully restored to full fellowship with God.
I am sure that when I say that rebuke and restoration are normal for Christian men (and women!) that every Christian reading this will agree. We all have issues and God loves us too much to ignore them. “My son, do not despise the Lord’s discipline, and do not resent his rebuke, because the Lord disciplines those he loves, as a father the son he delights in” (Proverbs 3:11-12).
But as we have seen, the key to rebuke is repentance with “a broken and contrite heart.” Only then will we regain the joy of God’s salvation and an eager desire to accomplish the good works God saved us to do.
“Then I heard the voice of the Lord saying, “Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?” And I said, “Here am I. Send me!”
Now we are getting into the meat of 2 Timothy 3:16. In this series, we have seen that God saves us, surrounds us with other believers who want to do good works, gives us his inspired Word, rebukes us, and restores us. Now Paul says God trains us to live a certain way: in righteousness.
Imagine a world where everyone knows God, loves God, and obeys God. In this imaginary world, because of their love for God, everyone also loves each other. They honor each other, speak truthfully to each other, trust each other, and work towards each other’s good. The world made up of these people has no crime and it has no locked doors. Instead, people spontaneously invite each other into their homes for fellowship around their dinner tables. In this imaginary world, people resolve any disagreements quickly and amicably. This world has no class or racial divisions because everyone accepts everyone else on an equal basis. And finally, this world has no poverty because each person considers it their personal responsibility to meet the needs of their neighbors who find themselves unable to meet their own.
“Right! If only. Pure fantasy,” you say. And you are right. This imaginary world I have just described is quite different from the actual world we live in.
And yet, we can all agree that living in a world like this would be nice. Something in us longs for this kind of world, a world where everyone indeed loves each other.
Possibly the first thing that comes to our minds when I describe this imaginary world is heaven. But while it certainly is true that this imaginary world resembles what we will experience in heaven, nevertheless, I am talking about an imaginary world. In fact, it is not even imaginary. It is this world. It is this world as it will be in the future.
The Bible says that the imaginary world I described above will indeed exist, but it will not happen until “the regeneration, when the son of man sits on his glorious throne,” (Matthew 19:28). Jesus’ reference to “the regeneration” on Matthew 19 refers to the Millennium, the 1,000 year reign of Christ that he will institute after his return to earth in glory as predicted in biblical prophecies, such as Zachariah 14:16-21.
Sometimes the Bible refers to that future time of righteousness, prosperity, peace and blessing as “the day” and contrasts it with our present time of sin, suffering, war, and poverty as “the night.” But the Bible also teaches that, while “the day” has not yet dawned, believers can, in anticipation of the dawn, “wake up” and “light a light” until “the daybreak comes.” Paul uses metaphors like these in Ephesians 5:8-14 when he describes precisely this betwixt and between situation we believers find ourselves in when it comes to living righteously in a sinful world:
“For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light (for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth) and find out what pleases the Lord. Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. It is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret. But everything exposed by the light becomes visible—and everything that is illuminated becomes a light. This is why it is said: ‘Wake up, sleeper, rise from the dead, and Christ will shine on you.'”
Paul says in this passage that even though the reign of world-wide righteousness (“the regeneration”) that will characterize Christ’s rule is still in the future, nevertheless, we can experience the essence of that reign in a substantial way now by living a righteous life in this unrighteous world. Or, continuing the analogies of night/day (referring to specific periods of time when unrighteousness and unrighteousness reign over the world ) and darkness/light (referring to specific states of unrighteousness and righteousness that characterize individual behavior), even though the sun has not come up yet and everyone is still asleep, we can rise early in the morning and, in anticipation of the dawn, light a candle so that we can see clearly until the sun comes up.
Thus, a man of God who lives righteously has a different moral compass from the rest of the world. He thinks differently. He acts differently. He treat’s money differently. He responds to his boss at work differently. He talks differently. He treats women differently. He has different attitudes towards marriage, sex, and procreation. He relates to his neighbor differently. He even fills out his taxes differently.
Consequently, a man of God cannot live out his faith without being noticed. There is no such thing as an incognito man of God. “Everything that is illuminated becomes a light.”
The moment someone places their faith in Christ as their savior from sin, God removes his sin and imputes the righteousness of Christ onto him.
“For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God” 2 Corinthians 5:21.
Christ took our sin on himself and experienced the consequences – death. We have taken Christi’s righteousness on ourselves and also experience the consequences: life. Eternal life.
But when it comes to living righteously, that is something quite different from our position in Christ. Living a righteous life is the result of learned behavior. It does not come naturally for us.
Living righteously in the Bible refers to the practice of relating to God and others righteously, fairly, and justly. God expects us to live righteously because we have been made righteous in Christ. Consequently, righteous living is the logical conclusion of our faith in Christ and our consequent position in Christ.
“As a prisoner for the Lord, then, I urge you to live a life worthy of the calling you have received. Be completely humble and gentle; be patient, bearing with one another in love. Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace.” Ephesians 4:1-3
In this passage, our “calling” refers to our position in Christ as righteous saints. But “live a life worthy of the calling” refers to our need to live righteously in our daily lives.
Years ago, I baptized a new believer at church one cold winter Sunday morning. Unfortunately, the person responsible for filling the baptistry forgot to turn on the baptistry heater. I made the discovery when I stepped into the baptistry and immediately started shivering. But when the baptismal candidate stepped in, he spontaneously shouted out for everyone in the church to hear, “D…n this water’s cold!”
Of course, we all laughed. But it was also a vivid reminder to us “seasoned Christians” that when we started our journey of faith, we started it from mile zero.
Fortunately, the believer has several sources for knowing how to live righteously, such as our conscience, the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit, and the examples of other believers.
But by far, the primary source of our knowledge of what a righteous life looks like comes from the Bible. The Bible is full of commands and exhortations to righteous living.
“The New Testament provides numerous examples of righteous living, which include:
These examples demonstrate that righteous living involves both personal obedience to God’s commands and a commitment to serving and loving others.”1
Taken together, the total exhortations to righteous living in the New Testament number in the hundreds and represent a body of truth that is worthy of our constant meditation and implementation.
Our foundational passage for learning how to do God’s good works reads “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, restoring and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3:16, 17)
Notice that our training in righteousness is the culmination of our being “thoroughly equipped for every good work,” not the performance of the good works themselves. True, doing good works is righteous in itself. But living a righteous life without giving thought to doing the good works God has planned for us negates the whole purpose of our salvation.
Failing to understand this distinction between living righteously and doing God’s good works can choke off our spiritual lives and denude us of our calling.
Prime examples of focusing only on one’s righteousness and ignoring good works are the Priest and the Levite in the story of the Good Samaritan. When they passed by the left-for-dead stranger waylaid by robbers, they were practicing righteousness according to the law, which commanded them to avoid dead bodies after being purified at the temple. But they forgot the importance of good works and therefore ignored the man they passed by.
Bringing this distinction between righteous living and doing God’s good works forward to our own history, during slavery, churches in America’s southern states focused almost entirely on personal righteousness but, like the priest and Levite, forgot the radical nature of good works and thus ignored the plight of the slaves in their midst.
Finally, we can apply this same distinction to our present day when, as so often happens in the vast majority of churches, we attend church on Sunday and worship with other believers (righteousness), but ignore the pressing needs of the widows, single moms, and fatherless children who are worshipping with us in that same service, needs that should be met with our good works (Titus 3:14).
We can think of righteous living in terms of the old medical doctrine, “primum non nocere,” “First, do no harm.” In other words, “Whatever you do for your patients, don’t make things worse.” But doing no harm to others is not the fulfillment of what medicine is all about. Medicine is much more than maintaining the patient’s status quo. Medicine is about curing a patient’s illness. Medicine is about healing a patient. A physician who only does you no harm but fails to cure your viral pneumonia violates the whole purpose of medicine.
In the same way, righteous living is primarily about doing no harm to others and unrighteous living is about the harm such an unrighteous lifestyle causes others. One cannot do God’s good works when one’s lifestyle hurts people.
On the other hand, doing God’s good works goes way beyond simply maintaining the status quo by not hurting people any more than they already have been. God’s good works proactively reach out and heal the harm that we and others have caused. God’s good works ameliorate the pain and suffering that sin and Satan have brought into the world, announcing in the process the imminent presence of the Kingdom of God.
We now come to the climax of 2 Timothy 3:12-17, our foundational passage for men’s ministry. In this passage we have learned that God is at work in every Christian man’s life, first by saving him, and then by immersing him in a fellowship of mutual believers called the church, which will help him in his quest to do God’s good works. But God doesn’t stop there. God has given men his Word, which is inspired by him and therefore authoritative for all Christian men.
But in order for the Word of God to be effective in a Christian man’s life, he must study it and learn it so that he develops a body of sound doctrine from it, is reproved by it, and then restored through it to fellowship with both God and others. Finally, from his Bible a Christian man learns how to live a righteous life. That is, he learns how to stop hurting others around him.
All of this is but preparation for the ultimate purpose God saves a man in the first place: to bring healing to those around him who are suffering in various ways by performing good works on their behalf.
Michael S. Hyatt, the former President and CEO of Thomas Nelson Publishing, and an expert in leadership development, has stated that every organization should have a “so that” process and purpose statement that fills in the following two blanks: (We do this – our process) so that (this will happen – our purpose).
New Commandment Men’s Ministries has a “so that” process and purpose statement that runs like this: (New Commandment Men’s Ministries helps churches recruit, train, organize, and deploy teams of men who adopt their widows, single moms, fatherless children, and others with long term needs – our process) so that (their church can say, “There is no needy person among us.” – our purpose)
2 Timothy 3:12-17 is a classic “so that” process and purpose statement. It is God’s process and purpose statement for men’s ministry: (God does this – his process) so that (men of God do this – his purpose). We can outline God’s process and purpose statement for men’s ministry this way:
(God does this – God’s process with men)
(So that a man of God does this – God’s purpose for men)
What I have outlined above is men’s ministry, nothing more and nothing less. Everything that God is doing in the lives of men, and everything we as men’s ministry leaders should be doing in the lives of our men, is so that our men will become men of God who are prepared to do every good work that God saved us to do.
We can also state this description of the process and purpose of men’s ministry in negative terms.
All of the following things that God wants to do in men (God’s process) are critical, but,
but then we neglect actually doing the good works God saved us to do (God’s purpose) – which all of these previous things are simply prerequisites for – then...
Sadly, it is my observation that 90% of local church men’s ministries are failing in their God-given mission. Rare is the church that understands the purpose and importance of good works in the life of a Christian man, because they are only focusing on certain aspects of God’s process, instead of using that process to accomplish God’s purpose in men.
In sum, men’s ministry has forgotten the purpose of the process.
“…the man of God”
This phrase “ὁ τοῦ θεοῦ ἄνθρωπος,” translated “the man of God,” is used only here in the New Testament. Paul is saying that God’s desire is not that his good works be done by just any man, because they cannot be done by just any man. They can only be done by a certain kind of man: a “man of God.” [Since I am addressing men within the context of men’s ministry, I am using the literal translation. Obviously, these teachings apply to women as well, hence the NIV’s gender neutral translation of the phrase “ὁ τοῦ θεοῦ ἄνθρωπος” as “the servant of God.”]
“Of God,” “τοῦ θεοῦ,” is in the genitive form and can indicate possession, “God’s man,” or perhaps quality, “a godly man.”
Within the context of our passage, then, a man of God is a man who has been saved through faith in Jesus Christ. As a result of his salvation he is functioning within a fellowship of believers, especially a fellowship of other godly men, is learning and applying the Word of God to his life, has experienced biblical rebuke and been restored in his relationships, and has learned how to live a righteous life.
All of this, Paul says, is so that God will have a man who will be able and willing to do all of his good works.
Therefore, a godly man is the culmination, or goal, of the work of God in a man’s life that always results in good works. That is, godliness and good works are inseparable.
One way to understand the practical ramifications of what it means to be a godly man is to think of what it means to be a godless man, or a man controlled by his fleshly lusts, by the world, and by Satan. Such a man always causes harm to himself and to others, as Scripture describes in many places. Here are two examples:
“This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, high-minded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God.” 2 Timothy 3:1-4
“Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy. Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.” Romans 1:28-32
Just as a godless man, or a “man of Satan,” so to speak, brings evil, pain, suffering and discord into his own life and the lives of those around him through his sinful works, so a godly man, or a “man of God,” brings righteousness, healing and well-being into his own life and the lives of those around him through his good works.
“…may be adequately equipped”
But, as we have seen, a man of God must be adequately equipped to do those good works.
The Greek word for “adequately equipped” is ἐξηρτισμένος (exertismenos), which means “fully equipped” or “fully furnished” to do a task.
What happens when a Christian man is not fully equipped to do every good work? That Christian man is not a “full-service” man of God because he cannot do everything God wants him to do. Consider these analogies:
If a dentist does not have an x-ray machine, she cannot see cavities that are otherwise invisible to the naked eye. Because she is not fully equipped, she cannot fill all your cavities and is not, therefore, a “full-service” dentist.
An auto mechanic who does not have a hydraulic lift cannot properly work under your car and would not be able to repair your transmission. Because your mechanic is not fully equipped, he is not a “full-service” mechanic.
A pilot who has only been trained on a Piper Cub, would not be able to pilot you on a Boeing 777. Because he is not fully equipped, he is not a “full-service” pilot and cannot fly you from the US to Europe.
In the same way, a man who is not saved is definitely not fully equipped to do all of God’s good works.
But neither is a Christian man who fails to fellowship with other believers. He, too, is not fully equipped to do all of God’s good works. He is not a “full-service” man of God.
So too, a Christian man who is ignorant of the Word of God, and of God’s will and God’s ways, is also not fully equipped to do all of God’s good works and is not a “full-service” man of God.
Neither is a Christian man who refuses the rebuke of God’s Word for his on-going sin.
Nor the Christian man who has not been restored in his relationships with God and others.
And certainly not a Christian man who is living an unrighteous life.
None of these Christian men are adequately equipped to do every good work that God wants them to do. They are only equipped to do a few of God’s good works. They are not “full-service” men of God.
God’s will for all Christian men is that we become men of God who are becoming more and more proficient in doing all of God’s good works as we learn to work with other Christian men (and women) in pursuit of God’s good works, as we study and learn the Word of God, as we properly respond to biblical rebuke, as we experience restoration in our relationships with God and others, and as we learn to live righteously. These Christian men are full-service men of God who are ready to do every good work that God brings their way.
“…for every good work.”
What exactly does it mean for a man of God to be fully equipped “for every good work.” Does it mean running around frantically trying to do every possible good work, but never succeeding at doing them? Or does it mean something else? To understand this term, “every good work,” we need to look at how it is used in the rest of the New Testament.
“Every good work” is a technical term (a technical term means that whenever it occurs it is used in the same specific way) in the New Testament. The Greek is “πᾶν ἔργον ἀγαθον” (pan ergon agathon) and it occurs nine times, eight of them in Paul’s epistles. Here are those nine New Testament occurrences.
Summary
“Every good work” refers to the things a servant of God does to please him. The Bible is especially useful for preparing us to accomplish every good work since it informs us of God’s will. Holiness always results in every good work. And God promises to give us everything we need to accomplish every good work. Examples of every good work are bringing up children, hospitality, washing the saints feet, and helping the poor. Also involved in every good work is submitting to government authorities. A distinctive of a godless man is that he is unfit to do every good work.
Simply put, every good work is what we Christians are always about. They are our joy and purpose in life because we know that good works please God and that they are what we have been saved to do.
One problem Christians can have with good works is confusing specialized good works with general good works.
Specialized good works relate to a believer’s giftedness and to a limited need in the body of Christ. For example, Paul writes in 1 Timothy 3:1, “If anyone aspires to the office of overseer, it is a good work he desires to do.” Not every believer is called to the pastorate. Only a certain subset of believers are called to do that: “If anyone aspires…”.
On the other hand, the Bible commands all believers to do good works relating to people in need. These are general good works and encompass what I have previously described as “the protocol” (“Plead the cause of the widow and orphan and I will transform your culture.”) Here are some examples:
Here, the phrases “our people,” “If anyone,” and “each of you” demonstrate the universality of these commands to do good works. Thus, while only some believers are called to the good work of pastoral ministry, all believers are called to the good work of meeting pressing needs. The first is a specialized good work, the second is a generalized good work.
Keeping this distinction clearly in our mind when we read scripture will help us discern exactly what it is that God has saved us to do.
“There were giants in the earth in those days.” Genesis 6:4
When men of God understand the will of God through their knowledge of the Word of God, and then express the love of God by doing the works of God, they become true spiritual giants in the earth, wowing everyone around them.
When a local church’s men’s ministry has something unusual like that. Something unexpected like that. Something spectacular like that. Something important like that. Something excellent like that. Something renowned like that. Something valuable like that. Something admirable like that. Something heroic like that. When something like that appears in ordinary men in an ordinary local church, word of it spreads rapidly and people come running.
And when that happens, their men’s ministry has become a men’s ministry men want to know.
We have seen from my last series, “A Men’s Ministry Men Want to Know,” that men who have a passionate desire to serve widows and single moms have an acquired taste. That is, the average non-Christian man on the street does not normally think and act that way.
Rather, to become a “man of God,” we must be saved from our selfish, self-centered, and godless ways and come into a right relationship with God through faith in his Son, Jesus Christ. Then, having done so, we must come to understand God’s heart for widows and single moms by learning his Word, by developing a clear overview of spiritual reality that results in sound doctrine, by accepting biblical reproof and restoration, and by learning to live righteously. As we do, we become men of God who are “fully equipped for every good work.”
But just because we are in the process of becoming men of God who are engaged in doing God’s good works, this does not mean that we have arrived, that we are free from sin, or that we will never make major mistakes in this life. Take, for example, Paul’s statement in Philippians 3:12-14:
“Not that I have already obtained all this, or have already arrived at my goal, but I press on to take hold of that for which Christ Jesus took hold of me. Brothers and sisters, I do not consider myself yet to have taken hold of it. But one thing I do: Forgetting what is behind and straining toward what is ahead, I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me heavenward in Christ Jesus.”
If anyone has been a “man of God,” it was Paul himself. And yet even Paul knew that he had not “already arrived.” That mentality, “I have not already arrived,” must be every man of God’s mentality. Yes, we are busy doing God’s good works. But while we may be doing the works of God, we still have issues. Doing good works does not mean we have “already arrived.”
This truth that no man of God has already arrived was impressed upon me in my teens and early twenties by my mentor, role model, and uncle. “Herb, always remember. Every man of God has feet of clay,” he would say.
That metaphor, “feet of clay” refers to “a weakness or hidden flaw in the character of a greatly admired or respected person” (Dictionary.com). It has its origin in Daniel’s interpretation of King Nebuchadnezzar’s vision:
“Your Majesty looked, and there before you stood a large statue—an enormous, dazzling statue, awesome in appearance. The head of the statue was made of pure gold, its chest and arms of silver, its belly and thighs of bronze, its legs of iron, its feet partly of iron and partly of baked clay. While you were watching, a rock was cut out, but not by human hands. It struck the statue on its feet of iron and clay and smashed them.”
From a distance, the statue Daniel described to King Nebuchadnezzar was enormous, dazzling, and awesome. But when he got up close and looked down, he saw something disappointing: feet of clay mixed with iron. That is, the feet were not capable of holding up for long the otherwise fabulous statue. The entire stature was, therefore, a huge disappointment.
In its context, the statue in Daniel chapter two refers to consecutive historical kingdoms, each lesser in glory and stability. But the idea of “feet of clay” came to be applied to men (and women) of great social stature who, nevertheless, have severe and often hidden flaws.
The Bible is full of examples of men of God who had feet of clay.
All of these men of God demonstrated “feet of clay” after they had been called by God to serve him.
It is true, “every man of God has feet of clay.” By impressing this truth upon me, Uncle John, as our family affectionately called him, was protecting me from disappointment. And he was right to do so because, sure enough, some of the men of God whom I have known have indeed demonstrated that they have feet of clay.
One man of God I knew, a pastor, got embroiled in a huge argument with his church board, became embittered, and left his church in a huge mess. Another man of God was arrested, tried, convicted, and imprisoned for decades for secretly sexually assaulting women in alleyways. Another man of God confessed to pornography addiction. Another man of God had an affair, divorced his wife, and married his lover. Another man of God got caught and convicted for embezzling funds. All of these men were, and are, true men of God, were respected leaders in their churches, and later repented of their sin.
And all of them had feet of clay.
And yes, I have feet of clay too. I have a problem with my temper. I documented one example for you here.
While I don’t know all of the circumstances surrounding the above examples, I believe there are several reasons why men of God may succumb to their feet of clay.
The reason why all men of God need to be involved in their church’s men’s ministry is because effective local church men’s ministries give men of God who have feet of clay — that is, who have a sinful nature — two things: insight and light.
First, an effective local church men’s ministry helps men of God honestly identify and deal with their own unique weaknesses and sins. This is insight and it is the first step in achieving genuine healing and victory over sin.
Second, an effective local church men’s ministry gives men of God the opportunity to talk openly with trusted friends about those weaknesses they are struggling with. This openness is “light” and it is the final step in achieving victory over sin.
“Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous person is powerful and effective.” James 5:15
The reality that all men of God have feet of clay means that God not only seeks to minister through the good works that he has saved and called men of God to do, but God also seeks to minister to men as they do them. And one of the best ways for God to accomplish that is through a local church men’s ministry.
And pastors, I’m speaking especially to you. It is vital for you to personally participate in your local church men’s ministry, even if only as a participant. By doing so, you telegraph the message that you, too, need this ministry, for you, too, have feet of clay.
(For an idea of what a local church men’s ministry looks like when it genuinely ministers to men of God who have feet of clay, see my post, “The First Men’s Breakfast“.)
So witch comes first, ministry to men, or ministry through men. That is, after conversion, do we first help a man deal with his problems and only then begin to teach him to do good works? Or do we first emphasize good works and deal with his “clay feet” in the process? I believe Scripture teaches both explicitly and by example that we should immediately invite the new believer to get involved in doing good works and then, as issues manifest themselves, help them deal with those issues.
First, Scripture clearly states that the whole purpose of a new believer’s salvation is for him to do good works. We see this emphasis in Ephesians 2:8-10; Titus 2:14; 3:3-8 (especially v. 8); and Titus 3:14.
But Scripture also gives us specific examples of new believers immediately being encouraged to practice good works.
The priority of ministry through new believers before ministry to new believers in the ministry of John the Baptist
“The ax is already lying at the roots of the trees. All the trees that don’t produce good fruit will be cut down. They will be thrown into the fire.” “Then what should we do?” the crowd asked. John answered, “Anyone who has extra clothes should share with the one who has none. And anyone who has extra food should do the same.” Even tax collectors came to be baptized. “Teacher,” they asked, “what should we do?” “Don’t collect any more than you are required to,” John told them. Then some soldiers asked him, “And what should we do?” John replied, “Don’t force people to give you money. Don’t bring false charges against people. Be happy with your pay.”
The priority of ministry through new believers before ministry to new believers in the ministry of Jesus:
“Zaccheus stopped and said to the Lord, “Behold, Lord, half of my possessions I will give to the poor, and if I have defrauded anyone of anything, I will give back four times as much” (Luke 19:8).
The priority of ministry through new believers before ministry to new believers in the early church:
“All the believers were together and had everything in common. They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need. All the believers were together and had everything in common. They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need.” Acts 2:44
The priority of ministry through new believers before ministry to new believers in the ministry of Paul:
“Anyone who has been stealing must never steal again. Instead, they must work. They must do something useful with their own hands. Then they will have something to give to people in need” (Ephesians 4:18).
The priority of ministry through new believers before ministry to new believers in the Old Testament:
Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Aaron, David and Elijah, whom I cited above, were all called and practicing their ministry, their “good works,” before God dealt with their “clay feet.”
Modern conservative Christianity tends to entirely ignore the topic of good works, mainly because we have a strong emphasis on salvation by faith as a free gift, not as a result of our good works. But this imbalanced emphasis ignores the central role that good works do play after salvation in the life of every Christian (Ephesians 2:8-10).
This imbalance on the topic of good works has lead to a dearth of teaching on the subject in men’s ministry. Rare, if at all, is the book, article, post, or conference speaker who teaches on the role of good works in the Christian life. Consider the following list of sixteen breakout seminar topics at one nationally syndicated men’s conference ministry:
One would never know from this list that the entire purpose of a man of God’s salvation is to do good works, even though there is one workshop listed above on a Christian man’s everyday work.
And yet, “Every man of God has feet of clay.” That is, every man of God still has a sinful nature and has issues. Ignoring this fact will lead to an imbalance in the opposite direction: focusing only on the good works a man of God is to do and not addressing his felt needs.
I know of one local church men’s ministry where all they do is use teams of men to serve their widows and single moms. This is inadequate men’s ministry. (New Commandment never intended men’s team ministry to be a standalone men’s ministry.) The men on those teams have needs too, sometimes very dramatic, intense needs. Those needs must be addressed as those men of God do the good works God saved them to do.
Assuming that we are going through the process Paul describes in 2 Timothy 3:12-17, the process that God uses to turn us into men of God who are equipped for every good work — the process that includes being saved, learning God’s word, accepting reproof from God’s word, experiencing restored relationships by God’s word, and living righteously in accordance with God’s word — we can now start helping people and healing people by doing the good works that God saved us to do.
But alas, we men of God also have feet of clay: chronic and glaring deficiencies that, when people get up close and personal with us, they cannot help but notice. And the problem is, if we ignore our feet of clay, then our feet can at some point crumble and bring an entire lifetime of doing God’s good works into disrepute.
What to do?
The answer, the Bible tells us, is to develop a humble and healthy sense of self-awareness.
“God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.” John 4:24
When Jesus spoke to the woman at the well, he didn’t just say, “God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit.” Rather, he added something important at the end, something that the woman at the well was missing. “God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.” That is, we are only truly worshiping God when we do so with honest self-awareness in our spirit.
The woman at the well wasn’t being truthful with Jesus or with herself about who she was in her spirit and about what kind of life she was living in her practice. Until she gained self-awareness in this area, no spiritual progress could be made. It wasn’t until Jesus called her out on her fornication and she acknowledged the truth about herself that she could then be saved and her spiritual life could begin.
In the same way, we men of God need self-awareness because God demands it of us.
We see this same process of Jesus revealing spiritual truth about us to accomplish self-awareness when Jesus encounters Peter by the lake after his Resurrection, an encounter that I call “The First Men’s Breakfast.” Here Jesus brings to light Peter’s pride and feelings of superiority when he asks Peter if he loves him more than the other disciples love him. It was embarrassing. It was awkward. But it was a necessary moment of self-awareness that Peter had to acquire before he could make any more spiritual progress.
The Apostle Paul describes this process of attaining genuine self-awareness as thinking of ourselves “with sober judgment.”
“Do not think of yourself more highly than you ought, but rather think of yourself with sober judgment, in accordance with the faith God has distributed to each of you.” Romans 12:3
The Greek word here, ὑπερφρονεῖν (hyperphronein), means to have an exalted view of one’s self. Paul warns everyone in the Roman Christian community, a community prone to have an exalted view of themselves since they lived in the capitol of the greatest power in the world, to avoid this fatheaded attitude.
Instead of viewing themselves as VIPs, Paul exhorts his readers to think of themselves with σωφρονεῖν (sōphronein), with a detached and objective judgment.
Sometimes when our ministry to others — meaning working to meet the needs of others — results in great fruitfulness, that very fruitfulness can lead to pride, self-confidence and, eventually, to spiritual disaster. The antidote to this scenario is genuine self-awareness and the humility it brings.
“So you also, when you have done everything you were told to do, should say, ‘We are unworthy servants; we have only done our duty.'” Luke 17:10
A man of God has self-awareness when he understands that, (1) he still has a sinful nature, (2) he lives in perilous times, and (3) he has a powerful enemy.
Like a cantankerous guest who has overstayed his welcome, we men of God still have our “old man” hanging around. And no, I am not talking about our fathers. I am talking about our sinful nature, aka “flesh,” “body of death,” “sin that dwells in us,” and “the carnal mind.” Scripture teaches that every man of God still has this unwanted guest. Our salvation has not touched him in any way. He is as bad now as he has ever been. And as much as we would like to improve him or, failing that, get rid of him, we cannot. We will always have this unwanted guest until the day we die. Only then will we be presented faultless in God’s presence (Jude 1:24). Worse still, every now and then we let our old man rear his ugly head. Scripture has much to say about this rebel that lives within every believer.
Whew! There is a lot to unpack here. But simply put, our newborn spirit and our flesh are in a civil war (Galatians 5:17). We can’t change our flesh and we can’t get rid of it. But we can ignore it and instead focus on a new and overwhelming reality: that is, on our newborn spirit, on the Holy Spirit who indwells us, on Christ who intercedes for us, on God who is our Father, on fellow believers in the church, on honest and open fellowship with other believers (1 John 1), on worship with other believers, on the Word of God, and on doing the good works God saved us men of God to do (Romans 6). (I cover this topic of how to overcome the flesh in more detail in my post, “The Bikini and the Berka.”)
“Be very careful, then, how you live—not as unwise but as wise, making the most of every opportunity, because the days are evil.” Ephesians 5:15
It is not an accident that our passage, 2 Timothy 3:12-17, in which Paul describes the process by which God takes a sinner and makes him into a man of God who is equipped for every good work, starts with this dramatic warning: “Everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted”. Indeed, if we have never suffered for our faith, that is something to worry about. “Woe to you when everyone speaks well of you, for that is how their ancestors treated the false prophets,” Jesus warned his disciples in Luke 6:26.
In warning Timothy that all men of God will suffer persecution, Paul is simply extrapolating from what he has already written just a few verses before 3:12: “This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.”
Whether or not we are in “the last days” right now only our Lord knows. But one thing for sure, we are two thousand years closer to it than Paul and Timothy were when Paul wrote 2 Timothy.
I think we can all agree, though, that whether or not we are in the last days, it sure feels like it. Our post-Christian culture is fast becoming an anti-Christian culture. Want to see how anti-Christian our culture is? Post a Christian add on Facebook, as I have done, and target everyone, Christians and non-Christians alike. Then watch the virulent, anti-Christian comments from non-Christians pour in.
Everywhere we turn, whether it be on radio, on TV, on the Internet, in entertainment, in the news, at the mall, on billboards, and in school, our senses are assaulted with conversations, print media, images, and film that challenge, contradict, and mock our faith and morals. Yes, “the days are evil,” and that is all the more reason to make the most of every opportunity by doing the good works God saved us men of God to do.
“Be alert and of sober mind. Your enemy the devil prowls around like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour.” 1 Peter 5:8
Men, as if it isn’t enough that we have an unwanted guest living inside of us, that is, our sinful nature, and that we are surrounded by a culture that is completely antithetical to all that we believers stand for, we also have a powerful enemy who hates us and all that we do and seeks to destroy us and discredit our work.
Part of self-awareness is understanding that every man of God has a target on his back with a red laser dot shining on the middle of the target. Man of God, turn around and you will see that the Devil is staring down the barrel of his rifle right at you. And his finger is on the trigger. He is just waiting for the right moment to pull it.
Paul writes in Ephesians 6:12, “Our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.”
Do you remember that list in my last post? It was a list of men of God who crashed and burned. Here it is again:
“One man of God I knew, a pastor, got embroiled in a huge argument with his church board, became embittered, and left his church in a huge mess. Another man of God was arrested, tried, convicted, and imprisoned for decades for secretly sexually assaulting women in alleyways. Another man of God confessed to pornography addiction. Another man of God had an affair, divorced his wife, and married his lover. Another man of God got caught and convicted for embezzling funds. All of these men were, and are, true men of God, were respected leaders in their churches, and later repented of their sin.”
So, once again, fair warning: “”Be alert and of sober mind. Your enemy the devil prowls around like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour.”
Always remember that, as a man of God, we are here to do good. But the Devil is here to do no good by neutralizing our good deeds.
“This is the message we have heard from him and declare to you: God is light; in him there is no darkness at all. If we claim to have fellowship with him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not live out the truth. But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin. If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us.”
Often we read in Scripture that blinding light accompanies divine appearances. The Transfiguration and Saul’s conversion are two examples.
But John is not talking about physical light in 1 John 1. John is talking about moral light. John is saying that God is also light in the sense that he is morally pure. He is holy. This moral purity that God possesses searches out and reveals for all to see the moral state of all sentient beings around him, such as angels and humans.
And since men of God still have a sinful nature, we cannot be in God’s presence without blinking and shading our eyes and wanting to hide. This natural reaction must be consciously resisted by all men of God.
Instead, we must make the courageous decision to be openly truthful about ourselves. After all, everyone else around us can see our faults anyway. One of the things that I have appreciated as I have ministered in over one hundred and fifty men’s conferences in the past twenty years is seeing men openly confess their sin and then begin to help other men with their struggles. Like AA, we can all say, “Hi, I’m (our first name here). And I am a recovering sinner.”
That is self-awareness.
“We proclaim to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also may have fellowship with us. And our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son, Jesus Christ. We write this to make our joy complete.” 1 John 1:3-4
The reason why John wrote his first epistle is so that he could have genuine, honest “fellowship” with his Christian audience. But for John, fellowship wasn’t just sitting around a table at a men’s breakfast eating sausage, eggs, pancakes and shooting the bull. Fellowship, as we saw in the section above, is self-revelation in the light of God’s holiness. Only when this brutal honesty happens is a men’s ministry fulfilling its purpose for men of God.
Just as spies in a foreign country have “safe houses” where they can take refuge from the enemy that surrounds them, so too, men of God need their men’s ministry to be a “safe house” for them from their flesh, from the world, and from the Devil. They need a place where they feel safe to open up and share their deepest struggles. That is the genuine fellowship John is talking about in 1 John. And as difficult as transparency sometimes is, it always leads to “complete joy” in the end.
In our local church men’s ministry’s “safe house,” men of God can develop self-awareness by feeling fee to talk about the trials, tests, and temptations we are going through
I learned an important lesson about men when I was a pastor doing marriage counseling: men rarely opened up, especially in front of their wives, unless they were doing something with me. If I didn’t do something alone with the husband to give them a chance to talk about what they were really feeling, they would invariably sit stoically silent in the counseling session with their arms crossed, listening to their wives complain about them.
Women, on the other hand, open up to each other, and to their pastor, as a matter of course.
What I did for the men I was counseling was invite them to go hiking with me in the Rockies, which are just twenty minutes away from us.
At first, we would hike along and not say much. But, sure enough, after about half an hour of strenuous hiking, the men would start spilling their guts. It never failed.
The lesson? Women relate face to face. Men relate side by side. Men feel threatened when you sit them down across from your desk and ask them to tell you their deepest and darkest secrets. They also feel threatened when asked to share their inner selves with a group of men they do not know or trust.
But put men in smaller groups where they can do something together so they can bond and learn to trust each other, and you have fertile soil for the genuine fellowship John is talking about in 1 John 1.
One of the reasons why New Commandment Men’s Ministries has successfully used teams of men to serve widows and single moms is that, by doing so, men have an opportunity to create these types of deep relationships with other men on their team, relationships that last for years.
Whatever mechanism you use, all men’s ministries must strive to create for men safe and sustained relationships in small, long-lasting groups, that provide opportunities for men to develop their self-awareness and be able to share it honestly with others.
Men of God, do we know what our weaknesses are? What our besetting sins are? What our triggers are? Do you have someone we can open up with?
In this section I will be writing about common issues all men of God face, how we can recognize them, how we can respond to them, and how local church men’s ministries can help us overcome them.
Assuming The “Van Kemps” were pillars in my childhood church; godly, faithful, and respectable people. Their two sons, “Steve” and “Phil” were in my youth group. One day, terrible news spread throughout the church: the Van Kemps’ oldest son, Steve, had been diagnosed with osteosarcoma, bone cancer. Sadly, it had already metastasized and he died a few months later.
But the family tragedy didn’t stop there. A few years after Steve’s death, Phil developed the same cancer and died from it as well.
And then, adding tragedy upon tragedy and sorrow upon sorrow, Mr. Van Kemp also developed the same cancer and he too died from it.
I was a teen at the time and lost contact with Mrs. Van Kemp. But over the decades since, I have often wondered how she survived those terrible Job-like tragedies.
As if it is not enough that, as I chronicled in my last post, men of God have to deal with their sinful flesh, a disdainful world, and a hateful Devil, at some point we will also experience terrible events that feel like we have been punched in the gut by God himself. I am sure that is how Mrs. Van Kemp felt when she experienced the deaths of her two sons and her husband. I call these extremely difficult events hurdles. They are hurdles because they challenge our faith in a good and all powerful God and responding the wrong way can “trip us up” and prevent us from doing the good works that God saved us to do.
The world’s reasoning about the existence of evil and God goes along these lines: since there is evil in the world, then God, if he exists at all, is either not good or not all-powerful. He can’t be both at the same time. For if he were good, he would want to rid the world of evil. Therefore, since there is still evil in the world, he must not be all-powerful. And if he is all-powerful, he can rid the world of evil. In that case, since there still evil in the world, he must not be good.
This theological problem, called “theodicy,” has bedeviled the human race ever since one of the earliest pieces of human literature – the book of Job – was written. The conundrum, “Why has a good and omnipotent God allowed this horrific thing to happen to me?” is at the core of each hurdle that every man of God must overcome. It perplexed Job, and it perplexes us believers to this day. Our hurdles challenge us at every level of our being – spiritually, intellectually, emotionally, volitionally, and physically – and reveal what we truly believe about God’s character and God’s power.
I have great respect for track and field athletes who run the hurdles. How they manage to run a race at lightening speed while leaping over each seemingly insurmountable hurdle after insurmountable hurdle is an amazing sight to behold.
Like those track and field athletes, every man of God who is doing the good works God saved him and equipped him to do eventually also faces three major types of what seem at the time to be insurmountable hurdles in his life, hurdles he must respond to appropriately or else he will get tripped up. These three types of hurdles are called tests, trials, and consequences. All three of these obstacles are always difficult and unpleasant experiences and sometimes, like Mrs. Van Kemp, they feel utterly overwhelming. Nevertheless, they are necessary experiences in our Christian life.
There is no such thing as tragedy for a man of God. All of our hurdles, all of our obstacles, and, yes, all of what the world calls irrational, meaningless tragedies instead have a purpose for us and are ultimately for our good. “All things work together for good to those who love God,” Paul reminds us in Romans 8:28. Therefore, it is not the obstacles themselves, but whether we overcome them, that is important. Or, as the old adage goes, “It is not what happens to us, but what we do with what happens to us that matters.”
The first thing to do, then, when we have painful experiences is to understand what they are. Let’s look first at tests and trials.
Tests – δοκιμάζω (dokimázō) – and trials – πειρασμός (peirasmos) sometimes appear together in the New Testament and can be used interchangeably. For example, James writes in James 1:2-3, “Count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials (πειρασμοῖς, peirasmois) of various kinds, for you know that the testing (δοκίμιον, dokimion) of your faith produces steadfastness.”
But while tests and trials can be used interchangeably, they do have slightly different meanings. For example, in James 1:2-3, we see that trials refer to the actual experience of our pain and suffering while tests refer to the outcome or result of our pain and suffering. We see this same distinction in 1 Peter 1:6-7, “”In this you rejoice, though now for a little while, if necessary, you have been grieved by various trials, so that the tested genuineness of your faith—more precious than gold that perishes though it is tested by fire—may be found to result in praise and glory and honor at the revelation of Jesus Christ.”
So, when we experience trials in the form of pain and suffering of various types, we are doing so in order that we may pass a test. I like to think of these tests as being on three increasingly difficult levels: pop quizzes, tests, and final exams.
I think of the everyday trials and travails of life as pop quizzes. These are the normal nuisances – the lost keys, the overflowing washing machine, the speeding ticket – that occur in the warp and woof of life that test our patience, but are relatively easy, or at least should be easy, to overcome.
On the other hand, there are the major, and sometimes predictable, sorrows of life, like illnesses, problems with children, and difficulties at work. I call these tests. How we handle tests, along with pop quizzes, often predict how we will respond to the next and final level, the final exam.
Pop quizzes and tests are one thing. But then there is the dreaded final exam – our ultimate hurdle – that we prepare for all semester (or, like me, cram for at the last minute). God’s final exam for us refers to a shocking and nearly unbearable experience we have that challenges our very faith in a good and all-powerful God. Below are four biblical examples of “final exams” that God gave Job, Abraham, Peter, and Jesus.
Then the Lord said to Satan, “Have you considered my servant Job? There is no one on earth like him; he is blameless and upright, a man who fears God and shuns evil. And he still maintains his integrity, though you incited me against him to ruin him without any reason.” “Skin for skin!” Satan replied. “A man will give all he has for his own life. But now stretch out your hand and strike his flesh and bones, and he will surely curse you to your face.” The Lord said to Satan, “Very well, then, he is in your hands; but you must spare his life. So Satan went out from the presence of the Lord and afflicted Job with painful sores from the soles of his feet to the crown of his head. Then Job took a piece of broken pottery and scraped himself with it as he sat among the ashes. His wife said to him, “Are you still maintaining your integrity? Curse God and die!” He replied, “You are talking like a foolish woman. Shall we accept good from God, and not trouble?” In all this, Job did not sin in what he said.” Job 2:3-10
Some time later God tested Abraham. He said to him, “Abraham!” “Here I am,” he replied. Then God said, “Take your son, your only son, whom you love—Isaac—and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on a mountain I will show you.” … Then he reached out his hand and took the knife to slay his son. But the angel of the Lord called out to him from heaven, “Abraham! Abraham!” “Here I am,” he replied. “Do not lay a hand on the boy,” he said. “Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.” Genesis 22:1-2, 10-12
“Simon, Simon, Satan has asked to sift all of you as wheat. But I have prayed for you, Simon, that your faith may not fail. And when you have turned back, strengthen your brothers.” But he replied, “Lord, I am ready to go with you to prison and to death.” Jesus answered, “I tell you, Peter, before the rooster crows today, you will deny three times that you know me.” Luke 21:31-34
Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil. After fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry. The tempter came to him and said, “If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread.” Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.’ Then the devil took him to the holy city and had him stand on the highest point of the temple. “If you are the Son of God,” he said, “throw yourself down. For it is written: “‘He will command his angels concerning you, and they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.’” Jesus answered him, “It is also written: ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’” Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. “All this I will give you,” he said, “if you will bow down and worship me.” Jesus said to him, “Away from me, Satan! For it is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only.’” Then the devil left him, and angels came and attended him. Matthew 4:1-11
Summary
Note that out of these four examples, God gives his final exam to only one, Abraham, toward the end of his life. God tests the other three when they are relatively young. Also note that all of the tests are different. They are tailored to the individual person. In addition, except for Abraham, both God and Satan are involved in each test. For Satan, the purpose of the test is to tempt the believer to recant his faith, or, in Jesus’ case, to disobey God. But for God, the purpose of the test is to prove the genuineness of the believer’s faith and obedience.
“In this you greatly rejoice, even though now for a little while, if necessary, you have been distressed by various trials, so that the proof of your faith, being more precious than gold which perishes though tested by fire, may be found to result in praise, glory, and honor at the revelation of Jesus Christ.” 1 Peter 1:6-7
God has one ultimate goal when it comes to our faith: to prove that it is genuine. But what is genuine faith? To answer this question, we need to look at proven faith in the context of three other types of faith.
“Jill” is our daughter’s best friend. They have known each other since grade school. Through their friendship, my wife and I have gotten to know Jill’s parents and siblings, and they are stellar Christians. Jill’s father is a wonderful man of God and a leader in his church and her mother is a kidney donor.
Jill and our daughter, along with our two families, have marched through many of life’s milestones together: graduations, marriages, new homes, pregnancies, births. …and a funeral.
Yes, a funeral. Jill’s husband’s funeral. She was nine months pregnant with their first and only child the morning her husband died. That morning, he got out of bed, went to the kitchen for breakfast, and suddenly collapsed on the kitchen floor while Jill was still in bed. Hearing the commotion, Jill got up and discovered that her husband had died of a heart attack.
That night, while grieving her husband’s death, Jill went into labor and the next day she delivered a beautiful, healthy baby girl. Within the span of forty-eight hours, Jill had gone from being a happily married, expectant mother, to a grieving widow and single mom with a newborn baby. Her entire world had been turned upside down.
Several days later, while driving to the funeral, I wondered what I would witness upon meeting Jill after she had gone through such overwhelming trauma.
What I witnessed at the funeral was a woman who was still grieving the loss of her husband, but thankful to God that a wonderful baby girl had been born. Jill’s faith in God’s goodness was holding firm. I walked away from that funeral knowing that, yes, the next months would be very difficult, full of extreme ups and downs. But Jill was passing her final exam.
As if to prove to the whole world that Jill had indeed passed that exam, God arranged for her and her daughter to meet a young Christian widower at her church who worked in the same profession as Jill’s former husband. Jill and he fell in love, married, and they now have two more children along with Jill’s first child.
We have seen that not all trials and tests, the first two hurdles, happen to us because we deserve them. In fact, many trials and tests occur specifically because we do not deserve them. It is this very fact that makes these types of trials and tests so difficult. Job’s three “friends” ignored that reality and tried to make the opposite case to him: “What did you do, Job, to deserve this? It must have been something terrible,” they accused him. “Otherwise God would not have let it happen to you” But in reality, we know from the first two chapters of the Book of Job that Job was a righteous man and the text specifically says that he did not deserve what Satan did to him. Job himself knew he didn’t deserve the pain and suffering he was experiencing and defended himself against the accusations of his three supposed friends throughout the rest of the book. Therefore, the correct response to the first two types of hurdles is to answer the question, “What did I do to deserve this?” by saying, “Nothing. God is testing my faith.” And then hold onto God with all our might until the testing ends.
“No temptation has overtaken you except what is common to mankind. And God is faithful; he will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear. But when you are tempted, he will also provide a way out so that you can endure it.” 1 Corinthians 10:13
“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows.” Galatians 6:7
But sometimes we experience pain and suffering and we know very well the answer to the question, “What did I do to deserve this?” The reason we know the answer is because there is a direct correlation between something wrong that we did and the pain and suffering that we are experiencing from it. In this case, the answer to the question, “What did I do to deserve this?” is always manifestly obvious: “I wrote a counterfeit check and now I am serving two years in prison for it;” or, “I cheated on my wife and now she is divorcing me;” or “I drove while drunk, and now my license has been revoked.”
In these cases, the correct response to this third hurdle – consequences for our actions – is to confess our sin to God and make amends to anyone we have hurt.
But make no mistake, there are still consequences of forgiven sin. I don’t remember where I read that phrase, but “the consequences of forgiven sin” is an excellent biblical observation. When we confess our sin, God forgives it and restores us to full fellowship (1 John 1). But there are still consequences that result from our sin. Here are four biblical examples of men of God who suffered consequences for their forgiven sin.
In Numbers 20, we read that God commanded Moses to speak to the rock and it would produce water. Instead, out of anger Moses disobeyed God and struck the rock. As a result, God told Moses that he would see the promised land, but he would not enter it. And that is what happened.
David sinned against God by raping Bathsheba, getting her pregnant, and murdering her husband. David confessed his sin and God forgave him. But David suffered severe consequences (a civil war, led by one of his sons, and temporary exile from Jerusalem) for the rest of his life.
Peter denied Jesus three times, even thought he said he would never do that. After his resurrection, Jesus forgave and reconciled with Peter, but also predicted that Peter would die by crucifixion (John 21:15-29).
Prior to becoming a believer, Paul (called Saul) persecuted the church relentlessly. But at his conversion, Paul experienced God’s love and forgiveness, but was also told through Annanias “how much he would suffer for my name.”
While it is true that much of the pain and suffering we experience in life happens they are trials and tests that prove the genuineness of our faith, some of our pain and suffering happens because it is self-inflicted. We know this type of suffering is the consequence of past forgiven sin because there is an obvious connection to it.
The fact that there are consequences of our forgiven sin does not mean that God cannot or will not use us after our sin. It simply means he is disciplining us as a loving Father who uses us, often very fruitfully, in spite of our sin. As the writer to the Hebrews writes:
“In your struggle against sin, you have not yet resisted to the point of shedding your blood. And have you completely forgotten this word of encouragement that addresses you as a father addresses his son? It says, “My son, do not make light of the Lord’s discipline, and do not lose heart when he rebukes you, because the Lord disciplines the one he loves, and he chastens everyone he accepts as his son.” Endure hardship as discipline; God is treating you as his children. For what children are not disciplined by their father? If you are not disciplined—and everyone undergoes discipline—then you are not legitimate, not true sons and daughters at all. Moreover, we have all had human fathers who disciplined us and we respected them for it. How much more should we submit to the Father of spirits and live! They disciplined us for a little while as they thought best; but God disciplines us for our good, in order that we may share in his holiness. No discipline seems pleasant at the time, but painful. Later on, however, it produces a harvest of righteousness and peace for those who have been trained by it. Therefore, strengthen your feeble arms and weak knees. “Make level paths for your feet,” so that the lame may not be disabled, but rather healed.” Hebrews 12:4-13
Are we experiencing discipline for forgiven sin? Praise the Lord! We are sons of our Father in heaven who disciplines us that we may share in his holiness.
So how do we respond when we experience the pain and suffering the consequences of our forgiven cause us? We respond with patient acceptance and a willingness to learn from the sin.
O man of God, let us not think that following Jesus Christ and doing his good works is a walk in the park. We have a world, our flesh, and the Devil to fight, and huge obstacles to overcome. But we have this promise, Jesus Christ has saved us, the Holy Spirit indwells us, our Father in heaven watches over us, our church supports us, our loved ones surround us, and the Word of God abides in us. As Jesus says:
“In the world you will have tribulation. But be of good cheer, I have overcome the world.” John 13:33
"Cliff," who is now deceased, was a born again Christian who had come to know Christ as his savior as a young adult. The problem was that Cliff was also bipolar and frequently went off his medication. And when Cliff went off his medication, he did wild, crazy things. For instance, Cliff lived in Reno, Nevada, and one day, when he was in his manic state, he decided to try to eradicate legalized prostitution in the state by faking his own abduction in order to bring attention to his cause. For several days his disappearance led to a frenzied search for him by the authorities, only for him to be found...and then found out.
But Cliff's pièce de résistance was the day he tried to liberate Cuba from Fidel Castro.
Cliff had been off his medication for months when he developed the delusion that he could personally liberate Cuba from Fidel Castro. In his unmedicated state, he flew to south Florida, enrolled in a flight training school, and, when he was able to fly the school's plane solo, promptly stole it and turned it toward Cuba where he crash landed on a beach near Havana.
"I'm here to liberate Cuba from Fidel Castro!" he proudly announced to the authorities when they arrived at what they thought was an accidental crash scene. The Cuban government took Cliff into custody and, realizing they had someone who was struggling with mental illness, repatriated him to the U.S. a few weeks later.
Back in the U.S., Cliff was arrested upon arrival in Florida, charged with grand larceny, convicted, and given probation. But Cliff, still finding it difficult to stay on his medication, broke his probation and as a result wound up in prison where he spent most of the rest of his life.
Unfortunately, Cliff's inadequate response to his mental health issue caused him to conflate his natural Christian desire to do good works with grandiose schemes caused by his bipolar disease that brought himself and others pain and suffering, which hindered, not helped, the cause of Christ.
In another example of someone who conflated his emotional pain with his good works, I personally experienced the receiving end of the pain a church staff member caused because of the unresolved emotional conflicts he had with his family. Otherwise well-qualified, I hired him in spite of knowing that he was alienated from his father and three brothers. As a consequence of his unaddressed mental health issues, he duplicated the relationship he had with his family with me (because I was another father figure for him), which caused serious problems. The good works he was attempting to do instead became destructive.
As men of God who are seeking to do the good works God saved us and equipped us to do, if we do not address the mental health issues we may have, eventually they will catch up to us and poison our good works.
The main question any man of God faces when he slips into depression or some other emotionally abnormal state is to ask why. "Why, if I am walking with the Lord and doing the Lord's work, am I feeling this way?" Not being able to answer that question adequately only makes the emotional problem worse. Consider the psalmist's predicament in Psalm 42 when he couldn't understand why he was depressed.
"As the deer pants for streams of water, so my soul pants for you, my God. My soul thirsts for God, for the living God. When can I go and meet with God? My tears have been my food day and night, while people say to me all day long, “Where is your God?” These things I remember as I pour out my soul: how I used to go to the house of God under the protection of the Mighty One with shouts of joy and praise among the festive throng.
"Why, my soul, are you downcast? Why so disturbed within me? Put your hope in God, for I will yet praise him, my Savior and my God."
"My soul is downcast within me; therefore I will remember you from the land of the Jordan, the heights of Hermon—from Mount Mizar."
"Deep calls to deep in the roar of your waterfalls; all your waves and breakers have swept over me."
"By day the Lord directs his love, at night his song is with me—a prayer to the God of my life."
"I say to God my Rock, “Why have you forgotten me? Why must I go about mourning, oppressed by the enemy?” My bones suffer mortal agony as my foes taunt me, saying to me all day long, “Where is your God?”"
"Why, my soul, are you downcast? Why so disturbed within me? Put your hope in God, for I will yet praise him, my Savior and my God." Psalm 42
Psalm 42 tells us the story of a devout Jew who loves God dearly, and yet is depressed: "Why, my soul, are you downcast? Why so disturbed within me?" He has no idea what the answers to those questions are. All he knows is that at some future point he will get through it with God's help. "Put your hope in God, for I will yet praise him, my Savior and my God," he tells himself.
Like the psalmist above, we can think that because we are saved, reconciled to God, and walking with God, that therefore we shouldn't have any mental health issues. Sometimes, if we are struggling with chronic depression or other emotional issues, feeling so down and not having any answers as to why we feel that way may even cause us to doubt our salvation. "Why am I still feeling like this? I must not be a Christian."
But we human beings are multifaceted, complicated creatures. We are not just spiritual beings. We also have physical, social, and psychological aspects to our existence. As a result, not only is our emotional wellbeing affected by our spiritual state, but it is also affected by our family history, by our upbringing, by our social setting, by our genetics, by our hormones, by our brain's hardwiring, by our health, and by many other factors that can negatively impact us.
Thinking that all emotional problems arise from our spiritual state is a trap that men of God can fall into. Such thinking often results in unnecessary guilt that just exacerbates an emotional problem and distracts us from finding its real cause. If a man of God who obediently walks in fellowship with God and does the will of God still struggles with emotional issues such as depression, chronic stress, irrational thoughts or compulsive behavior, then it is time for him to look for other causes instead of spiritual ones.
"I say I'm fine, yeah I'm fine oh I'm fine, hey I'm fine but I'm not
I'm broken
And when it's out of control I say it's under control but it's not
And you know it
I don't know why it's so hard to admit it
When being honest is the only way to fix it
There's no failure, no fall
There's no sin you don't already know
So let the truth be told"
--"Truth be Told" by Carly Pearce and Matthew West
According to the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), two out of ten men live with a mental illness. ("In 2021, there were an estimated 57.8 million adults aged 18 or older in the United States with AMI [any mental illness]. This number represented 22.8% of all U.S. adults.")
Local church men's ministries are one of the few American institutions specifically designed to congregate men together for the purpose of developing relationships. As such, a church's men's ministry can play a vital role in addressing men's mental health issues. Here are some suggestions on how this can be done.
Because he loves us, God desires to provide us with a durable rest that can weather any trial and calm every fear. He does this by developing a trusting, loving relationship with us. I call this rest a "durable rest," because it is not based on our circumstances, but on our relationship with God. David famously describes this rest in Psalm 23. Let's break the psalm down into its components.
"The Lord is my shepherd, I lack nothing. He makes me lie down in green pastures, he leads me beside quiet waters, he refreshes my soul." Psalm 23:1-3
What a beautiful picture! This verse is the essence of psychological health. "Ahhhh! I feel so rested!" Scripture repeats this theme of rest for the believer in many places. Here are two examples:
“Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.” Matthew 11:28-30
"There remains therefore a rest for the people of God. For he who has entered His rest has himself also ceased from his works as God did from His." Hebrews 4:9-10
David goes on to emphasize that his rest is not just dependent on an idyllic scene. He says he has this rest even when God leads him away from the green pastures and quiet waters. Why? Because God is with him.
"Even though I walk through the darkest valley, I will fear no evil, for you are with me; your rod and your staff, they comfort me. You prepare a table before me in the presence of my enemies. You anoint my head with oil; my cup overflows." Psalm 23:4-5
We too have God's durable rest when we can face any difficulty without fear because we know that the Lord is leading us every step of the way.
David ends his psalm by giving the secret to his durable rest: assurance of his salvation.
"Surely your goodness and love will follow me all the days of my life, and I will dwell in the house of the Lord forever." Psalm 25:6
Assurance of one's good standing with another person provides the foundation for healthy relationships and for healthy psychology. In David's case, the person he is relating to is God. David's assurance of his eternal good standing with God through faith explains why he can rest, even in the most difficult of circumstances.
What we have, then, in Psalm 23, is a clear description of healthy spirituality and psychology: "I am loved eternally by God who cares for me, watches over me in the most difficult of circumstances, and will never leave me." That knowledge enables David to rest spiritually and emotionally.
So, Men of God, here is the question: Are we experiencing this durable rest that God provides?
Wait a minute. At first blush there seems to be a direct contradiction between Psalm 23 and Psalm 42. In Psalm 23, David is indomitable, experiencing a peace and rest even in the face of imminent death and the threat of attack by his enemies. He tells us he feels at perfect peace because of the relationship he has with God, his "shepherd." But in Psalm 42, the author (Psalm 42 was written by the sons of Kora.) sounds befuddled and depressed. He doesn't understand why he is feeling that way, even though he has a sound spiritual relationship with God, just like David does in Psalm 23. (See, for example, verses 1-2, 5, 8, 11 in Psalm 42.)
The answer to this seeming contradiction between Psalms 23 and 42 is that there are other causes for mental illness besides spiritual causes, as I pointed out above. So if we are walking in fellowship with the Lord, as David is in Psalm 23, but still struggling with depression or other forms of mental illness, like the psalmist expresses in Psalm 42, then it is time for us to get help so we can explore what those other causes may be.
In this case, I suggest you talk to your pastor and also see a doctor for a full medical exam and lab workup. You can also get referrals from your pastor and/or doctor for counseling. Just know that, in this case, your depression or other mental or emotional issue is not because of a lack of spirituality, but because of a lack of insight.
If you are struggling with thoughts of suicide, call the national suicide hotline phone number, 988, now for help.
My late uncle and mentor was a pastor. When I was a young man he told me, “There are three primary temptations for a pastor: money, sex, and fame.” He was right. I have seen men of God become compromised because they fell victim to one of these three occupational hazards. In this chapter, I will discuss fame and how insidious it can be, not just for pastors, but for any man of God who seeks to do the good works God saved him to do.
“Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. ‘All this I will give you,” he said, “if you will bow down and worship me.'” Matthew 4:8-9
“He must not be a recent convert, or he may become conceited and fall under the same judgment as the devil.” 1 Timothy 3:6
By “fame,” I am not simply referring to someone with a mass following, but anyone who is tempted to exalt themself over others, who wants to command a following, even if it is a following of just one other person. We all struggle with this temptation because we think having the attention of others, and the power that comes with it, validates us and gives us a sense of success. But striving after fame always creates conflict.
Many years ago I invited a successful and wealthy Christian businessman onto our board at New Commandment Men’s Ministries. Our focus at New Commandment, of course, is to help churches use teams of men to serve their widowed and single parents. The church this businessman attended had a thriving men’s team ministry. But eventually I noticed something. This man never joined one of his church’s teams in order t serve the widows in his church. He also never supported New Commandment financially. He was only interested taking control of our board. He had no real concern for the needy in his church, or any other church, for that matter. He just wanted power and control over the ministry.
One does not have to be a pastor or on a ministry board to “become conceited and fall under the same judgment as the devil.” I have seen two Christian men argue over who drives the church van. But, in reality, pastors, because of their position in the church, can find this temptation especially overwhelming. Here is why.
I confess, whenever I have traveled abroad, no matter what country I was in, I sometimes ate at the always-ubiquitous McDonalds because, while it certainly doesn’t offer up the greatest food in the world, I knew exactly what I was getting and I could get ice in my water.
But in all of the McDonalds I ate in, I never learned the names of those who cooked my food because it made no difference who cooked my food. The reason was because everything had been standardized by the McDonalds corporation. Consequently, I didn’t made it a practice to go behind the counter of a McDonalds and congratulate the workers in the back with, “That was a fine Big Mac you cooked up for me!” It never even crossed my mind to do so.
Liturgical churches are like McDonalds: say what you will about them being boring and staid, but at least you know what you are going to get. You know what you are going to get because the service has been standardized by the denominational hierarchy. In these churches, the sermon, or “homily,” is normally short and plays only a minor role. Because of this focus on a standard liturgy, any priest anywhere in that denomination can perform the liturgy pretty much just as well as any other priest. Therefore, who the priest is is relatively unimportant.
On the other hand, in non-liturgical churches — and here I’m talking about most of conservative Protestant Christianity — one gets served up a whole panoply of worship styles, depending on which church one attends. But while these churches can be rather fluid in the way they design their worship services, nevertheless, all of them have one thing in common: the sermon is the most important part of the service.
There are a some good reasons for our emphasis on the sermon, of course. One is our belief in sola scriptura; that the Bible is our sole authority for faith and practice. Therefore, preaching the Word of God well is of utmost importance in our worship services. Another reason for this emphasis is that the rest of the worship service is not sacramental in the sense that it bestows Devine grace on us. So by definition, it has less importance. Rather, in worship we celebrate the Divine grace (that is, salvation) that has already been bestowed on us through faith in Christ. This is why we do not believe in sacraments, but rather ordinances, which are baptism and communion.
Because the sermon has such a central place in non-liturgical churches, who preaches the sermon and how they preach the sermon takes on primary importance.
Or rather, instead of a liturgical worship service that is like a McDonalds fast food restaurant where the service is always the same predictable, albeit boring, stuff no matter which church in the denomination you attend, non-liturgical churches are like one-star Michelin restaurants where the chef is all-important, and therefore praising the chef for his great cooking is a natural response.
Consider how the following article idolizes a Denver chef who is referenced in a Michelin guide book: “Michelin inspectors were impressed by Chef Michael Diaz de Leon’s approach to seasonality and locality, all the way down to the grains that are milled or nixtamalized in-house. ‘The menu, which is Mexican at its core, has a clear narrative, and is perhaps best displayed in lamb prepared two ways — as a street-style taco and ground lamb leg kushiyaki with a quenelle of mole chichilo,’ the guide says.”
That writer’s adoration of Chef Michael Diaz de Leon and his nixtamalized food is the same adoration we give our pastors who preach to us. And it can turn them into monsters. “O pastor! That sermon was wonderful. It moved me to tears!” we tell them as we walk out the door of our church in what someone has called “the glorification of the worm ceremony.” Give a pastor enough of that kind of feedback and he can become drunk with self importance and not even know it.
As I have said above, the threat that lionization brings isn’t limited to pastors and preaching. Any man of God doing whatever the good works God has called him to do faces this threat. The reason is because our good works are like light. And while that light is meant to glorify God, it also, invariably, illuminates ourselves as well.
To inoculate us men of God against the temptation we have to forget our place, to “think more highly of ourselves than we ought,” God often starts our discipleship by isolating us in desolate, strange places. In the Bible, we see God do this in the lives of Abram, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, David, Elijah, Jesus, and Paul. I am sure many reading this have had this experience of God isolating you from everything you hold dear: your family, your work, your home, even your church. The effect this isolation has on us makes us feel lost, alone, small, weak, anonymous, and, yes, forgotten; exactly the opposite of fame.
When I graduated from seminary, I was twenty-five, single, and inexperienced. I had a dream of preaching in a church, but no church wanted a twenty-five year old, single, and inexperienced pastor. (Except one church in Snook, Texas, and only because the church had a young woman in their congregation they wanted me to marry!) So I took a job in Houston as an oil and gas lease broker. I was making great money, but I was miserable. Driving around rural Texas leasing mineral rights from ranchers was the last thing I expected to do after seminary. This city-boy did indeed feel lost, alone, small, weak, anonymous, and especially forgotten … by God.
But God was teaching me an important lesson. He was teaching me my place in the grand scheme of his Plan.
“He made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a slave.”
Truth be told, we are all just infinitesimally small, ephemeral gnats in this vast universe. But our Bible tells us that we are God’s gnats; created in his image and redeemed through the blood of Jesus, who himself became a gnat like us. And it is this kenosis, this emptying, that Jesus did in order to save us that God wants us to imitate. God wants us to imitate Jesus because it is Jesus’ act of utter humility, and his alone, that cures us of our craving for fame.
I am going to quote Philippians 2:1-8 here, but I am going to reverse the order, putting verses 5-8 first, and then 1-4 after because Paul makes it clear that, as he writes verses 1-4, he already has 5-8 in mind. We know this because of the way 5-8 begins, “In your relationships with one another:”
“In your relationships with one another, have the same mindset as Christ Jesus: Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage; rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a slave, being made in human likeness. And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to death—even death on a cross!” (Ephesians 2:5-8)
So Paul is talking about our relationships with fellow believers and how the Incarnation informs those relationships. But what kind of relationships with fellow believers will the Incarnation produce if we truly understand it and emulate it?
“Therefore if you have any encouragement from being united with Christ, if any comfort from his love, if any common sharing in the Spirit, if any tenderness and compassion, then make my joy complete by being like-minded, having the same love, being one in spirit and of one mind. Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves, not looking to your own interests but each of you to the interests of the others.” (Ephesians 2:1-4)
What, then, is the cure for a craving for fame? The cure is an attitude of a slave in service to others. Willful, joyful, humble, obedient slavery to the One who himself became a slave for us.
“So you too, when you do all the things which are commanded you, say, ‘We are unworthy slaves; we have done only that which we ought to have done.’”
Having the mind of Christ, Paul teaches us in Philippians 2:1-8, always results in service to our fellow believers. “Selfish ambition or vain conceit” (in other words, “fame”) cannot thrive in that kind of environment. Rather, we “value others above ourselves” by “not looking to [our] own interests but (and here he is emphatic) each of [us] to the interests of the others.” Jesus practiced this selfless attitude toward us as a slave. Now he calls us to practice it as well toward each other…as his slaves. When we do, we starve our selfish, self centered, and sinful nature and our new man blossoms.
Because of that experience I had years ago with the wealthy, power hungry board member, I always make sure now that everyone who joins New Commandment’s board is already involved on a team of men at his church serving their widows and single moms. Because all of us on our board know what the “mind of Christ” feels like in our service to our widows and single moms, we also know what the “mind of Christ” feels like in our service on our board. As a result, over the years we have become close friends, united with Christ, sharing in the Spirit with tenderness and compassion. We are, after all, unworthy slaves, just doing what we are supposed to be doing.
That attitude is God’s will for every man of God in your church as well.
As we have seen, our mission as Men of God is to do the good works God saved us, called us, and equipped us to do. These Divinely preordained good works are critical to the execution of God’s plan and have immense positive consequences in our lives, in the lives of those around us, and in the life of the church.
In our own lives, our good works produce joy by adorning the gospel, by drawing people to faith in Christ, by building new relationships and restoring old relationships, and by bringing us an eternal reward in heaven.
In the lives of those around us, our good works result in love, security, and provision for our families, for our extended families, and for the pressing needs of our neighbors.
And in the life of our church, our good works make it possible for it to function properly and for it to be able to say, “There is no needy person among us.”
Unfortunately, there is an evil, wicked, vile person who works to destroy all of that. His name is Satan. Yes, I believe in a personal spiritual being by that name and he is evil personified. He is so powerful and so charismatic that he was able to persuade one third of the angels in heaven to follow him in rebellion against God. Satan now leads this renegade host of demons in a fight to the death against us as children of the living God.
Satan and his miscreants will do everything in their power to keep us from accomplishing the good works God saved us to do and they are often very successful in doing exactly that.
“Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.” Galatians 6:9
Exhaustion, failure, fruitlessness, betrayal, conflict, hopelessness, insecurity, doubt. All of these feelings and experiences are normal for all of us who seriously pursue the good works God saved us to do because we are in a spiritual battle. Paul emphatically tells us in Ephesians 6:12, “We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” The key word in this verse is “wrestle.” We are in hand to hand combat with “principalities,” “powers,” “rulers of the darkness of this world,” and “wickedness in high places.” With Satan and his demons, it is personal. Very personal. Because of this, our wrestling match can be exhausting and discouraging.
Discouragement, then, is a normal experience for all men of God who are serious about pursuing good works. Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, David, Elijah, the disciples, Mary, John Mark, Paul, Timothy all experienced discouragement. In fact, it is difficult to think of any godly person in the Bible who did not. Some of them dealt with it well. But many of them at times did not. Instead, their discouragement motivated them to do stupid and foolish things.
Therefore, we men of God must learn to recognize when we are discouraged, what we are discouraged about, and know how to deal with it.
When we get discouraged, the first thing to do is to stop and ask why. Below is an unscientific and somewhat hokey discouraged/encouraged test. Read through the categories and think of a number between 1 and 10 — with 1 being very discouraged and 10 being very encouraged — that best describes where you are in that category.
Am I growing in my relationship with God? Am I coming to know him better and love him more deeply? Am I living in joyful obedience to his Word and his will for my life? Do I share my life with him in prayer and am I meditating daily on his Word? Do I confess any sin to God quickly?
Am I experiencing oneness, peace, love and joy with my wife? Do we handle disagreements well? Are we communicating clearly and do we enjoy doing things together?
Am I available for my children? Am I a healthy example for them? Do I have loving relationships with them? Am I helping to meet any ongoing pressing needs in my family and extended family?
Do I have friends? Are they a positive influence on me? Can I talk with them about deep things?
Am I successful in my work? Do I find my work fulfilling? Do I have healthy work relationships with my peers and superiors? Do I have enough time for my wife, children, church, and fun activities? Am I getting, and taking, enough vacation time?
Do I understand the role of good works in my life? Do I know what the good works are that God has saved me to do and do I enjoy doing them? Are people benefiting from my good works?
Am I practicing healthy habits by eating well and getting the rest and exercise that I need?
Am I content with what I have? Am I living below my means? Am I paying my bills on time? Do I repay my debts as agreed? Do I have an emergency fund? Am I saving enough for retirement?
Am I comfortable in my own skin? Am I satisfied with the kind of person I am and with the life I am leading?
So how did we do? Are there any particular areas where we scored ourselves below 5? Notice that our good works are not the only category that we can be discouraged about. There are all kinds of things that can discourage us. But my experience, and maybe this is yours as well, is that when I am discouraged in any one of these categories, my good works suffer. The reason is because I become focused on what I am discouraged about, and that distracts me from doing the good works God saved me to do.
Many years ago my employer laid me off. After getting the news, I walked dejectedly out to the parking lot, got into my car, and turned the ignition on. The radio was tuned to a Christian station and suddenly these lyrics immediately blared loudly out of the speakers: “GOD IS IN CONTROL! WE BELIEVE THAT HIS CHILDREN WILL NOT BE FORSAKEN!” It was the precise encouragement I needed at the precise moment I needed it.
Discouragement without encouragement results in dysfunction. If we do not identify and respond to discouragement quickly and properly by proactively getting the encouragement we need, we can soon become despondent, aimless, and lethargic. We will simply run out of gas and coast to the side of the road.
Oxford Languages Dictionary defines encouragement this way: “the action of giving someone support, confidence, or hope” Someone who encourages us is someone who affirms us (support), instills courage in us (confidence), and inspires us to persevere (hope).
There are several biblical examples of people who received encouragement from others at a critical time in their lives, including David, who received encouragement from Jonathan when he was being persecuted by Saul (1 Samuel 23:15-18), young Timothy, who received repeated encouragement from Paul in his two pastoral epistles to Timothy (1 and 2 Timothy), and Paul himself, known as Saul at the time, who was encouraged by Barnabas, the “Son of Encouragement,” when he was a new believer and under suspicion from other believers because he had persecuted the church (Acts 9:27-28). All three of these examples beautifully illustrate what it means to give someone “support, comfort, or hope.”
Learn to treat discouragement like cancer: the sooner we diagnose it and address it, the easier it is to treat it. If we wait and let discouragement fester, it will metastasize and affect everything we do. Here are some strategies for seeking out encouragement when we feel discouraged.
We can seek out encouragement by…
God never intended for us to fight the battle we are in alone. Participating in our church’s men’s ministry will provide us with an immediate booster shot of encouragement. A men’s ministry will surround us with like-minded godly men who can come alongside us and help us through any fog of discouragement we may be experiencing. And pastors, you especially need to get involved with your men’s ministry. You do not necessarily have to lead it. The last thing you need is one more responsibility. But you can greatly benefit from it.
Finally, if you are a men’s ministry leader in your church, remember that there are always men who are attending your events who need encouragement. Be sure to affirm your men and encourage your men. After all, the entire purpose of your men’s ministry is to see your men blossom.
As a pastor for twenty years, I spent a good amount of time counseling married and engaged couples. I could write an entire book giving marriage advice. But if there is one thing I would tell Christian couples today, this is it:
Fifteen year-old Hayes Sherman and his friend were watching TV in Hayes’ Lake Tahoe home while his mother slept upstairs. Suddenly, a hungry bear entered their kitchen through an open garage door and began rummaging through the refrigerator. Realizing that the sounds of grunts and crashing containers of food emanating from the kitchen were sure signs that there was a bear in their home, Hayes urgently called his mother upstairs to tell her about the ravishing bear trashing the kitchen and that she shouldn’t come down the stairs.
As he talked to his mom, the bear bumped into the door separating Hayes and his friend’s room from the kitchen. While they held it shut, the door shook as the bear tried to open it multiple times.
“That is the worst-case scenario as a parent, to have a bear between you and your children,” Hayes mother recounted latter to CNN. “I am glad that I didn’t run downstairs, because that probably would have just agitated the bear.”
After speaking with his mom, and still holding the door shut with the help of his friend, Hayes called 911 and soon the police arrived, opened the door, and let the bear out of the house.
Like the bear in that Lake Tahoe home, there is a bear in our homes and it seeks to destroy them.
That “bear” is moral relativism and it is as destructive to our marriages and families as any literal bear possibly could be. The philosophy of moral relativism views moral values as “relative” to individual beliefs and prevailing cultural norms. This philosophy holds that there are no objective morals that are true for all people in all societies at all times. Rather, moral values can change, depending on the person and the culture that the person lives in, or, as the saying goes, there are “different strokes for different folks.”
With respect to sexual morality, moral relativism is the de facto law of the land in American culture. The logical conclusion of relative sexual morality, therefore, is a laissez-faire attitude toward marriage and family. One can arrange one’s sex life and one’s family life, according to one’s own desires and convictions, that is, if one wants to get married at all.
The result is an implosion of the institutions of marriage and family in America.
While Christians have been warning about this cultural maelstrom for years, the sad fact is that moral relativism now infects even our churches, along with the hearts and minds of individual Christians like ourselves.
Notably, the story of the bear in that Lake Tahoe home makes no mention of a husband and father who could protect the mother and children from the deadly bear.
Like that defenseless family in Lake Tahoe, millions of American families stand helpless against the bear of moral relativism because it has robbed them of faithful men who will always be around to protect them. Without the basic guiding principles that 1) sex outside of marriage is wrong, and 2) marriage is between one man and one woman only, principles that buttressed Western civilization for two thousand years, men dessert their families by the millions and let them dissolve into chaos.
Even many men of God who should know better have allowed moral relativism to seep into their homes. Some dabble secretly in pornography. Some have affairs. Some approve of same sex marriage. Some even allow their adult children and unmarried partners to live with them so they can save money to buy a home.
Given our current cultural debauchery, faithfulness to one’s marriage covenant, as taught in the Bible, is a radical lifestyle these days. Not laughing at a crude sexual joke told by one’s boss, not looking at online pornography, not longing for someone else’s wife, not approving of an adult child’s relationship with an unmarried live-in lover, not going along with the crowd when it comes to attitudes about same sex marriage, not watching movies that trash marriage and biblical sexual morality, all of these actions are examples of how we can counter the bear that threatens to destroy us and everything we stand for.
We truly strike a blow for Jesus Christ and biblical truth when we bravely and boldly demonstrate fidelity to our wives and children by our actions.
Imagine that you have signed up for a course at your local junior college called “Construction 101” and the course description reads, “In Construction 101, you will be given tools to build things.”
On the first day of the class, you and your classmates eagerly sit, awaiting your instructor. Soon, your instructor comes in, pulling a huge bin on wheels that is full of tools. After introducing himself, he reaches into the bin, begins pulling out the tools, and distributes them to you and the other students. He pulls out hammers, screwdrivers, levels, skill saws, socket wrenches, tape measures, paint brushes, trowels, shovels, and much more.
After loading you down with a multitude of tools, the instructor says, “Okay, now go make something with these tools. I will visit each of you at the end of the semester and grade you on what you have made and how well you have used your tools. So make sure it is good.”
Immediately, you raise your hand. “Wait a minute,” you say in dismay, “You haven’t shown us how to use these tools. You haven’t told us what you want us to make with them. You haven’t given us any materials to build with. And you haven’t taught us how to build whatever it is we are supposed to build.”
“But I have given you the tools, just like the course description says,” the instructor points out. “You’ll figure out the rest.” With that, he walks out the door.
This rather silly parable describes a paradox many Christians find themselves in when it comes to the topic of good works. We all know that we are supposed to do them. We also know that we have been “equipped” to do them (2 Timothy 3:16-17). But like the students in “Construction 101,” we often have only a vague idea of what actually doing good works entails. What exactly are these good works that we are to do? we may ask. Why are they so important? How are we to do them? Who should benefit from them? How do they relate to our salvation? Is God going to judge us for our good works? A lack of answers to these questions can affect how we do our good works, or whether we do them at all.
The purpose of this piece on good works is to provide biblically clear answers to these questions — and many more — on the topic of good works. I have written several posts on this subject in the past. Along the way I have pointed out that Conservative Christians in general, and men’s ministry leaders in particular, avoid this subject. This needs to change because ignoring the massive biblical teaching on good works restricts the proper expression of our faith before a watching world. Hopefully, the following essays will help us take a step in the right direction.
“My Father is always at his work to this very day, and I too am working.”
– Jesus
Christians worship the God who does things, not lifeless, immobile idols. Nor do we worship abstract ideas, immoral demigods, or whatever other gods we might make up in our minds. We worship the living God who “is always at his work to this very day.” And because God is good, the works that he does are good as well.
But not only does God do things, and not only are the things that he does good, God has called us as believers in his Son to do good works too. That is, just as Jesus said, “I too am working,” we should also be saying “I too am working.”
But what are these good works that God want’s us to do? To answer this question, the first thing we should look at are the good works that God himself has done, is doing, and will do as revealed in Scripture. The reason is because, while we will never do good works to the degree that God does his, we can learn important lessons about the nature and purpose that our good works should have, and how they fit in with God’s overall good works.
Let us turn first of all to God’s good works in creation, for we live in them and experience the blessings from them to this very day.
"And God said, 'Let there be light,' and there was light." Genesis 1:3
God initiated his good works of creation through speech. “And God said…” occurs over and over again in the creation narrative. Creation is God’s speech as expressed in space and time and as such it contains information that God intends for us to understand.
This conviction that a rational God created a rational universe which can be comprehended by the human mind has formed the foundation of Western science for the last four hundred years. Science, a good work in itself, therefore simply susses out the rational expression of what God was thinking in those moments of creation.
Thus creation, as science demonstrates time and again, is made up of layers upon layers upon layers of information, that is, speech. We see this emphasis on creation as God’s speech again in John 1:1, where three times John calls the Second Person of the Trinity, Jesus Christ, the “Word” through whom “all things were made.”
The Psalmist eloquently describes creation as speech in Psalm 19.
1 The heavens declare the glory of God;
the skies proclaim the work of his hands.
2 Day after day they pour forth speech;
night after night they reveal knowledge.
3 They have no speech, they use no words;
no sound is heard from them.
4 Yet their voice goes out into all the earth,
their words to the ends of the world. (Psalm 19:1-4)
"And God saw that the light was good." Genesis 1:4
God’s creative good works have a moral quality about them: they are self-evidently good. That is, creation does not just exist, it is good that it exists. When we see it, we think that it should exist. We are glad that it exists. We welcome its existence and want to learn everything we can about it. God’s creative good works automatically elicit from every person who observes them, including God himself, an irresistible “Yes!” Every time we stand in awe of creation, we are agreeing with God. Modern day conservation efforts are the logical conclusion of the self-evident reality that God’s creation is good and therefore should be protected from fallen humanity’s avarice.
Besides expressing God’s creative goodness, God’s good works in creation reveal several other divine qualities. For example, they reveal his infinite power when he produces something out of nothing simply by calling creation into existence. Then, again simply by saying it, God brings order out of chaos. This order, as we learn daily through scientific exploration, displays infinite intelligence.
But there is more. God, in his creative good works, was not simply doing “random acts of kindness.” His creation has purpose, as we learn again and again throughout the Word of God. As such, God’s creative good works build on each other: out of darkness God creates light, then out of formlessness God creates heaven and earth, then out of the waters God creates dry land, and then in the land, sea, and sky God creates living things that reproduce.
We now come to the origin of human good works as God originally intended. God creates two unique animals who are also persons because they bear God’s image: Adam and Eve. God freely and lovingly makes a covenant with Adam and Eve because, as bearers of his image, Adam and Eve have free will.
The covenant God makes with Adam and Eve involves them procreating and filling the earth, as well as tending to the garden and enjoying its fruit, but also being sure to not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil that is in the midst of the Garden of Eden. If Adam and Eve keep this “agreement,” this covenant, they will prosper and live in their garden, but if they do not because they eat the forbidden fruit, God tells them they will die.
Therefore, keeping their covenant with their Creator-God encompasses all of Adam and Eve’s “good works” that God creates them to do. Accomplishing God’s assigned good works for them is central to their existence. God’s good works are not something they do on the side while pursuing their own pleasure. Rather, doing God’s good works is their pleasure. Accomplishing them is the reason they exist, and they know it.
Thus, in a perfect earth prior to the fall, God employs free agency through covenant love to manage and expand on his good works.
And this is where we come in.
The good works God has for us to do today are based on his speech, which has now been expressed, not only in creation, but also in his inspired Word.
Like Adam and Eve, God has entered into a covenant, a New Covenant, with those of us who have put our faith in his Son, Jesus Christ, as our savior from our sin. (More on this later.) Like Adam and Eve’s covenant with God, our New Covenant encompasses all of the good works God has created us and saved us to do.
Our covenant with God involves an overall plan based on the gospel, the Great Commission, and the New Commandment, and includes some specific good works and some generalized good works.
When we do these good works, they are undeniably good to everyone who is watching, including unbelievers.
The good works God has for us to do are not just “random acts of kindness,” but purposeful, cumulative, regenerative, powerful, orderly and brilliant.
The good works God has for us to do fit in with, and expand on, God’s overall plan of good works.
The good works God has for us to do are the very reason for our existence.
And finally, like Adam and Eve, the good works God has for us to do produce life and joy and peace and beauty.
“We are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.” Ephesians 2:10
As we look at God’s good works in history. we are learning that what God does reveals his nature. In creation, we saw that God’s good works reveal his omniscience and omnipotence. In his creation of Adam and Eve in his image, we learn that God himself is personal. And in his establishment of a covenant with Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden – called the Edenic covenant – we learn about God’s lovingkindness.
But the goodness of God’s creation does not last long. Adam and Eve sin, breaking their covenant with God. But it is the very breaking of their covenant that provides God another opportunity to practice even more good works. But this time, God’s good works in response to Adam and Eve’s fall are not just physical, but spiritual and moral. In his treatment of Adam and Eve, God demonstrates both his justice and his mercy, his righteousness and his love. These dualities will resonate throughout the Old Testament and culminate at the cross.
“Love and faithfulness meet together;
righteousness and peace kiss each other.” Psalm 85:10
“Then the man and his wife heard the sound of the Lord God as he was walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and they hid from the Lord God among the trees of the garden. But the Lord God called to the man, “Where are you?” Genesis 3:8, 9
If there is one thing that Adam and Eve’s fall teaches us – and which we all know from our own personal experience – it is that sin is embarrassing. Evil is one thing. But sin is a personal affront to a personal God who keeps trying to find us, which is why non-believers talk a lot about evil, but never about sin. The concept of sin raises a whole host of embarrassing issues non-believers spend their entire lifetime trying to avoid, just like Adam and Eve when they hid behind trees. Modern sinners hide from God in their fancy homes, in their massive trucks towing their trailered boats, and behind their desks in their corner offices. Hiding from God is a lifelong chore.
Sin is embarrassing because it kills things and assigns the responsibility to us. What sin kills is our relationships. It kills our relationship with God. It kills our relationship with our self by killing our spirit. It kills our relationship with our spouse. It kills our relationships with our children. It kills our relationships with our neighbors. It kills our relationship with the natural world. And, eventually, it kills our relationship with our bodies.
The embarrassment that sin causes manifests itself when, again, like Adam and Eve, we try to pretend before God and others that there is “nothing to see here.” “I’m doing just fine, God. Thank you very much.”
All of us have at one time or another tried to amend our ways with token good works; our own version of furtively sewing and donning an inadequate fig leaf suit of clothes to cover our sin. Like the man who boasts about his safe driving record because he stops at 99% of red traffic lights, we boast of how “I’m really not all that bad.”
If only God would just leave us alone we would be fine, we think. But he doesn’t just leave us alone. He keeps calling out to us. He calls out to us in the form of our conscience. He calls out to us in the form of beautiful sunsets. He calls out to us in the form of a holy book called the Bible. He calls out to us in the form of an uncomfortably relevant sermon. He calls out to us in the form of concerned friends. He calls out to us in the form of a tract we pick up on a bench. There is just nowhere to hide from the God who keeps calling out to us in unexpected ways and at inconvenient times: “I’m here! Where are you?”
This, then, is God’s first good work in response to the fall: he doesn’t give up on us sinners. Instead, he relentlessly pursues us.
*****
“I fled Him, down the nights and down the days;
I fled Him, down the arches of the years;
I fled Him, down the labyrinthine ways
Of my own mind; and in the mist of tears
I hid from Him, and under running laughter.
Up vistaed hopes I sped;
And shot, precipitated,
Adown Titanic glooms of chasmèd fears,
From those strong Feet that followed, followed after.
But with unhurrying chase,
And unperturbèd pace,
Deliberate speed, majestic instancy,
They beat—and a Voice beat
More instant than the Feet—
‘All things betray thee, who betrayest Me.’
– Francis Thompson, The Hound of Heaven
Something to keep in mind as we look at God’s good works in response to Adam and Eve’s fall is that their fall is not the first fall that God is dealing with. By the time Adam and Eve arrive on the scene, Satan, and a third of the angels of Heaven, have already rebelled against God. As a result, God evicted Satan and his sinful hoard from heaven. But now God tells Adam and Eve that if they sin, they will die.
In fact, God had told Adam and Eve that if they ate the forbidden fruit, they would die that very day, “Of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”
But the Serpent, who was Satan incarnate and who had not died when he sinned, at least not physically, tells Adam and Eve, “You will not certainly die, for God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”
At first blush, after Adam and Eve eat the fruit, Satan seems to be the one who is telling the truth and God the one who is lying: Adam and Eve do not die that very day, their eyes are indeed opened to know good and evil, and God does acknowledge that “The man has now become like one of us.”
Observing all of this, as we are told they often do, the remaining faithful two thirds of the angels of heaven must be asking “What is happening here? Why didn’t Adam and Eve die? God said they would. Why is he allowing evil to go unaddressed in the world?” And that question, “If there is a God, why does he allow evil in this world?” is still the primary objection to belief in God that unbelievers raise to this very day.
To be sure, Adam and Eve do die upon eating the fruit. They die spiritually, and their subsequent experiences will show them just how profound their spiritual deaths are. But God allows them to continue in their physical “life” in order to show them mercy and hint at their redemption. However, he does this at great cost to his reputation. And this – God’s demonstration of mercy in spite of looking soft on evil – is his second good work in response to the fall.
“But do not forget this one thing, dear friends:
With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.
The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.
Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.
But the day of the Lord will come like a thief.
The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire,
and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare.” 2 Peter 3:8-10
“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows.” Galatians 6:7
I have written on “the consequences of forgiven sin” before, but it bears repeating: yes, God does forgive Adam and Eve of their sin, as we will see below. But nevertheless, Adam and Eve – including all of us descendants after them – will still have to live with the consequences of their sin. God’s justice requires this. For example, God forgave Moses of his sin, but Moses still could not enter the Promise Land. God forgave David of his sin. But David still suffered from the rebellion of his son Absalom. God forgave Peter of his sin. But Peter still would eventually suffer death by crucifixion. And God forgave Paul of his sin. But Jesus told Paul in his vision on the road to Damascus, “I will show you how many things you must suffer for my sake.”
The consequence for Adam’s sin is that he will have to work by the sweat of his brow. The consequence for Eve’s sin is that she will give birth in severe pain. And the consequence for Adam and Eve’s marriage is that it will always involve some degree of strife. In all of this, God demonstrates his justice. But God has something else to prove with his good works.
“Without the shedding of blood, there is no remission of sin.” Hebrews 9:22
But if there are always consequences for our sin, even for forgiven sin, then what good is forgiveness? Why bother to repent and seek forgiveness at all?
The reason we seek forgiveness and restoration in our relationship with God, in spite of the fact that, in this life, we still have to experience consequences for our sin, is because to know God and to walk in harmony with God is everything we could ever need or want. Reconciliation with God is life itself. God is perfect love, perfect beauty, perfect intelligence, perfect creativity, perfect peace, perfect power, perfect good, perfect…well, God is perfect in every good quality that we could possibly imagine. Nothing, no embarrassment and no consequence from our sin can compare to the tragedy of being alienated from God, especially being alienated from God forever.
And so God provides a way for Adam and Eve to be reconciled with him. He removes their pathetic fig leaves and gives them their own tailormade animal skin suits. But of course, this means that animals had to be sacrificed for Adam and Eve.
It must have been shocking for Adam and Eve to see God kill animals, skin them, and then make coverings for them out of those skins. They knew they were the ones who were supposed to die, not those animals. But he “left their sins unpunished, ” all the while knowing that he would sacrifice his Son, and his Son would sacrifice himself, for their sin.
“God presented Christ as a sacrifice of atonement, through the shedding of his blood—to be received by faith. He did this to demonstrate his righteousness, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished— he did it to demonstrate his righteousness at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.” Romans 3:25, 26
“All our righteousnesses are as filthy rags.” Isaiah 64:6
The doctrine of total depravity often gets a bad rap. The reason is because many think it teaches that all people are as bad as they can possibly be and that no one, therefore, does any good works, ever.
But we know from simple observation that most people are fairly decent in their behavior most of the time. We also know from everyday observation that most people practice good works in some form. Indeed, every religion in the world teaches the importance of good works.
But the doctrine of total depravity is not saying that all people are as bad as they can be and therefore they never practice any good works at all. Rather, the doctrine means that sin infects all people to some degree or another and, consequently, everything we do, even the good things we do, are also infected with, and affected by, sin.
Like a waiter who drops a fork and knife on the floor, picks them up, wipes them off on his sleeve, and then gives them to us to eat with, our own good works are not sterile to God. They are compromised by our rebellious souls. Just as the waiter did not adequately account for the prevalence of germs on the floor, so we, too, often do not account for how sin permeates us and our good works.
Adam and Eve’s “good work” of making themselves fig leaf coverings does not account for their disobedience. They are infected with sin and simply taking fig leaves from a fig tree and weaving them together to cover themselves does not solve their problem. Their good work does not address their real issue: sin.
Token good works, therefore, are the best the unsaved person can do. These good works have the appearance of a solution, but they do not address the actual problem of a rebellious heart.
It is only when we admit the insufficiency of our own good works – the fig leaf coverings that we have made for ourselves – and, rejecting them as Adam and Eve rejected theirs by undressing themselves in front of God, accept the good work of redemption accomplished freely for us through Christ’s death – that is, when we clothe ourselves with Jesus Christ through faith in him – then and only then we can then be reconciled to God and do the good works he redeemed us to do.
In this way, by rejecting our own good works and doing the good works God saved us to do, we demonstrate the reality of our salvation from slavery to sin. Or, as Paul put it in Romans 6, we are no longer slaves to sin, but slaves to righteousness.
“In the same way, count yourselves dead to sin but alive to God in Christ Jesus. Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body so that you obey its evil desires. Do not offer any part of yourself to sin as an instrument of wickedness, but rather offer yourselves to God as those who have been brought from death to life; and offer every part of yourself to him as an instrument of righteousness. For sin shall no longer be your master, because you are not under the law, but under grace… You have been set free from sin and have become slaves to righteousness… Just as you used to offer yourselves as slaves to impurity and to ever-increasing wickedness, so now offer yourselves as slaves to righteousness leading to holiness.” Romans 6:11-14, 18, 19
Token good works, therefore, are good works that we choose, that fit our lifestyle, and mesh with our agenda. They are simply an expression of our own autonomous selves. But doing God’s good works comes from the heart of the one who has been born again; who has been “conquered” by God and by his love for us. God’s good works are designed by God himself for us to do in joyful obedience to Him.
“For we are God’s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works; which God has prepared beforehand for us to do.” Ephesians 2:10
“Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.” Galatians 6:9
The final lesson we learn from God and his good works in response to the fall is that the world we live in is no longer conducive to doing God’s good works. Our world is filled with spiritual thorns and thistles. The good works God has saved us and called us to do must now be done by “the sweat of our brow,” so to speak.
No longer is obedience to God simply a picnic in Paradise. Doing God’s good works on earth is like planting a garden on Mars. This world belongs to Satan now and us believers are aliens. Doing God’s good works is countercultural in the deepest sense of that term. Now we must “overcome evil with good.” Our resistance may result in “the shedding of blood.” We may suffer “for doing what is good.” We have to “encourage one another to love and good works.” Indeed, we may even be tempted to give up because we have become “weary in doing good.”
It is no wonder, then, that modern conservative Christians, especially modern conservative American Christians, almost entirely ignore the subject of good works. Instead, we live the good life and forget the good works that God gave us a new life to do.
So far, we have looked at God’s good works in creation and his good works in relation to the fall. Now we turn to God’s good works in the rest of the Old Testament.
Obviously, we cannot cover all of God’s good works in the Old Testament. But we can look for patterns. And patterns there are. To help us discern them, here is a brief summary of Old Testament history in seven time periods.
Calling God’s judgment a good work may seem odd, but righteously dealing with sin and the pain that it brings is fundamental to doing good.
The Old Testament gives us many examples of God’s judgment. For example, God judges Cain, the entire world – except Noah – with the flood, the descendants of Abraham with slavery in Egypt, the Israelites in the wilderness, the Israelites during the time of the Judges, King Saul, King David, King Solomon and the idolatrous kings after them. Finally, he judges the entire nations of Israel and Judah.
But at the same time, God demonstrates mercy with his good works by initiating covenants with Cain, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Israel, David, and Judah. For God, justice and love are not either/or but both/and.
God often intervenes miraculously in Old Testament history. He enabled the elderly Abraham and Sarah to have a son. He performed mighty miracles in Egypt to deliver his people from slavery. He fed his people with miraculous manna in the wilderness. These and many more Old Testament miracles testify to God’s love, care, and protection for his people.
Throughout the Old Testament narrative, God’s good works seem to come to an imminent and premature end. Adam and Eve sin and ruin God’s creation. The world becomes so dissolute that it must be destroyed by a flood. The sons of Jacob begin intermarrying with outsiders, threatening their covenant with Abraham. Evil kings in Israel and Judah rise to power and abandon the faith. The northern ten tribes are captured and fade into historical oblivion. Jerusalem is destroyed.
And yet, out of each defeat, out of each seemingly impossible situation, a new and greater hope and new a greater initiatives arise. The previous “defeats,” we discover, are not failures at all, but simply foundations for something far greater.
We saw in the creation account that God intended to use agency – in the form of Adam and Eve – to advance his creation. God’s practice of employing agency to accomplish his good works continues in the rest of Old Testament history. God used Noah to save the world from ultimate destruction. He used Abraham to begin the Jewish race, Moses to deliver God’s people from slavery and birth them as a nation, the Judges to deliver Israel from her enemies, David to begin the messianic ancestral line, Solomon to build the temple, Jonah to save the Ninevites, and the prophets to rebuke as well as encourage his people.
Again and again, in the darkest hour, when everything seems hopeless and lost, God chooses one person to lead his people back to him. How did they do it? Simply by believing God and following his direction.
Throughout Old Testament history, we learn many new things about God from his good works. For example, we learn that God is hesed; a loving, covenant-making and covenant-keeping God. We learn this from the numerous covenants God enters into with individuals and nations. We also learn that God is holy through his giving of the Law to Israel. We learn that God judges sin, although reluctantly, when he judges the world with a flood, when he judges Egypt, and when he judges the Israelites numerous times. We learn that God is faithful to his promises and that he is merciful to those who confess their sin to him.
In this sense, God’s good works show humanity who he is and why we must come to terms with him.
While God works through individuals in the Old Testament, he also emphasizes groups, specifically hereditary groups. This family emphasis is especially true with God’s dealings with Abraham. God’s covenant with Abraham specifically focuses on him and his descendants (“I will add many to the number of your children and all who come after them, like the stars of the heavens and the sand beside the sea.” Genesis 22:17). Starting with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Abraham’s descendants multiply into clans and tribes and, eventually, into a nation. It is through this nation that God’s messiah, Jesus Christ, came.
An important lesson we can learn from God’s good works in the Old Testament is that individual believers play a central role in carrying them out. In a sense, we work hand-in-hand with God when by faith we do the good works he has for us to do. Believers are not simply observers in a divine play, but active participants in its production. The writer to the Hebrews makes this connection very clear:
“By faith Abel brought God a better offering than Cain did… By faith Noah, when warned about things not yet seen, in holy fear built an ark to save his family… By faith Abraham, when called to go to a place he would later receive as his inheritance, obeyed and went… By faith Moses, when he had grown up, refused to be known as the son of Pharaoh’s daughter. He chose to be mistreated along with the people of God rather than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin… And what more shall I say? I do not have time to tell about Gideon, Barak, Samson and Jephthah, about David and Samuel and the prophets, who through faith conquered kingdoms, administered justice, and gained what was promised; who shut the mouths of lions, quenched the fury of the flames, and escaped the edge of the sword; whose weakness was turned to strength; and who became powerful in battle and routed foreign armies. Women received back their dead, raised to life again. There were others who were tortured, refusing to be released so that they might gain an even better resurrection. Some faced jeers and flogging, and even chains and imprisonment. They were put to death by stoning; they were sawed in two; they were killed by the sword. They went about in sheepskins and goatskins, destitute, persecuted and mistreated— the world was not worthy of them. They wandered in deserts and mountains, living in caves and in holes in the ground. These were all commended for their faith, yet none of them received what had been promised, since God had planned something better for us so that only together with us would they be made perfect.” Hebrews 11
Furthermore, we learn from God’s good works in the Old Testament that good works reveal the nature of the person performing them. With our good works we demonstrate the reality of our salvation; what we were saved for, but not what we were saved by. (Ephesians 2:8-10)
God’s good works in the Old Testament also remind us that our own good works can sometimes seem futile and inconsequential. But there is no such thing as a futile good work.
And finally, God’s good works throughout the Old Testament with respect to the family remind us that those of us who have family dependents have a huge responsibility to love, support, and bless our spouse, children, and extended family in the name of Jesus Christ.
We come now to the Incarnation, which encompasses some of the most radical good works God has done. The Incarnation, where the third person of the Trinity becomes a human being, shows us the logical conclusion of a God whose very essence is love. For it is his love for us which compells God to give us his son and it is Christ’s love for us that compells him to become a human being.
Thus, the Incarnation of Jesus provides us with a wellspring of information about the kind of good works God has saved us to do.
“God loved the world so much that he gave his only son.” John 3:16
Sadly, throughout human history, and all over the world, many cultures have practiced ritualistic child sacrifice. Archaeological evidence of parents sacrificing their children to appease the gods has been documented in Iraq, North Africa, West Africa, Central America and South America. Even ancient Israel, when it apostatized and fell under the spell of the Canaanite God Moloch, practiced child sacrifice.
Christianity eradicated that practice once and for all. Instead of worshipping a vicious God who extracts our dearest possession from us, we worship a loving God who sacrifices his dearest possession for us. The Father giving his Son for us marks the beginning of the Incarnation.
Note that God does not give his son to us out of obligation, but out of love; a love so great that he gladly and willfully gives his son to us.
“Who, being in very nature God,
did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;
rather, he made himself nothing
by taking the very nature of a servant,
being made in human likeness.
And being found in appearance as a man,
he humbled himself
by becoming obedient to death—
even death on a cross!” Philippines 2:6-8
But there is a second part to the Incarnation. If the first part is the Father giving his Son, then the second part is the Son becoming a human being. In the Incarnation, Christ allows his love for us to change him permanently. At his birth, the Second Person of the Trinity, the Son of God, empties himself of all divine glory and power. He “made himself nothing.” In practical terms, that means he donnes the nature of a servant, or slave. But the emptying does not stop there. Even as a slave, Christ further humbles himself “by becoming obedient to death.” But even in death he does not stop emptying himself. He becomes obedient to the worst kind of death, “even death on a cross!”
“When the set time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law.” Galatians 4:3
God doesn’t like loving from us a distance. God seeks us. God pursues us. He wants to be with us. He wants to live inside of us. And so, to show us how much he loves us, Christ, the Second Person of the Godhead, becomes one of us. That is, Christ personally identifies with us in all of our human existence, except for our sinful condition. This identification with the human condition begins at birth.
Just like all human beings, Jesus Christ is born of a woman. But unlike all human beings, Jesus Christ is born into poverty and laid, wrapped in rags, in a feeding trough. The love of God eschews all pomp, all power, all pride, and all privilege.
The result of Jesus’ identification with humanity is that we have a Savior who knows and understands us. “For we do not have a high priest who is unable to empathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are—yet he did not sin.” Hebrews 4:15.
“Have this attitude in you which was also in Christ Jesus.” Philippians 2:5
Only when we have the love of God in their hearts can we do the good works God intends for us to do. Without that love, we will revert to “token” good works. Token good works are nice things people do for others that still allow them to maintain their own personal agenda. God’s love, on the other hand, takes him to places he normally doesn’t go. It takes him to a stable in Bethlehem. It takes him to the wilderness for 40 days. It takes him on a journey to introduce the Kingdom of Heaven to his people. It takes him to an upper room where he kneels and washes his disciples’ feet. And ultimately, it takes him to a cross and to a tomb.
To be sure, in the Incarnation, God’s good works are a radical expression of his love for us, but they are also meant to be a radical example for us to follow. The kenosis, the emptying, quoted in Philippians 2:6-8, is preceded by this admonition in verse 5: “Have this attitude in you which was also in Christ Jesus.”
To do the good works God saved us and called us to do, we must set aside our own agenda, our own pride, our own position in this world, and go wherever the love of God takes us.
“It is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work.” John 14:10
I have a thought experiment for us to do. In our fallen world, what kind of good works would a perfect person, who has direct access to a holy God and his infinite power, do? A modern non-Christian might answer by saying he would be like Super Man, flying around and rescuing people in distress. But the problems with his mythical superman, of course, are that Superman is, well, mythical, and even as a myth he is unable to deal with our real problem: sin.
On the other hand, the wonderful Christian answer to that thought experiment is that we have a real, historical example of the kind of good works a perfect person who has access to a holy and infinitely powerful God, did in this fallen world. Indeed, that perfect person was Jesus Christ, God incarnate, “Immanuel,” God with us, the Second person of the Trinity. Everything he did in his lifetime was good. And everything he did, he did within the context of a sinful and depraved culture, all the while never compromising with that culture.
It will benefit believers, then, to pay close attention to Jesus’ earthly ministry and his good works, for we, too, as his followers, have direct access to the same holy and infinitely powerful God. And we, too, are called to do good works.
“We have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are, yet without sin.” Hebrews 4:15
The first rule of doing good works is to not do evil works. Sadly, we often, but not always, do our evil works when we are under pressure. “I was tired when I said that.” “I was facing eviction when I stole that money.” “I deserted my fellow soldiers in battle because I was afraid to die.” “I was frustrated with someone when I slandered him.” “I was…” We excuse our evil works because we were under pressure and think that our true selves are who we are when we are not under pressure. “I’m actually a nice person,” we tell ourselves, “except when….”
But in reality, it is what we do and say while under pressure that reveals our true selves.
Picture two uninflated balloons lying limp on a table. They look identical in every way. But one of them has been pierced with a small needle, creating an invisible hole. How do we tell which one is the one with the tinny hole in it? You apply pressure. You can do this by simply filling them with water. As they fill up, the one with the hole in it will squirt water through its hole because it is under pressure.
Like the balloon with the hole in it, pressure reveals our true character…and its flaws.
The Bible tells us that Jesus, in his earthly humanity, was like us in every way. He looked just like any ordinary person might look (Isaiah 53:2). The only difference was that under the most extreme forms of pressure, he never sinned.
We may forget that Jesus’ temptation by Satan in the wilderness happened at the end of forty days of fasting. He was dying of starvation when he resisted Satan three times. But his temptations didn’t stop in the wilderness. Jesus was tempted throughout his ministry. In one example, Peter became a source of temptation, a “stumbling block,” to Jesus:
“From that time on Jesus began to explain to his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem and suffer many things at the hands of the elders, the chief priests and the teachers of the law, and that he must be killed and on the third day be raised to life. Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him. “Never, Lord!” he said. “This shall never happen to you!” Jesus turned and said to Peter, “Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the concerns of God, but merely human concerns.” (Matthew 16:21-23)
Of course, the final temptation for Jesus was his death on the cross. We must remember that Satan did not want Jesus to die on the cross. He wanted Jesus to suffer and come down from the cross in rebellion against his Father. And yet, even under the most extreme circumstances possible, Jesus did not sin.
“From that time Jesus began to preach, saying, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” Matthew 4:17
Two questions: How far is Bethlehem from Jerusalem? Answer: 5.5 miles. How far is Babylon from Jerusalem? Answer: 1,314 miles. When the Magi, who had access to the great Head Magi Daniel’s prophetic writings (Daniel 5:11), trekked 1,314 miles from Babylon to Jerusalem and asked “Where is he who is born king of the Jews?” the religious leaders of Jesus’ day knew the exact answer to that question: Bethlehem, which was just a hop, skip, and jump from Jerusalem…and all downhill. Here is how the religious leaders answered that Bible quiz contest held by King Herod:
“After Jesus was born in Bethlehem in Judea, during the time of King Herod, Magi from the east arrived in Jerusalem, asking, “Where is the One who has been born King of the Jews? We saw His star in the east and have come to worship Him.” When King Herod heard this he was disturbed, and all Jerusalem with him. When he had called together all the people’s chief priests and teachers of the law, he asked them where the Messiah was to be born. ‘In Bethlehem in Judea,’ they replied, “for this is what the prophet has written: “‘But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, are by no means least among the rulers of Judah; for out of you will come a ruler who will shepherd my people Israel.’”” (Matthew 2:1-6)
This passage tells us that when the Magi arrived, it was as if God had put up a giant billboard in Jerusalem that said, “Your Messiah and King is here! You can find him in Jerusalem! Go check it out!” All the chief priests and teachers of the law had to do to bring in the kingdom of God was to walk 5.5 miles to Bethlehem – about a two hour jaunt – and check out what Scripture and the Magi and God were telling them. But they didn’t do it. In fact, the only person who took the Magi seriously was Herod himself. And we know the disastrous consequences of that.
The indifferent response of the religious leaders in Jerusalem to the announcement of their messiah’s birth in Bethlehem foreshadowed the response of the entire nation to Jesus’ announcement of the kingdom thirty years later.
But unlike the Magi, Jesus’ proclamation that the kingdom of heaven was at hand wasn’t exactly a positive message. If he had just left things at “The kingdom of Heaven is here!” he may have gotten a better response. Instead, he preceded the good news of the coming kingdom with some bad news in the form of a command: “Repent!”
In the ancient Near East, when a king approached a city to visit, a herald would precede him, announce the coming of their king (which was called a “parousia“) and tell the citizens to get ready by repairing the roads leading into town. This practice is what John the Baptist was referring to when he announced the coming of the messiah, ““A voice of one calling in the wilderness, ‘Prepare the way for the Lord, make straight paths for him.’” (Luke 1:3)
Repairing roads for the coming king is also what Jesus was alluding to when he announced, “Repent! The kingdom of heaven is here.” Jesus and John were not referring to literal roads, but to moral propensities and sinful acts that made the reception of their coming king difficult, if not impossible.
Jesus was saying that the kingdom of heaven was first and foremost a moral kingdom, a kingdom where people were righteous and did righteous deeds. Hence the requirement that they repent of their unrighteous ways.
Of course, the problem wasn’t just their sinful acts that they needed to repent of, but their sinfulness, their sinful condition. They had to be born again. They needed a new spirit, a new heart, and a new mind to be citizens of the kingdom of heaven and only the cross could enable that kind of change.
Therefore, Jesus’ good work in announcing the coming of the kingdom of heaven was that he didn’t compromise the truth and mince words while doing so. He told his fellow Jews exactly what the kingdom required, knowing all the while that they wouldn’t – indeed couldn’t – fulfill that requirement.
“Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up.” Deuteronomy 6:7
There is a Christian saying that I first heard as a kid that I absolutely hate: “He’s so heavenly minded that he’s no earthly good.” Nothing could be further from the truth. A believer who is heavenly minded is a believer who has been fully equipped to do heavenly good on earth.
In announcing the coming kingdom of heaven, Jesus was indeed “heavenly minded.” Therefore, it was only natural for him to follow up on his announcement with in-depth, explicit teaching about the nature of the coming heavenly kingdom and its implications for his people. To accomplish this task, Jesus used every opportunity he could to get his message across. He taught in synagogues, in homes, while walking from place to place, while sitting in a boat, while sitting at a well, and while visiting the temple in Jerusalem. He taught individuals, small groups, larger groups, and massive crowds. He used prose, commands, metaphors, similes, parables, and even curses – whatever it took to get his message of the coming kingdom across.
As a result, Jesus’ teaching upended the social and religious order of his day and reverberates through the centuries to this day. Jesus held his listeners spellbound and forced either a Yes! or a No! There was no middle ground. People either responded positively or negatively to him.
Just as radical as his teaching about the coming kingdom was his teaching about himself. Jesus called God his Father, referred to himself as the “I am” of the Old Testament, and claimed to be the fulfillment of messianic prophecy; the gate through which everyone must enter the kingdom of heaven: “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No man comes to the Father, except through me,” he boldly proclaimed. (John 14:6)
Jesus never flinched. He called out sin wherever he found it and praised good wherever he found it as well. He knew what the consequences would be for speaking “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth,” but he did it anyway.
[Note: In this post I am only covering Jesus’ example of doing good works. I will cover Jesus’ explicit teaching on good works when I review the biblical teaching on good works as a whole.]
““The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me [i.e., Moses] from among you, from your brothers—it is to him you shall listen.” Deuteronomy 18:15
Jesus did the majority of his miracles to accomplish compassionate healing. He healed the possessed, the blind, the crippled, the sick, the lepers, and, as the ultimate healer, he raised the dead. One can imagine the constant joy and rejoicing in the crowds surrounding him as thousands of people experienced Jesus’ miraculous power to heal.
But Jesus did other kinds of miracles as well, and these miracles, along with his miracles of healing, had one main purpose: to reveal who he was to his disciples, to the religious leaders of his day, and to the entire nation. Some of the miracles Jesus did, he did in order to show that he was the prophet that Moses had promised to his people. For example, Jesus calmed the water and walked on water while Moses divided the Red Sea and walked through it with his people. Jesus fed five thousand men in the wilderness, along with their wives and children, while the Children of Israel ate manna in the wilderness as they were led by Moses. And, in his first miracle, Jesus turned water in stone jars into wine, while, for Moses’ first miracle, which happened in the presence of Pharoah, he turned the Nile River into blood, including “even the water in stone vessels.”
Jesus was no magician. And he certainly was not a mere entertainer. He was God Incarnate who did his miracles through the power of the Father who dwelt in him and who was working through him. While many of his miracles resulted in healing, the main purpose of all of his miracles was to reveal who he was: the Second Moses and the promised Messiah.
But Jesus didn’t just do miracles, he was also a prophet. Prophets in the Old Testament often made two kinds of prophecies: near prophecies and distant prophecies. Near prophecies were predictions that would come true during the lifetimes of the prophet and his listeners. Distant prophecies were prophecies that would come true in the distant future, often after the prophet and his listeners had died. Hence, the purpose of the near prophecies was to confirm that the giver of the prophecies was a true prophet and that the distant prophecies would indeed come true.
In Jesus’ case, the near prophecies he gave were prophecies of his coming suffering, death, and resurrection on the third day. Among the distant prophecies he made were prophecies concerning God’s judgement on Israel for rejecting him, the trials that the world would go through until he comes again, his return in glory, and the establishment of the Kingdom of Heaven on earth. His disciples (and us) would have and do have the fulfillment of his near prophecies as confirmation that his distant prophecies will indeed happen as well.
“He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him.” John 1:10, 11
I have another pair of questions for you. Here’s the first one: Does it require faith to do a miracle? Answer: Yes. In fact, we have an entire chapter in the book of Hebrews, Hebrews 11, that talks about the miracles that believers have done by faith: “By faith Noah, when warned about things not yet seen, in holy fear built an ark to save his family.” By faith Abraham…. By faith Isaac…. And so on. So, yes, faith is required to do a miracle.
Now here is the second question: Does it require faith on the part of onlookers to conclude that a miracle has happened? Answer: No, it does not. We see this clearly when Peter healed the lame beggar. In response, the Sanhedrin concluded: “What shall we do with these men? For the fact that a noteworthy miracle has taken place through them is apparent to all who live in Jerusalem, and we cannot deny it.” (Acts 4:16, emphasis mine) The Sanhedrin had no faith in Jesus but still could not deny that Peter had done an amazing miracle in his name. In fact, if someone claims to do a miracle in your presence and then insinuates that you need to have faith when you doubt that a real miracle has happened, then it wasn’t a miracle. Real miracles are obvious and undeniable by everyone who sees them, even skeptics.
Since genuine miracles are undeniable even by skeptics, this causes them extreme mental tension when they see one. On the one hand, they want to hold onto their unbelief. But on the other hand, the miracle they witness cannot be denied, resulting in a type of spiritual and mental schizophrenia.
This state of extreme tension is what happened to the religious leaders during Jesus’ ministry as they personally witnessed over and over again his miracles. For example, the healing of the lame man by the pool of Bethesda happened right in Jerusalem. The raising of Lazarus from the dead happened a mile and a half from Jerusalem. And then there are the thousands of people whom Jesus healed all over the country. No one could deny the reality of these miracles, including the spiritual and political leaders of the nation. But these leaders still held onto their unbelief and they still rejected Jesus as their messiah.
Nevertheless, Jesus pressed on. In spite of the unbelief of Israel’s religious leaders, in spite of their threats, in spite of their aspersions, he continued to do what God called him to do, knowing full well what awaited him in the end.
Jesus did not just do miracles and teach. One of the most consequential things Jesus did was to recruit, train, and deploy disciples. By doing so, he duplicated his ministry and planned for the future, a future that, even when he was physically gone, would always have his disciples in it…even for centuries and millennia.
This does not mean that Jesus’ discipleship ministry was easy. It was not, even for Jesus. Many times his disciples simply did not understand his teaching. As a result, it took a while for them to comprehend his true nature. They often misunderstood his agenda. Sometimes they were rude (to children) and harsh (wanting to call down fire on someone) and quarrelsome (they often competed with each other over who was going to be the boss). At the end of his earthly ministry, all of his disciples eventually abandoned him and one of them betrayed him. Because they didn’t believe his teaching about his resurrection, Jesus’ disciples lived in fear and bewilderment when he did die, and were shocked when He rose from the dead. One of them even continued to doubt after Jesus’ resurrection.
But Jesus had confidence in his disciples. After he rose from the grave, he gave them the Great Commission to make disciples all over the world, and then he gave them the Holy Spirit to accomplish it.
And world-wide discipleship is in fact what has happened, and is happening, to this very day. For example, it is estimated that the number of Christians in China is growing by 7% to 10% annually.
“At that time some Pharisees came to Jesus and said to him, ‘Leave this place and go somewhere else. Herod wants to kill you.’ He replied, ‘Go tell that fox, ‘I will keep on driving out demons and healing people.'” Luke 13:31, 32
One thing that becomes clear when reading the gospels is that no one intimidated Jesus. For example, as early as the age of twelve Jesus felt comfortable engaging in discussions in the temple with the religious leaders of his day. “After three days they found him in the temple courts, sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions.” (Luke 12:46)
When, as an adult, Jesus entered into ministry, he never changed his message in order to avoid conflict, often resulting in dire consequences: “All the people in the synagogue were furious when they heard this. They got up, drove him out of the town, and took him to the brow of the hill on which the town was built, in order to throw him off the cliff. But he walked right through the crowd and went on his way.” (Luke 4:28-30)
Sometimes Jesus’ disciples worried about him offending the Pharisees. For example, Jesus had been teaching that it isn’t what people eat that defiles them, but what people say. “Then the disciples came to him and asked, “Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this?” (Matthew 15:12).
Jesus never flinched. He never held back. He never modified his message. And, most infuriating of all, he never lost an argument (i.e., see Mark 11:27 to 12:37). Jesus left his detractors, namely, the Pharisees and Sadducees, speechless, befuddled, and embarrassed when they tried to corner him.
The same applies to the political rulers of Jesus’ day. When the Pharisees tried to scare Jesus to leave the area by telling him that Herod wanted to kill him, Jesus dared to publicly call Herod a “fox.” And when he stood on trial before Pilate, Jesus boldly spoke about his kingdom (John 18:33-38).
“Here comes your king, riding on a young donkey.” John 12:15
“Jesus made himself nothing.” the Apostle Paul wrote to the Philippians (Philippians 2:7). This “emptying,” this kenosis, as theologians call it, began in heaven even before Jesus was born. It was there that he chose to lay aside the trappings of his deity and become a human being. The kenosis continued when Jesus was born into the human race of a virgin in a barn and lay in a feeding trough, wrapped in rags. His kenosis became even more evident when he and his parents had to flee as refugees into Egypt.
Then, at the beginning of his ministry, Jesus’ kenosis motivated him to be baptized in the same way sinful human beings are at their conversion.
The kenosis continued when, by the power of the Holy Spirit, Jesus was led into the wilderness for forty days of intense temptation. Throughout his ministry Jesus’ kenosis continued to manifest itself in many different ways. He often slept outside as a homeless person. He felt more comfortable with ostracized sinners, tax collectors, and prostitutes than he did with the religious leaders of his day. He berated the rich and sided with the poor time and again. Even at the height of his popularity, at the Triumphal Entry, when Jesus entered Jerusalem as a conquering king, he muted the whole event by riding through Jerusalem’s gates on a young donkey.
Jesus’ kenosis knew no limits. He continued to empty himself before his disciples by washing their filthy feet. And then he did the unspeakable, he died on a cross for the sins of the world. He emptied himself until there was nothing left to empty.
“Again Jesus said, “Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, I am sending you.” And with that he breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit.” John 20:20, 21
No one doubts the transformation that occurred in Jesus’ disciples after he was gone. Eleven previously weak, doubting, struggling, and contentious men suddenly, following Jesus’ Ascension, turned into bold, confident, fearless, and effective apostles who spread the good news of salvation through faith in Jesus throughout the Roman Empire. As a result, the church grew, and grew, and grew.
What happened? What caused this change in these men? What caused it was Jesus’ gift to them of the Holy Spirit, the third person of the Trinity, who permanently indwelled them. The Holy Spirit, these men would learn, convicts and regenerates us sinners, places us in the church, the body of Christ, empowers us with gifts, and comforts us through trials and temptations. It was the presence of the Holy Spirit in the apostles and in their converts that made them so effective. And it is still the presence of the Holy Spirit in believers today that makes us effective as well.
“Jesus saw his mother there, and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby.” John 19:26
One of Jesus’ good works, one that is near and dear to my heart, is his very last before dying for our sins. There is Jesus, suffering in extreme pain on the cross, yet he still summons the strength to guarantee the wellbeing of a widow and single mother — his own mother, Mary — standing there beneath him.
“When Jesus saw his mother there, and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to her, “Woman, here is your son,” and to the disciple, “Here is your mother.” From that time on, this disciple took her into his home.” (John 19:25-37)
We sometimes forget when we read this story in John 19 that Jesus had four brothers and at least two sisters (Mark 6:3). We even know his brothers names: James, Joses, Judas, and Simon. After Jesus’ death and resurrection, his brothers came to saving faith in him (Acts 1:14). His brother James became the head of the church in Jerusalem and his brother Jude wrote the book of Jude.
So the natural question is, why didn’t Jesus entrust Mary to one of his brothers instead of to John?
One reason may be because John was the only apostle not to be martyred and it would be more difficult for the authorities to find and kill Mary if she were not cared for by her own family. While that may be true, I believe there was another reason Jesus asked John to care for his mother: he wanted to show all of his followers how widows and single moms in the church should be treated, namely as if they are our own mothers and our own sisters.
Jesus explicitly taught this truth to his disciples: “Then Jesus entered a house, and again a crowd gathered, so that he and his disciples were not even able to eat. When his family heard about this, they went to take charge of him, for they said, ‘He is out of his mind.’ …Then Jesus’ mother and brothers arrived. Standing outside, they sent someone in to call him. A crowd was sitting around him, and they told him, ‘Your mother and brothers are outside looking for you.’ ‘Who are my mother and my brothers?’ he asked. Then he looked at those seated in a circle around him and said, ‘Here are my mother and my brothers! Whoever does God's will is my brother and sister and mother.’ (Mark 3:20,21; 31-35, emphasis mine)
As a result of Jesus’ teaching and example on the cross, the early church took him quite literally, as we see in 1 Timothy 5:1, 2, “Treat … older women as mothers, and younger women as sisters, with absolute purity.” And then, immediately following this exhortation, Paul gives us an example of what it means to treat older women as if they are our mothers in a long passage about qualifications for the “widows list.” (1 Timothy 5:3-16) In other words, when Jesus said to John “Behold, your mother,” he was not just concerned about his mother, Mary, but also giving us a powerful example of how all believers are to guarantee the wellbeing of our fellow believing widows and single moms.
“ Very truly I tell you, whoever believes in me will do the works I have been doing, and they will do even greater things than these, because I am going to the Father.” John 14:12
There is so much to say about Jesus’ life of good works that I will try to summarize this material by saying that Jesus is our perfect paradigm for good works. In everything we do for the glory of God, we should look to Jesus as our example. Here are some key takeaways:
Jesus did not do his own good works. He did the Father’s good works through the power of the Holy Spirit. Our good works are also to be an expression of the Triune God working through us: being born again through faith in Jesus, and then Jesus interceding for us, the Father blessing our work, and the Holy Spirit leading and empowering us. Walking in fellowship with the Triune God while doing his good works makes us unstoppable.
We cannot do God’s good works when we are full of ourselves. The good works God calls us to do always involve emptying ourselves of ourselves, only to discover a greater fullness than we could ever have imagined, the fullness of God himself.
Proper discipleship is helping believers become more and more obedient to Jesus’ teaching and more and more like Jesus himself. The only legitimate legacy for a Christian is a legacy of obedient, Christ-like disciples.
Jesus eschewed the rich and powerful and focused on the lower classes and the sick. But, oddly, Jesus also taught that “the poor will always be with you.” He said this because the world in general, and his own people in particular, had rejected him and poverty would be one result of that rejection.
But among his followers, Jesus taught that we are to love each other and sacrifice our lives for each other so that his church can say, “There is no needy person among us.” While poverty is a characteristic of a Christ-rejecting world, the absence of poverty is a characteristic of a Christ-accepting church. (Titus 3:14)
Jesus’ humility in washing his disciples’ feet was a good work done for the purpose of reconciling himself to his disciples. At the same time, he gave us his New Commandment: “Love each other as I have loved you.” Humbly seeking reconciliation with any we are estranged from is a critical good work.
I have only scratched the surface when it comes to analyzing Jesus’ good works and applying them to our own lives. I haven’t even discussed Jesus’ explicit teaching on good works, which I will do later in this series. But I hope this discussion has motivated the reader to look to Jesus in prayer and seek his guidance in relation to the good works he has for us to do.
“At one time we too were foolish, disobedient, deceived and enslaved by all kinds of passions and pleasures. We lived in malice and envy, being hated and hating one another.” Titus 3:3
Never underestimate the ability of us human beings to enslave each other and, indeed, to enslave ourselves. True, all countries have outlawed slavery today. But still slavery stalks us in many shapes and colors. Human trafficking is one form of modern slavery, of course. But on the other side of the spectrum lay many other forms of slavery, such as gambling, substance abuse, overextended debt, and pornography addiction.
People also suffer from emotional and psychological forms of slavery. We can be enslaved to bitterness, jealousy, hatred, bigotry, divisiveness, even self-hatred.
But the Bible teaches us that there is one form of slavery that transcends all others: spiritual slavery to sin. Ignoring this issue creates havoc in our lives, the Bible teaches us. Resolving this issue creates a foundation for resolving all other forms of slavery we may be experiencing.
The exodus of Israel from Egypt gives us a prime example of this truth that we must deal with our spiritual slavery to sin before we can truly be free from all other forms of slavery. The Israelites thought all of their problems were caused by their physical slavery to the Egyptians. But after God freed them from Egypt, the Israelites still faced deep, systemic spiritual dysfunction that rose to the surface time and again.
The Jews of Jesus’ day made the same mistake their ancestors did. They thought their primary problem was their subjugation to Rome and that the messiah was coming to deliver them from their political and social oppression and bring in the kingdom of Heaven on earth. Consequently, when Jesus made it clear that his kingdom required repentance and spiritual holiness, the nation rejected him.
Truth be told, admitting that we are enslaved to sin embarrasses us. For example, my most popular blog post by far, out of the hundreds on NewCommandment.org, is entitled: “Should You Tell Your Wife Immediately about Your Pornography Addiction?”1
Slavery to sin embarrasses us because it implies helplessness in the deepest level of our being. Our inability to stop sinning is the very definition of slavery. Only when we acknowledge our helplessness and our need for someone outside of ourselves to save us can we even begin to deal with our slavery to sin.
The Bible says that the one person who can redeem us from slavery to sin is Jesus Christ. Only by faith in him can he save us from slavery because only he has paid the price required for our redemption.
“The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands.” Psalm 19:1
The Lord will lay bare his holy arm
in the sight of all the nations,
and all the ends of the earth will see
the salvation of our God. Isaiah 52:10
My childhood pastor liked to say that creation is merely God’s fingerpainting – the work of his hands. But redemption is God showing us his arm and flexing his muscles.
It is no accident that this promise in Isaiah 52:10, about the Lord laying “bare his holy arm” as he brings salvation to the world, occurs just a few verses before the famous prophecy of the suffering servant in Isaiah 53, where Isaiah predicts in great detail what God bearing his “holy arm” to us means.
“Who has believed our message
and to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?
He grew up before him like a tender shoot,
and like a root out of dry ground.
He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him,
nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.
He was despised and rejected by mankind,
a man of suffering, and familiar with pain.
Like one from whom people hide their faces
he was despised, and we held him in low esteem.
Surely he took up our pain
and bore our suffering,
yet we considered him punished by God,
stricken by him, and afflicted.
But he was pierced for our transgressions,
he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was on him,
and by his wounds we are healed.
We all, like sheep, have gone astray,
each of us has turned to our own way;
and the Lord has laid on him
the iniquity of us all.” Isaiah 53:1-6
Isaiah wrote this prophecy in the past tense – called the “prophetic perfect tense” – as though the predictions it describes had already happened. Prophets often used this technique to emphasize the certainty of their predictions. In reality, Isaiah penned his prophecy seven hundred years before the death of Christ on the cross. In this prophecy Isaiah vividly portrays God “flexing his arm” by providing a saving substitute who would bear “the iniquity of us all.” By describing this radical act of redeeming sinners and making us his children when we receive by faith this provision for our sin, Isaiah is telling us that redemption is God’s greatest good work of all.
But what is redemption and what does it mean to be redeemed?
“The New Testament Greek word for ‘redemption’ is ἀπολύτρωσις (apolytrōsis). This term is derived from the root word λύτρον (lytron), which means ‘ransom” or “price of release.” It appears in several New Testament passages, including Ephesians 1:7, Colossians 1:14, and Hebrews 9:15, and it conveys the idea of being set free or delivered from bondage, often with the implication of a ransom being paid.2
In other words, the concept of redemption implies that someone is living in detrimental circumstances from which they cannot escape and another person comes to their rescue and graciously frees them from those circumstances at great cost to themselves.
Let’s take a closer look at how the New Testament writers used the term ἀπολύτρωσις (apolytrōsis).
1. Redemption as physical release from adverse circumstances
These passages employ apolytrōsis (redemption) in its ordinary sense of someone in confinement or imminent danger being redeemed and set free by someone else who meets certain demands. In Hebrews 11:35, redemption refers to release from torture, which some OT saints refused. In Luke 21:26-28, Jesus predicts the cataclysmic events that will occur at the end of the world and his return in glory. He describes his return for his followers as the beginning of their “redemption” from those horrible and inescapable events. In Romans 8:23, the term “redemption” refers to the resurrection of our bodies from the grave at the return of Christ to the earth.
2. Our redemption as a spiritual release from God’s judgement because of our sin
Sometimes Paul conflates the past and future phases of our redemption into one grand vision. In Ephesians 1:13-14, even though we have not yet arrived at our final heavenly destination, Paul describes believers as though it has already happened: we are citizens of heaven and destined for heaven, but not yet residents of heaven, because of our redemption, that is, the forgiveness of our sins.
3. Our redemption as a past spiritual accomplishment
In this passage, redemption is in the past tense and refers to believers as sinners who have fallen “short of the glory of God” and who have already been justified freely through the redemption that Christ accomplished on the cross.
4. Our redemption as a present spiritual possession
In 1 Corinthians 1:30, Paul reminds believers that it is because of God’s wisdom that they have been saved through Christ Jesus. Then Paul describes this wisdom in three parts, one of which is redemption. Thus, redemption is an expression of God’s incomprehensible wisdom, and would never have been imagined or predicted by human wisdom. Therefore, no one can boast about their current position as one who is redeemed. It was accomplished by someone else alone: Jesus Christ.
In Ephesians 1:7, Paul sets “redemption through his blood” in this passage in apposition to “the forgiveness of our trespasses.” That is, we have been set free from God’s eternal wrath because of the blood of Christ. And this redemption has resulted in the complete and full forgiveness of our sins, which we have right now. All of this is an expression of God’s overflowing grace toward us.
5. Our redemption as a future spiritual reality
There is also a future tense to our redemption. While our redemption was accomplished in past history because Jesus Christ died on the cross for our sins, and is something we possess right now because our sins have been forgiven through faith in him and we now have eternal life, there are still certain aspects to our existence that need to be redeemed. For example, our mortal bodies will be transformed into immortal bodies, and our sinful nature, which all Christian still have, will be abolished once and for all when we are “presented faultless before his presence with exceeding joy.” (Jude 1:24)
This future reality is what the phrases “until the redemption of those who are God’s possession,” “sealed for the day of redemption,” and “the promised eternal inheritance–now that he has died as a ransom” refer to.
1. To do God’s good works, we must be functionally free from sin
“Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles. And let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us” Hebrews 12:1
Of course, there is no such thing as a Christian who has no sin. “If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us,” John warns us in 1 John 1:8. But, as John promises us in verse 9, we can confess our sin when God makes us aware of it and thus we can continuously walk in fellowship with the living God on a daily basis. We can do this even though we are not fully aware of all of our “unrighteousness.”
This ongoing process of joyfully walking with God and responding to “issues” as he brings them up is the present tense of the three tenses of redemption, which are often stated this way: we have been redeemed from the penalty of sin, we are being redeemed from the power of sin, and we will be redeemed from the presence of sin.
Redemption from the power of sin is what the writer to the Hebrews calls throwing off “everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles.” I call this process of throwing off “living functionally free from sin.”
Thus, if we are living in the throes of sin, we cannot do God’s good works until we confess our sin and begin walking once more in regular fellowship with the Lord God.
2. To do God’s good works, we must understand that God’s act of redeeming us is not just redemptive, but also exemplary
“This is how we know what love is: Jesus Christ laid down his life for us. And we ought to lay down our lives for our brothers and sisters.” 1 John 3:16
Sometimes theologians emphasize the redemptive aspect of Christ’s death on the cross so much that they ignore another aspect of Christ’s death, namely that it is also an example for us to follow, as John clearly tells us in 1 John 3:16 – “And we ought to lay down our lives for our brothers and sisters.” In addition, The Old Testament concept of a “kinsman redeemer,” someone who “rescues” a relative in need, also teaches us that God wants us to understand our redemption as exemplary and not just redemptive.3 However, in our case, the “kin” we are to be redeemers for are not just our physical relatives, but also our brothers and sisters in Christ. John continues: “If anyone has material possessions and sees a brother or sister in need but has no pity on them, how can the love of God be in that person? Dear children, let us not love with words or speech but with actions and in truth.” (1 John 3:17-18)
One way to think about our relationship to God’s redemption of us as an example for us to follow is to compare it to Adam and Eve’s relationship to God creating the heavens and the earth. On the one hand, God had created all that they could see. But God also invited them to participate in his creation, albeit in a very small way, by being fruitful and filling the earth with human beings, and by tending the garden. In the same way, God has redeemed us from the penalty of sin, is redeeming us from the power of sin, and will redeem us from the presence of sin. But he also invites us to participate in his redemption, however small it may be, by “redeeming” those in need around us.
Some of my fondest and earliest memories are of my father teaching me how to straighten old nails. A survivor of the Depression, Dad made it a practice of saving any nail he pulled out of a board. He saved his rusty bent nails in a large jar on a shelf out in our garage. Through the dirty glass they looked like dozens of dead mangled worms. He would spill them out on his workbench, find ones that were just the right size for our project, and give them to me to hammer away on. I was probably only five or six years old, but I got pretty good at straightening those nails. It thrilled me that my father, standing so close to me as we worked that I could smell his Old Spice, would include me in his home projects.
One thing the Bible makes clear is that, like my dad, God loves to include you and me in his “home projects,” so to speak. He intends for believers to participate with him in his good works, not just stand by and observe Him as he does them. As we will see below, this invitation to join him in his work occurs again and again throughout Scripture.
But as we have seen in this series, “Toward A Practical Theology of Good Works,” doing God’s good works does not come naturally. Rather, they are an acquired skill born of a renewed heart. When it comes to doing good, all believers start out as novices who have to learn “what pleases the Lord,” as Paul says in Ephesians 5:8-10:
“For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light (for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth) and find out (dokimazontes1) what pleases the Lord.”
Paul is saying that learning to do the things that please God our Father requires an ongoing, long-term commitment to consciously take our Lord’s desires into account as we live out our lives as believers.
To find out what kind of good works please God, we first looked at the good works God himself has done
Specifically, we looked at six periods where God did good works. Here they are, each with a summary of what we have learned.
We learned from God’s creative activity that his good works originate with his speech. Therefore, if we are to do the good works God wants us to do, we must pay attention to his speech as well. That is, we must know and follow the Bible as our guide for doing God’s good works.
Furthermore, God’s creative good works “fit together” and build on each other like a grand, three-dimensional puzzle. In the same way, the good works God has for us to do are not just “random acts of kindness,” but purposeful, cumulative, regenerative, powerful, orderly and brilliant.
And just as God’s good works in creation were obviously good to God, and still are to us today, so also the good works God is calling us to do are undeniably good to everyone who sees them, including unbelievers.
And finally, God, through the Edenic covenant he established with Adam and Eve, invited them to join him in his creative process by ruling over his creation, tending the garden of Eden, and by being fruitful and filling the earth with billions of people.
Thus the most important lesson we learn from God’s good works in creation is that we always, always must do God’s good works as an expression of the covenant he has established with us. Our covenant with God is called the New Covenant and it forms a structure that organizes the good works that we do for him and with him.
“All our righteousnesses are as filthy rags,” scripture tells us in Isaiah 64:6. The unbeliever’s attempts at good works only result in token good works; they are the equivalent of Adam and Eve’s futile act of clothing themselves with fig leaves in the presence of God. Adam and Eve would not acknowledge their sin, their rebellion, their spiritual death, indeed, their separation from God.
Before Adam and Eve could regain their ability to do God’s good works, they had to “undress” from their own good works, their own pitiful fig leaf clothes, in front of God and each other, and then dress themselves instead in God’s gift to them of a new set of clothes, tailored for them by God himself from the skins of sacrificial animals who died in their place that day. It was only when they came empty handed to God and accepted his free gift, his covering for their shame and sin, that they could again renew their relationship with him.
Like Adam and Eve, to this very day God invites us sinners to set aside our own good works and enter into a new covenant with him based on faith in Jesus Christ as God’s sacrificial lamb who atoned for our sins. God clothes us believers in Christ and sees us in him, radiant with his righteousness. Therefore, only God’s good work of redemption makes true good works possible in the life of the believer.
As Christians, then, we must be careful to distinguish between God’s good works and the world’s token good works that do not address the problem of our rebellious hearts.
A final lesson we learn from God and his good works in response to the fall is that the world we live in is no longer conducive to doing God’s good works. Our “gardens” are now full of weeds because the world is under a curse. Doing God’s good works can be difficult, perhaps even dangerous. But, like the garden of Eden itself, the end result is always a garden that is wonderful, even exhilarating. “Let us not become weary in doing good,” Scripture exhorts us, “for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.” Galatians 6:9
To review God’s good works in history, we looked at several historical periods in the Bible, such as the periods from Cain and Able to the Flood, Abraham to Joseph in Egypt, the Exodus to the Judges, and the United Kingdom to the Divided Kingdom,
The main lesson we learn from God’s good works in history is that individual believers play a central role in carrying them out when they do so by faith. In a sense, as history progresses, we work hand-in-hand with God in accomplishing his plan and purpose when by faith we do the good works he has for us to do. Again, believers are not simply observers in a divine play, but active participants in its production.
The writer to the Hebrews makes this emphasis on individuals acting in faith throughout history explicit in Hebrews 11 where he names fifteen Old Testament individuals who participated in God’s historical good works through faith. Then, having elaborated at length on several specific examples of believers doing God’s good works through faith, he reaches a crescendo when he lists good deed after good deed after good deed in one long list:
“And what more shall I say? I do not have time to tell about Gideon, Barak, Samson and Jephthah, about David and Samuel and the prophets, who through faith conquered kingdoms, administered justice, and gained what was promised; who shut the mouths of lions, quenched the fury of the flames, and escaped the edge of the sword; whose weakness was turned to strength; and who became powerful in battle and routed foreign armies. Women received back their dead, raised to life again. There were others who were tortured, refusing to be released so that they might gain an even better resurrection. Some faced jeers and flogging, and even chains and imprisonment. They were put to death by stoning; they were sawed in two; they were killed by the sword. They went about in sheepskins and goatskins, destitute, persecuted and mistreated— the world was not worthy of them. They wandered in deserts and mountains, living in caves and in holes in the ground.” Hebrews 11:32-38
Believers accomplished all of this simply by believing God and then doing the good works that God called them to do.
The chief lesson we learn from the Incarnation about doing God’s good works is that attitude is everything when doing them. Right after reminding his readers to not look “to your own interests but each of you to the interests of the others,” Paul reminds them to accomplish those good works in the following manner: “Have this attitude in you which was also in Christ Jesus.” (Philippians 2:5) Paul then goes on to describe Christ’s attitude, which was one of absolute humility. That is, only when we, like Jesus Christ, set aside all pride, all pretense, all status, and all self service can we do the good works God calls us to do.
Without an attitude of humility, we will revert to “token” good works. To do the good works God saved us and called us to do, we must set aside our own agenda, our own pride, our own position in this world, and go wherever the love of God and his good works take us.
Everywhere Jesus went, he did good works. He preached the coming of the Kingdom of Heaven. He called people to repentance and faith in him. He taught his disciples. He healed the sick, cast out demons, and raised the dead. In the process, Jesus told his disciples something remarkable: “Very truly I tell you, whoever believes in me will do the works I have been doing, and they will do even greater things than these, because I am going to the Father.” (John 14:12)
And that is exactly what happened. At the end of Jesus’ earthly ministry, he had maybe a few hundred disciples in a very small geographical area. But after he died and rose from the grave, and after he gave his disciples the Holy Spirit and then ascended into heaven, his disciples took his message of salvation to the ends of the civilized world. Today, there are hundreds of millions of disciples of Jesus who are spread around the world, on every continent and in every country.
As the incarnate Son of God, as the one who perfectly obeyed God in every way, Jesus is our one and only paradigm for good works. In everything we do for the glory of God, we must look to Jesus as our example. Jesus invites us as believers in him to participate in his good works and “do even greater things than these.” How do we do these good works? Here are a few key principles taken from the life and teachings of Jesus Christ:
Through faith in Jesus Christ, and with the presence of the Holy Spirit who indwells us, we have the power to do amazing God-honoring, Christ-exalting, and people-blessing good works
Now that we have been redeemed, we have been set free to do something wonderful: genuinely serve God by doing his good works from a grateful heart. Before our salvation we selfishly thought we could get away with just serving ourselves, but we were actually serving Satan. And we all know what the consequences of that lifestyle were: pain and alienation and even death!
Now, as an expression of our redemption, we have the opportunity to daily shrug off temptation and avoid sinning because we have a new affection, a new lover, God himself! Of course, we will never be sinless until we stand in God’s presence, as John in 1 John 1 tells us. But we can remain “functionally free” from sin by maintaining our fellowship with God. We can confess sin as God makes it clear to us and maintain our relationship with him and the good works he calls us to do. Or, as the writer to the Hebrews puts it, “Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles. And let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us” Hebrews 12:1
But not only does our redemption set us free to do God’s good works, our redemption also shows us the quality of the good works God has for us to do. That is, God’s act of redeeming us is not just redemptive, but also exemplary. Again, John expresses this truth so well when he writes in 1 John 3:16, “This is how we know what love is: Jesus Christ laid down his life for us. And we ought to lay down our lives for our brothers and sisters.” Having experienced the benefit of Christ’s redemptive work, that is, our salvation, we continue to participate in Christ’s redemptive work on the cross by imitating it as we serve others.
Now that we have learned about the kind of good works God has done in relationship to our universe and to our world and to us as human beings, I want to give you one example of a Christian who learned the reality of what it means to follow God’s good works wherever they led him. The following is a post I wrote about him a few years ago. It’s about a man named “Inky” and he is an excellent example of the principles I have summarized above.
Inky Goes to Smokey Mountain Garbage Dump
“I haven’t done anything with my life!”
That’s how I felt when I left church yesterday morning. I was visiting Redeemer Temple in Denver to help promote their men’s retreat. I’m speaking at it later this month.
I was looking forward to hearing the pastor preach, but instead, they had Marty Huber, a visiting missionary from the Philippines, give the message. Everyone called him “Inky,” short for “incubator.” I’m told they call him “Inky” because he was born premature and kept in an incubator for days.
Over thirty years ago, Inky had been attending Redeemer when he was invited to go on a two week medical missions trip working with the poorest of the poor in a garbage dump in the Philippines called Smokey Mountain.
At the time, Smokey Mountain was home to 30,000 people and was notorious for its poverty, crime, filth, sickness and death.
As Inky began to speak, he broke into tears as he described the conditions he found. Every night, three to four children would die in the camp. Sickness, malnutrition and starvation were everywhere. The stench of garbage, human feces, and dead corpses permeated everything.
During that short term mission trip, Inky would go to bed struggling with how God could possibly allow such suffering. Seeing his distress, a missionary challenged him to go up to the top of a hill overlooking the dump and listen for God to speak to him.
Inky did. And in that moment of distress, surrounded by garbage and human misery as far as the eye could see, he heard the voice of God calling him to minister full time in that garbage dump for the rest of his life. “I want you to tell these people how much I love them,” Inky said he heard God tell him.
From that moment on, Inky said the stench and filth of the dump no longer bothered him. Obeying God’s call, Inky set to work serving the poor, sick and dying in the camp. His stories of how God had used him to save the lives of hundreds of children and adults and lead even more to Christ kept me on the edge of my seat. Eventually, Inky and his fellow missionaries started a church at Smokey Mountain. God even used Inky to lead three drug lords to Christ!
Toward the end of his message, Inky showed pictures of several Philippino’s whose lives he had led to the Lord as children. They were young adults now and they were wearing caps and gowns. It was a picture of them graduating from college! Inky and his mission had arranged for the children they were working with to be sponsored by people in America, South Korea and other countries. With this financing, they founded a school for these “children of the dump,” educated them, and sent them off to college.
During his message, I noticed that Inky’s right hand trembled. As he finished, Inky said – almost as a side note – “By the way, last week I was diagnosed with Parkinson’s. In a few days, I’ll be flying back to the Philippines.”
Someone said recently that if you want to find Christians and the church at work, just go to any garbage dump in any third world country and there you will see them.
And if one of them has a trembling right hand, it’s probably Inky.
“You say, ‘I am rich; I have acquired wealth and do not need a thing.’ But you do not realize that you are wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked.” (Revelation 3:17) God, to the angel of the church of Laodicea
Not all of us are called to do our good works in third world garbage dumps. But in a sense, all believers minister in garbage dumps. Our particular garbage dump here in America is our debauched culture.
Driving up and down the streets in most neighborhoods in America, one would think that all is well. But all is not well in our culture. The homes we see behind those manicured lawns house people who are hurting from all manner of sin and strife and alienation. Loneliness, disease, addictions, and emotional struggles stalk them. Financial problems keep them awake at night. Marital issues threaten their families. The chaotic culture that surrounds their homes on the outside and invades their homes on the inside only magnifies their pain. And many of them are without God and without hope in this world.
Like the people in the church of Laodicea, they think, “I have acquired wealth and do not need a thing.” But in reality they are unaware that they are “wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked.”
All Christians struggle with the garbage dump that is American culture. But, like “Inky,” God has called us to minister in our own corner of the garbage dump we find ourselves in. And the way we do it is by joyfully participating with God as we do his good works with him.
We now turn to the practice and teaching of good works in the Bible.
In Part I of this series on a practical theology of good works we looked at the good works that God himself has done as recorded in the Bible. We did so in order to gain God's perspective on good works. Specifically, we looked at God's good works in creation, his good works with respect to the fall, his good works in history, his good works in the Incarnation, his good works in the life of Jesus Christ, and his good works in Redemption.
Beginning with this post I will review the topic of good works from the opposite perspective, that is, from the believer's perspective. I will do this first of all by looking at how believers' practiced good works in the Pentateuch, the first five books of the Bible: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy, and then by reviewing the biblical teaching about good works in the Pentateuch. Following the Pentateuch, I will do the same with the following biblical sections: Old Testament historical books, wisdom literature and poetry, major prophets, minor prophets, the gospels, Acts, Paul's epistles, Pastoral epistles, and Revelation.
There are many examples of believers doing good works in the Pentateuch. Below is an incomplete list of them with their biblical references. This list is a lot of material. After all, it covers believers doing good works from just after the fall to just before the Israelites enter the Promise Land. But as we make our way through it we will see some patterns about good works begin to emerge, patterns that will become clearer in the rest of the Bible.
What can we learn about doing God's good works from these examples in the Pentateuch? Here are a few principles.
Just as we saw in the previous section on God's good works, God does not just ask believers to observe him doing his good works. Instead, he invites us to participate with him in doing them, which we do by faith and with obedience. Thus, the list above is a list of believers joining in with God as he employs them to accomplish his good works, his purposes.
At the time they do their good works, the believers on our list do not always understand the purpose of what they are doing. They can't see the effect of their good works because they do not know the future. Or, they may have a prophecy about the future, as is the case with Abraham, but they do not know the details about how it will work out. So, in general, they just know that what they are doing is pleasing to God and therefore has meaning and fits within God's purpose.
Besides not knowing the future, or not knowing it in detail, these believers are often unaware that God intends for their good works to "fit together" with the good works of other believers. It is only as we see them in the context of the biblical narrative that it becomes clear that their good works build on the works of others in order to accomplish God's grand design. For example, Moses' good works build on the good works of Joseph. Joseph's good works build on the good works of Jacob. Jacob's good works build on the good works of Isaac. Isaac's good works build on the good works of Abraham. And Abraham's good works build on the good works of Noah.
Had anyone in this chain of good works not done them, the chain would have been drastically altered. Had Jochebed not put her baby, Moses, in a wicker basket on the Nile, the Exodus would not have happened the way it did. Had Rebekah not given water to Abraham's servant's camels, history would be completely different. Had Judah not offered himself up to save his brother Benjamin, Joseph may never have revealed himself to his brothers.
Therefore, doing God's good works form critical building blocks in accomplishing his purposes.
God does not tell Moses to build a boat to cross the Red Sea. He tells him to walk through it. On the other hand, God does not tell Noah to part the waters, he tells him to build a boat so he can float upon them. Moses isn't asked to sacrifice a loved one, Abraham is. Jethro doesn't interpret Moses' dreams, like Joseph does with Pharoah. Instead, he gives him wise counsel. God does not promise Abraham that he will lead his people to the Promise Land like he promises to Moses. That would make no sense to him because he is already in the Promise Land and he has no people to lead.
Many of the believers above commit sins, sometimes grievous sins. Moses murders an Egyptian. Later, he loses his temper again and strikes a rock, in disobedience to God. Judah has sex with a prostitute. Abram lies about his wife to Pharaoh. Jacob's sons sell their brother Joseph into slavery in Egypt and then lie about it to their father. And let's not forget Noah, who gets drunk and strips himself naked.
When believers in the Pentateuch sin, their sin does not alter the outcome of God's plan itself. It does, however, affect how they experience God's plan by making following him and doing his good works more difficult. Moses' committing murder resulted in him spending 40 years in Midian and his hitting the rock in anger resulted in him not entering the Promise Land. Judah's sexual immorality foreshadow his and his brother's depravity in selling Joseph into slavery, which alienated them from their father even more.
The motif of believers experiencing isolation appears frequently throughout the Bible, and the Pentateuch is no exception. For example, God isolates Noah on a boat so he can judge the world around him. Abram leaves his home and relatives to follow God to a land where he is a complete stranger. Joseph becomes isolated in a prison in Egypt. The children of Israel become isolated from Egyptian culture as pariah slaves for four hundred years. Moses becomes isolated in the land of Midian for forty years. The unbelieving children of Israel get isolated in the desert for forty years. God often uses different means of isolation from this world to prepare his people for doing good works
Believers also can experience persecution and death for doing God's good works. Joseph's brothers persecute him and almost kill him. Abel's brother, Cain, does kill him. The Egyptians persecute the children of Israel by enslaving them. And Moses experiences the ridicule of his people when he tries to intercede for them before Pharaoh.
We have seen that the Pentateuch gives us a great number of examples of believers doing good works. We now turn to the Pentateuch's teaching about good works.
The Pentateuch contains many different types of commands, such as commands that are prohibitions, commands relating to the Tabernacle, priests and Levites, commands relating to feasts and other observances, commands relating to food, and commands relating to social conduct, such as marriage and property rights. Observing all of these commands were good works in themselves because in doing so the Israelites fulfilled their covenant relationship with God.
On the other hand, there are specific commands in the Pentateuch that enjoin all members of the fledging Israelite nation to take positive action in relation to their fellow citizens. Here is an extensive (but not exhaustive) list of these positive types of commands.
Here are some key lessons we can learn about doing good works from the Pentateuch's teaching.
I can find only two examples that come close to these positive social commands in the Pentateuch. The first is Abram showing humility and longsuffering by giving Lot the first choice of the land. The second is Rebekah treating a foreign servant with dignity and respect by giving water to his camels. The relative absence of the descendants of Abraham practicing the kind of social norms that these commands promote my be attributed to ignorance and rebellion. But these types of commands are foreshadowed in Genesis 18:19 where the Lord says about Abraham, "For I have chosen him, that he may command his children and his household after him to keep the way of the Lord by doing righteousness and justice, so that the Lord may bring to Abraham what he has promised him."
There are individual good works and there are communal good works. Individual good works are the good works that God leads certain people to do at a specific time and place. Communal good works are good works that the entire community must do. The first list above refers to individuals in the Pentateuch doing the specific good works God leads them to do. The second list above refers to the communal good works that God commands the entire nation to do for each other.
As such, communal good works improve the social circumstances of everyone in the community, especially those on the periphery, and reflect the nature of God as righteous and just. We can see, then, that individual good works promote the purpose of God (the means to the end) while communal good works promote the character of God (the end itself).
Deuteronomy 15:7-11 - "If anyone is poor among your fellow Israelites in any of the towns of the land the Lord your God is giving you, do not be hardhearted or tightfisted toward them. Rather, be openhanded and freely lend them whatever they need. Be careful not to harbor this wicked thought: “The seventh year, the year for canceling debts, is near,” so that you do not show ill will toward the needy among your fellow Israelites and give them nothing. They may then appeal to the Lord against you, and you will be found guilty of sin. Give generously to them and do so without a grudging heart; then because of this the Lord your God will bless you in all your work and in everything you put your hand to. There will always be poor people in the land. Therefore I command you to be openhanded toward your fellow Israelites who are poor and needy in your land."
Deuteronomy 14:28, 29 - Instructions for the 3 year tithe for Levites, aliens, widows and orphans
Leviticus 19:9-10: "When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap your field right up to its edge, nor shall you gather the gleanings after your harvest. And you shall not strip your vineyard bare, neither shall you gather the fallen grapes of your vineyard. You shall leave them for the poor and for the sojourner: I am the Lord your God."
Leviticus 19:34 - "The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God."
Deuteronomy 24:19 - "Leave remnants of your harvest for aliens and widows."
Deuteronomy 14:28, 29 - Instructions for the 3 year tithe for Levites, aliens, widows and orphans
Deuteronomy 10:18-19 - "He defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow, and loves the foreigner residing among you, giving them food and clothing. And you are to love those who are foreigners, for you yourselves were foreigners in Egypt."
Deuteronomy 15:1 - "At the end of every seven years you must cancel debts."
Exodus 21:5-6 - A servant who loves his wife and children and can remain with them and his master, but he must do so permanently.
Leviticus 19:3 - "Each of you must respect your mother and father, and you must observe my Sabbaths. I am the Lord your God."
Leviticus 19:32 - "Stand up in the presence of the aged, show respect for the elderly and revere your God. I am the Lord."
Leviticus 19:18 - "Love your neighbor as yourself. I am the Lord.
Leviticus 19:36 - "Use honest scales and honest weights, an honest ephah, and an honest him. I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt."
Exodus 23:4 - Return your enemy's donkey to your enemy.
Deuteronomy 10:12-13 "And now, Israel, what does the Lord your God ask of you but to fear the Lord your God, to walk in obedience to him, to love him, to serve the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul, and to observe the Lord’s commands and decrees that I am giving you today for your own good?"
God intended for the Israelites to know his character and to love him for it by serving him in a way that reflects his character.
In essence, these positive commands describe God's vision of "heaven on earth." By them God intended for the nation of Israel to be an outpost of heaven in this fallen world, an outpost where God's character has extremely practical consequences.
And so, when believers today pray "Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done," we, too, are praying for heaven on earth. And by "thy will," Jesus is referring to these universal communal commands. They are the will of God for believers in a fallen world with respect to the poor, pastors, sojourners, widows, orphans, the fatherless, debtors, servants, parents, the elderly, one's neighbors, business customers, ...and, yes, even our enemies.
Having looked at the practice and teaching of good works in the Pentateuch, we learned several things about doing good works.
We now turn our attention to the practice and teaching of good works in the Old Testament historical books: Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1 & 2 Samuel, 1 & 2 Kings, 1 & 2 Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther.
Below is an extensive (but again, not exhaustive) list of good works in Old Testament historical books. Some of these I have highlighted in bold and separated with verse quotes. The good works highlighted in bold are communal good works and are highlighted in bold to set them apart from the unique good works.
Judges 21:25 – “In those days Israel had no king; everyone did as they saw fit.”
Ruth 1:1 “In the days when the judges ruled, there was a famine in the land.”
Ruth 4:16-17 – “Then Naomi took the child in her arms and cared for him. The women living there said, “Naomi has a son!” And they named him Obed. He was the father of Jesse, the father of David.”
The first thing to notice about this list is that there are many more unique and individual good works than there are communal good works.
The second thing to notice is that there are no examples of communal good works listed in the books of Joshua and Judges, which cover a historical period of hundreds of years. In other words, when it comes to communal good works, Joshua and Judges extend the dearth of communal good works in the Pentateuch.
The third thing to notice is that there is a sudden burst of communal good works with the Book of Ruth. In fact, communal good works are the only kind of good works we find in the Book of Ruth. Here are four of Ruth and Boaz’ communal good works listed with the communal commands they represent.
The Book of Ruth is the story of two people, Ruth and Boaz, doing communal good works from the first chapter to the last. The book only has communal good works in it and nothing else and Ruth and Boaz obediently doing these communal good works is what doing God’s will on earth as it is in heaven looks like. The Book of Ruth is heaven on earth.
Deuteronomy 10:18-19 – “He defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow, and loves the foreigner residing among you, giving them food and clothing. And you are to love those who are foreigners, for you yourselves were foreigners in Egypt.”
Leviticus 19:9-10: “When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap your field right up to its edge, nor shall you gather the gleanings after your harvest. And you shall not strip your vineyard bare, neither shall you gather the fallen grapes of your vineyard. You shall leave them for the poor and for the sojourner: I am the Lord your God.”
Leviticus 19:34 – “The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God.”
Leviticus 25:25 – “”If one of your fellow Israelites becomes poor and sells some of their property, their nearest relative is to come and redeem what they have sold.”
The Book of Ruth, then, is one gigantic spiritual and moral explosion, however brief, of heaven manifesting itself on earth. As such, obedience to these types of communal commands in the Book of Ruth represents God’s will for the entire nation. God wants all of Israel to act the way these two people are acting. Unfortunately, God had to go outside the nation to the land of Moab to find one person who would start doing these communal good works, that is Ruth. Then God finds one more person in the country itself, Boaz, who also is willing to do these communal good works.
As we continue on through the above list of good works, time passes. But Ruth’s and Boaz’ good works were not for naught. They once again find their expression in the lives of two of their descendants, David and Solomon.
The next long period of communal good works happens during the reign King David, and at the beginning of King Solomon’s reign, and are recorded in 1 & 2 Samuel and 1 Kings.
This list describes two kings, David and Solomon, suddenly acting very differently from the way kings in the Ancient Near East normally act. In this list, we see that David and Solomon both have a conscience. They show their enemies mercy and even honor them when they die. David forms an unusual friendship with Jonathan that is based on character. Solomon asks for wisdom. In short, David and Solomon love God and fear God and are acting in a manner that demonstrates that love for God. And when David sins, he does something that no other earthly king had done before, he publicly confesses it, repents, and accepts the consequences.
Thus. at this point in time, David and Solomon are doing God’s will on earth as it is in heaven. They are applying God’s communal commands to their reigns, and in David’s case, he did so even when he sinned.
Now that we have looked at these two historical periods of obedience to God’s communal commands -Ruth/Boaz and David/Solomon, there are two questions we need to ask: why is there a Book of Ruth and why is it in the location that it is in the Bible?
The key to understanding the purpose of the Book of Ruth is to look at the first verse of the book and the last verse of the book:
Ruth 1:1 “In the days when the judges ruled, there was a famine in the land.”
Ruth 4:17 – “And they named him Obed. He was the father of Jesse, the father of David.”
Ruth 1:1 references the moral decay and social chaos of the time in which Ruth and Boaz are living in. On the other hand, Ruth 4:17, the last verse in the book, indeed, the last word in the book, references David and his righteous reign. The author is saying, “Do you want to understand David? Then look at his ancestors, Ruth and Boaz. They are qualitatively different from the moral chaos that was going on in their lifetime.” They are different because they know and love God through faith and do his communal good works.
The Bible is making a massive point with the Book of Ruth. It is telling us that the Exodus, with all of its miracles, along with the conquering of the land, with all of its military victories, ended in abject failure due to the spiritual condition of the children of Israel. It was only when Ruth, acting with faith in the living God, sacrificed her existence in order to protect the widowed and childless Naomi, that things began to dramatically change for Israel. It was her communal good work, along with the communal good work of Boaz that followed, that laid the foundation for the righteous reigns of David and Solomon.
By definition, Old Testament historical books are not didactic. So we should not be surprised when we do not find much by way of teaching about good works in these books. Nevertheless, we do find some teaching, as we see in these examples.
Some of the teaching in these passages is commemorative in nature and meant to be absorbed by future generations. And like Ruth, who comes from outside Israel and has deep faith in God in contrast to her Israelite mother-in-law and father-in-law, we see other instances of this theme of the outsider who believes God, such as the Shunammite woman and the widow at Zarephath.
But in general, teaching about good works in OT historical books is very light.
In summary, by focusing on the practice of good works in Old Testament historical books, we have learned an important lesson: it was only when Ruth and Boaz started obeying the communal commands in the Pentateuch that the moral and spiritual state of the nation dramatically improved, culminating with the reigns of David and Solomon, but then petering out again because of sin.
We should note that, sadly, the reigns of David and Solomon occurred during a time when there was a political power vacuum in the Ancient Near East. Called the “Bronze Age Collapse,” there were no national “superpowers” that were able to exert influence beyond their borders. Egypt was in disarray, and Assyria and Babylon had yet to ascend. Thus the theocracy of David and Solomon had almost infinite potential to dominate the Ancient Near East had it not been for David’s sin, Solomon’s disobedience, and the division of the kingdom. Even so, Solomon’s reign reflects the potential of how the practice of communal good works could have spread throughout the known world as people came to faith in the living God of Israel.
Underlined titles are links to my book reviews.
7 Men and the Secrets of Their Greatness, Eric Metaxas, Thomas Nelson
Bond of Brothers: Connecting with Other Men Beyond Work, Weather, and Sports, Wes Yoder, Zondervan
Building Your Band of Brothers, Stephen Mansfield, Blackwatch Digital
Character that Counts: Who's Counting Yours?, Rod Handley, Cross Training Publishing
The Church Impotent: The Feminization of Christianity, Leon J. Podles, Spence Publishing
Dangerous Good: The Coming Revolution of Men Who Care, Kenny Luck, Nav Press
Developing a Men's Team Ministry to Widows, Widowers, and Single Parents, Herb Reese, Workbook and Video versions, New Commandment Men's Ministries
The Disciplines of the Christian LIfe, Eric Liddell, eChristian Inc.
Doing Good Well: Thirty Daily Meditations on Developing a Biblical and Focused Discipline of Good Works, Herb Reese, New Commandment Men's Ministries
Engage: Building Your Church Based Ministry to Men, Brian Doyle, Made for Success Publishing
Extreme Mind Makeover, Steve Etner, Overboard Ministries
Failsafe: Living Secure in God's Acceptance, Kenny Luck, Nav Press (Read my interview with Kenny Luck.)
From the Hood to the Hill: A Story of Overcoming, Barry C. Black
Healing the Masculine Soul: How God Restores Men to Real Manhood, Gordon Dalbey, Thomas Nelson
How to Disciple Men (Short and Sweet): 45 Proven Strategies from Experts on Ministry to Men, BroadStreet Publishing
Kingdom Man: Every Man's Destiny, Every Woman's Dream, Tony Evans, Tyndale
The Man in the Mirror: Solving the 24 Problems Men Face, Patrick M. Morley, Zondervan
Manhood Journey: Understanding a Man's World, Roy Smith, Pennsylvania Counseling Services
Manning Up: How the Rise of Women has Turned Men into Boys, Kay S. Hymowitz, Basic Books
Maximized Manhood: A Guide to Family Survival, Revised Version, Edwin Louis Cole
The Measure of a Man: Twenty Attributes of a Godly Man, Gene Getz
Men of Honor Women of Virtue: The Power of Rites of Passage Into Godly Manhood, Dr. Chuck Stecker, Seismic Publishing
Men of Influence: The Transformational Impact of Godly Mentors, Bill Hendricks and Howard Hendricks, Moody Publishers
Men to Boys: The Making of Modern Immaturity: Gary Cross, Columbia University Press
Men's Ministry in the 21st Century: the Encyclopedia of Practical Ideas, Group Publishing
No Man Left Behind: How to Build and Sustain a Thriving Disciple-Making for Every Man in Your Church, Patrick Morley, David Delk, Brett Clemmer, Moody Publishers
Of Boys and Men: Why the Modern Male is Struggling, Why it Matters, and What to Do About it, Richard V. Reeves, Brookings Institution Press
The One Amazing Thing God Wants to Do With Men, Herb Reese, New Commandment Men's Ministries
Recovering Biblical Manhood & Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism, John Piper and Wayne Grudem editors, Crossway Books
Rise of Servant Kings: What the Bible Says about Being a Man, Ken Harrison, Multnomah
Sleeping Giant, No Movement of God Without Men of God, Kenny Luck, B&H Publishing Group
Stepping Up: A Call to Courageous Manhood, Dennis Rainey, Family Live Publishing
Temptations Men Face: Straightforward Talk on Power, Money, Affairs, Perfectionism, Insensitivity, Tom Eisenman, IVP
The Truth About Men: What Men and Women Need to Know, DeVon Franklin, Howard Books
Twelve Ordinary Men: How the Master Shaped His Disciples for Greatness and What He Wants to Do With You, John McArthur, Nelson Books
Why Men Hate Going to Church, David Murrow, Nelson
Wild at Heart: Discerning the Secrets of a Man's Soul, John Eldredge
Herb Reese is an author, public speaker and President of New Commandment Men's Ministries. Herb has a B.A. in Ancient Near Eastern History from UCLA and a Th.M. in Pastoral Ministries from Dallas Theological Seminary. He has done post graduate work in The History of Ideas at University of Texas, Dallas and in Church Administration at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. After serving as a pastor over a period of twenty years, Herb founded New Commandment Men's Ministries, a ministry dedicated to helping churches recruit, train, organize and deploy teams of men who permanently adopt their widows, single moms, and fatherless children. Herb has served as President of New Commandment since 2003 and has helped hundreds of churches develop men's team ministries in all 50 states and several foreign countries. Herb and his wife, Patti, have three grown children and live in Arvada, Colorado.
Maranatha! Come Lord Jesus.
New Commandment Men's Ministries
Herb Reese, President
8680 W 81st Drive
Arvada, CO 80005
herbreese@newcommandment.org
303-880-8839